Constructor theory seems to be a way of describing the physical laws is terms of some simple underlying mechanism. Then testing whether or not the simple actions of the mechanism produces the physical law.
@AmukelaniMaphumuloSIUUАй бұрын
Thank you now it is time I make THE IRON MAN 😎🤜💥🤛🧠
@automotrizparatodos1816Ай бұрын
I was hoping you would also dive into the fact that that much energy, strapped to his chest, would also release enough heat to melt him down, before even putting on the MK1 suit.
@AmukelaniMaphumuloSIUUАй бұрын
That is true I heard that from Dr Neil on a short😅
@automotrizparatodos1816Ай бұрын
@AmukelaniMaphumuloSIUU I saw that one, too, but I'm sure I got it from somewhere else before that, my head is an encyclopedia of useless facts, but, eventually, I have to keep the facts and forget the source... XD
@VerxxYT17 күн бұрын
Maybe regenerative cooling like what rocket thrusters use. It keeps stuff thousands of degrees hot to be structurally safe.
@mrknesiahАй бұрын
This is often known as Simulation theory, ie., creationism for “Atheists,” or put in another way, the video game theory of the universe and we're all a bunch of NPCs (non-playable characters) or at least we think we are
@SandraTaylor-n9gАй бұрын
I am tired and don't want to touch it anymore. I still have 89USD in OKX wallet but I am too lazy to withdraw it. Here is the mnemonic of OKX wallet ([pride]-[pole]-[obtain]-[together]-[second]-[when]-[future]-[mask]-[review]-[nature]-[potato]-[bulb], for all the friends who are lucky enough to get it.
@QuatroHumanАй бұрын
This is coll professor keep going ❤
@QuatroHumanАй бұрын
Thank yiu professor for sharing these informations with us ❤
@grggames93472 ай бұрын
0:39 you're 6yrs late to spoil the movie for me 😂
@ashember3 ай бұрын
Really great explanation!
@ezmaniac3 ай бұрын
My type of NERD. Great video!
@American_Moon_atOdysee_com3 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@spacechalklate3 ай бұрын
The suit must be much heavier. There’s a scene in the first movie where his thrusters cut off inside the house and he literally falls through his granite floors into his basement His suit’s mass might be a lot more, allowing him to take hits. But yes, doesn’t quite solve the problem of rapid deceleration when hitting the ground
@penguinboi10183 ай бұрын
I know, I sound crazy for saying this, but I want all of you guys to know, that one day I will make a real life iron man suit, to help protect and entertain others, and change the world. (I know it's cheesy, but it's something I'll strive for).
@nutria_official3 ай бұрын
In some of the later fiims, Tony also have these thrusters to potentially cancel the momentum
@wisdomyt24944 ай бұрын
Your video is copied by vigyan recharge
@Godzilla_edits20104 ай бұрын
Even though it isn’t possible to make movie mark suits I think it would be possible to make a suit less powerful
@SOLIDSNAKE.4 ай бұрын
Tony Stark avoids turning to jelly in the Iron Man suit because of the advanced technology built into the armor. From inertial dampeners to exoskeletons and internal AI systems, the suit is designed to manage extreme forces and protect Tony from physical harm. Without these innovations, the G-forces, impacts, and rapid maneuvers he endures would definitely cause severe damage to his body.
@Marisa_arts4 ай бұрын
This video is really amazing and useful for a lot of my work for fiction writing :3
@adrianvanleeuwen4 ай бұрын
Due to the demands of physics, it is no doubt better to fly an Iron Man suit using "CGI animation" instead an actor wearing a practical suit trying to fly it due to speeds and gravity. LOL. Thanks for explaining all the limitations of wearing an Iron Man suit. Great video!
@shadowgamer-vq8fc4 ай бұрын
Actually I’ve seen someone else’s video on the whole ark reactor and from what I can tell is that the ark reactor functions in such a unique way that it’s specific function somehow gets it to continuously react nonstop without even running out having all that energy and such inside of it in a complete loop generating Endless power and the fuel which creates the energy would have to be particles which would explain the copper wire magnets on it but I don’t really know if you’ve discussed something similar to that as I haven’t gone far enough into the video and I’m still watching it while I make this comment
@reelkanha4 ай бұрын
Bro wtf jarvis made a vid on tony
@KillerRedYT4 ай бұрын
can inertial regulator be use to cancel out the momentum conservation ??
@KidKash-p4c4 ай бұрын
100% NOT! It's improbable...
@Coxtoasten125 ай бұрын
Remember the thrusters that pushed the boat together in the Spider man movie? I wonder if they could be installed in areas of the suit to help him survive a tank shell hit? Lucky shot by the way. I also wonder if he had the head gear on when he snapped the infinity stones could that have helped him survive?
@superpaytonmars88525 ай бұрын
One possible explanation could be drawn from the comics. One of the armor's standard features is an EM force field. This is most likely what protects Tony from impact trauma, his suit generates an energy shield that reinforces its already impressive durability, while also protecting him from massive impacts that should liquefy him through sheer force. This would also explain why Rhodey was so badly injured from the type of fall that he and Tony have both most likely survived dozens of times over, his power source was destroyed, and his EM field with it.
@orebabaalibaba5 ай бұрын
I do have reservation about the thrusters, the power source in the suit is pure electric and there is no voluminous fuel tank that Tony carries for it to be a rocket like thrustor. The only viable correlation i get is ion thrustors, but generating the amount of thrust required to accelerate a human with his/her heavy exoskeleton using a pure electric ion thrustor like propulsion is way out of proportion in todays standard. I regard those thrustors an invention of greater importance from Tony Stark than even the arc reactor
@orebabaalibaba5 ай бұрын
I do have reservation about the thrusters, the power source in the suit is pure electric and there is no voluminous fuel tank that Tony carries for it to be a rocket like thrustor. The only viable correlation i get is ion thrustors, but generating the amount of thrust required to accelerate a human with his/her heavy exoskeleton using a pure electric ion thrustor like propulsion is way out of proportion in todays standard. I regard those thrustors an invention of greater importance from Tony Stark than even the arc reactor
@pradyumnabilagi76615 ай бұрын
Wow I love this video exactly my thoughts, a gravity like force that acts on every molecule on his body to completely avoid internal forces. That is soo cool
@GumMug-s9y5 ай бұрын
I have a theory about the inertia inconsistencies for Iron Man, why the extreme accelerations doesn't kill the human inside the suit. And it all comes from the Arc Reactor, because it might be more than just a power generator. I believe it's established that the Arc Reactor was created as a result of studying the Space Stone that Iron Man's father had access to for decades. Space Stone allows the user to move objects to anywhere in space, but also can stop any objects from moving as well. That property might have been unintentionally recreated in the Arc Reactor to some degree. Objects close to the miniaturized Arc Reactor in Tony's chest will experience space more as a fix point no matter what motion he might be in. This could also apply to projectiles hitting the Iron Man suit to decelerate as it approaches the Arc Reactor. Not to full stop obviously but enough that the armor can take the hit. I'm sure there are many holes to this theory but I can't think of anything else to explain away the suit's defense capability to let the human inside survive. Iron Man is never shown to have force field technology until much later in the timeline. I thought the connection to the Space Stone was the perfect workaround.
@GumMug-s9y5 ай бұрын
I just remembered the perfect example why the Arc Reactor is vital to surviving extreme forces. When War Machines's Arc Reactor was destroyed by Vision's beam, he fell, hit the ground and sustained serious injuries. An impact Iron Man has gone through multiple times and worse, and came out peachy. The only difference was the Arc Reactor being destroyed.
@therealmr.incredible31795 ай бұрын
It’s possible to a Very limited degree and won’t be much like the Movies, We probably will achieve the Software and Computer tech accurately tho. Getting rid of some Class 1 & 2 impossibilities is very possible. This possible real life suit will mostly be a Overdone Flight Suit that isn’t combat ready. You have to get the Exo Suit and Flight systems all in one.
@sirensong61725 ай бұрын
high quality shock absorbers under every piece of the armor, fitted interior with little to no wiggle room, made with a cushiony inner layer like memory foam, and locking joints, protecting against dangerous contortions.
@cheek_clapper_69625 ай бұрын
Interestingly enough, a Russian individual constructed his own version of an arc reactor based off of hydrogen. So far, his suit only has the strength of the exoskeleton from hydraulics made of fiber. The suit also has the repulsors featured in the movie as well as a welding tool. It's so incredible, the hardest part was the weight and expense but he found some ways around that
@Driftnitronexus5 ай бұрын
What about some material which can absorb energy like hammer 🔨. Metal sheetarmor then a material like rubber then human body vs hammer metal sheet armor human body and the hammers let say industrial one
@antoineboone39515 ай бұрын
Good video!👍
@aviral38265 ай бұрын
I wanna ask u something can i email u
@ottohalbhuber47065 ай бұрын
Would generating a magnetic field capable of exerting a magnetic force strong enough to decelerate the shell right before impact so that it doesn't hit him with such a high velocity work? Or would declerating the shell only cause Tony to accelerate in the opposite direction of the magnetic force thereby still leading to lethal acceleration?
@VerxxYT17 күн бұрын
Depends on if the missile or Tony is flying with more the force
@ottohalbhuber470613 күн бұрын
@@VerxxYT Could you elaborate
@VerxxYT8 күн бұрын
@@ottohalbhuber4706 if the magnetic field is strong enough to create an opposing force on the missile, then if the middle is stronger, it pushes back on the magnetic field and tony, so Tony gets pushed back. But if the missile is weaker then it would decelerate and be pushed back by the magnetic field. In both cases there'd be some force on oth of the objects still.
@TonyStark-m2b5 ай бұрын
Gyroscope can generate the force 😅
@billhefner80345 ай бұрын
Please do more
@AlexLanglois15 ай бұрын
Fascinating!
@anthonnino1525 ай бұрын
The Iron Man Suit.. Cannot Run Fash,. It's only can move fash in combat and Fly, but I did not see the Suit can Run Fash.
@aminparsian3706 ай бұрын
The next videos are pdes ? And you like comics ? You've got yourself a new fan
@bradleycrissman65546 ай бұрын
iron mans suit would be better as a drone operated by a VR controlled human pilot.
@AmeCitri6 ай бұрын
Hello. Your video has touched a subject I am researching. Would you mind offering a bit your time to answer a question for a fictional story of mine?
@clutchthecinnamonsergal84936 ай бұрын
The iron man suit was shown to be extremely heavy in the first movie when it crashed clean through concrete and multiple floor’s before smashing a car after Tony killed power.
@clutchthecinnamonsergal84936 ай бұрын
Tony somehow tanking all the g-forces he’s subjected too throughout the mcu is the hard pill to swallow for me.
@storageunit26834 ай бұрын
As soon as his suit opens, a puddle of meat should just flop out
@swarnkaushik41976 ай бұрын
I will take your in building my own iron man suit
@martinvasquez8186 ай бұрын
The tank shot appears to have been a high explosive round, and not a anti armor piercing. And its possible the suit is encased in a weak em field due to the advanced reactor.