Correction: we are going to bipolarity, not multipolarity. USA and China. No Russia.

We are watching this in 2023 and speaking of Liberal rights is a joke today because the occupant of the WH has trampled all over our rights and plans to keep doing it. Trudeau in Canada is the same and al are now following the agenda of the Swiss based globalist elites. You will own nothing and you will be happy

American liberal democracy has turned out to be enforced global capitalist fascism!! Do as we say or else!!

This video has made me understand what's been going on in the world the last couple of years!

Taïwan will be the next Ukraine!

Rwanda is a product of european colonialism! The Hutu and thé Tutsis sere not killing each other before!

The election of Trump is a proof of american nationalism and isolztionism that the democrzts are trying to brake down in pushing for intervention worldwide!

The democrats are much more globalists and interventionists than the republicans because they are driven by the liberal ideology they want to impose worldwide!

He is only a clown from war criminal USA. The USA terror must be ended and USA must get free !

And they issued an arrest warrant to Putin

Rights? America? You're kidding, right? 🤣

The US is the real Megalomaniac Beast that committed numerous genocides around the world from the very beginning of its existence.

Muslim Feminists: Khadija was an empowered businesswoman, and Aisha was a university professor and a teacher for men. We must follow the example of the mothers of the believers. {And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance...} ال{وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلَا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَى... "Muslim" Feminists also: No, we don't have to follow this orders. It is not ours; It is for mothers of believers only.

Show me where in the Quran and Sunnah it says women (or men) have the right to a college education. Where does it say that? Stop lying against Allah, stop making up some new liberal religion and calling it "Islam." Just admit that your hot tears shed over lack of women's education are due to modern liberalism and have nothing to do with Islam. PS - And don't tell me "Seeking knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim." This hadith is referring to Islamic knowledge concerning obligatory beliefs and actions, e.g., aqida, knowledge of how to pray, fast, etc. It does not include "college education." If it did include college education, then this hadith would mean getting a college education is obligatory and if you are not college educated, you have committed a sin and are liable for punishment from Allah. Which is a ludicrous interpretation no one accepts..

*We can all agree that these matters should be handled by scholars. I have a sincere question though... What if we live in a world where prominent scholars are being jailed merely for speaking haqq and advising the rulers? Why are you not recognizing this current problem?**It's been three years since Sheikh Fahd al-Qadi died in Saudi prison due to medical negligence by the authorities.* Sheikh al-Qadi was arrested in 2016 because of a PRIVATE letter of advice he sent to the Saudi Royal Court in which he described violations committed by the Ministry of Education. He was known for his work with the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice. *He was sent to prison because he advised the ruler PRIVATELY! What will Madkhalis say next? Advise the rulers in your hearts and dreams.*

For all of those who think it is ideal if Muslim women are not financially dependent on men: Would it be ideal if Muslim men were not sexually dependent on their women? For example would it be ideal if men could purchase (at low cost) harems of docile life-like forever-young sex robots? How would you respond to Muslim men who justified this by saying such robots are necessary to give men true independence, such that they are not forced to stay in relationships with women who are rude, jealous, controlling, manipulative, fat, old, or ugly? How would you respond to Muslim men who said that Muslim women need to "step up their game" such that men choose to be with them instead of a robot that is more friendly, beautiful, young, and thin? The cop out answer is to say sex robots are haram, but there are other conceivable halal alternatives that would do the same thing: flood men with cheap alternatives. Obviously such alternatives would weaken and ultimately destroy marriage because it takes away the dependence that men have on women for sex. But that is literally what giving women financial independence does; it makes them independent from men. And that's why no society or religion ever did give women that independence, except for our current dystopia.

It's funny how the madkhalis fulfil the trait of the true khawarij, 1) they'll be from our ppl 2) harsh against the Muslims merciful towards the kufar 3) the Quran doesn't leave their throats.

"The problem isn't that he said "it's better to marry young". It's that he said, "women age like milk". That's just a horrible thing to say to a woman. Why could he not approach it with care like the Prophet (saw) would?" ****** ****** ****** Oh no! Are women's feelings hurt?!!! Are they going to cry?!!! Oh heavens noo! ANYthing but that!!! Nooooooooo!!!!!! You're right. We should approach things with care like the Prophet ﷺ, like when he said, "Women are the majority in hell," and, "I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you (women)."

Obviously, it’s still possible to lose weight on any diet - just eat fewer calories than you burn, right? The problem with this simplistic advice is that it ignores the elephant in the room: hunger. Most people don’t like to “just eat less,” as it may result in having to go hungry forever. Sooner or later, many will likely give up and eat without restriction, hence the prevalence of “yo-yo dieting.” While it should be possible to lose weight on any diet, some appear to make it easier and some to make it much harder. The main advantage of the low-carb diet is that it may cause you to want to eat less. Even without counting calories, overweight people tend to eat fewer calories on low carb. Thus, calories count, but you don’t need to count them.

*Atheists claim that they are intellectually superior to religious people because they are willing to question their beliefs, whereas religious people are dogmatic and refuse to question their deepest beliefs and won't consider evidence that could potentially undermine those beliefs.* Well, have you ever heard an atheist say: "I wonder if constantly increasing individual freedom is a good thing." "I was wrong about democracy being a viable system." "Maybe the sexual revolution was a mistake." "The evidence shows that equality of the sexes is destructive." "Let's have a debate on if freedom of speech and religion is good for society." "Could it be that women need fewer rights?" I have never seen an atheist raise these questions or hold these positions up to serious scrutiny. Nor do they provide any evidence for their beliefs on these matters. They simply assert them and ridicule and mock anyone who disagrees with them.

*Let's offer a course on Western/liberal marriage:* *_Lesson #1: Don't ever argue with your wife because that is emotional abuse, and she will call the police and accuse you of hurting her. Police don't need any evidence to arrest you, so enjoy your stay in prison._* Lesson #2: Don't you ever dare to deny your wife having sex with others. You don't own her. If you're a real man, you'll help her find a boyfriend or two and let them use your bed while you sleep on the couch. *Lesson #3: Be fair to each other, but remember, she can accuse you of abuse at any time and destroy your life.* _Lesson #4. Your wife is tilth for all men (and women). They will use her as they, please. Enjoy your married celibacy._ Lesson #5: If your spouse wants to change "their" gender, don't argue. Just be happy for "them," you transphobe. *_Lesson #6: Want a divorce? Don't want a divorce? Doesn't matter. She can leave you for any reason or no reason at all. She gets to take at least half your wealth and custody of your children, and you pay all her legal fees. She might even end up living with her boyfriends in the house you bought with your kids._*

Rex Tom, FBI Director of Investigative Publicity, stated in 2006 about the FBI's position: “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

people should've listened to this guy for the past two decades.

As with everything else, liberalism has fucked over world politics for all eternity

Russia will never trust the west again.

Rather narrow-minded presentation, it's no wonder that we Hungarians had to build the atomic bomb for America, the first Ford vehicle, the first computer, and I could list.The narrow view that explains everything in terms of liberal democracy is perhaps possible because this lecturer cannot interpret the concept of social patterns.It would be easy to understand the concept of social patterns if we looked at the social pattern as a thought, an object, an action behind which there are balance processes.For example, it is thanks to the first computer built by the Hungarian mathematician János Neumann that I can now teach you from my phone and this is a sustainable social process that is global.The hydrogen bomb built by Ede Teller also ensures world peace. And given that a hydrogen bomb is an social object, we can understand why an object can also be a social pattern.Similarly, the Wilsonian principles that ended the world war by your own President Wilson, which you did not observe when you liquidated Hungary, the Christ of the peoples, are also valuable as social models.And if you understood what social patterns are, then social balance in the world is nothing but the harmony of social patterns.

Very good video even when he believes that liberalism is the solution to all humanity problems.

As an observer it is amazing to see how intellectuals in the US brainwash themselves without even realizing it (or perhaps they do but it is a covering act)! The American Liberal democracy did not go to Iraq (or all other countries that they bombed in ME) for the purpose of democratization! You don't carpet bomb a nation(S) or sanction them or treat them like garbage or rape them in military prison to bring democracy! The reason so call American liberal hegemony attacked Iraq was (1) To block Chinese and Russians in the Middle East from having access to vast energy resources, (2) exploit Iraq and it's resources which they are doing until today (3) divide and conquer the ME (4) Dismantle and destroy ME countries for the expansion and domination of the state of Israel (5) Prepare the situation for the final achievement which was to bomb Iran! . Iranian expansion was the cause of this failed project in the ME. The so called liberal democracy of the West is nothing but a cover up for further exploitation, domination and devastation of the world population by global corporate capitalism which thankfully was doomed to failure.

"The blob beat me" a convenient answer when the alternative is that he was a pathological liar or corrupt... but that probably has nothing to do with his behavior and choices while the singular most powerful force in global politics. Obama was the first person I voted for. The idea that he (and his administration and party by extension) failed at fulfilling every promise and campaign commitment they made because they were overwhelmed by Washington bureaucracy is absurd. It is the abject failure of the liberal order that is responsible for the demise of the global liberal order, I fact that they can not and will not accept and the underpinning of a lot of the instability we're experiencing.

The man, the acadamic, bought the book!

Is the right of a human preserved in USA & Canada? How has that been achieved and what records exist to support it? Is right to bear arms preserving lives in USA & Canada and what are the records to support that assertion?

John spoke to typical white people in Geneva who hate non westerners . Their attitude is one of racism, When has China ever attacked or invaded western countries? John believes the Chinese won't fight back? Westerners intervened into China for 8ver a century, killing millions. Does John think Chinese won't fight back?

In Korean War, China was not nuclear but defeated USA & allies, pushed them back from where they started. USA Secretary of State-went to China and told them to stop war or USA will use nuke and it has used before. China then realised like other countries the value of nukes, and no it’s us nuclear, what threat will you give them now?

Keep out of countries. Let them regionally solve the problems left behind European imperialism.

You went to Iraq and later as mission changed in Afghanistan for human rights. Remember professor? Rwanda would have become another Iraq and Somalia, last hack down.

China , the professor is nationalist and not just humanitarian. There are many or most doing this .

See history’s influence on Rwanda Genocide. You will see European imperialism.

So much hate in west against China, who has not invaded so far its own integral part Taiwan. Why hate, this is colour and religion.

WhyChina being last country to align with; once Russia or Soviets were communist, and in a recent survey East German missed communism.

North Africa threat from rear. So who will join who, you do not know.

Remind professor comments; USA is country divided and of hate and I go to China and say thanks, I have come amongst my people, and now he is proud to be raised by so called liberal country, which protect human rights. Alas if you see the human rights abusive we are facing.

Russia will and should. be with USA, the professor says, why? Because it is a reborn Christian country? Can China move to other religion to keep winning, religion will not change Chinese nationalism or their identity. It is preparing Pakistan and May be other Islamic and non-white , non-Christian countries or Christian countries sidelined , which are victim of oppression and racism has been taken out of world ‘s context like Fukuyama in “ End of History is maddening . Who kept dollar number one currency in world without backing of gold? Petrodollar. Liberal America professor has not committed massive abuses by whites towards non-white like African-American even Christians. Do not delude professor; you yourself said USA is country of HATE. You cannot go into grocery store knowing will you come out alive. Massive contradictions by professor. Small place to write or have enough to say.

Causes of massacre in countries under imperialism imposed like Congo was basically responsibility of imperialists to create wedge between people on origins, the idea was novel to these countries before imperialism. Nationalism and racism was left in countries by European. Take blame professor. Stupid questions, given Canada is very Cold country, everything is frozen including minds. Professor says, establishment made Obama do things he is unwilling, how he exclude others from pressure of establishment?

This theory that US wanted to spread liberal democracy in the middle east is wrong. It was for US hegemony not liberal hegemony. To prove it wrong simply look at relation between US and Saudis just aa an example, do they ever pushed for democracy there, absolutely not. In fact I argue that it's the opposite, US does not want real democracies in the middle east or Latin America, because those democracies then may not align with or be profitable for US, so the only thing US is after are regimes that obey US.

Here we have another "Messiah" another articulate (to the naive) nut. The US has many deffects and made many mistakes but there is nothing wrong with wanting to spread democracy. The US went to Vietnam, to Irak, to Afghanistan to oppose evil regimes, as Communism and despots were and are in the USSR, Communist China, Communist Vietnam, dictators like the ones in Irak, Iran, Afghanistans, and it dit always so in response to the aggressive behaviours of the USSR, Mao, Sadam, etc., and now Xi's. There is nothing is wrong with trying to include China in the capitalist democratic system. It obviously was a mistake, for the time being, but it will probably turn out right. After all, the Communists of China ditched economic Communism because it became obvious to them that Communist economics is an oximoron. The Chinese opted for Nazi style capitalism, a capitalism controlled by the state. Unfortunately, too many Chinese, much like Nazi Germany, got into their heads the crazy idea they are superior and that everybody must submit, specially the West. for some crazy reasoning that the West humiliated China. The hard truth is China humiliated itself because its internal divisions and weakness. I mean, Imperial Japan (another superiority-based regime), beat the hell out of China during WWII until the West freed China by destroying Japan. It is a rational belief to assume humans, all humans want freedom and the power to choose rulers. After all, the West re-enacted Greek democracy, although only partially, because the Europeans realized there was no reason to submit to King or Church and that democracy was better because humans, like all animals like freedom and respect. He is right that the US (Kissinger and Nixon) misjudged Chinese Nazi-like nationalism, at least in the short medium turn. But I have another take; sooner or later the Chinese will realise they can have even more prosperity and freedom if they ditch the CCP. And the will, either in a violent uprising, in view that a peaceful regime change in Tiannamen and Hong Kong was not possible. It is likely that also a new Denxiao Ping will decide, will realise, that political Communism+nationalism based on cultural-racial superiority acts as a brake on China and will eventually destroy the CCP regime because, as China becomes more powerful, the rest of the World, particularly all large industrial democracies; Japan, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan, India, all of Europe and democracies elsewhere, plus countries who may not be sound democracies but fear Chinese expansionism, will develop a great alliance, that even post-Putin Russia will join (much like did against Nazi Germany). The hard truth is that China is just another dictatorship like Nazi Germany and will collapse because the Chinese revolt, or the CCP ditches the totalitarian regime because it threatens its prominent members who will consider a better outcome to become rich oligarchs (if not prosecuted). I Think the professor overestimates the stability of a regime who needs fear and terror to control its own population and to those who are not "Chinese" (Uyghurs). The professor also underestimates the example that Taiwan represents for many Chinese under the CCP; the Chinese of Taiwan, along with the native peoples of Taiwan, show the Chinese people are capable of democracy, of liberal democracy and even of Swiss style direct democracy, which they are doing. Remember Taiwan started as a right wing dictatorship. Many in CCP and others in China sooners or later will realize that as a dictatorship there is no way the big democracies of the World will accept or tolerate at World dominated by a totalitarian regime. I agree the US gets involved in too many foreign wars; it is one of the effects of representative democracy which, particularly in the US has fallen into the hands of a professional political caste and the lobbies who propel them. I think Mearshimer is basically anothe articulate fool. Like too many in the liberal democracy establisment. That is why I bet on Swiss style direct democracy; it has produced the most stable, less polarized, most responsible voters in the World, as the way the handle their national debt shows. Of course, in a Swiss style direct democracy, where the people would stop the government from sending the people to their deaths in any war that does not threaten the survival of the nation. The professor is right that China, dictatorial China, like any dictatorship, will not rise peacefully, that is whyeit will not rise; it will be stopped by a great economic and military alliance, a World Alliance. I wiss the professors had less faith in the inherently unstable Chinese dictatorship and more in democracy, even in defective liberal democracy. Although would be much better for humanity if he wrote and spoke to bring Swiss style direct democracy to the US and to other democracies and all nations. But I doubt he will be able to; he is one of those "messianic guys" who does not believe in the ability of voters to make complex decisions (as the Swiss show decade after decade), he thinks he has special insights, almost "revealed" insights the people need to be guided. Unfortunately, too many people seem no need such leadership, I do not know if comes from the seduction Judeo-Christian-Islamic-Marxist ideas (which to me make no sense) or simply because the forgot the ideas, the freedom and the reason that gave birth to ancient Greek democracy and all the other amazing achievements that are really the root of moderm democracy, science and everything else. The professor dismises Europe too soon.

It is imperative that America tries to reconsider employing a 'Contemporary form of Containment Policy' while dealing with The PRC. This is after all what China is doing. Holding allies hostage through checkbook diplomacy.

The greatest speech/lecture ever on foreign relations. Sadly, too smart for our not too smart leaders, you know, the lying useful idiots.

Liberals in Australia are conservative lololol

I appreciate an honest colonizer like Mr. Mearsheimer. Not the pretend peace-loving nonracists that are total frauds whom litter the West. On top of that he mostly knows what he's talking about