I've never read Coriolanus, but reading all Shakespeare's plays is something I want to do, too. Those are brilliant reflections on Gulliver's Travellers I'll have to pick up A Manual for Cleaning Women.
@natalikharauli141329 күн бұрын
Cool video, good luck!
@pinkerperson3844Ай бұрын
Very nice! Great that you're enjoying reading more this month! Yes, being named something strange for the country you're born in and then changing their name is very familiar.
@EquipteHarryАй бұрын
Hernandez Michelle Gonzalez Mark Walker Mark
@zonic_reading2 ай бұрын
Crazy how people with huge channels cannot give this type of content, good job we need more of your videos 🙏
@NatashaStory-p6r2 ай бұрын
Wilson Anthony Wilson Jeffrey Moore Larry
@Calcprof3 ай бұрын
Enoch is in the Ethiopian Orthodox (Christian) bible.
@jaime83184 ай бұрын
Over rated?? yeah....That's why so many millions f copies of his novels have been sold all over the world in dozens of languages, right? Maybe the problem is not the books, but the reader.
@twyckoff874 ай бұрын
Tolkein fought in WWI. Thats probably more relevant than WWII.
@StephenYuan4 ай бұрын
Personally I never finished it. Gave up halfway through Return of the King and never went back. Don't think I ever will either.
@issoufguene24394 ай бұрын
come on guys, if you comment at list click the like bottom
@goyasolidar4 ай бұрын
That is a hell of a thing to suggest. I would argue that every fan of fantasy should read the books, not just for their cultural significance, but because they are exceptional works of narrative and world building.
@mrchristian04574 ай бұрын
I get it that people have their own opinions but man, saying LotR isn’t that great of a fantasy novel is wild. To say it’s not the most important fantasy novel when it essentially defined the genre is also wild. Also, really? “So you don’t have to”? I get you don’t like it but that to me is blatant disrespect and seems to be clickbait.
@alessandropizzocaro75064 ай бұрын
"so you don't have to" ?! Bro what are you talking about? These books are quite possibly the greatest work of fiction ever conceived.
@nono-hg7yd4 ай бұрын
Obviously, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when you give the greatest fantasy book of all time a 3/5, pretty hard to not lose any credibility. Seems when reading you glossed over what makes the book universally loved and praised.
@Adamantos-Elean4 ай бұрын
nice orc cosplay bro
@xavierpaquin4 ай бұрын
LOTR is full of a beauty and nobility that nothing else captures. It's length gives it an aesthetic, meditative quality that would be lost by cutting it short... you only get bored where you can't see the beauty. It's not about action, it's about savoring the journey. Tolkien's background as a linguist and historian shows everywhere and gives his world incredible depth that rewards rereading, and I think some experience reading history actually helps in really appreciating LOTR for what it is, which is closer to a fictitious history than a literary epic (which is even truer for the Silmarillion). Finally, unlike most fantasy literature which could be classified as escapism, it has a true moral core. It doesn't wallow in darkness for entertainmen'ts sake, but elevates you towards a noble standard. Beauty and the Good go hand in hand. As far as I'm concerned, Fantasy as a genre doesn't need anything else than Tolkien! A welcome cure from anything contemporary, a balm for the soul.
@arvoswithharvo7594 ай бұрын
Thank you for putting into words what I perhaps wasn't eloquent enough to express - I agree with you that the novels have a meditative quality which is lost by focusing on just the core plot beats. I am a somewhat fast reader by habit, so it's not something that I'm used to. I did appreciate the connections to history and myth, especially in the motif of folk music that runs throughout. And of course the amount of work that goes into creating the various languages is admirable too. I was aiming to assert that whilst those are both good things, they are not the only measure of effective fantasy storytelling. I see Tolkien as taking a vast and uncompromising attitude towards his craft which distinguishes his work from what most modern fantasy authors would consider good practice, and I certainly respect that. That being said, I don't see fantasy or any fiction on a linear scale of style and quality. In the video I wanted to speak to the fact that although Tolkien's work is at the pinnacle of fantasy, largely owing to its immense care and detail, it's not the case that new works of fantasy must aspire to that same level of worldbuilding to be considered effective. It's not that Lord of the Rings itself is flawed, but that we don't need to always demand fantasy universes to hold up to the same level of detail. Even if I didn't enjoy it to the fullest, it's something rich and complex enough for people to fall in love with, and I do wish I worded that better in the video proper. I do want to one day read the Silmarillion, though perhaps I will save it for after a re-read of the trilogy. Everything I have heard about the Silmarillion builds it up to be a massive challenge, so I want to come prepared!
@xavierpaquin4 ай бұрын
@@arvoswithharvo759 LOTR doesn't really prepare you for the Silmarillion in terms of background, you can jump right in. The events of LOTR aren't even really connected with those of the Silmarillion, they happen much later in the same world. To use your Bible analogy, LOTR might be the Gospels, and the Silmarillion Genesis. The challenge with the Silmarillion is that it's history through and through, with a couple of tales thrown in the mix. Characters and setting change with every chapter so it's easy to get lost in the details. It just requires more careful reading, going back a lot with the help of the index to connect threads, and constantly referring to the map (which is also the case for LOTR though). However, it's a third of the lenght of LOTR, which helps! 😂 After listening to your review though, I thought maybe the Silmarillion wouldn't be for you 😉 But if you go ahead, do it before rereading LOTR. Me, I'm gonna reread it before rereading LOTR, and start that by reading the appendices first 😄
@MeanDark24 ай бұрын
"so you don't have to", lol, why wouldn't you want to read these books? really good books.
@SgtWicket4 ай бұрын
The movies adapted what teenage me thought the books were. The older I get, the more off-base the movies seem.
@MatthewBreck4 ай бұрын
highly recommend you read it for ya self!
@carlosherediavargas29854 ай бұрын
So we don't have to?
@robynationNH4 ай бұрын
LotR films >>> LotR books (except for the Witch King)
@Askyl4 ай бұрын
No way José! The movies are literally the best cinema ever, but the books triumphs them hard.
@SgtWicket4 ай бұрын
Movie Legolas and Gimli are unbearable.
@Adamantos-Elean4 ай бұрын
lol you're funny (and stupid)
@alessandropizzocaro75064 ай бұрын
Absolutely not !
@StephenYuan4 ай бұрын
The movies are better because shorter
@pinkerperson38445 ай бұрын
Wow! Sounds like a busy month! That was unfortunate to read those are 3 books back to back. At least the Shakespeare play was a beary funny read.
@pinkerperson38446 ай бұрын
Haha that's a fun placeholder! Hope you're doing better this month!
@pinkerperson38447 ай бұрын
5 books this month, that's a much more sustainable pace to read. Interesting that you only understood The Sellout towards the end. Maybe it would have been a different experience if you got it earlier or if you didn't get it even up until the end.
@arvoswithharvo7597 ай бұрын
I feel like some books have early parts that teach the reader how they're supposed to read them, like tutorials in games! Like if a narrator's supposed to be read as unreliable, there would be a short scene or passage which demonstrates how this unreliability works. I wonder if The Sellout also had something like this earlier on that I missed.
@ReadingIDEAS.-uz9xk8 ай бұрын
That is a lot of reading! Some people don't read that much in a life time. Best wishes to you.
@pinkerperson38448 ай бұрын
Wow that's a lot of books! Great effort!
@pinkerperson38449 ай бұрын
Oh lol I was looking forward to the bottom 3 but it was skipped. You've read a lot of interesting books this year!
@pinkerperson38449 ай бұрын
Haha can't stop buying books. Final Bosses each month would be crazy. Good luck and hope you finish a few this year! Hope you enjoy the rest of LoTR! I remember finishing Hobbit and just skimming the other books since I already knew the story. I actually quite enjoyed the movie version 'A Man Called Otto'. I didn't feel like it was sad at all because maybe that was because of the adaptation.
@luisaguilar42869 ай бұрын
Im glad to come across this video, currently going through my first reading. The Franz Pokler and Ilse chapter really struck my emotional core.
@apocalypsepreventionagency Жыл бұрын
I work in childcare, children are terrors 😭 I should read Agnes Grey
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
it's certainly a hard job! Anne Bronte's novel definitely sympathises!
@Mai2727 Жыл бұрын
But how would the perfect Austen suitor be? Misleading title
@SalvadoreBogdanov Жыл бұрын
Absolute mad lad
@0FynnFish0 Жыл бұрын
Of course she is "conservative" by todays standards. She lived over 200 years ago and grew up in the british upper class. She wrote for and about the world of her time and that's partly what's so fascinating about it. Doesn't mean we should go back there, but literature in my opinion isn't just meant to keep you in your modern reality and reaffirm your own moral system and worldview over and over again. About her being judgemental, well, I'd say she's very perceptive. Of course I can't say how nice of a person she really was, but that eye for details in other peoples behaviour is exactly what you need as an author. How else would you create believable characters?
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching and commenting! Perceptive is a great word for it - her talent as a writer shines through in all the little details she ascribes to her characters I think it's very true too that all literature is valuable and it's worthwhile to read books that go against my morals. Her work is certainly significant and important, but I feel like for her own audience her novels were meant to be enjoyed, and often her attitudes towards class and relationships made it hard for me to love her characters or enjoy following their stories. If only I owned a manor though!
@apocalypsepreventionagency Жыл бұрын
The perfect suitor indeed 😍 Once upon a time i read some Austen , Sense and sensibility and probably some others as well, it was okay but perhaps too old-fashioned for my adolescent brain to comprehend. My favourite books is stuff more like 1984, Brave New World, Agatha Christie. I like character driven stories (especially in my own writing) but idk if i want to read books where the characters kinda suck 😅 also the size of those paragraphs 😭😭
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
I definitely agree - it's challenging to get through Austen for her pacing. she has wonderfully complex characters but it takes effort to warm up to some of them!
@joyc7117 Жыл бұрын
Also, have you read project hail Mary?
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
i haven't! I'm not in a big rush to, though I have heard many people say it's great
@joyc7117 Жыл бұрын
Too many 4/5s you've given me decision paralysis.
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
if i had to rank my enjoyment of the 4/5's, it'd go 3 Body Problem > The Scope of Permissibility > Bonjour Tristesse > Cloud Atlas > Persuasion >>>>> Dune oh wow there were a lot of 4/5's
@informalliteraryexperiments Жыл бұрын
Generally, is it sad, or is it serious? Same thing I guess, just like happy is usually associated with lighthearted.
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Interesting books! I never thought books would have a powerpoint or even recipes included. Sounds like a racist theme is hard to read but interesting when it works.
@tomlabooks3263 Жыл бұрын
Great question. It’s because artists are typically sensitive and deep, and it’s easier to land on a sad existential outlook than a positive one for these people. Where you find great profundity AND great positivity is, usually, in religion.
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Interesting books. I'll look out for an adaptation of I have some questions for you in a few years.
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Congrats on 28 books! There's so many interesting books and so many horrible books explained so fast. Really surprised you went through every single book but guess that's why it took 55 minutes. That's so much progress towards 100 books. I'm sure you'll hit it!
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Wow that's a 55 minute video. Could have been 55:55 but it's 1 second off.
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Very unusual books!
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
I'll definitely read the buried giant. Thanks for the recommendation. Wait what, you didn't find it worth it?! Why are you keeping it up in 2023 if you didn't enjoy the challenge?
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Wow new camera angle!
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Very nice year! 85 books in a year is great! Looking forward to the January video!
@briamccarthy5105 Жыл бұрын
85 books?!?!!!!!
@rxseqvartz5679 Жыл бұрын
I've had Blindness by José Saramago on my bookshelf for years. I am exited to read it this year! Also I just discovered your channel. Can't wait to see your future content. I have a question though. Please don't feel pressured or anything but will you upload a video about your best books of the year? I'm interested in knowing that :)
@arvoswithharvo759 Жыл бұрын
I'm working on a video along those lines, should be done soon!
@rxseqvartz5679 Жыл бұрын
@@arvoswithharvo759 that’s awesome! Can’t wait
@pinkerperson3844 Жыл бұрын
Oh in the end you did have that docked point for racism. Fun how the completely find book was completely fine. Are your ratings hovering over your head on purpose?