The one photo towards the beginning from the A1 with the tight crop showed the best micro detail in this vid. I frequent a forum almost everyday & my impression is the Sony is better for this at longer distances & lower light. Not quite sure about Canon but they produce real high quality photos also. Nikon users produce some very nice photos also but not from as far as distances & in lower quality of light. Could be the editing , user's experience & wanting to post a photo that some might not post based on quality. For what it is worth, I still am shooting a Nikon D810 DSLR. I need sticky BIF AF & if going to upgrade the camera & lens to mirrorless also,,,, Depends on budget. On budget-If going with a tele-zoom in the 100-600mm zoom, rite now, Canon R5II with 100-500 or a good deal on a used Long EF lens. Prime lens new =Nikon Z8/9 with one of the PF 600/800 lenses when on sale. Money is no concern & the best keeper rate is most important, Sony A1/A1-2 with the 600 f4. Heck, even the Sony A7RV will keep focus using mechanical shutter but with a low buffer & shutter count. When a Green Heron is leaning off a fallen tree limb & stretching slowly just before that speedy lung into the water for a snack & jumps back up on to the limb. I want to catch that whole sequence of at least 10 photos tack sharp. Anyway, these choices are just my thoughts on seeing a lots & lots of post every week & watching quite a few vids. No you tube creator using multiple brands is going to go deep dive very detailed into the keeper rate scenario brands against each other (execpt Jared Polin & MAYBE the Northrups) because of the multi viewers watching & including the gear used vids get more views. =smart business. Heck, I can get some real nice photos with my D810/200-500 (& by no means is the D810 a wildlife camera) but a good percentage of them are at closer distances & in super nice light. Just that the keeper rate % is like 7 times lower than these new for action mirrorless systems.

@ I personally don't like the Sony color profile, and with my large hands I quickly get stuck between the lens and the camera grip of the Sony. Sony has some very nice wildlife lenses coming out. I shot with a Canon R3 for 3 years until 4 months ago. I really like the colors of the canon. In poor contrast conditions, the AF of the R3 also had a hard time, and I had to focus manually. The heavy weight was also something that often made me decide to leave the R3 at home on long walks. I have now been without a camera for 4 months now and am looking into a lighter camera system. If you often photograph from a photo hut or car, weight is not an issue, but if you like to walk, that is a different story. Good luck with your purchasing considerations.

Is anybody using the 1.7 (edited sorry about wrong number mistake) firmware update for the OM-1 v1 that was supposed to fix the autofocus problems on the v1?

@@theflyingdutchman7127 Thanks. I'm walker. sometimes I take my bag with tripod & other lenses because I'll shoot what ever I come across. But most times or should say more these days I;ll just go with the camera & long lens.

Sorry i diden´t mention it in the video :) im 180cm

😂 i did notice when i did the edit but thought “what the h…” .. its is a SUPER tripod 😁

Also the OM-1 gear 🎥📷😁

No OM-1 and 150-400mm 😁

@@DennisJacobsenWildlife This is unexpectedly amazingly good, what a beautiful video.👍👏❤️

@@theflyingdutchman7127 For static stuff its amazing, the trouble starts when there is to much action and stuff in the background :) and thanks! appreciated

@ the perfect camera system has yet to be invented. perhaps in the future. long live the future

Its a great hide for sure 📷🎥👍🏻😁

fantastic 😁 i hope this year i can follow them again!

For what i know its their own :) but im not 100% sure!

Good tip 👍🏻😁 thanks for sharing

I posted exactly this before seeing your post. Absolutely spot on and what make the camera amazing for low light static images. It won't work at a concert or gloomy sports stadium, but at a museum or church etc it was a game changer.

thanks and same to you 📷😀

thanks, i will and a happy new year to you Richard :)

Thank you :) appreciated!

Thanks Sam and same to you :) :)

Thank you Thomas and same to you :) :)

Mange tak :) skal gøre mit bedste for at gøre det interessant! godt nytår :)

I lige måde Carsten :)

Thanks, appreciated! and more yellow and blues are coming in 2025 ;) hehe happy new year to you and your family

Thanks and same to you Roger :)

Thank you and a happy new year to you also 😁😁

☺☺☺

🙏☺

Thanks 🙂 I like the Z9 better overall and thats just my opinion! AF i think is slightly better on A1 for photos and on Z9 in video and of course the weight can be an issue but overall for me the Z9 is the right camera right now 😀 happy new year Richard!

I want to show the over all difference in these systems and not in each photo. Since the making of this video i have gone semi pro in photographing football and right now its winter and dark so i only have stadium lights to work with and the OM-1 is unusable for pro photos in this condition and also in generel the DOF is not shallow enought no matter where the goal keeper stands with MFT and my agency would let me "go" if i used the OM-1 in the pro matches 😉 here you can see results from Z9 + Z 400mm instagram.com/dhjfoto

There are times where one system is preferred over another but both MFT and FF has its place in this world for sure :) thanks for your comment. BTW do you have a portfolio you can link to and share with me and the people following this channel?

I donr remeber the exact size when buttom and top are taken of, but it is quite compact 👍🏻😁

Hi Jose, personally i dont think its worth the upgrade. So im keeping the mark 1 and see what happens in the future 😁 maybe i will do a settings episode some day 🤔 Thanks for your comment 🙏🏻