@@F15CEAGLE1 oh dear

He lied to you and you liked what he had to say.

@derhafi Oh, gee....well since you simply ASSERT that (how original, like the rest of his critics 🙄) I'm of course going to believe your opinion. For dogmatic types who are always asking for evidence, you critics don't supply evidence of your assertions. Goodbye, troll.

@@jvt_redbaronspeaks4831 Well, his critics are right. Did that ever occur to you? Have you ever wondered howe many things about nature we figured out, thanks to Intelligent Design? Here is the entire list of ID's contributions to our knowledge: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Hmm....why might that be? I'm sorry to burst your bubble here but Meyer is a demonstrable liar....look up any fact check on his books...it's an almost impressive pile of lies and misrepresentations. The fact that he gives you the feeling that your faith based belief in scientificaslly justified, is essentially his job, but that does not make it true. He has never published anything in a peer reveid journal ever...and works for an institution of which of which one of its founders Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr. openly wants to replace democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy. His part in this operation is to bedazzle the scientific illiterate, in attempt to straighten them in their delusion that divine magic is real. It is really impressive in how many ways they manage to dress up the same fallacies over and over. The religious nature of intelligent design is also proclaimed loudly and repeatedly in the Wedge document, which he wrote and signed, that states among other nonsense theit goals: “"To replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God" Is this what counts as unbiased inquiry to you? Does that sound like scientists who are interested in the truth about how the worls works, seriously? Or does this sound more like some frauds who are only interested in their fundamental Christian Agenda. The simple fact that ID is based on an assumption that some ill-defined intelligence, which supposingly isnot subject to the known laws of physics, that supposingly interacts with the fabric of our reality in ways that have thus far eluded every controlled experiment ever performed in the history of science..aka a fantasy without any demonstrable correlationwith reality, supposingly had a hand in reality…....That is the core idee of ID and a textbook definition of pseudo-science. It all boils down to: If we haven't fugured it out yet...this intelligence which happens to be God did it. The core os ID is the God of the gaps fallacy.

​@@jvt_redbaronspeaks4831 "like the rest of his critics" I'm right...his books are demonstrably full of errors, misrepresentations and lies. Which is essencilly his job...he is an intelectual vandal working for the Christian Taliban aka the Discovery Institute, an Institution of which one of its founders Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr. openly wants to replace democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy, where there is no research done whatsoever, but lots of PR in favour of the pseudoscientific idea of ID, which has never and will never contribute anything to our understanding of nature. Don't take my word for this, take his. Here are his goals from the wedge paper, written and signed by Meyer: "To replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God"

Kent Hovind had to go to jail for not paying taxes...and he is no Dr.

Duh, ya think? My my, religious people should never address the scientific world( pearl clutching) . God bless .