@@I77AGIC yes I have. I’m just trying to show you how long it takes and whether it gives any errors or anything else like you’re in front of the computer, there is some value in editing. I might switch to that depending on what people want.

@@I77AGIC once the subscribers increase, I will put a pole and I will see what everyone decides on

@@pdjinne65 I know it seems like that I totally agree

You’re saying that as if it’s going to stop improving. It’s currently the worst it will ever be. And ALSO, you say that as if Hollywood isn’t going to use AI, which they will

@@imValerium I do VFX for Hollywood movies for a living. AI is barely used so far. Too unreliable, not enough definition, not enough control.

@@imValerium Also a trained eye can immediately see where AI was used. You can't even cheat with it 🤣🤣 Believe me, I've tried.

@@pdjinne65 brother, your problem is you’re thinking about the technology as it currently is. If we go back only 1 year ago, the video generations we were getting were shockingly bad, and in only a year they’ve gotten SO much more consistent. You say a trained eye can immediately see, but an untrained eye ALREADY struggles. In another year this will be significantly better. If Hollywood doesn’t adapt at all, they will continue to take years to produce one movie, whereas content creators will quickly overtake them in quality AND quantity. And before you say- YES there will continue to be AI slop, but there will also be masterpieces that can only be achieved with AI and the human touch.

@@quercus3290 well somebody has to do it. I do it so you guys don’t have to.

@@quercus3290 you wanna know something funny this is my actual second $200 that I’ve spent

@@FutureInsightsHQ aha, well its either on this or on runpod I guess!