EN LOS AÑOS 1952 al. 1955, YO DI EL CURSO EN LA HAVANA, CUBA, PARA PILOTO PRIVADO, DE LAS 35 HORAS DE VUELO, QUE EN AQUELLOS AÑOS YA ERAN ESAS HORAS DE VUELO, PARA SACAR LA LICENCIA DE ""PILOTO PRIVADO"". EN AQUELLOS AÑOS, EL COSTO ERA DE $ 10 pesos cubanos, QUE ERAN AL CAMBIO POR EL DOLLAR ^ESTADOUNIDENSE^, EL PESO CUBANO VALIA <2 o 3 centavos (céntimos ), más que 1 DOLLAR. PUDE HABER VENIDO EN ESOS AÑOS, A ESTUDIAR LA CARRERA MILITAR , AQUI A EE. UU. AA. , PERO DESISTI DE HACERLO. CONTINUE EN EL MODELO C - 46, PERO AL TRIUNFAR LA REVOLUCION EN 1959, SE SUSPENDIERON Y CERRARON MUCHOS AEROPUERTOS EN CUBA, Y YO PUES ME VI OBLIGADO A DEJAR ESOS ESTUDIOS Y ENTRENAMIENTO EL AERPTO. DONDE HICE EL CURSO DEL PIPER CUB J 3, ESTABA EN UNA PEQUEÑA FINCA DE ^HIERBA^, <<GRAMA>> IN ENGLISH, EN LA CARRETERA DE < BACURANAO, QUE IBA DICHA CARRETERA, HACIA LAS PLAYAS DEL < ESTE> DE LA *HAVANA*, ( PLAYAS DE *GUANABO*, STA. MARIA DEL MAR , BOCA CIEGA*). EN CUBA , EN ESOS AÑOS AL PIPER < J 3 CUB >, SE LE DECIA <<UNA PLUMA VOLANTE>>. YO AUN POSEO UN CATALOGO DE LA ESCUELA AMERICANA DE AVIACION << CALIFORNIA AIRCRAFT INSTITUTE>>, CON TODAS LAS INSTRUCCIONES A SEGUIR, PARA VOLAR EL *J 3*. ES EL UNICO QUE CONSERVO Y LOS RECIBIAMOS DE ESTA ESCUELA, RADICADA AQUI EN CALIFORNIA . YO RESIDO AQUI EN EL ESTADO DE<<FLORIDA>>, Y COMO CURIOSIDAD, PUES SOY // BASTANTE MAYOR DE EDA. //. LES ENVIO MI E--MAIL, POR SI QUIEREN Y DESEAN ESCRIBIRME ALGO. SALUDOS A USTEDES. < UNA DISCULPA >. EL COSTO DE LOS $10 pesos cubanos, era el valor de la hora de vuelo. ATENTAMENTE. SINCERILY YOURS . Camilo Perez Pereiro
@CallMeJack087 күн бұрын
Class B, class C and class E above 10,000msl are the only airspace that require ADSB
@marianogonzalez925917 күн бұрын
I have an engine for sale 890hrs sense overhaul O-235 C with log books
@Biff_B_Boatwright23 күн бұрын
Sorry to hear. We took the family dog and kids out there and saw the damage. Truly sorry for the loss of all affected by Milton. Hoping the insurance companies will be kind to us to help us fix our house…….happy landings
@mikeryan627723 күн бұрын
That really sucks Matt I saw it the day after the storm, was shocked to see all the damage. Have you seen the Cub Bill has for sale very nice plane if you wanted to stay in a Cub.
@J3PiperCub23 күн бұрын
I have and I have flown it, not sure where I am going from here. Thanks
@i.r.wayright145724 күн бұрын
From having worked at Lock Haven Airport, I can tell you that sucks.
@khopkins571524 күн бұрын
Sad to see...there is no substitute for the experiences that J3 brought to you...power to you for looking forward and focusing on what comes next...
@dandunlap863825 күн бұрын
I OTR and have a CDL. I also have type 2 diabetes (probably 70+% of truckers do). Because of the diabetes, I’m required to get medical clearance every year as opposed to every two years. With diet, exercise, and medication, I’m able to keep my A1C in the mid 6’s. Would this condition alone exclude me from being PIC?
@J3PiperCub25 күн бұрын
You would need to speak to an AME with something that specific, thanks for watching.
@stevedemars28126 күн бұрын
Dude, get rid of the background noise. It made the video unwatchable.
@DrewCase-ip4bl7 күн бұрын
Mute it.
@stevedemars2816 күн бұрын
@ it has some good info but the plane background noise isn’t needed. As a sound guy I’m trying to help
@ColeAviation27 күн бұрын
So sorry to see this. 😏 Glad y’all made it out safe down there.
@durrow27 күн бұрын
Excellent - thank you for making this
@kentfield220527 күн бұрын
Oh my, I’m so sorry. That ol girl really took a hit from the winds. What a beautiful plane. Keep us informed on your next Cub.
@kennethdoucette605227 күн бұрын
I am so sorry to hear this news.
@charlesroscoe999727 күн бұрын
Had a Piper Cherokee 150 with a 160hp upgrade and VG’s and an STC that amounted to tape on the stabilizer. That handled better in slow flight & stalls better than any C150, 152 or 172. To omit the Cherokee would be a shame
@charlesroscoe999727 күн бұрын
140 which is a 150 hp. Couldn’t edit
@Desmo-Ай бұрын
Hi J3, I have a Private Pilot's License it is not current, I have not flown for 10 yrs. or so. I am interested in purchasing another plane either Ultralight or Sport category, I imagine if I go with the Light Sport I would need to get a Flight review, Instructor sign off?
@rapinncapin123Ай бұрын
Excellent video!!
@wadebaker8481Ай бұрын
SE-5 Bi plane that is my dream
@poppianejo38562 ай бұрын
If they are worried about a 2lbs sUAS flying, but not worried about this…the FAA is the F$&k’n idiots I always knew they were.
@auhs702 ай бұрын
It is not a LIGHT sport rule....it is simply Sport Pilot. I am one of those.
@birds_eye_view2 ай бұрын
Couldn’t have said it better! 👍😎❤️
@jschwartzmier2 ай бұрын
Hello, im looking at a 42 Cub. It has a O-145 engine. People have told me to stay away since the engine is hard to find parts. Any thoughts on this?
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
The Continental engines have parts issues as well. I would not shy away from the deal just because of the Lycoming.
@Coops7772 ай бұрын
Who wants a Bonanza when you can fly a cub and enjoy the scenery with the door open?
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
I absolutely agree!
@Tom_in_CA2 ай бұрын
I just passed my Sport Pilot FAA written test today, yay! The bad news is the last spot in the EAA Sport Pilot Academy was taken last Friday. I can wait until June or find another school… (All the local schools only do PP)
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
I know it is more money, but go ahead and get your PPL if you can, rather than wait. It is true there are places in the country where LSA instruction is sparse.
@JoeCnNdАй бұрын
@@J3PiperCubhopefully gets better after the update.
@commentatron2 ай бұрын
I'm training in a J3 Cub, fulfilled requirements (and then some!), waiting on a DPE. How do you think the MOSAIC changes will affect the prices of the newly included LSA aircraft?
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
@@commentatron I think the new additions like 172’s and the like will get even more expensive, the same thing happened when basic med came into being. Traditional LSA Cubs and champs probably won’t change much.
@thatfeeble-mindedboy2 ай бұрын
Get some kind of wind noise blocker for heavens sake… Im sending you the bill for my subwoofer…
@xzqzq2 ай бұрын
If you want to do something positive, reign in the aviation bar, which has reportedly doubled the cost of light aircraft.
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
Please show me that "report" :)
@xzqzq2 ай бұрын
@@J3PiperCub I long ago stopped citing sources, lest I get into disputes about ' reputable ' and 'reliable ' nitpicking...
@clytle3742 ай бұрын
Those would be great changes. I was a student pilot years ago, and recently decided to build an ultralight. This might change my mind
@daviddavis3252 ай бұрын
So now they're willing to change it. Cessna 120/140 owners tried for years to get the weight limit increased by 100 lbs. 🙁
@todd7182 ай бұрын
My brothers Porterfield CP-75 missed the light sport weight limit by 6 pounds with the original regs.
@daviddavis3252 ай бұрын
@@todd718 That had to hurt. Speculation was that FAA resistance to raising the limit was because it would hurt sales of Cessna's 162 Sky Catcher.
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
The somewhat arbitrary weight limit was tied to a European standard that was listed in Kilos. Speed, HP, Seats, prop, and gear make much more sensible limits than a weight limit. A Pitts gross weight is around 1700 pounds, A Cherokee Six is over 3400 lbs, weight has nothing to do with what they are like to fly safely.
@lemonylemon22893 ай бұрын
Really interesting. Is there any changes to manufacturing rules? Or would upstart companies be able to just start selling new 172-alike aircraft for 1/4 the price of a cessna?
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
I don't think anything like a 172 is going to be 1/4 the price of a 172, regardless of the regs. The license you need to fly a 172 is not driving the price of one.
@lemonylemon22892 ай бұрын
@@J3PiperCub Well I suppose that’s true
@Barstool_cub_driver3 ай бұрын
If it’s allowed for pipeline such work, would that mean I need to get a commercial too? And would I need PPL then? Or can I just do my light sport and then get my commercial?
@jrcolmena3 ай бұрын
I'm guessing you need the follow the traditional POL-commercial route for pilot training, and this is more about using LSA aircraft for commercial purposes, hence you could buy newer non-certified aircraft for the commercial work, but the pilot training requirements being the same. But what do I know.
@mikeryan62773 ай бұрын
@@jrcolmenacorrect, you know more then you think
@J3PiperCub2 ай бұрын
Excellent question, the proposed law is hundreds of pages, it might be in there somewhere.
@jackdixon45303 ай бұрын
Good Video!!
@u4eahere5303 ай бұрын
This was an excellent informative video! Thank you!
@ultimateweapon72753 ай бұрын
So useful, for a multitude of modelers!
@maxbootstrap73973 ай бұрын
When you say "controllable pitch propellers" are allowed --- do you mean "ground adjustable props" or "constant speed props" (or both)? Frankly, it sure would be nice if the rotax 916 engines (which require constant speed props, I think) can power new light sport airplanes.
@J3PiperCub3 ай бұрын
I believe it would allow constant speed props, but honestly I am not sure what all it would encompass.
@davidsullivan82363 ай бұрын
I think it’s ok as long as you have proper training
@markomar-b3d3 ай бұрын
hey j3piper cub friend im mark from san francisco and a 60 yr old private pilot. i went for my class 3 med and although i passed (with flying colors) he refered it to the faa. with my pcp,s help im sure too get the class 3 but if i go with the light sport rules, can i still fly a cherokee 140 two place i have at half moon bay airport (n calif.) I APPRECIATE YOUR FEED BACK. MARK SAN FRANCISCO CALIF. THANKS AND GREAT VIDEOS YOU DO.
@J3PiperCub3 ай бұрын
Talk to your AME, but under the rules right now, a 140 is not allowed under LSA, that might change in the future, look at my other video on MOSIAC. Also think about Basic Med. Good luck and thanks for watching.
@buttcrack77843 ай бұрын
I’m curious about the propeller on the 65 H.P. engine. What diameter and pitch was it?
@wilburfinnigan21424 ай бұрын
Why do you fly the Cub from the back seat ??? Wouldn't visibility be better from the front and ability to see the instrument panel ???
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
The airplane is designed to be flown from the back seat when flying solo.
@wilburfinnigan21424 ай бұрын
@@J3PiperCub Thanks but seems strange, evidently the guy that designed it never flew it ....
@chuckcampbell39274 ай бұрын
🛫📖🛬 Been waiting for your next upload. All your labor & 💰 has paid off for you
@bradconklin28784 ай бұрын
Love the J3.
@michaelsamson32764 ай бұрын
A 72" pitch prop would have you going 175 mph! I think you meant something like a 48" pitch
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
You are correct sir!, can't handle 175 mph.
@buttcrack77843 ай бұрын
72” DIAMETER, 48” pitch.
@Kevin_7474 ай бұрын
C-85 made a big difference on my Champ. Mine is a dash 8 so I'm still propping. C-85's are real expensive these days, glad I bought mine 30 years ago.
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
I am still sorting out battery issues on my installation, so I end up propping mine at times as well.
@jimmydulin9284 ай бұрын
The 85 HP Continental is a nice addition to your J-3 because it doesn't mess up the feel/balance of the airplane like putting really big engines on the old 65 HP trainers. One of the really useful things about all the low powered trainers is that they teach/demand total energy management. I taught in all of them at very high DA airports, midday in summer as well. With heavier pilots and passengers these days they teach energy management well at lower DA as well. I used to say, "If pulling on the stick does not get you the climb you want, try pushing a bit. Level in low ground effect to cruise airspeed on the long runways up high was 50% to my total energy. Pitch to just over the obstruction, as Wolfgang suggests, saved some of that life giving airspeed, and down drainage egress was more free energy. Enjoy the ability to zoom a bit on the extra fuel energy, but don't forget Wolfgang's "Law of the roller coaster." Don't lose all the good energy management techniques the old girl has taught you so far.
@davestarr71124 ай бұрын
I've flown Cubs for years (J-3s, PA-11s, and PA-18s) but never flown a J-3 with a C-85. What is involved with the changeover process, paperwork-wise? An STC, Form 337 or?
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
@@davestarr7112 the 85 hp continental was an approved engine on the original J3 type certificate, so I believe it is just a logbook entry, but my A/P did all that.
@davestarr71124 ай бұрын
@@J3PiperCub Aha, I did not know that thanks.
@irritantno94 ай бұрын
that aeronca looks like it was at 67FL? is there yellow overspray on the instrument panel? I cant tell
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
@@irritantno9 there is some overspray, the instrument panel is a future project
@bradleypoehler96094 ай бұрын
What, if any, did this change your payload.
@J3PiperCub4 ай бұрын
@@bradleypoehler9609 I am still limited to 1220 lbs gross weight, but I will get better performance with a passenger
@berniebrown91154 ай бұрын
Thanks for the ride
@dennisbrown11744 ай бұрын
Miss your cub videos!
@marka89474 ай бұрын
The only thing keeping your wings on are the termites holding hands.
@AceInvader4 ай бұрын
It goes for any hobby or interest, that the Facebook group has about as many intelligent people as the forum, the problem is the Facebook group is more accessible to morons, and they tend to be quite loud, and love to voice their terrible opinions.