The Hidden Dangers of AI - Part 1
22:58
Is AI Actually Conscious? (Part 3)
15:12
Пікірлер
@SisebutoSirois
@SisebutoSirois 20 күн бұрын
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
@AdeBorris
@AdeBorris Ай бұрын
Great analysis, thank you! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
@SatishPolanco
@SatishPolanco Ай бұрын
Excellent breakdown! You made complex topics easy to understand, well done! For those wanting more insights, check out my bio. Thanks again, looking forward to your future content!
@NigelTolley
@NigelTolley 3 ай бұрын
If you go back far enough, you'll be fine. 1960-70s. (All the computers were female maths whizs!)
@PlannedNExecuted
@PlannedNExecuted 3 ай бұрын
*Nah nah, it’s gonna be way more than 40%*
@GrantCastillou
@GrantCastillou 3 ай бұрын
It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461
@lisaisdeceased
@lisaisdeceased 6 ай бұрын
gpt3 was made usable by using cheap, physically and emotionally taxing labor, by going to poor countries and paying people pennies to flag violent and abusive prompts. After working in these conditions people have been diagnosed with ptsd. Yet again companies find a way to masquerade the exploitation of poor countries for profit so we feel disconnected from the issue.