No firmament exists

@WhistleMiner false

No. This is a misleading video, made with a camera that’s not properly focused.

They dont have to be dying stars .

''Stars are full of life, and not dying suns a gazillion miles away'' - Polaris who is currently holding Altair hostage

Stars don’t look like this. What you’re seeing is nothing more than atmospheric distortion amplified by an out-of-focus camera.

Stars are incased in the firmament. If you are looking for a scientific term look for Sonoluminescence. Kind of like Bioluminescent in the oceans. What the Sun reminds me of is maybe a giant magnifying glass. 50-100 miles in circumference. Probably the same circumference as the moon, which is lesser energy. There are declassified CIA documents out there which measure the heat/energy off the firmament too. Hope that helps

the sun is not a star, it's the sun

This shot isn’t excellent. It’s out of focus. What you’re looking at is the light from the star (besically a single point) being distorted by the atmosphere, then being smeared out by the camera being out of focus.

@@MrRobot777 Stars work through nuclear fusion, not sonoluminescence.

@@MrRobot777 12,000 satellites in orbit prove there is no firmament.

8.6 light years away? Hahahaha

Simple measurements prove Earth isn’t flat.

@ simply not true sir.

@@mikealchin525 It is true, and can be verified by anyone. Even observations as simple as watching a ship go ver the horizon are enough to prove Earth is not flat.

Earth is spherical. Simple observations and experiments that anyone can do confirm this. the stars don’t look like this: this is just a camera that’s out of focus. What NASA shows and tells us is reality, and has been proven correct by tons of independent observations.

So you are telling me 99% of Astrophotographers are nasa

NASA shows you reality, unlike this video.

It is focussed, I have similar footage myself. And have you tried holding a camera still when zoomed in? There has been an effort to stabilise the footage. And if the movement was from the rotation of this realm, it would move to the left. Nice work Sherlock.

@@WorkInLight No, it’s not focused. The technology to hold a camera still when it’s zoomed in is called a tripod. The movement from Earth’s rotation is in different directions, depending on where you point the camera relative to Earth’s axis of rotation.

@@Hobbes746 It is focussed, and I have footage identical, and I use a TRIPOD when doing so, even with a tripod, when zoomed in it is very hard to keep the camera still, any small movement (even breathing can be enough) is magnified just as the view through the camera is.. The Earth does not rotate, stars are not a ball of gas. You can't simply dismiss things with assumptions. Maybe you could try getting curious instead of dismissive? Have an open mind instead of an open mouth. try it, it's actually good for you.

@@WorkInLight No, it’s not focused. Stars simply don’t look like that when they’re in focus. Source: looking at stars through a telescope. I can measure Earth’s rotation using several different methods.

@@Hobbes746 Sorry buddy, they look like that when I view them, 125x magnification, is that sufficient for you? 'Michelson & Morley' proved a stationary earth some time ago. Of course, the freemason scientists do all they can to explain this away. Have fun spinning mate, it seems you're a bit dizzy.

I'm hoping to get better footage soon.

@@MrRobot777 that was amazing

Gods LEDs 🙏

@@MrRobot777 ck out M.C ESCHER and LEONARDO DAVINCI ....STAR DRAWIINGS ...same as these, thx

Nope. Actual stars, photographed badly and out of focus.

​@@Hobbes746nope 😂

@@JordanWallace-nb4id Empty denial is useless.

Lights in the water? Where did you get this idea from? If you say: "from Bible" I will ask: "would you give me the Scripture" And you will dissappear, because there is not any.

@@mikemental8285 Genesis 1, read the bible and be a good disciple.

@@mikemental8285 Genesis 1

​@@mikemental8285all over the bible bruh 🤣😂

@@JordanWallace-nb4id Really? Can you show any such a Scripture? Even one? No, you cannot. There is not even one little verse in the whole Bible thst would say such a thing. This happens when people watch videos with itching ears, and don't read the Bible

Hertz

Lol 😂

Thanks very much Uncle Mick 🙏

Energy trapped in a cell fluctuating in the firmament? That's my 2 cents.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nomVpp2KebuXf6s

​@@MrRobot777Ive actually heard that stars are potentially a Sonoluminescent phenomenon caused by vibrations, or something of that sort. Either way, they certainly aren't giant hot balls of gas visible from millions of light years away.

Sonoluminesence, think of a light under water that is created by sound vibrating the water so it produces this light. If you want to go deeper, measure the temp of moonlight vs moon shade with an infrared thermometer and your insight into the lies of the govt will begin.

​@@MrRobot777indeed, Job 37:18

It's because you've been taught to think this is a NASA star. Stars don't exist as NASA explains, rather, like this perfect example, they are sonoluminesence. Before you spew govt sponsored answers/programming go and measure the temp of moonlight vs moon shade with an infrared thermometer and you will have proof that EVERYTHING they taught you is a lie.

@@DonnyBrisco Nope. You are making up nonsense based on out-of-focus images.

@@DonnyBrisco No, moonlight isn't colder than 'shadow'. What you're measuring is not the temperature of the light, but how efficiently objects can radiate heat away. When the sky is unobstructed, this process is more efficient than when an area is obstructed (by items that create shadows).