AMAZING video!!!👍

Man, thank you so much! This tipe of approach is very insightful and necessary. Greetings from Brazil. God bless you.

On this video we can't caught the no.....becoz ...the caption cover the half parts

Harika bir anlatım olmuş. Çok işime yaradı. Teşekkürler.

2:32 , I have a doubt regarding the potential line, doesn't the potential must be zero as it is moving along the line???

Such an awesome job on the subject! totally wonderful! I have a tertiary degree in phyics with a specialty in electronics, and yet, you still helped me understand more of the Curl equation. Your videos really rock! So excellent!

Very narrated and explained!

Thanks a lot for the material! Btw, is it your voice in the video? You don't have any accent at all.

Very clearly explained, thanks.

Amazing pace and animations!!

Just what I needed, amazing work! I hope more is coming in the future :)

Magnetic field is the kinetic energy of moving charges.

tf... the Time-Dependent S.E. is just a first order equation dependent on time only. You just wrote out the full Schrodinger Equation for the time-dependent S.E.

Thank you!

whats up with the weird sum symbol? never seen that ever

This was by far the best video I watched on Maxwell equations. Thanks for your work!

thanks

Electromagnetic waves are only created by sources. So it is not valid to set the sources to zero. When the source is included, this results in the wave equation equal to a source. Solving this in homogeneous PDE yields a nonlinear phase vs distance dispersion curve. Apply phase speed and group speed operators on this curve shows that the both the phase speed and group speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduces to the speed c in the farfield, starting at about 1 wavelength from the source. After that the speed decays asymptotically toward speed c, but never becomes exactly c, even at astronomical distances from the source. So the speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZbin presentation of above arguments: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZazlX1tq7iErLM *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

Thumb is for force Index finger is for magnetic field Middle finger is for movement of charged particle.

Welcome to my utopia of death!

🙏🏻

Please 🙏 make a video on divergence and curl theorems please

Please 🙏 make a video on divergence and curl theorems please

Please 🙏 naje a video on divergence and curl theorems pkease

Please make a video about del oprator ,divergence and curel theorems it difficult to understand for me

great explanation, you are a genius

The Photon energy is the energy for 1 second at a given frequency. For that reason ever cycle has the same energy and we are told that we need higher energy to write on the ball so why can't we just leave it a bit longer? I suggest that it is not the energy of the so called Photon that matters but the frequency. It is said that higher energy at lower frequencies just gives more Photons at lower energy. I suggest that at lower frequencies at lower frequencies just makes the amplitude higher as it does at very low frequencies where we can see the waves on an oscilloscope. The only thing that get's higher at higher frequencies is the frequency and there fore of cause also the energy for ever second.

Why you stop making videos?🥹

Why you stop making videos?🥹

Why you stop making videos?🥹

I really enjoy your calm explanations and the great animations

So clear and concise.😍😍😍😍

Outstanding lecture it is!!! Thanks a lot Sir.

This explanation is so good! Thank you!

Great Sir

Thanks a lot.

God bless you man

didn't quite understand contraction. i mean i get what you're saying but multiple examples would've been nice

I see the genius in Maxwell. We owe him for his contribution.

Is anyone familiar with Euler’s or anyone else studying this variation of Euler’s contain column studies? The video and white paper describes the mechanical properties related my unique variation of Euler’s Contain Column studies. It shows how materials (representing fields) naturally respond to induced stresses in a “quantized“ manor. This process, unlike harmonic oscillators can lead to formation of stable structures. The quantized responses closely models the behaviors known as the Quantum Wave Function as described in modern physics. The effect has been used to make light weight structures and shock mitigating/recoiled reduction systems. The model shows the known requirement of exponential load increase and the here-to-for unknown collapse of resistance during transition, leading to the very fast jump to the next energy levels. kzbin.info/www/bejne/raOlpKSfepWpfZYsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3

1.5x speed is way better.

The best video of this topic I love it!!!!

¡Gracias!

🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 See utuber video 'Uncovering the Lost Secrets of Weber's Electrodynamics (Dr Andre Assis RTF Lecture)' for answer to many quandaries in physics that include explanations of the precession of the perihelion of Mercury sans Onerock's stupidity theories, I mean relativity theories. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛

Wonderful

Absolutely brilliant video! Really clear and concise.👌👍 Thank you!! Edit: Just realised this was your first video. Can’t wait to see the rest!

Thanks a lot

What does the last thing mean ?

Thank you

Amazing video, but I wish you'd just used the arrows for vectors, the bold is pretty hard to distinguish and it does matter a lot.