Great lecture! Thanks for sharing this!

As a 10-year professional who has seen a lot of presentations, this is probably one of the top 2-3 best. Genuinely insightful observations, and 100% agree with needing a rigorously objective design process especially for institutional clients (e.g., universities).

The flawless version of you sounds horribly scary, we are already judging ourselves and others enough, why would you want a machine doing that? 😅 Amazing work otherwise.

Brilliant, Cerena…congratulations to you and your graduating class…

Thank you for this video

Dope

National popular vote compact is now up to 209 electoral votes. 61 to go!

Omg I’m so jealous! Congrats to each and every one of you. 🤗🤗

I literally cannot believe this video has been watched so few times and with no comments. I was fortunate to have known Karen when she was at Cooper Union. Then she always struck me as being especially persistent, but she survived being a very young freshman from Macungie, PA with a lot of insecurity, to creating that beautiful thesis project and continuing to grow and grow and grow until this video. Yes I agree completely with her advice. Always think by drawing. Until you do, what you know and don't know are figments of your imagination. The drawing will show you, always; you may not recognize it at first, but you cannot rise out of the mud until you understand where your foot is. And persist. I did not; I decayed, she has flourished. Thank you for showing this video. Unfortunately--I can tell by the people coming and leaving--the real architects even at Cooper are in the minority. I was privileged to attend only elite schools my entire life. And so I can say, big deal--half or more (much) of my classmates everywhere were dimwits and often pompous on top of it. This video should be shown not only to a Cooper Union audience. Draw, draw and draw and never give up. Karen has learned so much about architecture, but about educating, about the practice of architecture, about working in the public sector--I only ever got to be a lap dog architect or perhaps decorator for the almost-wealthy people who might hire me. She has truly done honor to Cooper Union. Brava

00:38 Nice one!

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5jWfnqtrt2eq9ksi=KSBOIMJdfzP0ehh1

In a modern world where people are better educated they will see that this electoral college system is unfair and takes power away from them the people , there for in the long term it will become unsustainable

There is no way that big cities would 100% determine the winner of the election. It was possible for Bush to win the popular vote in 2000 and Trump to win the popular vote in 2016 without a single vote in a big city switching hands.

In theory a candidate can become President even though he lost popular vote by 20 million votes. Sapient sat. Therefor electoral college is a broken system waiting to be fixed, modified or completely abolished.

Simple. Do both. The president has to be voted in by both popular vote and electoral college. If they dont have one or the other, recounts are needed until one does.

Excellent research, thank you! 👏🏻

What a fantastic lecture and love letter to Friedrich Neugebauer. Thank you very much.

The EC is necessary to quarantine states stuffing the ballot box. Felon voting, lack of voter identification, ballot harvesting, mass mail in balloting, lowering voter age. All of these will be done by states as soon as we get rid of the EC. It would turn the presidential election into a banana republic joke.

@34:24 "Jazz was born in the streets." this one line from a jazz musician just eliminates the acoustic concern with the glass backdrop. I guess one could hire an army of PR and craft another argument; but doubt it will win over this line. Bravo, uhhhh man; dialogue, argument, sometimes that's how to hammer down a design decision.

A wonderful lecture about the genius of Fridrich Neugebauer! Thank you.

Cooper the Union....Please... for G's sake...Can you get a better microphone?

Is the long driveway with a big dog argument even applicable in a modern world anymore? I don’t have door to door sales anymore but I get a lot of campaigns coming at me via social media, commercials, and text messages. Couple that with people leaving dense areas because they can work remotely and you may not be able to rely on the notion that people who live in rural areas think the same way.

Fascinating

She's so lovely, go Alicia Vikander!

Peace and Inspiration ❤☀️

People against winner take all make no sense in wanting a popular vote because that would be winner take all on a national level lol 😂😅😮

Proportional votes wont make a difference so it isn't a big deal either way

Hillary's vote lead was concentrated in New York and California. Two states shouldn't be able to control the election. The EC makes all states count thus it is the best system

I named my Kindle Scribe Manutius. Yes, I am a nerd.

😢 Promo'SM

Hi

What are the available unions for architects and design professionals?

He is a professor of what? In his first few sentences, he talks about a free "Person" does he even know what the word means in that definition? Why does he not talk about "free men/women"? That is what people want to know about, and not a free person, as a person (n.) directly from the Latin persona "human being, person, personage, a part in a drama, assumed character," originally "a mask, a false face," such as those of wood or clay, covering the whole head, worn by actors in later Roman theatre. Then if he knows the Bible, he should have a look at Acts 10:34, 34: Then Peter opened his mouth and said, of a truth, I perceive that God is no respecter of persons. Then should know his "maxim of Law" in Latin, "Expressio unius est exclusio alterius," translated into English as "The expression of one thing is the exclusion of the other." That is what is called the one, two and three; Christians will of told that is God's laws, the commandments, in the land of the living, so why does he not join us; whoever accepts the "Messiah" will be saved, and no one goes to the Father without knowing him, and he will receive those sins. Those founding men knew him and even warned us, the people of keeping, hold of the constitution and not lose it. They gave you democracy, but will you be able to defend it? Stopped listening to it after that, saying with a forked tongue.

This is so cool

The 4th amendment deals with the peoples rights you ass f ck tyrant bastard!!! It has nothing to do with you federal f ckers. Dumb ass. Go back to class. You better retire pal, because your not going to be getting too many more checks from us educated people with that kind of mentality. Damn ass!

Is this all about the democracy? Cuz we are a republic, not a democracy

76-5b-102. Legislative determinations -- Purpose of chapter. (1) The Legislature of Utah determines that: (a) the sexual exploitation of a minor is excessively harmful to the minor's physiological, emotional, social, and mental development; (b) the sexual exploitation of a vulnerable adult who lacks the capacity to consent to sexual exploitation can result in excessive harm to the vulnerable adult's physiological, emotional, and social well-being; (c) a minor cannot intelligently and knowingly consent to sexual exploitation; (d) regardless of whether it is classified as legally obscene, material that sexually exploits a minor, or a vulnerable adult who does not have the capacity to consent to sexual exploitation, is not protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution or by the First or Fifteenth sections of Article I of the Utah Constitution and may be prohibited; and (e) prohibition of and punishment for the distribution, possession, possession with intent to distribute, and production of materials that sexually exploit a minor, or a vulnerable adult who lacks the capacity to consent to sexual exploitation, is necessary and justified to eliminate the market for those materials and to reduce the harm to the minor or vulnerable adult inherent in the perpetuation of the record of the minor's or vulnerable adult's sexually exploitive activities. (2) It is the purpose of this chapter to prohibit the production, possession, possession with intent to distribute, and distribution of materials that sexually exploit a minor, or a vulnerable adult who lacks capacity to consent to sexual exploitation, regardless of whether the materials are classified as legally obscene.

I’m powerless Sense 10-22-2018 undermined my authority to justify sexual voyurism

Officer Della Rowley Williams remember voyurism? What is Voyeurism? The crime of voyeurism is defined in A.R.S. 13-1424. Voyeurism is classified as a sexual offense. The essence of the offense is invasion of privacy. But to constitute a criminal act, there are a number of facts that must be proven. The law says voyeurism is (a) a knowing invasion of privacy of someone, without that person’s knowledge, for purposes of “sexual stimulation,” or (b) the disclosure of a photo or recording (digital, video or film) which is made in violation of section (a) above, without knowledge or consent. Invasion of Privacy None of these words mean very much, of course, unless the phrase “invasion of privacy” is adequately defined. The statute therefore goes on to say that it includes a number of possible circumstances, in which the person photographed or recorded has a reasonable expectation that they will not be viewed and/or photographed, taped or recorded, and that the viewing/photographing/taping/recording includes: The person while engaged in sexual intercourse or sexual contact (direct or indirect fondling of the genitals, buttocks, or female breast); or The person while partially or completely undressed; or The person while defecating or urinating; or Directly or indirectly, captures the person’s genitals, buttocks, or female breast, whether clothed or unclothed, so long as the view is not visible to the public. While some of these situations may be fairly straightforward, some are not. For example, in what circumstances can the viewing of a fully clothed person be an invasion of privacy? This is not the only case where questions may arise as to the meaning and interpretation of the voyeurism law. Without Consent For purposes of sex crimes, ARS 13-1401A7 defines the phrase “without consent” to include much more than simply being unaware of the situation in question. It also includes (a) being coerced or forced by the threat of immediate force against a person or property, (b) lack of consent by virtue of mental disorder, intoxication (drugs or alcohol) or any situation in which the alleged victim’s cognition is impaired provided that the condition is known or reasonably should be known by the other party, (c) the alleged victim is deceived intentionally as to the nature of the act in question, or (d) the alleged victim is deceived into believing that the other person is the victim’s spouse. The essence of the above statute leads to the conclusion that voyeurism includes not only situations where the viewing/photographing/taping takes place without the alleged victim’s knowledge, but also where consent is predicated on deception, mental disorder, or drugs and/or alcohol. Exceptions to Voyeurism There are numerous situations in which conduct that might otherwise be classified as voyeurism is specifically exempted. These situations include: Videotaping, etc., where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, but the action is for the purpose of security, and notice of the activity (videotaping, etc.) is clearly posted. Filming, etc. by a law enforcement officer as part of an otherwise lawful investigation. A recording by correction officers, provided that it is for security reasons or is related to an investigation of alleged misconduct in a jail or prison. Use of a child monitoring device in a residence for supervision or safety monitoring by a parent, guardian, or responsible person in that person’s residence. While the above list details the statutory exceptions to a voyeurism charge, there are additional defenses that may apply in a voyeurism case. Defenses to Voyeurism Charges Certain defenses may be raised to any charge, and these are not necessarily dependent upon the case being a voyeurism or other sex crime case. Materials (videotapes, recordings, etc.) obtained through a search violating your fourth amendment rights will lead to the materials being excluded from evidence. In some case, the inability to use these materials could effectively destroy the prosecution’s case against you. Similarly, prosecutorial misconduct, false testimony, and entrapment, among others, may lead to your case being thrown out. With regard to the defense of a voyeurism charge in Arizona, however, the starting point is that the action complained of - viewing, videotaping, recording, photographing, etc. - is only illegal where it is both knowing and for the purpose of sexual stimulation. Your state of mind in this regard, both that you are aware of your actions and that they are for the purpose of sexual stimulation, are elements of the offense, and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Absent such proof, the case against you will ultimately be dismissed, or a not guilty verdict will be entered. Voyeurism Penalties Voyeurism is generally a class 5 felony. If, however, it is alleged that you displayed or distributed a photo or recording in which the person depicted can be recognized, it will be charged as a class 4 felony. The presumptive sentences for these offenses are 1.5 year (class 5 felony) and 2.5 years (class 4 felony) in prison. Although conviction for voyeurism does not, by the terms of the sex offender registration law, always require registration as a sex offender, the judge has the discretion to order anyone convicted of any offense under Chapter 14 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, which covers sexual offenses (including voyeurism), to register.

Officer

Greenstien? Enough said. I prefer to go listen elsewhere now.

Uhm.

It's oh so typical to have a discussion about architecture and use words like Pedagogy - in the title no less. But then refuse to acknowledge that the actual pedagogy here and throughout the academia de architecture, is to over complicate the world of architecture by using an adapted 'architecture speak' filled with unnecessary words like 'notion' and 'um'. For example: "Um, there's this notion um (hand gesture), perhaps a naive notion, that this line (drawn with the Ivy League squiggle of course because a line drawn with a smooth hand is just not 'notion' enough) is somehow transformed through a cognitive process probably mostly taking place in the frontal cortex of the observer, to mean something other than what that line is not. Ummmm, this line, or this notion of this line, if it can even be called a line, has become, if the observer will let it, more than a representation of a wall, it's the ummmmm, notion of this (more hand gestures) interstitial space, that space between the line which has yet to be drawn (with, let's hope, another squiggle) that potentially intrigues the viewer to transform a somewhat ephemeral-banal vertical-space-definer into that which is otherwise 'notionally' unknown. Please! There's no way these 18-20 year old kids (let alone a 60 year old client coming to a real architect) have the foggiest idea about what is actually being said by this arch-speak pedagogy. When you're at home talking with your kids or at the grocery store, you don't arch-speak. It's only when in front of an academic audience. Arch-speak is a facade a mask, something to hide behind. I suggest, just keep it real and the kids will finally get it.

Let's boil this hog down to the basic facts. 1. Those advocating for either a Constitutional Amendment to eliminate the Electoral College, or advocating for the NPVIC are on the side that doesn't win elections All The Time. That galls them and they want to hold the majority at all times. 2. They know they are lying when they say that "everyone's vote will count". No those votes won't count when as stated before New York, and California would result in one side always having more popular votes and therefore that party would always win the presidency. 3. One side is defending the Rule of Law and the US Constitution and the other side doesn't like the Constitutional limits that prevent them from being in power all the time. 4. The side advocating for the NPVIC won't moderate. They won't listen to those in the minority. They view themselves as being smarter than everyone else, just like every narcissistic sociopathic megalomaniac in history. "We're really smart and We know what's best for you." 5. They know that they won't be able to get 3/4ths of the state legislatures to ratify a Constitutional Amendment eliminating the Electoral College. So, they came up with the NPVIC. In other words they are engaging in an "end around" the US Constitution. 6. IF the NPVIC does get enough states, which would be a minority of states, to vote for the NPVIC then all of the states that didn't enter into the "compact" would become completely irrelevant with regard to Presidential elections. Not a single vote cast by any American in those states would count for anything. But of course that's the whole point of the NPVIC. Regardless of what those that advocate for it claim.

Absolutely Brilliant. GOT TO LOVE THAT MADISON, BILL OF RIGHTS ALSO MAKES BETTER SENSE OF THE CONSTITUTION! RELIEF SOMEWHAT for critics of the CONSTITUTION....

1:20:15 I think was their best argument for keeping the EC. However it did not age well given how Trump and Republicans are getting ready to rig the next election though state legislatures. I would say this is one more reason why the EC allows for corruption. The scenario she calls out as “impossible” to get a majority of 51 states to collude looks like it will shorty be reality.

It’s really funny to see how the two who want to keep the EC have almost zero facts and nothing but “what if” scenarios and the two against the EC not only have facts for their own points but against everything the other two have to say. Not even a close debate for anyone looking at this objectively.

Lol. Always such weak arguments that are easily destroyed to try and keep the EC. It’s time to abolish it and those against it have a clear agenda trying to remain in power through minority rule. Just like when we were on the verge of passing legislation to abolish it was blocked, southern racists and ironically NY blacks (who had outsized power at the time) banded together to keep it. Every party and coalition has wanted to abolish the EC, it just depends on if you are in power or not. It’s anti democratic and there is literally zero excuse for it today.

Underappreciated talk

INVESTIGATE IOWA JUDICIARY Wrongfully Prosecuting, convicting peaceful people who were in exercise of Rights: kzbin.info unconscionable