Пікірлер
@infiniteuniverse123
@infiniteuniverse123 3 жыл бұрын
It's time for a paradigm shift. Fusion is not the answer. The quest for the ultimate energy ends with the strong force between quarks. It is called quark plasma and its catalyst is nothing but the dark matter of space. Once the quarks have been separated, the pressure of the dark matter of space goes through any containment system to attack the reaction. As the electron neutrinos come in to attack the reaction, they are subsequently thrown out of the reaction as gamma rays. Once this reaction is started, it is self contained and will need no input from us at all except to extract the heat from the system. Hydrogen will be sealed in a giant sphere and severely compromised with heat and pressure. Then, the "spark" will be applied with an enormous amount of electricity for a short amount of time. Then, the reaction will be started and require nothing from us to facilitate. It is the perfect reaction because the catalyst is the unlimited supply of the dark matter of space. When Einstein said a mere train ticket could power a train for a long distance, he meant if the matter in the ticket was transformed into quark plasma. The Big Bang theory is what has made us assume that fusion is the ultimate energy.
@woodywoodlstein9519
@woodywoodlstein9519 3 жыл бұрын
Hope Dennis gives a talk near me someday
@davidwilkie9551
@davidwilkie9551 3 жыл бұрын
Following in Dirac's POV about the significance of beautiful balanced Equation quantization and reciprocals as they occur in the naturally occurring Geometry of physical structures in Measurable Evidence.., the "macro-micro verse" of hyper-hypo Superspin-spiral embedded Modulation Mechanism Singularity time-timing sync-duration positioning, implies what, how and why things happen as they do. The default realization is a Universe apparently of Mathematical Fusion/Equation of wave-particle coordination-identification in a simple time-timing sync-duration function of e-Pi-i temporal resonance Quantum-fields, the Eternity-now fused Superspin cause-effect. Gravitational resonance containment states, precision tuning, and device designs, need thinking about..
@volta2aire
@volta2aire 4 жыл бұрын
36:00 game-changing - to deal with climate effects
@Zahraa_005
@Zahraa_005 4 жыл бұрын
Really interesting interview
@Ryterick
@Ryterick 4 жыл бұрын
Check-out safe ThoriumElectricUSA.com no government funding - replace closed coal and out-dated nuclear power plants - no CO2 release.
@Martinko_Pcik
@Martinko_Pcik 4 жыл бұрын
Is anyone building tokamak using MIT ARC design ? Is it already working at MIT ?
@MikeM-py2hq
@MikeM-py2hq 4 жыл бұрын
Nope, ARC is just a concept for now. SPARC will be built sooner. At the moment they are constructing test coils, if that goes well the rest of the machine should follow soon as that is known technology.
@Martinko_Pcik
@Martinko_Pcik 4 жыл бұрын
@@MikeM-py2hq Thanks Mike. In the meantime I found out they are hiring for jobs in Cambridge, MA. I have a feeling they know what they are doing and I wish them the best to pull it off.
@kurtklingbeil6900
@kurtklingbeil6900 2 жыл бұрын
@@MikeM-py2hq I recently watched this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZzTonRurqxsipY and thought by now, 6 years later, they must have something shaking, but apparently nothing yet, eh ? What is the ETA for SPARC spark-up ?
@MikeM-py2hq
@MikeM-py2hq 2 жыл бұрын
@@kurtklingbeil6900 Hi Kurt, indeed nothing running yet. But construction on the SPARC facility has started in the meanwhile. You have to understand these kind of projects take years. Back in 2016 they were still recruiting a team + funding basically. Once that is all in check the official design starts, let's say that takes 2 years. Then the building starts, but these are not off the shelve parts, but since it's a relatively small tokamak it takes "only" 5 years or so to build. They expect first plasma in 2025. But let's take this with a grain of salt, tokamaks are all unique and therefore run into unexpected issues, so delays are common. Anyway, it's an exciting project IMO.
@Martinko_Pcik
@Martinko_Pcik 4 жыл бұрын
He talks like a natural teacher. Very easy to listen to because he can dumb it down to my physics knowledge level
@woodywoodlstein9519
@woodywoodlstein9519 3 жыл бұрын
He’s Canadian That’s why he’s such a great guy all around. Straightforward with a sense of humour and little ego. Unlike Americans.
@lengould9262
@lengould9262 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Worthwhile listen to a very qualified speaker.
@doritoification
@doritoification 4 жыл бұрын
"The most dangerous nuclear reactor is the one that does not get built" Powerful words
@georgetaylor8801
@georgetaylor8801 4 жыл бұрын
0:41 crazy-girls.online
@ukulayme2
@ukulayme2 5 жыл бұрын
Pulling carbon out of the air to make fuel doesn’t create a negative carbon effect because you have to burn it again and release it back into the atmosphere. It’s just another net 0 project. I don’t understand why he’s claiming this is a net negative solution. The net negative solution would be to store the sequestered carbon underground, but then there’s no incentive because you can’t sell it as fuel.
@EnergyImpactCenter
@EnergyImpactCenter 5 жыл бұрын
Great point! Sorry if I didn't make it clear enough in the talk, but you need to build carbon based products from CO2 (like plastics) in order to make it net negative. Just because we don't want plastics in the ocean doesn't mean we don't want them!
@ukulayme2
@ukulayme2 5 жыл бұрын
@@EnergyImpactCenter I understand now! Thanks for the reply!