Fun fact: no one cares.

you dont, by default, have the right to say something which is "offensive". wish Americans knew what freedom actually was then they might respect it more.

@@chloegrobler4275 Yes. We do. See the UNANIMOUS Supreme Court holding in Matal v. Tam. Even Ginsburg agreed that "hate speech" is protected by the First Amendment. Grow a thicker skin, kid.

@@johnpauljones9310 america is retarded so i dont doubt that you protect people who spew out hate. except that you do protect minority groups and the language associated with them so no you don't get to claim all language is protected.

@@chloegrobler4275 Banning hate speech from the public square doesn't make the hate disappear. After the failed 1923 Munich coup, the nazi party was banned, it's leaders thrown in prison, and their members could no longer meet in public. All that did was drive them deeper into the shadows where their rhetoric got even worse and led to WW2 and the Holocuast. "Retarded" would be thinking banning hate speech would work again. Notice the US never started a world war or murdered 10 million people in a span of 5 years. Stop being an infant.

@@johnpauljones9310 where the fuck is this conversation going holy shit. all I'm saying is there are some things you don't get to say and some things you do, while knowingly or unknowingly breaks some law or serves no other function but to elicit a negative emotional reaction from someone else. if i ever argue that banning hate speech ever got rid of the people making it. i will be sure to point out that not letting fucking fascists walk openly, spewing out their garbage does serve a greater good, in that some dumbass walking down the street doesn't get a bad idea put in his dim head. not that its my point at all but do you really believe that "driving them deeper into the shadows" was the thing that killed millions of people? pick up a fucking history book and you will realise that it was in a sense inevitable that a second world war was coming. the initial impetus for hitlers interest in politics and the later anti semetic influences he would have all started from the german defeat in ww1, not a groups feelings being hurt in the public square. rhetoric wins hearts and minds, so yes, fuck all the people who want to say some dumb shit then when they get put in their place they can stick their finger up their bums and cry about their free speech, like they ever believed in it in the first place. also also, Germany today has a lot of restrictions we would i hope all agree are better in the long run. while America today doesn't have any hate whatsoever right??? the people with all that hate haven't ever tried to seize power from the democracy ever right????? lets all forget what "free" rhetoric got America on january 6 right???? i could keep going on but damn people be FUCKING RETARDED out here man.

Shit, I think I'll give it another go soon. Thanks!

typo; you meant 'So f***ing UNtrue!!!!!'

@@marcokite nope that's what you want it to mean you just watched it and it hurts because it's true oh its damn true.

True but one side is full of seditionist sooooo, yeahhhhh

democrats like pelosi are a sort of tumour that slowly saps your strength BUT THE REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS!!! they are like a bobcat gauging away at your intestines, eating all your organs without so much as a smile.

yeah look at Biden

Still more liberal than conservative, even though defining things in such binary terms is idiotic.

Lincoln was a racist who wanted the black population to 'return' (his word) to Africa and told the South it could keep slavery as long as they returned to the so called 'Union'.

@@shade9272 - Lincoln was a racist who wanted the black population to 'return' (his word) to Africa and told the South it could keep slavery as long as they returned to the so called 'Union' - so calling him 'liberal' is totally idiotic.