I wonder why my maths teacher never learnt it this way and taught us this..i would have been math genius by now fr.
@Kate1427Ай бұрын
Impressive!
@Dagothdaleet2 ай бұрын
If my parents loved me, I would have become a mathemagician like Art
@hq10824 ай бұрын
I love that I'm learning how to do this, god bless the internet truly.
@sooryanarayanan42734 ай бұрын
Amazing sir thanks
@khristinazhang64125 ай бұрын
first
@mtc-j9i5 ай бұрын
You still need the skill of multiplying in your head, but you’re using more manageable numbers to get it done (distributive property style). I like this. Everyone won’t have the skills to do it, but I like this.
@khristinazhang64125 ай бұрын
first
@consciousnessinanutshell5 ай бұрын
Does anyone else close an eye sometimes when they're doing a calculation?? And if so...which eye do you close?
@khristinazhang64125 ай бұрын
first
@aresorum7 ай бұрын
11:33 I couldn’t follow, as he doesn’t say his every thought. Can someone explain further?
@artiehess71108 ай бұрын
When this guy was a student at Mayfield High School (Ohio), he was brought into my 8th grade algebra class at Mayfield Middle School (1978-79 school year) and taught the class his methods for squaring numbers, and I still use them today.
@Amantheparadise8 ай бұрын
Wow
@alfonsomzrt9 ай бұрын
My man is so passionate about squaring
@sohampendse848810 ай бұрын
It is Vedic mathematics it is from India, which our sadhus made these tricks copied by west
@ericwazner6521 Жыл бұрын
❤👍
@stevefrandsen7897 Жыл бұрын
Elegant math
@GrifGrey Жыл бұрын
I like how simple this is, all he's saying is just A^2 = (A-d)(A+d) + d^2, but that's why its so smart to me.
@DrakeLarson-js9px Жыл бұрын
This video gives a non-prime, non-integer mathematician insight into 'what's new' in this unique and interesting field within the broad horizon of mathematics. Very well stated overview.
@ericwazner6521 Жыл бұрын
love Art! super cool👍
@jobsucks Жыл бұрын
I’ve been searching so many of his presentation. Finally found an explanation of how he guessed the missing number
@keithchen2005 Жыл бұрын
But the question is asking median, mode, mean to form a NON-CONSTANT arithmetic progress. Your solution is to let them form Constant arithmetic progression. Am I correct?
@connectedrestoredministrie1995 Жыл бұрын
In this case, a non-constant arithmetic progression is interpreted as merely a arithmetic progression with a non-zero "step size."
@rupa6354 Жыл бұрын
Got confused as well, basically non constant means that the number doesn't repeat ie 2,2,2,2 etc
@dr.rahulgupta7573 Жыл бұрын
Sir, your method is based on the formula : a^2=( a^2--b^2) +b^2= (a-b)( a+b) + b^2
@johndwolynetz6495 Жыл бұрын
Mathieu 12 simple group be like
@practicemathseveryday Жыл бұрын
Good job prof. 👍🏽
@Divinenature3 Жыл бұрын
its called teacher..... thanks for improving knowledge
@acroleo4512 Жыл бұрын
As my Specialist teacher would say "He made math his slave".
@kwilson5832 Жыл бұрын
I do the 'working out the day of the week of any date' as well, but I do it slightly differently. My way sounds more complicated than Arthur's, but I find it easier because I don't have to remember a lot of year codes. For my version, I work out how many years since the last February 29th eg if the date is 13th July 1913, then the last 'leap day' (Feb 29th) was 1912, so I add '1'. Now I deduct 1900 from that leap year. 1912 - 1900 = 12. Then I add whatever I need to make this number a multiple of 7. I need to add 2 to 12 to get 14, so my year code is 1 + 2 = 3. For 8th February 1996, the last 'leap day' was four years ago, so my year code is 4 + 1 (the one is 1996 - 1900 = 96. 96 divided by 2 is 48, add 1 to get 49). To work out previous (or future centuries), I work out the same date in the 1900s, so if I wanted to know 13th July 1813 then I would use the same method as above. To adjust for the different century, just add two days for each century you go back, or deduct 2 days for each century in the future. 13th July 1913 was a Sunday, so 13th July 1813 was a Tuesday. This method will work for any date between 1600 and 2400. It won't work outside these dates, as it assumes that every fourth year is a leap year, but 1600 and 2400 aren't leap years.
@aclemasultan1794 Жыл бұрын
Why are some people are hating him ?
@kwilson5832 Жыл бұрын
This is really helpful - thank you Dr Benjamin. It's clear that he just 'knows' the squares of most, if not all, two-digit numbers, in much the same way as a lot of people watching this just 'know' that 6 x 9 is 54, or that 8 x 12 = 96. This must be really helpful for calculating some of the larger squares.
@BasketballJunkie1324 Жыл бұрын
pretty cool trick but his speed takes years to achieve
@Mathin3D Жыл бұрын
Searching for "Mary P. Dolciani" on KZbin brings up a ton of videos by this clown. What gives???
@ekeredtv Жыл бұрын
mad lad
@Domsain Жыл бұрын
Funny thing that my school ( before ) teaches this making it simple. When I got to another city, they teach the exact same thing, making me a genius instantly lol/
@pkre7072 жыл бұрын
"pretty easy right?" uhhhhh😶
@chrisdooley11842 жыл бұрын
The nuns and brothers in grade and high school never explained mathematics as effectively as this guy. Because of the high tension in the classroom (mostly because catholic school teachers of the clergy ruled by fear and yelled at you for wrong answers) I never learned to relax and enjoy the process. I was scared silly and put as little effort as possible into algebra calculus etc but I did really excel at geometry because I had a great lay teacher who got me interested
@georgelopera62902 жыл бұрын
Very confusing! There is one indian kids square root numbers more easy to understand!
@forwatchingstuff2 жыл бұрын
yes but how does he managed that in one second?
@jerusmathematics78912 жыл бұрын
It's actually worked! Thanks for your knowledge sharing, sir!
@ayushchavan27412 жыл бұрын
I like that Arthur sir justified what shortcut he was teaching. You would get justification of the shortcuts everywhere.
@adityab.87152 жыл бұрын
His confidence and happiness reflects his pure hardwork... Really enthusiastic teacher!
@chanthatong60072 жыл бұрын
Hi how you get this one 191 to 343 Can you show how to get the answers please.
@balrajumoluguri8372 жыл бұрын
Ax+by=cz solved this problem aploded office email id
@oneofusall2 жыл бұрын
It looked like this video was made in 80's until he grabbed Ipad
@JD-wx3pk2 жыл бұрын
Omg.. he's a walking calculator
@johnodee1002 жыл бұрын
What a teacher!
@Deep_Mariana2 жыл бұрын
That almost done is so promising
@mannykhan77522 жыл бұрын
Ive been watching this guy since the 80s when he hosted his Mathemagics tour shows. He is brilliant.
@jobsucks2 жыл бұрын
I would argue the algebraic method he uses to square 4 & 5 digits numbers is different then the method he showed. The following is the method he uses: (a+b)^2 = A^2 + 2ab + b^2 [ ^2 represent square since I don’t have the symbol for square on my keyboard] example: (1234)^2 can be broken into a=1000, b=234 (1000+234)^2 = (1000)^2 + 2(1000)(234) + (234)^2 = 1,522,756 Edit: he only use the above method I mention for 5 digit calculations. For 4 digits he actually use the method described in the video. After watching the video again and reading some comments I realized my earlier statement wasn’t entirely correct