Mashallah

Subhan allah

How many times will you people break my heart by talking about karbala?😢😢😢

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Sallahu Alaihi WaAalihi Wasallam

SubhanAllah 🌹🌹

MahshaAllah 🌹🌹🌹

SubhanAllah 🌹🌹

Mustafa Mustafa 💟💟💟💟

MahshaAllah 🌹🌹🌹

SUBHANALLAH SUBHANALLAH SUBHANALLAH 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

subhan ALLAH💚

Bb BBL will also need the first of my new contract to me so to will have a full list of the work done in a good way time a good way of getting the first round part my car 🚙 😅the car was just the one I was going for and I think 🤔 has 😅been working on Friday and 😅on Friday 😅so you 😅have it 😅back 😅

MaSha Allah

❤

💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝

❤❤❤❤❤

Dua ki guzarish please

Aslamo alaikum ❤ Masood sohrwardi Dera ghazi khan

Can someone tell me what the beginning dhikr is? I'm absolutely hooked.

ماشاء الله ماشاء الله مرحبا مباركا مباركا

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

MahshaAllah ❤❤❤❤

❣️SubhanAllah🥺🥺MashaAllah❣️

Ma-Shaa-Allah, Alhamdulillah 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

Is karam ka krun shukr kese ada ♥️♥️

The best preacher of Alpharetta

Mashallah subhanallah kya baat hai

My favourite nath

ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ

SubhanALLAH❤️

You are such an amazing man! Your lecture made me cry. Do you have more content on the internet?

Salam, does anyone know where I can find the Dhikr at the begging of the video? Thank you!

Salaam is there a video for the whole lecture?

Is the Shaykh a Shadhili or Alawi?

اللہ پاک سلامت رکھے

سبحان اللہ

سبحان اللہ

SALAM YA PANJTAN PAK AS SALAM HAQ CHAAR YAAR

Sin is ignorance. This is well known Socratic definition of sin which, like everthing Socratic, is an opinion always worthy of attention. The difficulty with the Socratic definition is that it leaves undetermined how ignorance itself is to be more precisely understood, the question of its origin, ect. That is to say. even if sin be ignorance(or what Christianity would perhaps prefer to call stupidity), which in one sense cannot be denied we have to ask, is this an original ignorance, it is always the case that one has not known and hitherto could not know anything about the truth, or is it a superinduced, a subsequent ignorance? If it is the last question implies, then sin must have its grond in the activity with which a man has labored to odsecure his intelligence. But also when this assumed, the stiff-necked and tough-lived difficulty returns, promoting the question whether at the instant a man began to obsecure his intelligence he was distinctly conscious of what he is doing. If he was not distinctly of this, then his intelligence was already somewhat obsecured before he began, and the question merely returns again. If it is assumed on the contrary that when he began to obsecure his intelligence he was distinctly conscious of it, then sin (even though it be unconsciousness, seeing that this was an induced state) would not lie in the intelligence but in the will, and the question which must be raised is about the relation of he intelligence and the will to one another. With such questions as these ( and one might continue to augment them for a many a day) the Socratic definition does not deal. Socrates therefore never really gets to the determinant we know as sin, which is surely a defect in a definition of sin. Why is this? For if sin is indeed ignorance, then sin properly does not exist, since sin definitely consciousness. If sin consists in being ignorant of what is right, so that one consequently does what

Shaykh with a sense of humor MashaAllah Beautiful

الھم صل علی سیدنا حبیبہ محمد و علی آلہ واصحابہ وبارک وسلم تسلیما کثیرا کثیرا

الھم صل علی سیدنا حبیبہ محمد و علی آلہ واصحابہ وبارک وسلم تسلیما کثیرا کثیرا

Ya Rasool Allah Ji 🤲

Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd

Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd

Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd

Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd

Allahu akbar allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali ahli bytihi

Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd