Abolish the Death Penalty?
3:13
2 жыл бұрын
Is it ever OK to lie?
4:40
2 жыл бұрын
Do Human Beings Have Souls?
7:53
2 жыл бұрын
Is Water Wet?
3:45
2 жыл бұрын
10.2 Responding to Objections
6:24
2 жыл бұрын
9.2 Identify Missing Sub-Conclusions
5:38
9.3 The Third Commandment
4:15
2 жыл бұрын
9.1 Making Reasonable Inferences
4:47
8.1 Holding Hands and No Surprises
4:48
7.2 Interpret Statements Charitably
5:47
7.1 Recognize the Need for Charity
5:42
Get rid of Daylight Saving Time?
2:45
Can American democracy survive 2024?
4:25
Should the government tax soda?
6:11
Is a Hot Dog a Sandwich?
2:36
3 жыл бұрын
7.3 Evaluate Arguments Charitably
6:05
Пікірлер
@EducatedGuessGutFeeling
@EducatedGuessGutFeeling 25 күн бұрын
Well said sir
@selenium-es7hl
@selenium-es7hl Ай бұрын
All this is bogus...
@ChristaWilliams-d5z
@ChristaWilliams-d5z 7 ай бұрын
Hello! I will be creating a presentation on teaching Argumentative essays to middle school students, and I would like to borrow this idea. I want to tweak it and streamline it using the terminology we use at our district, but I wanted to reach out about citing you and permissions. Thank you!
@nathanotey139
@nathanotey139 7 ай бұрын
Hi, please feel free to use any of our materials, you can just credit ThinkerAnalytix!
@josefineahner4370
@josefineahner4370 7 ай бұрын
Hey, is it possible for you to look over a minmupp I made for you to find errors?
@Srinivas-oe3cj
@Srinivas-oe3cj 7 ай бұрын
Thanks dude your video helped me
@rubib7150
@rubib7150 Жыл бұрын
Is saying "you're entitled to your opinion" the same as saying "that's just your opinion"?
@jginfographics
@jginfographics Жыл бұрын
Why do you only want 2 co-premises? Why do you place an arbitrary limit on co-premises?
@HealthPoliticsAndProtein
@HealthPoliticsAndProtein Жыл бұрын
Is anyone developing a tool to automate argument mapping? The maps are easy to understand, but difficult to make.
@jennifercarlson-pietraszek8649
@jennifercarlson-pietraszek8649 Жыл бұрын
MindMup
@sarahmohamed7891
@sarahmohamed7891 Жыл бұрын
so helpful
@musictape7562
@musictape7562 2 жыл бұрын
Next time im going to win a arguement to my religious friend because of this
@mrs.anitaabdelmegid436
@mrs.anitaabdelmegid436 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Thank you for sharing!
@SlightRNG
@SlightRNG 2 жыл бұрын
Cool, thanks for this
@KiranSingh-nn8pz
@KiranSingh-nn8pz 2 жыл бұрын
OMG thank god you have made this video - this is really helping me!! BUT I still need another video on this, explaining more :( I still need more understanding!
@wisdomseeker3937
@wisdomseeker3937 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Nick. Was waiting for new maps :-)
@divyamadikeri5936
@divyamadikeri5936 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much..nice explanation..
@samanthajeluso7359
@samanthajeluso7359 2 жыл бұрын
This saved me from bombing a college paper, thank you!
@wisdomseeker3937
@wisdomseeker3937 2 жыл бұрын
Hope to have more weekly maps in 2022...please
@ThinkerAnalytix
@ThinkerAnalytix 2 жыл бұрын
Hi! Thanks for inquiring. More videos will be posted soon! Meantime you can find all our latest content at thinkeranalytix.org/weekly-maps/
@wisdomseeker3937
@wisdomseeker3937 2 жыл бұрын
@@ThinkerAnalytix awesome thank you
@devwhite22
@devwhite22 2 жыл бұрын
Well done!
@l.l.7025
@l.l.7025 2 жыл бұрын
The small town I'm from in the middle of nowhere, Facebook groups are great for allowing people to stay in touch. There are drawbacks as well, for example folks can get needlessly nasty from a local politics standpoint.
@l.l.7025
@l.l.7025 2 жыл бұрын
Great video Nate. Love your content and appreciate your analysis. Liked your joke about following you on FB!! What app are you using for moving your picture around?
@wisdomseeker3937
@wisdomseeker3937 2 жыл бұрын
Nice, I look forward to these weekly maps. A great channel.
@XavrrReminiscentOfficial
@XavrrReminiscentOfficial 2 жыл бұрын
On top of this, humans have simply managed to form this controversy themselves.
@XavrrReminiscentOfficial
@XavrrReminiscentOfficial 2 жыл бұрын
Wet doesn’t naturally occur. Wet is an adjective developed within the human mind as a convenience to describe some that has water on it. Something can’t be naturally wet because without humans the describing word “wet” would not exist. And Without the human logic or convenience of that word. Water isn’t wet. So to every other species water doesn’t exist and so doesn’t the term “wet.” So every other species of animal, alien life form, anything other than human disagree with you’re logic. In conclusion the thing we all know as water isn’t naturally wet. In addition to my conclusion, without the human brain the concept or study of water, and even water itself doesn’t exist. Wet isn’t naturally occurring therefore water can’t be wet unless you manipulate the physics. Even then me saying that implies I believe water isn’t wet. Which, then again proves my entire argument.
@wisdomseeker3937
@wisdomseeker3937 3 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to new vids please
@jrigg3484
@jrigg3484 3 жыл бұрын
It is
@mazin_0_0
@mazin_0_0 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, now I know why I always miss the point of my reading. this was the missing link without realizing it.
@manderse12
@manderse12 3 жыл бұрын
Whoah! First to view, first to comment! Great lesson, Nate! I'm using some of these videos to review good argument structure and teach new Ethics Bowlers what critical thinking looks like. Your site and these videos are excellent tools. Keep up the great work.
@samizdat_
@samizdat_ 3 жыл бұрын
Hi! what software is it (for the mind mapping)?
@ThinkerAnalytix
@ThinkerAnalytix 3 жыл бұрын
Hi, the software is called MindMup - argument.mindmup.org
@samizdat_
@samizdat_ 3 жыл бұрын
@@ThinkerAnalytix thanks a lot
@davidbolen8982
@davidbolen8982 3 жыл бұрын
By design, any “Critical Theory,” (CT) purposefully instills psychopathology. To be a CT, by definition, demands from its followers: activism. They must hold to the idea that “all systems,” all “whatever’s” are broken and need to be dismantled, destroyed. Most of “The Woke,” are not aware of, Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcus, who derived Critical Theory as derivative from Carl Marx‘s original ideas. These authors were shocked that the communist revolutions Marx predicted were not happening. The conclusion: Culture. Culture held people together more than race, class, or gender. But the brilliant essence, central to the theory, the great gotcha, of “Critical Theory,” is that it does not seek to address or remedy problems, as problems cannot be solved without tearing it all down. Thus, we see constant, unfixable, and unsolvable, criticism all the time. This will break even the most durable of human tolerance, and eventually violence will result. Destruction and division is the goal. Once the pathology is created, it is on autopilot. The god of critical theory is the narcissistic victim, and the devil is any system in which that victim resides. Most, if not all, “Woke,” adherents simply could not face a world where they are not victims.
@jaybourne1185
@jaybourne1185 3 жыл бұрын
the states bills do not ban critical race theory... they ban discrimination based on color or gender or immutable characteristics.... basically, judging people on group identity instead of their individual character or merit. in practice, especially in the vulgarized practices by kendi or crenhsaw are the worst marxism and nazism combined.
@jaybourne1185
@jaybourne1185 3 жыл бұрын
@@suezcontours6653 the playing field was made level nearly 70 years ago through the 14th amendment and the civil rights law. this finally removed all the prior democrat supported jim crow laws and provides full equality of the law irregardless of race or gender.
@jaybourne1185
@jaybourne1185 3 жыл бұрын
@@johnnywise9478 lol... equity by definition separates based on immutable characteristics of race or sex. it requires racism, bigotry, and discrimination to exist. no different than nazi or kkk.
@bestdjaf7499
@bestdjaf7499 3 жыл бұрын
I think you are kind of taking Center Right position. You are definitely representing some kind of Centrist's Views on CRT. Also the arguments are changing. At the beginning the Left would say that nobody is teaching CRT in Schools, but the argument have shifted to "It's about history". And now I see arguments that anti-CRT are just Nazis. I am kind of anti-CRT. But it's not even about CRT for me. I am arguing against Critical Theory in general. I am blaming CRT for the fall of standards. If you are interested, here are 3 videos I think describe CRT well: 1. "Ryan Chapman" has a good review of the popular CRT books. 2. "Millenial Gentlemen" has an interesting historical take on CRT: "The True Origins of Critical Race Theory & Anti-Racism Training" 3. KZbin "documentary" from "Progressives Today": "White Privilege Conference 2014". * 4. Also a kind of funny old video on Debate Association (CEDA) from "Internet Aristocrat": "Ever Forward Towards Oblivion - CEDA & The Death of Standards". Good luck with the project. I hope you do well.
@ragnampizadread9037
@ragnampizadread9037 3 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry, this is all bullshit. their is no such thing as "critical race theory" its seems like a title you all created to justify hiding the truth. Teach all the children, all the truth, all the time. Anything else is bullshit.
@Gili0
@Gili0 3 жыл бұрын
You should work on your argumentation because you failed to provide any premises supporting your claims.
@jpvoodoo5522
@jpvoodoo5522 3 жыл бұрын
I would think twice about making the claim that CRT doesn't exist. That is an objectively false statement. If you are in favor of CRT just say so.
@ragnampizadread9037
@ragnampizadread9037 3 жыл бұрын
@@jpvoodoo5522 Yes your right, if you accept that bullshit exists, Then bullshit exists. What is CRT? according to those who are for it, it is the black history that has never been taught. By giving it a separate title you have already differentiated it from all other history. And there we come back around to the bull shit. So I say again, teach all the children, all the truth, all the time.
@leftspeaker2000
@leftspeaker2000 3 жыл бұрын
So is asking "what is your concept of family" a normative or empirical statement ?
@DaBeezKneez
@DaBeezKneez 2 жыл бұрын
Thats a question, not a statement that could be true or false, nor empirical or normative.
@barnesreflections
@barnesreflections 3 жыл бұрын
Informative.
@kayodeemmanueladetunji3367
@kayodeemmanueladetunji3367 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Nate. For me, co-premises are still the most tricky. Keeping it simple so I don't violate any rules haha 😅😅
@matthewmccracken5179
@matthewmccracken5179 4 жыл бұрын
There is a difference in saying that's your opinion and saying that its untrue
@matthewmccracken5179
@matthewmccracken5179 4 жыл бұрын
You should studying the right methods of philosophic reasoning, for they are sound. Don't preach bias.