Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught 4 ай бұрын
How does it continue to swing without applying force?
@sciport 4 ай бұрын
You must have missed that. Fast forward to 7:50. 😊
@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for responding. Let me rephrase my question. How do they know that it is the earth causing the rotation and not the magnets? I did the math, it would only need to apply enough force to move it 1/80th of 1° each swing to complete the 360° day.
@sciport 4 ай бұрын
@@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught Good question! I'm going to ask Greg Andrews to reply to you. He's the "space" guy!
@justG01to05 4 ай бұрын
@@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught Greg Andrews here. Thanks for asking this great question and kudos on your calculations! Non-linear movement of the pendulum from its interaction of the magnetic system is definitely possible, especially when considering the setup isn't within ideal, perfect conditions. Thankfully, such movement is countered and more or less nullified via Lenz's law because the angle of deflection is quite small. Hope this helps.
@Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught 4 ай бұрын
@@justG01to05 Hi Greg, I am surprised and thankful for your response. The negation or correction of minor direction changes on trajectory paths would make sense under Lenz Law if those magnets were stationary. Theoretically, then shouldn't it also negate the minor changes it experiences from the earth's spin since that is the purpose. Also, How does it pass through the magnets without obstructing the path of rotation? Does it move with with the wire?
@samyjohnmusic 9 ай бұрын
❤❤❤thanks
@samlee2562 9 ай бұрын
This is one reason we shouldn't download pirate copies.. 🥲 save up and treat yourself to an epic movie 🍿👍
@ianhodges9464 9 ай бұрын
"My findings about the Foucault pendulum may very well astonish you ... The surprising truth is that oil Foucault pendulums are fakes . Most of them are fakes because they are forced to do what they do, rather than doing what comes naturally, and all the rest of them are fakes insofar as they are used as proof of the earth ’s [supposed] rotation. The only kind of Foucault pendulum which would not be a fake would be one that was free-swinging, operated properly, and either had no explanations, plaques or literature associated with it, or had such which plainly acknowledged that it cannot determine absolute rotation . / know of no such Foucault pendulum anywhere. The Foucault pendulum is a piece of scientific apparatus specifically designed and built to deceive and mislead. It is literally a “ humbug ” - a sham, a fake, a fraud, an artifice, a pretence, a hoax - and I believe it should be exposed as such. But the Foucault pendulum is more than a hoax. It is actually a religious propaganda tool. Foucault pendulum displays have something very serious and important to prove. ' - R.G. Elmendorf: A Critical Investigation of the Foucault Pendulum, published by P.C.S., PO Box 267 Baird ford, PA 15006, USA, Introduction.
@imaseeker100 9 ай бұрын
If you pointed a laser from a high ceiling to the floor, then lined up the pendulum on the point of light, would the pendulum be continuously deflected by a miniscule amount due to the earth's rotation?
@jimygod 10 ай бұрын
If you swing the pendulum in the direction of rotation, what is causing the pendulum to appear to move clockwise or counter clockwise?
@sciport 10 ай бұрын
Great question @jimygod! The Earth's rotation on its axis is what determines the direction (clockwise) that the ball will follow.
@jimygod 10 ай бұрын
@@sciport If you swing the pendulum in the direction of rotation, what is causing the pendulum to appear to move clockwise or counter clockwise?
@johnishikawa2200 10 ай бұрын
But the pivot that the pendulum cable is attached to at the ceiling is itself connected to the earth , and therefore the pivot must be producing a torque on the cable as the earth spins , which in turn will affect the orientation of the plane of the pendulum swing , would it not ?
@pon1 11 ай бұрын
The fact that it is spinning proves earth rotation, the fact that it takes longer time the closer you get to the equator proves that earth is a globe. Two proofs in one concept.
@oscaralmaguer5013 11 ай бұрын
Why would you say that the earth is spinning at 1000 mph?
@sciport 11 ай бұрын
Hello @oscaralmagure5013. Here's what he is referring to: "Earth spins on its axis once in every 24-hour day. At Earth's equator, the speed of Earth's spin is about 1,000 miles per hour (1,600 km per hour)." Source: earthsky.org/earth/why-cant-we-feel-earths-spin/#:~:text=Earth%20spins%20on%20its%20axis,don't%20feel%20Earth%20spinning
@slashmaster2 11 ай бұрын
So I understand how the back of a reflector can be cooled with water but how is the bulb itself cooled with water? Does it have glass veins in it? Is this water cooling in addition to fan cooling or is it only water cooled?
@wamabang 11 ай бұрын
There are also fans providing air circulation in the lamp house to help dissipate heat. There is also distilled water flowing in both ends of the lamp to control the heat from the arc lamp. The glass part of the lamp does not have glass veins.
@sciport 11 ай бұрын
Thanks John! @slashmaster2, John Armistead is our IMAX Manager.
@eric1393 Жыл бұрын
I have a (possible) answer to your challenge to prove the rotation of the earth without a Foucault pendulum! Assume we still had all our other knowledge of physics (namely, relativity and the speed of light) and could still perform parallax measurements to get approximate distances of celestial bodies like the sun, planets, and nearby stars, but, for some reason, hadn't proven the rotation of the earth. In that case, we could take measurements of the distances of the planets and the sun, and arrive at the same numbers for their positions in relation to the sun. We'll use light years and light days as the unit of measurement here. If we assume the earth is not spinning, we would observe that celestial bodies like the sun, planets, and stars "orbit" the earth once per day. So the other planets and distant stars trace an approximately circular orbit around the earth once per day. Say we also have determined they are themselves made of matter, rather than projections of light. Using our assumed knowledge of relativity and the speed of light, knowing that ordinary matter can not travel faster than the speed of light, we can set a limit about how far away the celestial bodies could be in their "orbits around the earth". Beyond this limit, they would have to be moving faster than the speed of light to orbit us once a day, which is an impossibility. All we really need to do is determine the radius of a circle with a circumference of 1 light day (the distance light travels in 1 day in a vacuum, equal to 0.002738 light years) as any mass with a daily orbit around earth farther away than that radius would have to travel faster than the speed of light to attain that orbit. A quick look at our handy 2 r π = Circumference = 1 light day formula and we get a circle with a radius of ~0.159155 light days. That's about 4.1224 billion kilometers. That's our limit for a celestial body's distance from earth in it's daily "orbit". No object we can physically see in the night sky can be farther than 4.1224 billion kilometers from earth without violating the laws of physics and traveling faster than light speed in order to complete 1 "orbit" around the earth per day. Let's check the planets, just to be sure. We've already established our ability to take accurate measurements of this distance, despite our blind spot about the earth's rotation. For fun, we'll use the date I'm typing this comment, just after midnight PST on November 6th, 2023. (Source: www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/planets/distance) Venus is OK (118.888 million km), and so is the Sun itself (148.309 mil. km). Mercury (210.313 mil. km), Mars (380.073 mil. km), and even Jupiter (596.214 mil. km) all look good! They're all under a billion km, much less 4.1224 billion. Uh oh, Saturn's pretty far away (1.409 billion km) and so is Uranus (2.788 bil km), but we're still within our limit, maybe we'll be OK. Uh oh. Neptune looks like a problem. Oh no! Neptune is 4.374 billion km from earth! And we see it "orbit" the earth every day! It must be moving faster than the speed of light! And so is Pluto! And a bunch of our space probes! And every object in the Kuiper belt, the Oort cloud, not to mention every star in the sky! They're all "orbiting" the earth faster than the speed of light! Actually, we're OK. We know those objects are plenty far away from us, and are doing just fine. Of course it's the earth that's spinning. There's no huge daily orbits of the planet. It's just our little blue and green ball, floating in our little divot in spacetime, spinning on its axis. Once every 24 hours, plus or minus a few milliseconds. No broken speed limits, just a few thousand peaceful brass pendulums swinging back and forth, slowly and silently tracking our pale blue dot's cosmic twirl.
@justG01to05 Жыл бұрын
I absolutely love the proof by contradiction track! ❤🤯 And I'm hoping you surreptitiously included Pluto with the planet category😁 (Yes, I know it's not a planet 🥹) However, there is way without utilizing proof by contradiction, and without knowing the speed of light, that can prove Earth is spinning. 👍🏾
@sauhamm3821 Жыл бұрын
proof of the spinning earth - watch the feed from the iss :)
@justG01to05 Жыл бұрын
A view of Earth from space is both breathtaking and a great way to prove the earth is spinning! Thankfully math (and the Foucault pendulum) are great alternatives for those of us whom may be quite nervous riding a vehicle with nearly 1 million pounds of fuel😆 However, there is a way to prove the Earth's rotation without going into space.
@kobus1901 Жыл бұрын
How do you keep the pendulum moving? Wouldn’t it stop at some stage? Or is movement induced by an electromagnet. In such a case how do you induce the movement without affecting the angle of the pedulum? Great video!
@sciport Жыл бұрын
Oooo, GREAT question! You actually nailed it on the head! At the very top, where the wire attaches, is called the pivot point. Just below it is a small circular electromagnet that the wire passes through. The electromagnet is juuusssttt close and delicately calibrated to be strong enough that the wire is grabbed/attracted by the magnet as the wire swings toward it. The wire is pulled to and touches the electromagnet. Then, as the heavy ball at the bottom swings the other direction, the wire overcomes the attractive force from the electromagnet. This action adds the same amount of energy that has been lost. In fact, if you stand at the bottom where our Greg, our planetarium manager, is standing and look up at the ceiling where the wire comes out, you can see a very slight vibration of the wire as it "snaps” away from the electromagnet. Now, to the “did you know…?” COOL part that you really didn’t ask for, but well, is just cool to know. We are taught and learn that gravity an invisible force that pulls objects toward each other. So, it is easy to make an inference or connection in our minds that there is a gravitational pull on the ball from the Earth and vice versa (true) and that this attraction is what would make the pendulum eventually stop swinging back and forth if we didn’t have our electromagnet (false). It is actually the energy “loss” due to FRICTION that would stop the pendulum from swinging without our electromagnet adding that energy “back into” our pendulum near our pivot point. Poppycock! Friction you say?!? Yep. There are different sources of that friction, which, to us wouldn’t seem to be that impactful - but welcome to the wonderful world of Physics! The types of friction impacting our pendulum include air resistance (on the ball, the wire, and even at the pivot point connection at the top) and the internal friction from the string itself. Each molecule of wire must exert force on the next molecule all along the length of the wire. And, all along the length of the wire, there exists friction “losses” which will eventually bring the pendulum to a halt. So, if we ignore all of these complications (even in an idealized case and EVEN in a vacuum) the main point is that it's frictional “losses” that cause the pendulum to come to rest, not gravity! Reference source: www.physicsforums.com/threads/swinging-pendulum-that-swings-forever.277748
@sciport Жыл бұрын
Forgot to tag you @kobus1901
@normanstewart7130 Жыл бұрын
Great demo. How long does it take to complete a full cycle?
@sciport Жыл бұрын
Hello @normanstewart7130! According to our local astronomy expert, it takes ~22 hours to make one full rotation back to the starting point.
@kitchencone Жыл бұрын
@@sciport I think that would be a half revolution. At the North Pole, a pendulum would swing unaffected as the earth turns under it. In 12 hours the back and forth direction would line up again with the initial line, but a full cycle is 24 hours. Where you are, at close to 30 degrees latitude, apparently a Foucault pendulum turns only half as fast, so a full rotation would be about 48 hours, or maybe 44 hours at 32 degrees.
@sciport Жыл бұрын
@@kitchencone Great points! I'm going to get with our planetarium manager and have him directly reply to this comment chain. Thanks Kitchencone!
@justG01to05 Жыл бұрын
Hello@@kitchencone...Greg Andrews here. I responded to your explanation but I recently learned my response did not go through. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . Your answer is correct - it does take 44 hours for a full rotation at our latitude...but the answer of 22 hours is also correct! As you superbly explained, the 44 hour cycle is based on the pendulum's perspective. The answer of 22 hours is based on an our unattached perspective. I thought I explained this concept in the original video but it may have been omitted for time consumption. Here's an example of what I mean by perspective. Assume a person is in a slow-moving train and they are tossing a ball up and down. Then assume a person is outside of the train watching the ball. The person in the train views the ball going straight up and straight down. The person outside the train sees the ball moving in an arch. Both persons view a different motion of the ball, and both motions are correct based on their viewing platforms. Unfortunately in my initial answer (of 22 hours), I did not define my viewing platform. My assumption was the question was based our observed viewpoint, not the pendulum's viewpoint. I also wanted to avoid creating a type of "TL;DNR" type of answer (which is what tends to happen when I go into nerd mode 😁 🤓)
@mageno4641 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate the tour. Curious how it looks now!
@brandonpeugh3843 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@concert_etiquette Жыл бұрын
what’s y’all’s power bill like? jesus!
@sciport Жыл бұрын
Don't ask!! 😎
@concert_etiquette Жыл бұрын
@sciport you guys should upload the demo you guys do before a showing. i remember being scared when the announcer guy said “The sub bass is located HERE”
@loupapai7949 Жыл бұрын
Hey Greg. Looking good!!
@loupapai7949 Жыл бұрын
Hey Greg, did you get this?
@gregandrews3867 Жыл бұрын
Finally I did. Thanks!
@loupapai7949 Жыл бұрын
This is really cool!
@ManNerdBoy Жыл бұрын
So cooool😎 first comment pls pin
@sciport Жыл бұрын
"There's no place like Dome!" We ❤ours!!! And, we ❤this simplified description of how it all works. In fact, Sci-Port Discovery Center just renovated our IMAX Dome Theatre with the NEW groundbreaking laser projection system which uses colored lasers to deliver stunning images and includes upgraded heart-pounding audio! Folks in the Ark-La-Tex are raving about it! Check us out! sci-port.org/imax/
@FromMyEyesToYours Жыл бұрын
They had a foucault pendulum at the Hansen Planetarium in Salt Lake City. Probably still do. Story goes, we were on a field trip there one day along about the 4th grade or so when one of our group reached out and smacked it. For some reason the smack caused the little stud at the bottom of the ball to come lose and contact the floor as the thing came to a hop-skip-drag stop. We all gasped out loud and I can only imagine how humiliated our teacher was. I always thought that it was necessary to fly in some kind of triple-PhD scientist from his lab on another continent to get the thing going again, but apparently not since the host here explains how the team there at Sci-Port starts theirs going on a daily basis (but, then again, maybe they are all triple-PhD scientists). Anyway.. thank you for this very interesting and informative video!
@sciport Жыл бұрын
😅 That is an awesome story/comment. Thanks for sharing it! Our Space Dome Planetarium Manager, Greg Andrews, is awesome - which you may gather from his enthusiasm in the video. He truly loves what he does!
@TruthStrangerThanFiction Жыл бұрын
The Draco constellation is Tubal-Cain with dragon constellation clearly in the shape of the number "2" with a "Ball" at the end 🐉 symbolizes "Two Ball" (Tubal) Orion the "Hunter" 🏹 constellation is Nimrod the Mighty "Hunter" also known as Osiris/Baal with orion constellation clearly in the shape of an "hourglass"⏳ a symbol of "Saturn" 🪐 Canis major 🐕🦺 and the dog star "Sirius"🐶 constellation is clearly none other than the Original "Caine" As Above☝️So below👇
@gregandrews3867 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info. As your comment highlights, the stories, artwork, perceptions (and in some cases the names) of constellations can, and often do, differ from one culture to the next, and even from one person to another! Everyone starts with the same canvas of stars but paints using the tools of their respective imagination.
@TruthStrangerThanFiction Жыл бұрын
@@gregandrews3867 This information I present is not my opinion but a fact, take from it as you wish.. From a critical thinking standpoint, one of the most fundamental areas the public lacks knowledge in, is in the realm of "Occult Studies" (TUBAL-CAIN is the Founder of the Craft) "ALCHEMY" was a way of hiding the TRUTH in plain sight.. Alchemy was and is right-hand writing of Church, meanwhile Masonry was the executive and military force behind it.. "When the human race learns to read the language of SYMBOLISM, a great veil will fall from the eyes of men." -Manly P. Hall
@aestheticmoon2954 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so muchh
@sugandhmalhotra Жыл бұрын
Good video. Very clear and simple explanation. I am curious to know what happens if we add weight to the front or made the straw longer
@sciport Жыл бұрын
YES! Those are great questions and thank you for the compliments.
@wadessirenvideos6750 Жыл бұрын
I noticed the Apollo 11 print on the top platter. Interesting how one of the last 70mm film presentations ever at the Sci-Port Discovery Center was of this print. Also, it's interesting to have learned that only about 12 IMAX 70MM FILM prints of this feature were made.
@JunkerDC Жыл бұрын
I went last weekend and I think you should trun up the volume some in your start up demo when it said something about base there was alomost nothing there the movie sounded good but it also said 6ch sound I think and the IMAX laser is 12 ch the movie sounded good but it was not as powerfully as Avarta 2 at IMAX with laser at amc for somereason there theater was shaking the heck out of us and the trailers were like real life in the sound deparment at amc might just be a Christopher Nolan thig but it was cool at yours I expected something a little more also the picture looked washed out something to do with the briteness the blacks looked gray
@sciport Жыл бұрын
Josh, thanks for the feedback. I'm forwarding this on to our IMAX Manager.
@oluwawamirionakoya3287 Жыл бұрын
I love movie theater's but I hate IMAX Dome, ask me why then I'll tell you guys why. Ask me anything about why I hate it😵💫😵💫😵💫
@slashmaster2 11 ай бұрын
Yeah, why do you hate it? The little holes in the screen bother you? It's not in focus well enough? Maybe the seats at yours were too bright and sent reflections back at the screen although they are black seats at this particular theater?
@oluwawamirionakoya3287 11 ай бұрын
@slashmaster2 Because imagine when they show the scene inside the ocean and all you see are big animals swimming over you and you start to get dizzy, and that case it makes you feel sick
@bagnome 2 жыл бұрын
I saw on your website that you're upgrading to digital IMAX. I was a bit saddened as I love the 70mm film format and still think it's the best format to watch a movie on. But I heard you were limited to 40 minute documentaries and the new digital system would allow you to show feature films. Now I'm kicking myself for not going more while you had your film system. Part of me hopes that you'll keep the film projection system around just in case, but I think you're going to be digital only from now on. Though the digital system will be cheaper and easier to maintain. Anyway, I hope the new system will bring you new opportunities to come.
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
@bagnome, Thanks for the comment. We here at Sci-Port had some similar feelings about the 70 mm format. BUT, I think were MORE excited at not only being able to see feature films like the new release of Black Panther 2 (set to go live for us on Friday, Nov. 25), but also that the image will be crisp and we'll have an entirely NEW sound system. It's going to ROCK! Keep watching our FB page for release and start dates! @Sciport or facebook.com/sciport/
@slashmaster2 11 ай бұрын
@@sciport How would the new digital system be more crisp when it has the same major problem of going through a lens that's very difficult to focus in a theater like that?
@twilight6779 2 жыл бұрын
Hydra (Sea Serpent) is another one of Nammu's sacred animals and that sign can also be dragons too
@karinawalter4233 2 жыл бұрын
2002
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, but you know the saying, "it's an oldie, but a goodie". The parents and teachers of our younger audiences request this every fall and it seems to have a sincere following.
@devontemoericke493 2 жыл бұрын
Lmaoooo wrrrrrong
@ChrisHVACguy 2 жыл бұрын
What's the compressed air used for?
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
Great question. Let me ask my IMAX Manager and we will let you know!
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
Christopher, from our IMAX manager, “Parts of the projector are pneumatic and use air to move certain things also there are air jet on the rotor that help form the loop on the film.”
@ChrisHVACguy 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, that's very fascinating, the brilliant minds that come up with this stuff..
@Aleziss 2 жыл бұрын
super high tech imax gear in grainy 720p...
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
That’s why were counting down the days till October when they officially break ground on the renovation for the digital IMAX Theatre!
@Aleziss 2 жыл бұрын
@@sciport ah ! can't wait to see the clear result then ! fun stuff...
@idkidk3552 2 жыл бұрын
RIP spectators neck
@Antibackgroundnoise 2 жыл бұрын
Aww man you skipped the best part, I would have loved to seen what amps are driving all your speakers.
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
Hello Total Plonker, i’ll see if our IMAX manager can share the 411 with you!
@NinjaSparkles 2 жыл бұрын
John is actually standing in front of the amplifiers at the beginning of the video. They're built into the wall behind him on the right. They're Sonics brand which is a brand made just for imax theaters. John tells me they pull a lot of power. That whole system including the speakers will be removed and replaced during our digital upgrade this year. Look forward to that!
@Edward135i 2 жыл бұрын
This is real IMAX, I miss the dome Theater that we used to have in Portland.
@sciport 2 жыл бұрын
William, we LOVE ours! As we were telling Carl, the best part is that we are going DIGITAL early next year (working out contracts, everything else, etc. now) and we'll KEEP the dome/wrap around screen!! 🎉
@Edward135i 2 жыл бұрын
@arizona Ranger no, they're called antifa and they are gay communist, not hippies.
@oluwawamirionakoya3287 Жыл бұрын
The first time walking in an IMAX Dome theater I got scared like my body freezed like an ice cube than when I looked up I had to hold on the handle of the seats that was during 5th grade
@Sanestpenji 3 жыл бұрын
Dude, I went to the omni theatre in Fort Worth Texas years ago on a field trip in school. I remember thinking that this was the future for movie theatres, now seeing behind the scenes I now understand why they weren't reproduced and made the standard... The requirements to run such an amazing experience can't really be streamlined and reproduced without serious money behind it and to get investors for a project like this that there is no real blueprint for isn't easy. But how cool is this? I've never seen screens like that and what a badass idea for the holes for the enormous subs. Everything about this is so amazing. If I had elon musk or Jeff bezos kind of money I would take this idea and optimize it to the fullest and even add in those roller coaster simulator type chairs with misters, fans and the works to go all out in making an experience like this something that reignites attention again.
@sciport 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Carl, thanks for your comment! Even though this is pretty cool, we’re actually going to be converting to a digital format beginning next spring. It will allow us to keep the curved image on the main screen which is a surround experience but with an actual digital movie which would include new releases as in regular theaters as well! Stay tuned.
@Sanestpenji 3 жыл бұрын
@@sciport that's what I was going to bring up, switching to digital data instead of having to rely on huge reels of film wouldn't just reduced the cost of operation, but make the maintenance easier too. I have a question though, are the movies you guys play in theatres like this limited to movies made for experiences like this? Like, you couldn't have any regular movie in theatres like this right? Wait, nevermind I answered my own question, you wouldn't be able to play them unless you had a reel for it, but considering you get it switched over to digital, what kind of new opportunities does that bring with it? :)
@sciport 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sanestpenji Yes. The new digital format would allow us to play not only the movies currently in the IMAX based genre, but also regular or other movies as in the ones playing in regular theaters. It totally opens up our whole world!
@julerobb1 3 жыл бұрын
@@sciport I would presume you would have ol' faithful around as a just in case scenario?
@kevinr1282 3 жыл бұрын
I want one.
@sciport 3 жыл бұрын
Right?!? LOL Wait till we go digital next year!
@rebolzz1789 3 жыл бұрын
Wow thanks for the tour. Hello from Turkey
@sciport 3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome ReBoLzZ! Thanks for checking out our tour. The planetarium behind the scenes tour is pretty cool to because it’s a digital planetarium. Be well and stay safe!
@joshuaspickler9943 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty Dern cool! Thanks for the tour
@sciport 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the shout out Joshua!
@cajunlady4893 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Greg It was great meeting you in person. Love your personality! We could sit and listen to your knowledge of various subjects all day and never notice the time. Your tour of the planetarium was awesome!!! Again, thank you for making our time special. With heartfelt gratitude Cajun Lady & Zane❤
@cajunlady4893 3 жыл бұрын
I agree!
@creatingpassions9897 3 жыл бұрын
Much Gratitude and Appreciation Magical Miracles Beautiful Divine Beings ✨
@maxvillanuevaavila7125 3 жыл бұрын
Now I know draco the dragon.
@revinhatol 3 жыл бұрын
_To the stars - Alle stelle_
@heatherkleiner7180 4 жыл бұрын
This is the coolest thing! Wow!
@heatherkleiner7180 4 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Smith is an excellent demonstrator. I have the pleasure of implementing outreach with Kenneth, and he connects so well with youth!