No not at all

Wtf is wrong with this "hindu right-wing organisation" This is a real incident. I am sure these organization people belong to these days' "so called dhongi babas" who definitely wouldn't appreciate such a movie.

Achhi movie he andh bhakto ko dekhni chahiye

What ever is showing in this movie is exaggerated,it is the creation of brainwashing Jihadis of Bollywood, boycott Bollywood,I acknowledge there are some brahims who are narcissistic and caste descriminating but they never sexually abuse women, Mughals are the ones who sexually assaulted women,this movie is work of the brainwashing jihadis, boycott this movie, boycott Bollywood.

The film focuses extensively on falsehoods about Karsandas Mulji, presenting him as a devout follower of Lord Krishna and a believer in Puranic deities, which contradicts historical records and his own statements in Maharaj Libel case. In reality, Karsandas Mulji was a critic of Puranic deities and did not believe in the stories of Lord Krishna's Ras Leela, which he described as false and amorous. His statements during the Maharaj Libel case, documented in his Gujarati newspaper "Satya Prakash" on October 21, 1860, reflect his disbelief in the Puranic texts and his systematic attack on Hinduism as part of a broader British colonial conspiracy. 1. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that all the Hindū Sanātana sects arisen in KaliYug are false “…the sect of the Maharajas has arisen in the KaliYug, therefore, according to the doctrines of the Shastras, it must be false ...” - “Satyaprakash” Gujarati Newspaper of 21st Oct, 1860 by Karsandas Mooljee 2. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that the stories of Lord Krishna, Gopees, Raas lila are false and amorous. “…The story of the "gopees" and the incarnations of Vishnoo are believed in by several sects, but are opposed to the ancient religion. The Shaivites believe in the incarnations of Vishnoo equally with the Vaishnayas. As far as I have reacl, all the sacred books do not contain amorous passages. I am not aware whether Sir William Jones has said that "Krishna is to this day the darling god of Hindū women." I have heard the story of Brahma coming out of an egg after remaining three millions and millions of years. I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Veds, which 1 have not read. The stories are considered by most Vaishnavas are literally true…” - Karsandas Mooljee, cross-examination by Mr. Bayley as part of Maharaj libel case proceedings (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) 3. Karsandas Mooljee accepting that he has not read the Hindū Sanātana texts and does not believe in any texts apart from Veds. Hindū Sanātana believes in multiple texts as its foundational and core texts including Ved, Puranas, Smriti, Tantra agama, Itihaas, and Vedant. “…I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Vedas, which 1 have not read…” - (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) Inaccuracies in the movie (as compared to Maharaj Libel case proceedings) The movie contains several inaccuracies regarding the beliefs and practices of the Pushtimarg sect. During the trial, the movie shows Karsandas explaining the correct meaning of Brahma Sambandh to the court, which was that all things are to be offered only to Lord Krishna and not to the Maharaja. However, this stand was actually taken by Jadunathji Maharaj in the real-life proceedings of the Maharaj Libel case. In fact, Karsandas Mulji maliciously and scandalously tried to prove to the court, by mistranslating the commentary verses of the Brahma Sambandh mantra by Gokulnathji (one of the Acharyas of Pushtimarg), and twisting the translation to mean that everything should be offered to the Maharaja and not to Krishna. This portrayal presents views that are far from the reality about Karsandas. The dialogues delivered on Brahma Sambandh by Karsandas in the movie were actually said by Jadunathji Maharaj as per the Maharaj Libel case proceedings. In the film "Maharaj," the facts of the historical Maharaj Libel case have been significantly distorted, especially in the pivotal trial scene. The movie inaccurately portrays the dialogue exchange between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj concerning the Brahmasambandha mantra, thereby misleading the audience about the actual events and character representations. Misrepresentation of Dialogues In the movie, the dialogues between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj during the trial are swapped, leading to a skewed portrayal of their respective positions. The film shows Jadunathji Maharaj accepting the Brahmasambandha mantra to mean that followers must offer their wives to the Maharajas. This is a gross mis-presentation of the historical records. In reality, it was Karsandas Mulji who presented this erroneous and defamatory interpretation in the court, not Jadunathji Maharaj. Historical Facts According to the actual case proceedings, it was Karsandas Mulji who twisted the meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra to suggest that the entire sect, including its original Acharyas, endorsed heretical practices. This misrepresentation aimed to malign the Pushtimarg sect and its spiritual leaders. Karsandas's allegations were part of a broader attempt to depict the sect as morally corrupt and its practices as deviant. Jadunathji Maharaj's Defense Contrary to the film's portrayal, Jadunathji Maharaj defended the true meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra in court. He clarified that the mantra meant all offerings should be made to Lord Krishna, not to the Maharajas. Furthermore, Jadunathji Maharaj acknowledged in the court that he was not a deity but a guru, emphasizing his role as a spiritual guide rather than a divine figure. This critical defense by Jadunathji Maharaj was aimed at correcting the false narratives presented by Karsandas Mulji and maintaining the integrity of the Pushtimarg sect's teachings. Character Assassination The film's portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj as a manipulative and heretical figure is a severe mischaracterization that strays far from the documented reality. By depicting him as someone who endorses immoral practices, the film unjustly vilifies him and misrepresents the true nature of his statements during the trial. This distortion not only damages his reputation but also misleads the audience about the fundamental principles of the Pushtimarg sect. 12 Reply

A66i movie ko hunesa India ban karta hai Aur America Praise karta hai That's why Hollywood is the Best ❤

Film is real

Nahi .. balki hindu ki asli garima ko darsaya hei ..

Islam mukt Bharat kro yrr kb tak muslim ka gulami kroge

Dekho jab keral story jhoti move ayi tab thess ki baat ni ayi.....ab Q aari bhai....sach samne aara katu

Hum film dharam ke liye nahi time paas ke liye dekhte hai

Bilkul nahi

I watched it and I want every religion to watch this movie

Jo hindu is is film se khafa he wo chahte he ki esa aaj bhi ho

Jadunath Sarkar photo is wrong

What about kerala ,Kashmir propaganda movies 😂😂😂

Nahi

We need to come out of casts for Reality movie was Fantastic, when true events going against Hindus in india where these Hindu right wings??? BUT they show their rights on this type of movies foolishnes

Film is real Not against HINDUS

very useful session sir thank you

Sir 11th se clat ki tayari kaise kare online batch kafi mehnga hai 😢

Can i prepare for clat within 3 months

Nahi

Must watch😃

Must watch for all the upcoming clat aspirants!

Hindu😂😂😂 pata nhi kab samjh ayega hindu ko

Thank you for the indepth analysis.

Good job

Wow❤

Free Sikkim free Khalistan free Kashmir

Tibbet has own culture, language, scripts Jay Sanatana, Jay Tibbet, Jay Hind.

Tibbet &Bharat Mansarobar Gurla Mangdhata Lasa Kailash Mahabharat. Jay Bharat, Jay Hind.

US going to pass H.R.533 resolution for Tibet China dispute act 2024

China can't care less about what India is saying about Tibet, just as India can't care less about what China is saying about Kashmir.

India dreams to have Tibet like Sikkim but she can not. She can only dream about it. Without the British, India will have nothing!

India is only raking up the Tibetan issue because the US is pushing it otherwise we were quiet about it all these years

Bharat Mata ki Jai 🙏 Jai Tibat 🙏

No sir, Tibet is not autonomous region of China and it's totally indepent country, it was conquered by red China in 195s, Tibet is highest country in the world.

सरजी, एक तो तिब्बत रीसोल्व बिल पर बाइडेन के हस्ताक्षर नहीं हुए है। और दूसरी बात भारत ने तिब्बत के २० या ३० जगहों के नाम बदले है। और इसीलिए तिब्बत चीन का अंग कदापि नहीं है, मतलब हमें सीओटी यानी चायना ओक्यूपाइड तिब्बत कहना चाहिए।

Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏🙏

Long live his holiness the great 14th Dalai Lama 🙏🙏🙏🏵️🏵️🏵️🌼🌼🌼🌷🌷🌷🌺🌺🌺🌹🌹🌹💐💐💐🕊️🕊️🕊️

Tibet is not part of china

Free Tibet ✊✊✊

Hindustan jindabad 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

You did not show the complete map of Tibet. There was no such things as Tibet autonomous region. It was just created by China after the occupation in 1959. The map you showed is just one province of Tibet called Utsang. You left out the other the other two provinces called Dhotoe & Dhomey .The three combined is the complete territory of what is called Tibet. Pls be careful not to be absorbed in Chinese propaganda and do more research before any presentation on public platforms. Thai you! ❤

👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏

Free Tibet!! 🙏🏻US🙏🏻India❤❤

Jai hind thank you India

Western part of Tibet is the home of Lord shiva lives with his wife parvati and his two children Om Namah Shivay 🙏

Tibet never meant to be ruled by Any LAAMAAs but only by the Shrongchong Gampo Emperors. Which element is responsible to dismantle the TAAIIIPHE the TIBETAN EMPERIRE and UPAAJONG the LAASAA ? Laamaas had no sovereign right to takeover the Imperial thrones. Write this statement on the walls. Justice to the last Tibetan Emperor is yet to be made.