Ho, merci pour ce fichier qui permet de voir tous les nodes. Je cherchais quelque chose comme ça depuis un longtemps. Merci.

Could you possibly be the new HEY Pictures? (Another geometry nodes youtuber) We'll see.

Only a coder / Houdini user would notice Blender's suspicious lack of for-each nodes right off the bat, lol.

Broski would this work on a geometry nodes tree ?

i cant find the sphere-ize node (im in blender 4.2)

Excellent and very well explained. Thanks

also got a bit lost with the reroute thing, but got it eventually! Thanks so much for this video, never worked with geometry nodes before, and just found your video as a perfect answer to what I was looking for!

I don't have that page button on my version of blender 4.1, was that changed at some point?

hey sorry im late to the party, you are clearly "surfing a singularity convergence" by using nodes to create the very node tools you're using to show us your node tools quickly :D this will be super useful for my desire to create images and video memes in blender (just an idea-slides for a powerpoint tutorial using blender to create everyslide. you've just demo'd a slide template builder using geometry node modifiers. so. sick. my process is parallel to yours im just in stop motion because ive never started streaming. YOU SIR are Slaying! in Real Time

but the matrix is just 4x4, merely for the purpose of transformation. If Blender allows creating matrix of any size, it will be truly powerful

I miss the good old days of Shift+Ctrl+Alt+C 😢 being a shortcut

As a programmer, adding a custom shortcut to every second action item in a user interface is a tedious but necessary step for good usability.

You might have to hold Option on macOS to show the underlines, I think. Just speaking from dated, generic macOS experience, though

How could'nt I know that:O

This video is very helpful, but I got stuck and would like to ask for help. On the right side, I cannot edit the input because there are only Interface and Properties options available. 10:50mp

18:12 I believe in contrary to active selection node, active element node gives you index of only one element meaning you could do operation only to the selection for example, but do it in relation to the active element ( so for example rotate selection around active element)

12:41 Looking at the old "axis angle to rotation" I can almost immediately tell what it asks for, what I'm Gona get and how to use it. With the new one I still have no clue so idk if it's more user friendly.

I hope the Blender manual shows the use case for each but, they won't. 😊

Axes to Rotation looks now more messy and confusing

I kinda prefer axis-angle because I'm a physicist dabbling in art rather than an artists dabbling in math, but it's probably for the best cause its easy for me to convert in my head and probably not so easy for an artist. It might be a minor headache though to in some cases add math nodes where previously none would be needed when using different inputs to generate a rotation angle, but in most cases it should actually simplify things.

Great video! 4.2's a really exciting update for Geometry Nodes. ^^ I hope you don't mind, but there are a couple of technical notes I'd like to add. This isn't really meant to be a dunk on the video or anything, but I just wanna clear up some details. 2:24 - This isn't true. The old behavior of Realize Instances is basically equal to "Realize All", where it just turns everything into realized geometry no matter the amount of nesting. The new addition is actually being able to restrict how many levels of instancing "Realize Instances" could strip away using the "Depth" option. 11:08 - "Axes to Rotation" doesn't replace "Axis Angle to Rotation", the latter still exists in 4.2 and is not deprecated. What "Axes to Rotation" actually replaces is a specific setup where you chain together two "Align Euler to Vector" nodes with the second one's pivot axis being equal to the first one's alignment axis. This is specifically for cases where you want to align but minimize twisting, so you align to two perpendicular vectors instead of just one. "Axes to Rotation" replaces this workflow, and avoids the headache of having to make sure the correct pivot axis is selected. You just give it two vectors, one being primary and the other secondary, and works off of that. It's a different use case from "Axis Angle to Rotation", which is just a conversion node for one of the common ways to represent rotations (i.e. Euler, Axis-Angle, and Quaternion). 18:04 - To answer the question, Blender has two types of selections: - "Selected" (highlighted orange in Edit Mode) - "Active" (highlighted white in Edit Mode). Multiple elements can be "Selected" but only one of the selected elements could be "Active". It's usually the last one you clicked on when making the selection. The usual way this becomes relevant, is for operations where the "Active" element becomes a reference point for how the rest of the "Selected" elements get affected. Examples would be rotating/scaling with the "Active" element as the pivot point, or copying an attribute value from "Active" to the rest of "Selected", etc. A big use-case would be shortest-path selections, where you can highlight a couple of faces as selected, and have GN calculate the shortest path to the active face, and select everything that falls under that path. Anyhows, I hope that added extra clarity for some people. Wasn't able to resist the urge to explain things in detail lol.☝🤓

In ur opinion, di u think that someday we'll have enough nodes to make video games in blender,? because I saw the mouse input node and made me wondering if now blender is trying to move towards vjdeo games

Thank u bro

support blender foreva hehe nice vid as always :D

I like your tutorials with geometry nodes it was awesome

:o Nice! I barely ever use blender but this will stay in the repertoire

This was nice ...going through the channel for detailed breakdown..subb3r !

I’m very glad you decided to do this 👍🏾

✅️ permanently allow the execution of <my chaos> My favorite blender setting

Jesus says: in the beginning was the geonodes😁Thank you, great work!

Really good shorts videos, I like blender info in this format 🙂🙌🏻

It would be better if you talked more about nodes instead of getting distracted by whining people

Don't feel bad, I enjoyed all of your videos. As you say it was a learning experience (and at least I went along with it) AND you went through the effort making those videos (which is quite a bit of work knowing from my own experience) and shared them with us. For free. And you responded to comments and improved upon your work. So, absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Thank you for doing it all. PS.: Although I was aware of "Extra Objects" I did not know the Solids were hiding there either, so a helpful tip.

This is extremely helpful because I was unaware of this easy way to make these complicated shapes! Great tutorial! This just shows you are human! No real harm and no foul because the ability to admit when you were wrong shows great character!

ForthNodes ? also see Factor language

LispNodes ?

Yes yes yes please geonodesopedia

Fabulous>>>> very exciting. Onwards please !! Thanks

Thank you for your thoughts on an efficient nodal system. Personaly, I add handy values in outputs, usefull for thé next node. Do you eventually sell your nodes that reproduce a 3d node?

What stage is realising the long term power of node templates, and building an internal library of node groups for different projects?

Thanks for being thorough and efficient. Most importantly, though, you took the time to cover fundamental aspects that almost all tutorials I've seen so far fail to explain. Your aside about integer and float ranges was perfectly helpful, by the way. I appreciate "peeks" down a rabbit hole even before a deeper look is appropriate. Great work and instant subscribe.

"No longer worried about creating all of that geometry in smarcomplicated ways in geometry nodes." I completely agree.

🥵🥵

it's rarely to see such a useful video series. I don't understand why there is so less viewers and subscribers... really hope this series can be made to the end.

I contend there is a higher level to Geometry Nodes Mastery: Writing *all new* Blender nodes (not node groups, but all new functionality) And/Or writing the code for other programs to add Blender node equivalents to them. Writing nodes in Unreal that do *exactly* what their Blender counter parts do pushes your understanding to all new heights. kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH3KpJyVnNR5oNU

"If you can think it, you can do it" Yes. I made a humanoid model entirely from Geometry nodes... ZERO modeling. 😁 18,000+ nodes 🥴 kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZzTpZt8fdyLmKM And kzbin.info/www/bejne/jouUaGSLeN2ZjqM

I'm writing all these nodes in Unreal, as well as an translation plugin. Export from Blender, import into Unreal with a few clicks. ^_^ All of your Blender Geometry node models can run natively in Unreal, giving both the Dev AND the player access to the inputs during runtime. ^_^ So far, I've got ~40 nodes created for Unreal that exactly match the form/function of their counterpart in blender.... Only an absolute absurd number left to got -_- kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH3KpJyVnNR5oNU