Thanks for the video. Mathematical answer to your question: We try to find a parameter Θ of the exp family distribution, which could lead to the maximum possible density/probability value. In other words, the derivative of log-normalizer (b'(Θ)) should equal to y. Since b'(Θ)=y, plus b'(Θ)=μ, this leads to μ=y. So the likelihood achieves maximum when you set the value of y as the μ parameter of the distribution. What causes you to have this puzzle? We are NOT trying different Xs, until we find the X whose density value is max. We are trying different μs, until we find the μ whose resulting distribution reaches the peak at the X point. When you try different μs, the variance of the density curve will change - it's not simply moving up and down as you did. Short answer: We do not know the μ of a distribution. Now we sample an observation (only one), and to estimate μ, our simple approach is to set μ exactly to the observation we have sampled. μ=y
@Ozay19988 күн бұрын
17 minutes of "Nation x killed more, we are democratic they are terrorits (ironic your government consists of right extremists), they lie and do PROPAGANDA and we are honest (shows kids with guns vs cool israelis which is absolutely not propaganda. wanna bet one can turn this around if one might look for pictures of israeli kids with guns ?)" The fact that this is the whole argumentation leaves a bitter taste. And then closes the video without mentioning a single wrong doing of the israeli state, whishing the hostages coming back home (which is all fine and right) and then instead of also wishing final peace for AT LEAST the innocent palestinians, like the children or something, rather say that they should accept israels existance :) No words of mercy and no heart, absolute darkness. Kind of confirms what most of the world currently thinks. That israelis just hate palestinians in generall. Like straight up for not being israeli. This is already the narrative. Why do you push it yourself ? The thing isnt that all people say that hamas is cool or something (i know some do, im not dumb or uninformed). The thing is that people would expect something better from the self proclaimed "good" or at least official side aka the Israeli state. But as the whole world can witness, is that its just the other side of the coin. Both parties just hate each other. thats it. You are at least as biased as the opposite position
@Leon-qe2wl13 күн бұрын
Hey Id like to ask if I could use already predicted dependent values for quantile regression. I intend to use a Geographical Weighted Regression (GWR) model to predict Y based on several explanatory variables. If my understanding is correct, if I used the same explanatory variables with the predicted y value for quantile regression, will this be valid?
@jvdp966014 күн бұрын
Why not use the jacobian and use the cross entropy derivative as a row vector in the final step
@shimi3065Ай бұрын
Fantastic stuff here. חמוכה שמח
@AhmedThahir2002Ай бұрын
Hi! Any reason why optimizing for the Poisson loss with NN gave poor results?
@bvkssameer7592Ай бұрын
hi what is the source of your content.
@shajidmughal3386Ай бұрын
thanks man
@lastyhopper27922 ай бұрын
Entering a highly complex field of study is like entering an old, established game where many players are veterans who have years of experience.
@lastyhopper27922 ай бұрын
1:24 Whoever tf decided to name "Statistics" after the famous concept of "statistic" deserved some jail time. And whoever make an introductory book on Statistics without mentioning these differing definitions deserve to have their PhD ruled out/invalidated.
@merttanyur89092 ай бұрын
thank you
@beckakhiwu17662 ай бұрын
Best video out here on GLM
@prashastvaish46882 ай бұрын
tdont just read out things, try to explain with examples
@aytacsekmen21383 ай бұрын
Such a good explanation. Appreciated it boss <3
@lordcasper33573 ай бұрын
thank you boss
@tankisolefeta57983 ай бұрын
Could you provide an example of how to run Recentred Influence functions in Python to analyze unconditional partial effects on quantiles within a regression analysis framework (i.e., unconditional quantile regressions)?
@Z.O.I3 ай бұрын
you just sved me 10 hours of my life. also i love cats
@peterorlovskiy21343 ай бұрын
Excellent video. Thank you!
@NellyHarlan3 ай бұрын
014 Alaina Crossing
@nabinbk10653 ай бұрын
great, thank you so much
@farazmoharrami3 ай бұрын
That was a great video summarizing the AFT and Cox PH. Fro my PhD I am working on the same problems and I found your videos super useful. Please keep going!🙌
@MattyMatiss3 ай бұрын
thank you so much for choosing something which is not gaussian! :D I'm trying to solve an exercise for a mixture of uniforms and stuck on one step, let's see if this video helps :)
@MattyMatiss3 ай бұрын
why do we need 1/2 or 1/k in front if we already have z and 1-z which determine the probability?
@RealMcDudu3 ай бұрын
@@MattyMatiss P(x,z) = P(z)*P(x|z) - the 1/2 or 1/k is P(z) .
@GallacherBetty-n1g3 ай бұрын
Camden Stream
@skgudipati33793 ай бұрын
Thanks bro, i was struggling to get this since 3 days.. at last got this.. thanks a lot..
@Muhammad-xo3ph3 ай бұрын
dude , give me mooooooore
@JaneXavier-z5i3 ай бұрын
Orpha Greens
@SüheylaSonsuzakadar-z6o3 ай бұрын
Waters Flats
@Yossef_M3 ай бұрын
thanks for your effort this video is really underrated.
@DorrisWells-y5i3 ай бұрын
615 Sharon Mews
@JohnGates-g1v4 ай бұрын
Jodie Crest
@garygashaigges22964 ай бұрын
745 Prudence Springs
@DanielJoanna-j8r4 ай бұрын
90021 Beer Causeway
@MeargNgusseSahle4 ай бұрын
Thank you very very much.
@BarbaraClark-d7w4 ай бұрын
Grimes Shoal
@ChristopherBradley-x7x4 ай бұрын
Champlin Way
@JeffreyParsons-h5u4 ай бұрын
Peyton Place
@papercut._.4 ай бұрын
This is actually good. you abtracted the rabibit hole math concepts and went straight to the general overview. Thanks!