Reasons to use a Buyer's agent, assuming Seller is represented by an agent: 1) That $700,000 house will be $700,000 whether the Seller pays commission to a Buyer's agent or not, so no downside, only upside unless you think you are a better negotiator and can get the price down. This is because the contract between Seller and Agent indicates TOTAL COMMISSION paid and permission to SHARE with buyer (aka. cooperating) agent should there be one. Commission paid by Seller DOES NOT CHANGE if the Buyer is unrepresented 2) In some areas it is ILLEGAL, or at minimum frowned upon, for seller's agents to double-end a deal (ie. represent both parties which is what is required should a Buyer approach without an agent) 3) There is information on MLS that is only available to agents and not the general public (ie. offer dates, specific availability for showings, rental history, Condo/HOA fees, etc.) 4) These days automatic lockboxes are used that require subscriptions to third party services that are not available to the general public, only registered agents 5) Theoretically, depending upon the morals, ethics and relationship of the Buyer and their Agent, Agents should be more knowledgeable about properties than the average consumer making what is likely the largest purchase of their lives. Professional agents that honor their fiduciary duties (they are hard to find but do exist) should be more knowledgeable on geographic areas, history of appreciation, liens, zoning, easements, tax issues on the property/Seller (which could be transferred to an unknowing buyer upon closing of the purchase), big ticket items (ex. windows, roof, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, foundation, water/fire damage/mold, septic systems), upcoming changes to local laws/bylaws/zoning, taxes (ex. land transfer, sales taxes if applicable, etc.), insurance, to name only what I can think of off the top of my head Reasons to use a Sellers agent: 1) Buyer's agents are SIGNIFICANTLY more likely to show a property where their commission is guaranteed via a contract between Seller and the Sellers agent 2) Buyer's agents are more likely to think an unrepresented Seller has no idea what they are doing and will try to convince them to accept a low-ball offer That's IT! No other reason to use a seller's agent except that buying agents won't show properties that aren't represented by seller's agents, or if they do it is with the intention of low-balling you. Everything a selling agent does is EASY and CHEAP for the DIYer.
@sharronvoth62082 күн бұрын
Good luck in your new business! This is so very needed in this industry! Homebuyers and homeowners have been paying way too much in commissions! I hope you are very successful!
@DIYHomebuyerКүн бұрын
Thank you so much! I wholeheartedly agree with everything you've said! I'm excited for the positive changes coming to the industry and the way homebuyers stand to benefit from better consumer education!
@jaeichinger3 күн бұрын
This occurs because the fed eases while the legislature is also easing. If the feds timed rates properly with the cuts and stopped printing money we would be fine. Probably have a period of deflation which would be painful for a few months but overall be a fever that breaks. The tax cuts have to also have reduced government spending. Th other cause of inflation during cuts its heavy deficit spending during a dip in tax revenue. The issue is all a catch. If taxes drop initially the government will run a huge deficit while revenue picks up from growth. They will overspend and the federal bank will print them out of a deficit. This causes long term inflation from the extra cash. So unless they can really create a huge budget surplus and influence the federal reserve to freeze rates we won't solve anything regardless of who is in charge. The system is stupid. Its designed to permanently enslave the masses into growing the money supply by pinching every ounce the citizens have. And people will claim that every ridiculous system is necessary and im just a dumb person because its designed to be self destructive if it isn't growing. Fiat monetary policy is a tumor that kills you in removal.
@mattlippiatt12733 күн бұрын
deficit spending is what is inflationary, not tax cuts. If govt is not overspending and taxing correct amount to cover its debt then there is equilibrium. Yes if more govt spending and tax cuts it's inflationary. If cuts to govt spending and the tax cuts create a surplus and reduction of the money supply you get low to no inflation. Debate can be made if moderate inflation is good or bad even at a 2 percent target. The real thing to look at is buying power vs wages compared to inflation.
@claydoub4 күн бұрын
Correction on the effect of cutting taxes: All business taxes are off of profit, not revenue, so cutting taxes does not effect prices of most goods (the price determined is the one that maximizes profit, regardless of how much that profit will be taxed). Businesses could use lower tax rates to compensate employees more, but they rarely do. High taxes do extract money out of the economy (typically out of the pockets of the most wealthy that rarely spend money anyways), but large government spending usually re-injects that money into the economy in places that are more needed (e.g. Public services, construction, etc). Trump has promised to reduce government spending which will mean less of that money is injected back in the economy.
@DIYHomebuyer4 күн бұрын
Great insight! Thanks for sharing.
@spotimpact.4 күн бұрын
"company pays employees more" HA yea the ceos and other high up employees that already have there pockets lined. All the hard working employees that actually do anything with get a thanks and a pizza party lmao
@DIYHomebuyer4 күн бұрын
Hey, a guy can dream, right?! In all seriousness, I agree - all too often the extra profits as disproportional sucked up by executives & shareholders at the expense of the hardworking employees.
@Toquelibre4 күн бұрын
We listed our condo at $40k below what we paid for in 2019 and have had almost Zero activity the past 3 months. Our realtor wants us to drop the price even more but we just don't want to make a bad decision either way. We're in no rush and optimistic that those interest rates will drop and will hopefully get some buyers interested again. We also live in a very liberal, Blue state and predict that a lot of unhappy folks in the Red states will gravitate towards our State which would also cause an increase in the Housing Prices. What are your thoughts? Should we just take it off the market for the Winter and Re List again in February or March?
@DIYHomebuyer4 күн бұрын
Thanks for the question! Like I said in the preface to the video, my crystal ball has been broken for several years now, so don't hold me to predicting the future. With that qualifier in place, if I were in your position, I'd delist and wait for market conditions to improve. Your observation about folks moving out of red states back to blue states is smart. It also doesn't sound like you're desperate - which is awesome for you! The main thing is that you should never let an agent pressure you into selling for less than you feel comfortable with.
@ms.b90934 күн бұрын
Deporting migrant labor will not make home building more affordable.
@yelenajoy5 күн бұрын
Well buyer’s agent paid by seller’s commissions. So I don’t know what are you talking about.
@DIYHomebuyer4 күн бұрын
Buyers who learn how to represent themselves can leverage the money the seller would otherwise pay to a buyer’s agent for their own benefit. I’m teaching buyers how to buy without an agent.
@ms.b90934 күн бұрын
@@DIYHomebuyer Let me represent myself in court too while i am at it! 🙄
@DIYHomebuyer4 күн бұрын
@@ms.b9093 It’s always funny to me when people equate real estate agents with attorneys. Real estate transactions are far more standardized than a legal proceeding. It’s not a fair comparison to say going unrepresented in buying a home is the equivalent of going unrepresented in court. But, even if the two were equivalent, it’s still someone’s right to choose to represent themself in court - just as it’s perfectly within ones right to buy a home without an agent. Unfortunately many listing agents fail to recognize this right and do not treat unrepresented buyers fairly. I’m committed to doing my part to level the playing field and advocate for consumers’ rights.
@tom1986ca5 күн бұрын
Not sure how you showed up in my feed, but thanks for the interesting info! Now back to the algorithm I scroll...
@DIYHomebuyer5 күн бұрын
@@tom1986ca I’m not sure either, but I’m glad I did! Thanks for the comment and for watching! I hope our algorithmic paths cross again!
@RogueDonut875 күн бұрын
Just a note, with large tax cuts to the extremely wealthy, it is very possible that PE firms and wealthy individuals continue to buy up any houses on the market to make them rentals. This is happening all over the UK. Assets prices may well rise due to the tax cuts and the average person will experience a more costly economy.
@DIYHomebuyer5 күн бұрын
This is a totally legit concern - and one that I share as well.
@cjn27146 күн бұрын
Should I buy a house now? I don’t really need it, but I have an opportunity to buy a small manufactured home for about $125,000 on a half acre at about 5% interest rate on the Rio Grande in northern NM. I’ll live in it for a year and do some minor upgrades then I could rent it out as a vacation rental in 2026.
@DIYHomebuyer5 күн бұрын
Great question! It sounds like you have a buy-and-hold mindset about the property. Historically, it's hard to lose when you hold a property for 10+ years. I suspect the value is truly in the land as manufactured homes often depreciate in value over time. But, if it's a good deal and you have the means, I generally encourage going for it! I'd be happy to talk through the particulars - shoot me an email: [email protected]
@dxd426 күн бұрын
Musk D.O.G.E. = CORRUPTION IT'S A PRIVATE COMPANY CONTROLING THE AGENCIES MUSK AND THE BILLIONAIRES NEEDS TO RESPOND TO HAHA If a company or enteprenour is nice with Musk, good... otherwise, they are f* America is turning into a Banana Republic.. PREPARE TO EAT TOXIC WASTE and get screwed even MORE by House industry giants
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
It’ll certainly be interesting to see how it all plays out. I’ve learned over the past decade not to bet against Elon, but I think there’s some validity to your concerns - especially regarding the real estate giants. Sticking it to them is a huge driver behind the content I create.
@Voltair1016 күн бұрын
26% of single family homes are being vacuumed up by private equity and Wall Street banks. Do you think this will slow down under Trump or grow exponentially. Only the top 1% will be living in a homes they own very soon. The rest will be renters paying whatever they tell them to pay.
@jasoncardoza63756 күн бұрын
Out of curiosity, what exactly is considered the top 1%?
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
This is another great concern, especially since the hedge funds buying up homes disproportionately disadvantage first time homebuyers. Not to be a pessimist, but I suspect this will continue to be an issue over the next four years.
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
Great question! I’ll let the OP on this thread answer with their opinion, but defining our terms is essential to productive dialogue.
@Voltair1016 күн бұрын
@@jasoncardoza6375 The people NOT in the 99%.
@jasoncardoza63756 күн бұрын
@@Voltair101 the average construction company owner is considered to be top1%. But you see many people such as yourself think it’s only billionaires who are the top. I’m taxed 37% because my gross income is high but I don’t bring home much. But it’s okay keep listening to leftist media. Here’s a direct quote from a legitimate source. “But who’s in this group of ultra wealthy taxpayers? Nationally, households that make $652,657 are considered among the top 1%. They earn more than eight times as much as the median household, which sits around $75,000. However, the 1% threshold varies from state to state, ranging from as much as $953,000 to as little as $368,000. SmartAsset analyzed data from the IRS and Bureau of Labor Statistics to determine the minimum income required to be among the top 1% of earners in each state.”
@HoostRidesAgain6 күн бұрын
The housing market will crash by 2026.
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
Bold take. I respect that! What data leads you to believe a housing crash is imminent?
@zachary29997 күн бұрын
I like many of the points you made! Some other points I'd like to add. If immigrants are in fact deported in large numbers, then the homes they currently occupy will also be freed up. A recession is a 70% chance by some estimates. If unemployment goes up and layoffs happen regardless of what Trump does, then foreclosures can start to make an impact on inventory. Demographics are also currently changing, with slower population growth that is yet to be realized.
@jasoncardoza63756 күн бұрын
The mass deportations are of the ones living in large cities in motels ( the same people that New York governor cut access to their ebt cards) the vast majority of the people don’t have homes
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
This is a thoughtful comment. Thank you! As someone else said, I don’t think deportations will lead to a proportional increase in available homes for sale. It’s probably the hospitality industry and owners of multi-family properties that will be most impacted. Good point about the dynamic nature of demographics though! That’s partly what makes these predictions so difficult.
@DIYHomebuyer6 күн бұрын
I agree with you. Deportation won’t lead to an automatic increase of available homes for sale.
@NatalieMarie9176 күн бұрын
@@jasoncardoza6375people also don’t realize that it’s very expensive to deport people (about $10,000 per person-assuming they don’t require a long flight), so it’s probably not going to be the mass exodus that people are expecting unless this new government is extraordinarily stupid with spending
@henrytep88845 күн бұрын
And the cost of building new homes…will just get exponentially worse with a mass deportation. How you going to get to 4 million homes deporting your labor force?
@whatsuptubeTV9 күн бұрын
Most buyers save more with a Realtor than without. The person that represents themselves in a transaction has a fool for a client.
@DIYHomebuyer8 күн бұрын
I'd be interested to see a study funded by a neutral source supporting your claim. Every DIY homebuyer I've worked with has saved at least $15,000 by representing themself. Most real estate transactions are not nearly as complicated as agents make them sound.
@nonactive365425 күн бұрын
Im not low balling. I'm re-etablishing reality.
@DIYHomebuyer25 күн бұрын
😂 Sometimes that is the right move. What really matters is what comparable properties in the area have recently sold for and how much competition is in the market at the time you’re making an offer.
@stevek8829Ай бұрын
The selling commission is shared with the buyers if sold through different broker. The seller pays the same % either way.
@DIYHomebuyerАй бұрын
Thanks for the comment! The cooperative compensation arrangement you’re referring to is going away because it’s unfair to both sellers and buyers. It hasn’t been officially banned by the DOJ yet, but it will be soon. Smart sellers are negotiating a lower commission for just the listing agent and leaving the amount a buyers agent will be paid TBD.
@stevek8829Ай бұрын
@@DIYHomebuyer thanks for the info. I don't see the unfairness. When buying I like to keep one agent as I search around. It seems fair to the seller's agent as it helps move the property faster with less work. It's been some years now since I bought.
@davidlundquistАй бұрын
That's why this real estate Business attract so many fleas balls
@Y1001Ай бұрын
Can't be more than $2000 worth of value, ever. Think of it as hourly rate of work.
@DIYHomebuyerАй бұрын
What do you think a reasonable hourly rate is?
@commieenderАй бұрын
Is any of this stuff gunna matter in a couple years anymore? I'm guessing not.
@DIYHomebuyerАй бұрын
Depends on what you mean by 'matter.' A new normal will be established. Real estate transactions and agency relationships certainly won't go back to the way they were before August 17, 2024. If anything, there will be more lawsuits that accelerate change.
@thesmarthomebuyercoachАй бұрын
I love this. Could we jump on a quick call? My name is Laura Moreno, I am the host of The First Time Home Buyer Podcast and wanted to learn more about what you think will happen with home buyers in the future ...
@DIYHomebuyerАй бұрын
Thanks, Laura! Would love to talk further! I'm excited about the work you're doing to serve first time home buyers, as well!
@brianbraunhuber78472 ай бұрын
Good Stuff!! I am a home inspector / real estate investor in Portland, OR.
@DIYHomebuyer2 ай бұрын
Thanks, Brian! Glad you enjoyed it! That's awesome you're in the industry! Do you purchase your investment properties with or without the help of a buyer's agent?