Of course! A couple places could be Instagram, lumix live streams, and the website contact page would be the best places

Then it would be the GH7😂

honestly setting up the cameras side by side with the exact same lens and same settings. I wouldn't notice much a difference. I literally copy and pasted the color grading effects on the clips.

true true

Dang! Yeah I have been trying to find the ARRI log for the GH6 online, but it somehow was sold out 😂

Yeah if you don't need the few extra specs, or worry about overheating the G9ii rocks! I don't use the record button on the top of any camera 😅

@@FourKnown G9ii has very similar noise. Panasonic has said the G9ii sensor is very similar to GH7 but I think they technically can't say it's BSI. It's one of those hush hush things where Panny doesn't want to explain the technical differences.

Product shots you can get the bokeh of 2.8 but the light of an 1.4, no crop, pro res raw, 32 bit float, arri log c3, better ibis. lol there is so many reasons😏

@@MatthewDangyou Product shots are 1. super fucking niche - 2. you don't have to worry about 32 bit float audio on product shots - 3 you don't have to worry about arri log c3 on product shots. 4. you don't have to worry about better ibis on product shots. These are all silly arguments... for folks seeing this, just get the damn full frame and make stuff...

The G9ii does have shutter angle and all the main video features. Currently you can’t see you display info on both screen and external monitor but your recording frame and all that you still can👍🏻

Yeah would be cool to see some type of Pro Res Raw LT though Apple would have to develop and make it. But if you need a weather sealed camera for snow, rain or dust then you wouldn’t be able to use the SSD too🤔🤷🏼‍♂️

You need a cage for ssd mounting and you cant use all modes with ssd. Cfexpress in gh7 is much much better and less stressful

Flippy Up Flippy out screen alll day!

100%

Honestly if you are okay pulling focus great camera, better image quality! The only thing (and I’m making a vs video soon with the GH7) is streaking for me. It legit happened to me on a client project with the camera and it was BAD

@@MatthewDangyou the streaking is pretty much what made me move to the GH7 although I’m keeping my GH6 as a c cam and with GH7 being my A cam and S5iix being my b cam.

I think that will be my choice too. Found in excellent condition with a 2 year warranty for €1200. What I save I invest in the Arri-log profile (also available for GH6)

With many people selling their GH6 cams, I snatched up a second one for $900 like new. It's an amazing camera. And the AF works just fine unless you're doing unrealistic super fast movements to stress test it.

@@MatthewDangyouI’m sorry to hear that. For some reason I have never noticed the streaking while recording but I can see it before pressing record button. I also only use in Dynamic Range Boost mode. I wonder if that has anything to do with it. I have certainly been in situations where I should see it (high contrast low light with a bright area of the scene) but never while recording. Weird.

I literally just copy and pasted the exact same effects. There was no color matching what so ever done

@@MatthewDangyou Thanks, in other words, do you recommend the g9II as a B camera for the gh7?

@WoobiTheCat oh 100% I mean if you like the advantages and would want both then for sure! I would say (if you could afford it) having the S5iiX and the GH7 would also be nice but requires different set of lenses

You're going to make me get a GH7 arent you.

Of course!! Hahahaha my bad😂

ARRI probably not, but the Lumix Lab app should hopefully come to S5ii

24-70 f2.8 from lumix

But do they really need to answer the FX30? Panasonic has never had an aps-c camera, nor do they make aps-c lenses, so they would be committing a lot of R&D to building from scratch.

​@@raksh9 fair comment, but I believe that there is a gap for an entry-level APS-C cinema camera. The crucial part would be that it would be L-mount. Sigma already have some L-mount APS-C lenses, so there isn't an immediate need for R&D on that front, plus you can use existing FF L-mount lenses. I think that APS-C is a bigger gap for Lumix than you might think. A lot of people genuinely prefer APS-C to FF, especially for cinema work, yet don't want to go as far as MFT. As I argue above, a smaller sensor would give Lumix the opportunity to address a lot of QoL features for the cinema user without it being an expensive or complex dev cycle. The FX30 is competitive in the entry-level cinema space, and is a strong on-ramp into the E mount ecosystem. That's what I believe Lumix need an answer to, and would currently be well-placed to deliver.

Once you know you know is the issue, most people just left for autofocus back in the day. So now you have to convince current consumers to switch lenses, cameras, basically everything to use Lumix. But when you do it is magical😂 But hopefully new consumers will see the value🤷🏼‍♂️

@@MatthewDangyou That's the word my dude, magical. These cameras actually make wanna film stuff. Never had that with other brands.

Yeah for me personally, Sony specs and all is great but it just does have that special sauce in terms of color. It takes more work to get a pleasing image out of it. Canon is little to punchy and crunchy for my taste. Now I have always loved Blackmagic image a lot and menu settings. But the form factor of most of the bodies, and autofocus are doo doo. (That and i don’t edit mainly in Davinci so FCP kinda struggles). Nikon lol once a 🥔 always a 🥔 Lumix is the perfect middle ground of all the amazing specs similar (not quite yet) of Sony (plus some also internal pro res raw, open gate, like cmon) but then still that amazing color science like Blackmagic. It really is just this magical camera that could have been so popular if they figured out PDAF sooner

@@MatthewDangyou Yea i see your point. To think that the decision to implement PDAF that late would set them back behind the competition like it did its crazy.

Yes to the first question, and it is pretty similar to S5iiX. Personally I like exposing a stop over and bring down my highlights. But the main difference is the native iso is 500 on the GH7

@@MatthewDangyou Great thank you. Regarding to the VLOG thing, I'd like to do the same but i'm not sure what to set the zebras to have the correct exposure. In the S5II I saw that ppl usually set the zebras between 90-95% but in the gh7 you an only set it to 80% max. This is the part I dont understand how it works and why is it different.

@@NathamMovies Honestly I don't look at Zerbras to much. I made a False Color Lut, or use False colors on an external monitor to check for exposure.