excellent work, however I'm afraid flerfers will just dishonestly reject the given distances
@jonathanleslie91005 ай бұрын
TY! It's a razor when I demonstrate it. I lecture around the world and build the "flat earth" adding the citiy I'm visiting each time. It gets more and more round each time. If the flerfs argue about the distances I ask them to look up the fuel consumption rates for airplanes against the mileage and find inconsistencies in any of the 130,000 commercial flights that happen EVERY DAY. Then to embarrass them a bit more I ask them for the definition of latitude and longitude which apparently none of them know what that means despite never challenging any places location marked by said lat and long.
@resolutecub9977 Жыл бұрын
Could maybe try lining it with thin bits of insulation, then put a little bit of plaster over it. Or maybe cloth or wool lining on the side away from pot stove
@jonathanleslie9100 Жыл бұрын
There are ton's of air gaps all over the place, the First step is to close them. I really don't want to disturb the raw look of the cabin with insulation/plaster. I just saw this heater I'm thinking of adding: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZoTOoo2krp1qe9k I think it will put me over the top on keeping it warm If I use both. Its made from an ammo can.
@resolutecub9977 Жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 oh nice. Duct tape never does any harm either
@jonathanleslie9100 Жыл бұрын
@@resolutecub9977 there is not a single piece of duct tape on this project and there never will be. LOL. I'm not against soaking cotton clothes line rope in a glue solution and stuffing the cracks though.
@resolutecub9977 Жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 poor duct tape manufacturers
@resolutecub9977 Жыл бұрын
Ah, yes, a true Heavy Metal Guitar
@jonathanleslie9100 Жыл бұрын
how the hell did I miss that joke. well done. I got as far as to start working on a CBG version of "Iron Man"
@thy-wounded4 жыл бұрын
Movie name please...
@jonathanleslie91004 жыл бұрын
Empire of the sun. Along with being the best movie to test sound (the mustangs entering the screen from one side of the theater and exiting on the other,) Its a great movie. It has to be watched on a big screen though.
@thy-wounded4 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 thank you..
@heggedaal5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant idea! Kudos.
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Although I think brilliant is an overstatement. Blindingly obvious I think is more appropriate. ;)
@geotruthnz70135 жыл бұрын
here's a 100% correct flat earth map kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZikfqx6ncuHeas
@jonathanleslie91004 жыл бұрын
1) that link is showing a polar projection. It is a picture of the globe stretched out into a circle. In short you have just showed me a globe as a flat earth map. try again. You have just demonstrated that you don't even know the definition of latitude and longitude if you are going to present a flat earth map that shows lat and long.
@geotruthnz70134 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 You don't know your subject very well. This map while at a glance is similar to the AE map it is also significantly different as it takes what works with the original AE map and has added more space in the north pole moving the countries further out which changes the shape of each country to be proportionally accurate. It is not a flattened globe so you should look at things closer before trying to sound like an expert. I have a video coming soon with an updated version of the map as well.
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
from an answer to someones post worth pointing out: The situation is that the earth is flat or it its not flat. My example clearly demonstrates that there is no way the 5 locations can fit on a flat surface with the known distances between the locations. Those are the two possibilities and I have just shown that the earth cannot be flat, therefore it is not flat. QED.
@MemoryLane778525 жыл бұрын
Obviously a flat earth map is quite impossible at this point.
@jonathanleslie91004 жыл бұрын
That is a conclusion I am not willing to commit to. I simply state that if you are presenting a case that the earth is flat, you must first present a map. It is far too hard to PROVE something is impossible. I will simply state that if you make an assertion, you must provide evidence. In 2019, it is clear that there is enough knowledge of the distances between locations on the earth to be able to make an accurate representation of what the earth looks like. I tested those locations and those distances form a globe. A person making the case that the earth is flat must be able to present a version of a scale model, specifically a flat model, doing the same thing.
@nagualchris25 жыл бұрын
The Flat Earth Society is well known disinformation. NO ONE in the modern flat Earth community supports them at all, yet they are always first in Google searches. This shows a direct effort from the establishment to misinform people on this topic, and get them to think the flat Earth position is dumb. It is far from it. Your logic is backwards here, by the way. You are expecting a flawless "flat Earth model", when in reality that question is posed to merely deflect the focus away from the failures and impossibilities of the heliocentric model. I do not need to provide you with ANY alternative model just to point out the fraud, lies, and lack of objective science in YOUR model. That is how logic works. If you had lemonade you claim cures cancer, and I have undeniable proof that it cannot do so and your claims are built entirely on fraud, do I need to cure cancer myself before I expose your scam? Of course not. Heliocentrism is a provable scam. We do not need to provide anything other than the information that proves this.
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
ahhh no. the claim is the earth is flat. If its flat, its able to be looked at in a scaled down fashion, and as such, shown. You must deal with it. Yours is what is known as an "argument from ignorance" fallacy. At best if you point out failures and impossibilities of the heliocentric model, all you have done is showed that the heliocentric model is wrong (assuming your evidence if correct.) Showing problems with [a globe based view of the earth] in no way supports a flat earth model. That is the definition of an argument from ignorance fallacy. The claim is the earth is flat and evidence for it must be supplied to support it. At the end of the day, your "proof" the earth is flat falls squarely on your ability to resolve a map that fits the conditions of what a flat earth must look like or else you have nothing.
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
In short my example clearly demonstrates that there is no way the 5 locations can fit on a flat surface with the known distances between the locations. The situation is that the earth is flat or it its not flat. Those are the two possibilities and I have just shown that the earth cannot be flat, therefore it is not flat. QED.
@nagualchris25 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 Hahaha. So you presume to tell me what MY claim is? My claim is that we cannot possibly be living on a spinning ball for MYRIAD reasons. My claim is that there is ZERO objective science to support heliocentrism. My claim is that all the so called "space agencies" are replete with irrefutable fraud. These are the claims I make that cannot be refuted. All observation. measurement, and verifiable science shows the Earth to be flat and motionless with the celestial objects revolving over us. There is not one single shred of science to suggest that the Earth is a ball or moves at all. YOU claim we live on a spinning ball because your parents and kindergarten teacher told you so. It is up to YOU to show something verifiable to PROVE that. Otherwise, I have NO CHOICE but to accept the world as I sense it and measure it... flat and motionless. Can you show otherwise? No one else can. Do I have fleets of planes and ships? Do I have unlimited resources? Do I have unfettered access to all areas of Earth to explore.... meaning, can I get an exemption from all 25 countries who signed the Antarctic Treaty preventing independent exploration? Do I have anything that it would realistically take to create a new model of Earth? OF COURSE NOT! It is absurd of you to demand such a thing, and you know it. The INTELLIGENT thing to do when you cannot possibly know something is to say "I don't know". That is not a logical fallacy. Demanding irrational "proof' of something, like you are doing, IS a logical fallacy. We can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Earth does NOT curve. The Earth does NOT spin. The celestial objects are LOCAL. The space agencies are FRAUDULENT. There is no science to support heliocentrism. ON and on and on. You want people to IGNORE all of that, until we can answer a question we are being PHYSICALLY PREVENTED from answering? Do you see how absurd and illogical that is? You can call me whatever you wish but these are my positions. I have never claimed to have a new model of Earth. I have only claimed that the one YOU hold up as true, cannot possibly be so. You believe in a lie that I can prove is false. Your view of the world is demonstrably INCORRECT. What things ACTUALLY are? I have no way of knowing yet... but that does not prevent me from calling you and your religion out for the fraud and pseudoscience it is!
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
@@nagualchris2 fix my map or shut up. give me a flat map and stop with the red herrings. without a map you are a lost fart in a windstorm. mY measurements have nothing to do with antarctic treaty, nasa, space agencies, or santa claus. My measurements go back to the days of columbus and repeat exactly what the world cartographers tried to do for 1000 years and CAME TO THE CONCLUSION that that world was round for the same reason I demonstrated here in this video. IT CAN"T FIT ON A FLAT MAP. Show me a flat map that works or go away. That is the entrance ticket to elevate you above bat-shit crazy.
@nagualchris25 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 Wow, you are a sad, delusional, willfully ignorant zealot. You are not concerned with truth or reality AT ALL... only defending your moronic religious beliefs. I do not care about whatever map you are talking about. It makes ZERO DIFFERENCE to the undeniable fact that we cannot be living on a spinning ball. We can see landmarks hundreds of miles away... far beyond where any curve would HAVE to be. We can show test after test that the Earth is NOT moving in any direction. We can show videos of the sun changing angular size as it goes away from the observer during sunset, NOT behind a curve. We can show HOURS of irrefutable fraud from NASA. On and on and on. You just close your eyes to ALL of that? Pathetic.
@josleys5 жыл бұрын
Great, but you should have chosen the scale, so that in the end it fits nicely on your globe!
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
I tried. I couldn't cut and drill the sticks that precisely that small. the thickness of the #8 bolt as it is is about 40 miles diameter as it is, if I cut the scale to my globe, that bolt would of been closer to 100 miles in diameter. The difference between the straight line vs arc angle between Honolulu and Panama City is only 150 miles, even the slightest mistake or just the difference between the bold and the drill hole wind-age would distort the results. If anything I should double the size (1cm=50 miles) and the model would be much more accurate.
@jefferykeown5965 жыл бұрын
While this is basically Jos Leys' video from (last year maybe?) it demonstrates the concept without CGI, and is unassailable in my opinion. Excellent work!
@josleys5 жыл бұрын
Mine is here : kzbin.info/www/bejne/gn6yoWmGoqmjppY
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
Not many people can work with CGI. I wanted an experiment than anyone could reproduce at home, in about an hour.
@jonathanleslie91005 жыл бұрын
@@josleys this is excellent. way past my skills of putting together a video. I just work in the woodshop. ;)
@josleys5 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 Never mind! You did a great job!
@jefferykeown5965 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanleslie9100 ... and that you did. You know how the Flerfs love to crow about CGI. Every one of them needs to see this.
@marsa76006 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/h2XZgKqHqpmpf80
@marsa76006 жыл бұрын
uu
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
flat earthers don't realize that if the map is showing latitude and longitude, then its a globe.
@scott_meyer6 жыл бұрын
Actually eastern to central Kansas is hilly. But if you get to the south west part of the state it starts to look like this. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGSZp5ymn8RokKM I have now idea how FEs are so easily conned....
@amarok87816 жыл бұрын
The AE polar projection earth, is what all our road maps are derived from. You use a flat earth map on your gps. Ever notice your google earth is cgi, till you get to high altitude drone range? There is a reason for that....It is all drone footage. Do you think maps come from a globe? We have to use math, to make a map fit on a globe, even take parts out....get that, take parts out.
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
map. show me the map with the 6 locations I just showed you so I can measure them the same way or STFU.
@amarok87816 жыл бұрын
Typical, do the work for me answer. Here, download the global war strategy map. It is high definition over 1500pix. It also has flight paths on it you can verify with your precious google earth. I already verified most of the flightpaths on that map. But you are welcome to do your own research.
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
@amarok: Damn skippy it's typical!!! That is what science is all about you fool. YOU make a claim and then YOU supply your evidence. You don't get to make a claim and tell your audience to go out and find evidence for your claim. Show your example of how you came up with the claim that we can test. I've spent years looking for a FE map and cannot find one that I can validate, and here you are saying you have one but won't tell me about it. What is wrong with your brain? "Here, download the global war strategy map" you say but you don't supply a link. There is no "Here". You want your claim to be taken seriously then make a serious claim and not a bunch of magical hand waiving. Good god, a 3rd grader would know better.
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
@amarok: so lets recap the conversation so far to see if I've got things correct: 1) I make a claim. In a video I supply my evidence, that you can repeat, showing my globe, my exact points of measure, and demonstrate the accuracy of the globe as a representation of the earth 2) You make a claim about drones, cgi, etc but supply no testable evidence. 3) I challenge your claim to supply the supporting evidence: show me a map of the Flat earth, feel free to stitch one together if you have to, but since you made the claim, I assume you should of done this already. This should be no big deal at all. 4) Your response is that I should go out and find the supporting evidence for your claim. Is that about right? Oh I almost forgot, 5) I'm scratching my head trying to figure out how you thought this is the proper way make a claim.
@thomasroland23646 жыл бұрын
The ocean is flat. Land has topography.
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
I think you completely missed the point.
@Wolfie60206 жыл бұрын
Great video and subbed. Distances all over the Earth prove we live on a Globe. I have been a pilot for over 30 years and the flight planning formulas used to calculate distances are based on a Globe and will only work on a Globe. There is no Flat Earth map and there never will be. All you get from the Flat Earth crowd are excuses. When you push harder for answers you get insults. That is all they have.
@Poseidon63636 жыл бұрын
I have seen hundreds of beautiful sunsets, shame the sun doesn't set on a flat earth, look what you are missing.
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
@poseidon63, no red herrings here. just a simple map please.
@Poseidon63636 жыл бұрын
???? bad link.
@fucdt6 жыл бұрын
take a small level and find all the level areas of that ball
@mikecrownshaw16466 жыл бұрын
FUCDT That's a strawman and you know it!
@fucdt6 жыл бұрын
the strawman now has a gun in the wizard of oz. go figure. anything is possible now
@LBBstore6 жыл бұрын
BBC admits 70% of airspace is not covered and tracked and yet FE researchers are expected to cover the world. Quite an unreasonable request and this is why dishonest request it. Anything to ensure we do not scrutinize and test the current model.
@mikecrownshaw16466 жыл бұрын
LBBstore Flat Earth my growing list (update 8/20/18 9:37:pm) 1) satellites A) If they are fake why is my tv dish pointed away from the cellphone towers? Without giving my location away I'll just say that my home is at the northern most part of the town i live in and my tv sat dish is pointed towards the direction of a mountain range I checked with both Google Maps and binoculars and there are no towers up there. B) Why is there a gas station with a dish up on it's roof pointed away from the cellphone tower in the parking lot? C) Why does GPS work in the ocean but phone calls will not? D) during a thunderstorm in the Northeast USA my mother looses sattalite signal and can't watch tv while she can still make cellphone calls this should not happen if sat tv used cellphone towers. according to many flatearthers gps is done by cellphone towers. A - D addresses those now on to the underwater cables ideas that were floated. E) so we apparently mapped 100% of the ocean floors F) cables do not broadcast gps signals you need sattalites in orbit and antennas or other receivers on the ground, on your phone and on top of airplanes. (Underwater cables being used for gps or cellphone towers would mean aircraft would have to move their antennas to the bottom) G) you lot think we have millions or billions of miles of underwater cables but no fishing ships, recreational boaters have ever pulled up one of these cables. No ships or aircraft that sank to the bottom of the ocean ever hit a cable. You have better odds of getting hit by lightening while hitting the lottery 10 times in a row. H) claim: airplanes loose GPS over the southern HEMISPHERE (first problem is you said hemisphere and used it in conjunction with a flat earth model) That's because flight tracking sites such as FlightAware and FlightRadar24 are displaying radar data via ADS-B receivers. Over vast expanses of ocean-North & South Atlantic and Pacific- there are no radar sites and thus no way to track flights. It would require the aircraft to transmit their location via radio to a ground station, which can be done since they have long range communication or even satellite communications. GPS, of course, works by reception only; the GPS receiver in the plane receives signals from GPS satellites and calculates its position for display to the pilot. The GPS satellites are clueless about plane’s location. That information would have to be transmitted back through a radio communications system, and usually that information just goes back to the airline headquarters, not ATC. It is fun to see a flight disappear off oceanic coverage, then calculate its track and attempt to re-acquire it as it approaches land fall. The Time of Arrival has been provided by the tracking service. I) sattalites are balloons or aircraft claim: Gps sattalites requires fixed (not moving) orbits to work properly. Balloons would have to be tethered to the ground to stay stationery (not moving) then you have the issue that eventually they will pop. Airplanes move constantly. J) the Google car. The Google maps car is for street view. (The view you as a vehicle driver will see.) The sattalites take pictures of the tops of things but can't image how things look from the point of view of a car driver. 2) Sun/Moon sets Perspective on a Globe: What we DO see is the sun or moon setting below the ocean while NOT getting smaller or farther away. ---- Perspective with flat Earth: If Earth were flat with a small close sun it SHOULD stay at the same height while getting smaller as it moves farther away same as an airplane. Funny how we NEVER see it this way. 3) the bible If you think the bible says earth is flat then why isn't flat earth square or rectangular in shape? Frisbees have no corners. (I have more information on this but it's too long to add here so if needed I'll make a second post) 4) Admiral Byrd steemit.com/flatearth/@kerriknox/debunking-the-flat-earth-admiral-byrd-conspiracy-part-3-of-4-the-flat-earth-antarctica-conspiracy 5) Earth has been mapped If no one can 100% prove the shape of Earth then how is Google Maps correct so damn often? Seriously i used it to travel from Schenectady NY to North Las Vegas Nevada and it's route and distances were never off by more than 50 feet when we went through some massive thunder storm and no more than 15 feet on clear days and that was in 2013. Now in 2018 the Google Maps app is even more accurate and never off by more than 5 feet. This couldn't happen if Earth were not mapped accurately with Earth's shape known. 6) hiding god A) How can the shape of earth hide god? B) if something as simple as the Earth's shape can hide the flat earth god maybe he isn't all powerful after all. C) man made clouds hide the shape of earth. How is this possible especially in areas that rarely have any cloud cover? 7) The icewall: On your flat Earth Gleeson map the icewall is only 300 miles away from the southern beaches of Australia and many flat earthers claim their p900 can see 500 miles away. So why is there no flat earther p900 shot of the icewall? 8) TIDES: A) You lot seem to think electromagnetism controls the tides. If that were true then explain. How a full moon produces the highest high tides. How the tides change on a regular time frame. Electro magnetism can't cause tides like Gravity does. Example full moon high tides and the recent full blue blood moon high tides were the highest in decades. This was documented on the show deadliest catch and i have friends who live near oceans and the great lakes who told me they never saw tides that high in their lifetime and they range between 25 and 70 years old. B) Boyency and Density can't change the tides as they are properties that the force of gravity causes. C) www.quora.com/Why-can%E2%80%99t-physics-prove-that-gravity-is-an-electromagnetic-force-When-I-heat-ice-cubes-on-a-hotplate-the-cubes-get-heavier-have-greater-intrinsic-gravity-and-become-electromagnetically-active-So-gravity-radiates-electromagnetic-force-into-cold www.quora.com/Gravity-doesnt-exist-its-all-density-and-buoyancy-How-should-I-argue-with-a-Flat-Earther 9) NASA images of Earth As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 10) does NASA mean to deceive? Not quite. The verb נָשָׂא (/nasa/) actually means lift or carry (or marry). However, the archaic verb נָשָׁא (/nasha/) does mean to deceive, though it is not attested in that form in the Bible, only in derived forms such as נִשָּׁא /nisha/ and הִשִּׁיא /hishi/. Regarding the claim in another answer that Hebrew had no concept of acronyms: that is incorrect. In fact, acronyms in Hebrew long predate those in English (in part due to the consonantal script). In fact, Hebrew has some of the oldest attested acronyms in the world, dating back close to 2000 years. 11) Earth's spin A) 1000mph on the Earth sounds fast but it's really slow. The earth only does one full 360° in a little over 24 hours. The hour hand on an analog clock makes 2 full 360° spins in the same 24 hours B) Your train analogy is very flawed but I'll work with it anyhow. The train has to accelerate to get up to speed, the earth does not. Once the train is at a constant speed you will not feel it, guess what the earths spin is a constant speed all day every day. The train will follow the tracks so you *might* feel some movement if it goes too fast around a corner, again the earth does spin constantly and does not go around any corners. The train will slow down to stop and you feel decelerating force, the earth does not slow down so no change in force. 12) As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 13) The first surface circumnavigation via both the geographical Poles was achieved by Sir Ranulph Fiennes and Charles Burton (both UK) of the British Trans-Globe Expedition. They travelled south from Greenwich, London, UK on 2 September 1979, crossed the South Pole on 15 December 1980, the North Pole on 10 April 1982, and returned to Greenwich on 29 August 1982 after a 56,000 km (35,000 mile) journey. 14) claim: The Moon is a only a light or self illuminating A. If it's only a light your problem is it has hills and valleys like rocks do. No other lights has crators. B. If it's a solid rock then your problem is no other rocks self illuminates. -- Sent from Fast notepad
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
@lbbstore, your joking right? this has nothing to do with airspace its simple, sailing distances between known points, knowns for 500 years. stop making excuses and resolve the basic locations.
@LBBstore6 жыл бұрын
TJ Jones Flat Earth Crush heart Map... You can also google Einsenhauer Planisphere based off of the Gleason’s Map. Where will you send that money too? Never make these cowardly online bets you will not back up!
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
Lb., the money will be sent to any address you like. Just show us the map, don't tell us to Google it if you want to claim the money. It's all yours just show us the map, a single flat map of the earth , in reasonable detail so that we can print it on an 11x17 piece of paper and verify that the map is accurate. What's the big deal? Why would you tell us to Google it instead of claiming your prize?
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
So lb., you have $20,000 waiting for your map. You'd be a fool not to take it.
@alancrabb6 жыл бұрын
Serious researchers might be intrigued by this : kzbin.info/www/bejne/p6PQdq2Inq-Ziqc "Flat Earth : It's Time to Up our Game"
@alancrabb6 жыл бұрын
Apologies Kevin D : I see you already linked to it. Good stuff though, eh?
@edgewyze73526 жыл бұрын
Show one example of navigating with a sphere. Every map is flat or a distorted projection. Hey! Take a picture of the curvature🤮
EdgE : why 'nope'? Actually, don't bother, I think we all know. How about a 'nope' for this : tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/gallery/apollo/AS10_Hasselblad%20(70%20mm)/list#AS10-27-3980 Image ID: AS10-27-3980 Program: Apollo Mission #: 10 Frame #: 3980 Magazine: 27 Camera: Hasselblad Lens: 70 mm Film Type: color
@peterpoop77606 жыл бұрын
EdgE WyzE "nope" Is that all your poor brain can manage? If you have any other opinion, then present your evidence. "Show one example of navigating with a sphere. " Every intercontinental flight. Every long distance ship's voyage. "Every map is flat or a distorted projection. " Then there's the FE "map" which is delusion.
@mikecrownshaw16466 жыл бұрын
EdgE WyzE Flat Earth my growing list (update 8/20/18 9:37:pm) 1) satellites A) If they are fake why is my tv dish pointed away from the cellphone towers? Without giving my location away I'll just say that my home is at the northern most part of the town i live in and my tv sat dish is pointed towards the direction of a mountain range I checked with both Google Maps and binoculars and there are no towers up there. B) Why is there a gas station with a dish up on it's roof pointed away from the cellphone tower in the parking lot? C) Why does GPS work in the ocean but phone calls will not? D) during a thunderstorm in the Northeast USA my mother looses sattalite signal and can't watch tv while she can still make cellphone calls this should not happen if sat tv used cellphone towers. according to many flatearthers gps is done by cellphone towers. A - D addresses those now on to the underwater cables ideas that were floated. E) so we apparently mapped 100% of the ocean floors F) cables do not broadcast gps signals you need sattalites in orbit and antennas or other receivers on the ground, on your phone and on top of airplanes. (Underwater cables being used for gps or cellphone towers would mean aircraft would have to move their antennas to the bottom) G) you lot think we have millions or billions of miles of underwater cables but no fishing ships, recreational boaters have ever pulled up one of these cables. No ships or aircraft that sank to the bottom of the ocean ever hit a cable. You have better odds of getting hit by lightening while hitting the lottery 10 times in a row. H) claim: airplanes loose GPS over the southern HEMISPHERE (first problem is you said hemisphere and used it in conjunction with a flat earth model) That's because flight tracking sites such as FlightAware and FlightRadar24 are displaying radar data via ADS-B receivers. Over vast expanses of ocean-North & South Atlantic and Pacific- there are no radar sites and thus no way to track flights. It would require the aircraft to transmit their location via radio to a ground station, which can be done since they have long range communication or even satellite communications. GPS, of course, works by reception only; the GPS receiver in the plane receives signals from GPS satellites and calculates its position for display to the pilot. The GPS satellites are clueless about plane’s location. That information would have to be transmitted back through a radio communications system, and usually that information just goes back to the airline headquarters, not ATC. It is fun to see a flight disappear off oceanic coverage, then calculate its track and attempt to re-acquire it as it approaches land fall. The Time of Arrival has been provided by the tracking service. I) sattalites are balloons or aircraft claim: Gps sattalites requires fixed (not moving) orbits to work properly. Balloons would have to be tethered to the ground to stay stationery (not moving) then you have the issue that eventually they will pop. Airplanes move constantly. J) the Google car. The Google maps car is for street view. (The view you as a vehicle driver will see.) The sattalites take pictures of the tops of things but can't image how things look from the point of view of a car driver. 2) Sun/Moon sets Perspective on a Globe: What we DO see is the sun or moon setting below the ocean while NOT getting smaller or farther away. ---- Perspective with flat Earth: If Earth were flat with a small close sun it SHOULD stay at the same height while getting smaller as it moves farther away same as an airplane. Funny how we NEVER see it this way. 3) the bible If you think the bible says earth is flat then why isn't flat earth square or rectangular in shape? Frisbees have no corners. (I have more information on this but it's too long to add here so if needed I'll make a second post) 4) Admiral Byrd steemit.com/flatearth/@kerriknox/debunking-the-flat-earth-admiral-byrd-conspiracy-part-3-of-4-the-flat-earth-antarctica-conspiracy 5) Earth has been mapped If no one can 100% prove the shape of Earth then how is Google Maps correct so damn often? Seriously i used it to travel from Schenectady NY to North Las Vegas Nevada and it's route and distances were never off by more than 50 feet when we went through some massive thunder storm and no more than 15 feet on clear days and that was in 2013. Now in 2018 the Google Maps app is even more accurate and never off by more than 5 feet. This couldn't happen if Earth were not mapped accurately with Earth's shape known. 6) hiding god A) How can the shape of earth hide god? B) if something as simple as the Earth's shape can hide the flat earth god maybe he isn't all powerful after all. C) man made clouds hide the shape of earth. How is this possible especially in areas that rarely have any cloud cover? 7) The icewall: On your flat Earth Gleeson map the icewall is only 300 miles away from the southern beaches of Australia and many flat earthers claim their p900 can see 500 miles away. So why is there no flat earther p900 shot of the icewall? 8) TIDES: A) You lot seem to think electromagnetism controls the tides. If that were true then explain. How a full moon produces the highest high tides. How the tides change on a regular time frame. Electro magnetism can't cause tides like Gravity does. Example full moon high tides and the recent full blue blood moon high tides were the highest in decades. This was documented on the show deadliest catch and i have friends who live near oceans and the great lakes who told me they never saw tides that high in their lifetime and they range between 25 and 70 years old. B) Boyency and Density can't change the tides as they are properties that the force of gravity causes. C) www.quora.com/Why-can%E2%80%99t-physics-prove-that-gravity-is-an-electromagnetic-force-When-I-heat-ice-cubes-on-a-hotplate-the-cubes-get-heavier-have-greater-intrinsic-gravity-and-become-electromagnetically-active-So-gravity-radiates-electromagnetic-force-into-cold www.quora.com/Gravity-doesnt-exist-its-all-density-and-buoyancy-How-should-I-argue-with-a-Flat-Earther 9) NASA images of Earth As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 10) does NASA mean to deceive? Not quite. The verb נָשָׂא (/nasa/) actually means lift or carry (or marry). However, the archaic verb נָשָׁא (/nasha/) does mean to deceive, though it is not attested in that form in the Bible, only in derived forms such as נִשָּׁא /nisha/ and הִשִּׁיא /hishi/. Regarding the claim in another answer that Hebrew had no concept of acronyms: that is incorrect. In fact, acronyms in Hebrew long predate those in English (in part due to the consonantal script). In fact, Hebrew has some of the oldest attested acronyms in the world, dating back close to 2000 years. 11) Earth's spin A) 1000mph on the Earth sounds fast but it's really slow. The earth only does one full 360° in a little over 24 hours. The hour hand on an analog clock makes 2 full 360° spins in the same 24 hours B) Your train analogy is very flawed but I'll work with it anyhow. The train has to accelerate to get up to speed, the earth does not. Once the train is at a constant speed you will not feel it, guess what the earths spin is a constant speed all day every day. The train will follow the tracks so you *might* feel some movement if it goes too fast around a corner, again the earth does spin constantly and does not go around any corners. The train will slow down to stop and you feel decelerating force, the earth does not slow down so no change in force. 12) As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 13) The first surface circumnavigation via both the geographical Poles was achieved by Sir Ranulph Fiennes and Charles Burton (both UK) of the British Trans-Globe Expedition. They travelled south from Greenwich, London, UK on 2 September 1979, crossed the South Pole on 15 December 1980, the North Pole on 10 April 1982, and returned to Greenwich on 29 August 1982 after a 56,000 km (35,000 mile) journey. 14) claim: The Moon is a only a light or self illuminating A. If it's only a light your problem is it has hills and valleys like rocks do. No other lights has crators. B. If it's a solid rock then your problem is no other rocks self illuminates. -- Sent from Fast notepad
@dolfinoff49256 жыл бұрын
Came for the Globe... Stayed for the Peavey! Is that a Rage 158? Anyways, great demonstration. Here is something very similar. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gn6yoWmGoqmjppY
@the-flatulator6 жыл бұрын
Flat earth map is totally accurate after drinking 2 dozen tequilas and popping some hallucinogenic drugs. Now reduce your IQ by half and take a look at the map. It's accurate now! :)
@arthurlewis91936 жыл бұрын
Kansas' is the possessive. You probably mean Kansases.
@-Fritz-6 жыл бұрын
If you get the flat earth AE map, and stretch it around a globe it works perfectly :)
@jonathanleslie91006 жыл бұрын
hadn't thought of that. oh dear. ;)
@chriscreek85776 жыл бұрын
No one has an accurate flat earth map,because the MOST HIGH said,"NO man can know the size of the FLAT plain..the earth is flat and ONLY the Creator knows the size,nasa ARE demons fooling sheeple into devaluing themselves and the Creator
@alancrabb6 жыл бұрын
chris creek : "the MOST HIGH said,"NO man can know the size of the FLAT plain." Would you care to tell us the source for this? Thanks.
@FSLTL6 жыл бұрын
This actually makes sense. 'No man can know the size of the flat plain', because there isn't one. It's spherical....
@mikecrownshaw16466 жыл бұрын
chris creek Flat Earth my growing list (update 8/20/18 9:37:pm) 1) satellites A) If they are fake why is my tv dish pointed away from the cellphone towers? Without giving my location away I'll just say that my home is at the northern most part of the town i live in and my tv sat dish is pointed towards the direction of a mountain range I checked with both Google Maps and binoculars and there are no towers up there. B) Why is there a gas station with a dish up on it's roof pointed away from the cellphone tower in the parking lot? C) Why does GPS work in the ocean but phone calls will not? D) during a thunderstorm in the Northeast USA my mother looses sattalite signal and can't watch tv while she can still make cellphone calls this should not happen if sat tv used cellphone towers. according to many flatearthers gps is done by cellphone towers. A - D addresses those now on to the underwater cables ideas that were floated. E) so we apparently mapped 100% of the ocean floors F) cables do not broadcast gps signals you need sattalites in orbit and antennas or other receivers on the ground, on your phone and on top of airplanes. (Underwater cables being used for gps or cellphone towers would mean aircraft would have to move their antennas to the bottom) G) you lot think we have millions or billions of miles of underwater cables but no fishing ships, recreational boaters have ever pulled up one of these cables. No ships or aircraft that sank to the bottom of the ocean ever hit a cable. You have better odds of getting hit by lightening while hitting the lottery 10 times in a row. H) claim: airplanes loose GPS over the southern HEMISPHERE (first problem is you said hemisphere and used it in conjunction with a flat earth model) That's because flight tracking sites such as FlightAware and FlightRadar24 are displaying radar data via ADS-B receivers. Over vast expanses of ocean-North & South Atlantic and Pacific- there are no radar sites and thus no way to track flights. It would require the aircraft to transmit their location via radio to a ground station, which can be done since they have long range communication or even satellite communications. GPS, of course, works by reception only; the GPS receiver in the plane receives signals from GPS satellites and calculates its position for display to the pilot. The GPS satellites are clueless about plane’s location. That information would have to be transmitted back through a radio communications system, and usually that information just goes back to the airline headquarters, not ATC. It is fun to see a flight disappear off oceanic coverage, then calculate its track and attempt to re-acquire it as it approaches land fall. The Time of Arrival has been provided by the tracking service. I) sattalites are balloons or aircraft claim: Gps sattalites requires fixed (not moving) orbits to work properly. Balloons would have to be tethered to the ground to stay stationery (not moving) then you have the issue that eventually they will pop. Airplanes move constantly. J) the Google car. The Google maps car is for street view. (The view you as a vehicle driver will see.) The sattalites take pictures of the tops of things but can't image how things look from the point of view of a car driver. 2) Sun/Moon sets Perspective on a Globe: What we DO see is the sun or moon setting below the ocean while NOT getting smaller or farther away. ---- Perspective with flat Earth: If Earth were flat with a small close sun it SHOULD stay at the same height while getting smaller as it moves farther away same as an airplane. Funny how we NEVER see it this way. 3) the bible If you think the bible says earth is flat then why isn't flat earth square or rectangular in shape? Frisbees have no corners. (I have more information on this but it's too long to add here so if needed I'll make a second post) 4) Admiral Byrd steemit.com/flatearth/@kerriknox/debunking-the-flat-earth-admiral-byrd-conspiracy-part-3-of-4-the-flat-earth-antarctica-conspiracy 5) Earth has been mapped If no one can 100% prove the shape of Earth then how is Google Maps correct so damn often? Seriously i used it to travel from Schenectady NY to North Las Vegas Nevada and it's route and distances were never off by more than 50 feet when we went through some massive thunder storm and no more than 15 feet on clear days and that was in 2013. Now in 2018 the Google Maps app is even more accurate and never off by more than 5 feet. This couldn't happen if Earth were not mapped accurately with Earth's shape known. 6) hiding god A) How can the shape of earth hide god? B) if something as simple as the Earth's shape can hide the flat earth god maybe he isn't all powerful after all. C) man made clouds hide the shape of earth. How is this possible especially in areas that rarely have any cloud cover? 7) The icewall: On your flat Earth Gleeson map the icewall is only 300 miles away from the southern beaches of Australia and many flat earthers claim their p900 can see 500 miles away. So why is there no flat earther p900 shot of the icewall? 8) TIDES: A) You lot seem to think electromagnetism controls the tides. If that were true then explain. How a full moon produces the highest high tides. How the tides change on a regular time frame. Electro magnetism can't cause tides like Gravity does. Example full moon high tides and the recent full blue blood moon high tides were the highest in decades. This was documented on the show deadliest catch and i have friends who live near oceans and the great lakes who told me they never saw tides that high in their lifetime and they range between 25 and 70 years old. B) Boyency and Density can't change the tides as they are properties that the force of gravity causes. C) www.quora.com/Why-can%E2%80%99t-physics-prove-that-gravity-is-an-electromagnetic-force-When-I-heat-ice-cubes-on-a-hotplate-the-cubes-get-heavier-have-greater-intrinsic-gravity-and-become-electromagnetically-active-So-gravity-radiates-electromagnetic-force-into-cold www.quora.com/Gravity-doesnt-exist-its-all-density-and-buoyancy-How-should-I-argue-with-a-Flat-Earther 9) NASA images of Earth As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 10) does NASA mean to deceive? Not quite. The verb נָשָׂא (/nasa/) actually means lift or carry (or marry). However, the archaic verb נָשָׁא (/nasha/) does mean to deceive, though it is not attested in that form in the Bible, only in derived forms such as נִשָּׁא /nisha/ and הִשִּׁיא /hishi/. Regarding the claim in another answer that Hebrew had no concept of acronyms: that is incorrect. In fact, acronyms in Hebrew long predate those in English (in part due to the consonantal script). In fact, Hebrew has some of the oldest attested acronyms in the world, dating back close to 2000 years. 11) Earth's spin A) 1000mph on the Earth sounds fast but it's really slow. The earth only does one full 360° in a little over 24 hours. The hour hand on an analog clock makes 2 full 360° spins in the same 24 hours B) Your train analogy is very flawed but I'll work with it anyhow. The train has to accelerate to get up to speed, the earth does not. Once the train is at a constant speed you will not feel it, guess what the earths spin is a constant speed all day every day. The train will follow the tracks so you *might* feel some movement if it goes too fast around a corner, again the earth does spin constantly and does not go around any corners. The train will slow down to stop and you feel decelerating force, the earth does not slow down so no change in force. 12) As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 13) The first surface circumnavigation via both the geographical Poles was achieved by Sir Ranulph Fiennes and Charles Burton (both UK) of the British Trans-Globe Expedition. They travelled south from Greenwich, London, UK on 2 September 1979, crossed the South Pole on 15 December 1980, the North Pole on 10 April 1982, and returned to Greenwich on 29 August 1982 after a 56,000 km (35,000 mile) journey. 14) claim: The Moon is a only a light or self illuminating A. If it's only a light your problem is it has hills and valleys like rocks do. No other lights has crators. B. If it's a solid rock then your problem is no other rocks self illuminates. -- Sent from Fast notepad
@duncanmcneill70886 жыл бұрын
chris creek - I think whoever said that MUST have been high. Kids, just say no to drugs.
@larryscott39826 жыл бұрын
chris creek Finally truth. The most high pot smokers are at a disadvantage in 3D spatial comprehension. That is what MOST HIGH means, as in Most inebriated and deluded.
@existdissolve6 жыл бұрын
Your experiments are flawed in a few areas. First, you are using math to calculate things. Math is not allowed! Second, you are "measuring"...come on, measurements aren't allowed! J/K, good video :)
@edgewyze73526 жыл бұрын
Says the guy believing satellites broadcast TV from 20+ thousand miles away.
@alancrabb6 жыл бұрын
EdgE : Did it over 60 years go : Here's the science that went into it : ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650012051.pdf And here's how they actually did it : ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710015677.pdf
@Reqnaw106 жыл бұрын
existdissolve. Very true. I was embarrassed about the lack of a map of the FE. Then I came across Flat Out. He is the towering genius of the FE community and his progress with mapping the FE is exceptional; as he shows us in this short video. kzbin.info/www/bejne/p6PQdq2Inq-Ziqc
@FSLTL6 жыл бұрын
+Edge WyzE Yes, they broadcast TV from 20+ miles away, true. Why don't you come with proof it isn't true, shouldn't be too difficult to do. It's so easy to just discard everything as fake. That's the only thing FE can do. Come with some hard evidence for once.
@mikecrownshaw16466 жыл бұрын
EdgE WyzE Flat Earth my growing list (update 8/20/18 9:37:pm) 1) satellites A) If they are fake why is my tv dish pointed away from the cellphone towers? Without giving my location away I'll just say that my home is at the northern most part of the town i live in and my tv sat dish is pointed towards the direction of a mountain range I checked with both Google Maps and binoculars and there are no towers up there. B) Why is there a gas station with a dish up on it's roof pointed away from the cellphone tower in the parking lot? C) Why does GPS work in the ocean but phone calls will not? D) during a thunderstorm in the Northeast USA my mother looses sattalite signal and can't watch tv while she can still make cellphone calls this should not happen if sat tv used cellphone towers. according to many flatearthers gps is done by cellphone towers. A - D addresses those now on to the underwater cables ideas that were floated. E) so we apparently mapped 100% of the ocean floors F) cables do not broadcast gps signals you need sattalites in orbit and antennas or other receivers on the ground, on your phone and on top of airplanes. (Underwater cables being used for gps or cellphone towers would mean aircraft would have to move their antennas to the bottom) G) you lot think we have millions or billions of miles of underwater cables but no fishing ships, recreational boaters have ever pulled up one of these cables. No ships or aircraft that sank to the bottom of the ocean ever hit a cable. You have better odds of getting hit by lightening while hitting the lottery 10 times in a row. H) claim: airplanes loose GPS over the southern HEMISPHERE (first problem is you said hemisphere and used it in conjunction with a flat earth model) That's because flight tracking sites such as FlightAware and FlightRadar24 are displaying radar data via ADS-B receivers. Over vast expanses of ocean-North & South Atlantic and Pacific- there are no radar sites and thus no way to track flights. It would require the aircraft to transmit their location via radio to a ground station, which can be done since they have long range communication or even satellite communications. GPS, of course, works by reception only; the GPS receiver in the plane receives signals from GPS satellites and calculates its position for display to the pilot. The GPS satellites are clueless about plane’s location. That information would have to be transmitted back through a radio communications system, and usually that information just goes back to the airline headquarters, not ATC. It is fun to see a flight disappear off oceanic coverage, then calculate its track and attempt to re-acquire it as it approaches land fall. The Time of Arrival has been provided by the tracking service. I) sattalites are balloons or aircraft claim: Gps sattalites requires fixed (not moving) orbits to work properly. Balloons would have to be tethered to the ground to stay stationery (not moving) then you have the issue that eventually they will pop. Airplanes move constantly. J) the Google car. The Google maps car is for street view. (The view you as a vehicle driver will see.) The sattalites take pictures of the tops of things but can't image how things look from the point of view of a car driver. 2) Sun/Moon sets Perspective on a Globe: What we DO see is the sun or moon setting below the ocean while NOT getting smaller or farther away. ---- Perspective with flat Earth: If Earth were flat with a small close sun it SHOULD stay at the same height while getting smaller as it moves farther away same as an airplane. Funny how we NEVER see it this way. 3) the bible If you think the bible says earth is flat then why isn't flat earth square or rectangular in shape? Frisbees have no corners. (I have more information on this but it's too long to add here so if needed I'll make a second post) 4) Admiral Byrd steemit.com/flatearth/@kerriknox/debunking-the-flat-earth-admiral-byrd-conspiracy-part-3-of-4-the-flat-earth-antarctica-conspiracy 5) Earth has been mapped If no one can 100% prove the shape of Earth then how is Google Maps correct so damn often? Seriously i used it to travel from Schenectady NY to North Las Vegas Nevada and it's route and distances were never off by more than 50 feet when we went through some massive thunder storm and no more than 15 feet on clear days and that was in 2013. Now in 2018 the Google Maps app is even more accurate and never off by more than 5 feet. This couldn't happen if Earth were not mapped accurately with Earth's shape known. 6) hiding god A) How can the shape of earth hide god? B) if something as simple as the Earth's shape can hide the flat earth god maybe he isn't all powerful after all. C) man made clouds hide the shape of earth. How is this possible especially in areas that rarely have any cloud cover? 7) The icewall: On your flat Earth Gleeson map the icewall is only 300 miles away from the southern beaches of Australia and many flat earthers claim their p900 can see 500 miles away. So why is there no flat earther p900 shot of the icewall? 8) TIDES: A) You lot seem to think electromagnetism controls the tides. If that were true then explain. How a full moon produces the highest high tides. How the tides change on a regular time frame. Electro magnetism can't cause tides like Gravity does. Example full moon high tides and the recent full blue blood moon high tides were the highest in decades. This was documented on the show deadliest catch and i have friends who live near oceans and the great lakes who told me they never saw tides that high in their lifetime and they range between 25 and 70 years old. B) Boyency and Density can't change the tides as they are properties that the force of gravity causes. C) www.quora.com/Why-can%E2%80%99t-physics-prove-that-gravity-is-an-electromagnetic-force-When-I-heat-ice-cubes-on-a-hotplate-the-cubes-get-heavier-have-greater-intrinsic-gravity-and-become-electromagnetically-active-So-gravity-radiates-electromagnetic-force-into-cold www.quora.com/Gravity-doesnt-exist-its-all-density-and-buoyancy-How-should-I-argue-with-a-Flat-Earther 9) NASA images of Earth As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 10) does NASA mean to deceive? Not quite. The verb נָשָׂא (/nasa/) actually means lift or carry (or marry). However, the archaic verb נָשָׁא (/nasha/) does mean to deceive, though it is not attested in that form in the Bible, only in derived forms such as נִשָּׁא /nisha/ and הִשִּׁיא /hishi/. Regarding the claim in another answer that Hebrew had no concept of acronyms: that is incorrect. In fact, acronyms in Hebrew long predate those in English (in part due to the consonantal script). In fact, Hebrew has some of the oldest attested acronyms in the world, dating back close to 2000 years. 11) Earth's spin A) 1000mph on the Earth sounds fast but it's really slow. The earth only does one full 360° in a little over 24 hours. The hour hand on an analog clock makes 2 full 360° spins in the same 24 hours B) Your train analogy is very flawed but I'll work with it anyhow. The train has to accelerate to get up to speed, the earth does not. Once the train is at a constant speed you will not feel it, guess what the earths spin is a constant speed all day every day. The train will follow the tracks so you *might* feel some movement if it goes too fast around a corner, again the earth does spin constantly and does not go around any corners. The train will slow down to stop and you feel decelerating force, the earth does not slow down so no change in force. 12) As for pictures of earth being Photoshoped. If i want to use my cellphone to take a picture of my street i will have to take several pictures as i can't stand back far enough to get all of one side in a single shot. Now if i want a single picture I'll have to use photos shop to stitch the images together to have just 1 image. Then go to kinko to use a special printer to print the extra long image onto paper. NASA has to stitch images of Earth together for the same reasons there's no 1 sattalite at the distance needed to get the entire earth in a single shot. Some have said why not use the Hubble telescope. It's too close to the earth and being a telescope it would be like reading a newspaper you're holding with binoculars. 13) The first surface circumnavigation via both the geographical Poles was achieved by Sir Ranulph Fiennes and Charles Burton (both UK) of the British Trans-Globe Expedition. They travelled south from Greenwich, London, UK on 2 September 1979, crossed the South Pole on 15 December 1980, the North Pole on 10 April 1982, and returned to Greenwich on 29 August 1982 after a 56,000 km (35,000 mile) journey. 14) claim: The Moon is a only a light or self illuminating A. If it's only a light your problem is it has hills and valleys like rocks do. No other lights has crators. B. If it's a solid rock then your problem is no other rocks self illuminates. -- Sent from Fast notepad