I appreciate this video but we should talk about how many NADH and FADH there are per step. My anatomy teacher requires knowing this
@Phoenix-ku4tg6 күн бұрын
Nice
@sarahlatimer37606 күн бұрын
This is masterful!
@sagaljiijiile85658 күн бұрын
❤❤
@amberali90918 күн бұрын
pls never take this down
@inviz_9 күн бұрын
I was a little bit confused in class and worried for my exam but this clears everything up. Thank you so much!
@Pookie-x7l10 күн бұрын
I’m using this for science fair lol
@CapnSpoon11 күн бұрын
im cooked
@ByRachelTaylor11 күн бұрын
🍳
@AnabiaTalib13 күн бұрын
Why my teacher literally send me a English video if I literally live in Italy- Now I have to Translate everything 😃👍 yay....
@zoroshort6914 күн бұрын
Thank you ❤❤..
@crystalrock100314 күн бұрын
Amazing. You taught me photosynthesis in time for my test in an hour 🙌
@YassinEmam-c9t14 күн бұрын
im here cus my exam is tmmrw
@vLogPhase17 күн бұрын
Thanks
@Le_epic_eclipse17 күн бұрын
Will peppered racism not start?
@Le_epic_eclipse17 күн бұрын
I sleep texted this but I question this
@llennzo14 күн бұрын
If you ever get the answer. tell me 🧍🏽♀️.
@poluefemus24 күн бұрын
dang, underrated channel
@GeedaarKhan24 күн бұрын
GOAT
@leahko899825 күн бұрын
thank you this was very helpful
@L0LDONOTTALK26 күн бұрын
who watch this video before a night in exam 😂
@NurSaheli26 күн бұрын
Us jvncmcl
@mbArrowYT28 күн бұрын
Also got sent here by my teacher what the hell thus is so weird I'm just gunna serch answers on my ph9ne whilst I'm here in my assessment
@AhmadAsifArifeen28 күн бұрын
Now I understand how corona virus effected us
@carolineseitz4397Ай бұрын
thank youuuu
@zeropoint7051Ай бұрын
good video and all but i think my bf is cooler
@ByRachelTaylorАй бұрын
Simp
@zeropoint7051Ай бұрын
amazinf reply lmfaoo @@ByRachelTaylor
@SustainaBricks6 күн бұрын
@@ByRachelTaylor lol
@SafiatouBarry296Ай бұрын
this was so helpful!
@user-il1vx7kx8oАй бұрын
I don't comment much but this is a very good video. Many teachers try to be over technical and end up not making sense but this is perfectly digestible
@ByRachelTaylorАй бұрын
🫶🏼
@saudadedudeАй бұрын
Omg this explains everything so well
@siu703Ай бұрын
I'm so happy i've found this video, your explanation is EXCEPTIONAL. I easily grasped the difference and even more information! Keep going!
@ByRachelTaylorАй бұрын
Thank you 🫶🏼
@miss_miscellaneous1420Ай бұрын
Watching this from my phone cuz my Chromebook is dead💀🤞🏾‼️
@janeturitaАй бұрын
Thank you! You really helped me on this topic! 😊
@jannatkhan6097Ай бұрын
Best explanation ever❤❤❤❤❤
@McreelyАй бұрын
I have a test tomorrow!
@huaIianАй бұрын
I have a phenomenal bio teacher, but her notes suck balls dude. cannot study off of them for shid. ur a life savior bro, thank you
@SalemAlshamsi-z2vАй бұрын
My teacher sent me this 👽
@nunyabitnezz2802Ай бұрын
Let’s paint the trees hot pink and see what happens!
@swordkeeper7638Ай бұрын
In 2x speed the music goes unbelievably hard
@kriskotАй бұрын
Amazing video!! Super helpful
@albertdepeal9658Ай бұрын
Looks a lot more like evidence of common design, but that's just me.
@albertdepeal9658Ай бұрын
@@PhilipK-xk4by Sure it would, apes have the most common processes to humans thus the most equal genetic instructions.
@mcmanustony18 күн бұрын
@@albertdepeal9658 Humans ARE apes.....
@kennaklonowski2522Ай бұрын
Ur literally the best KZbinr to explain this stuff 🙏🙏
@MG-hi1ejАй бұрын
The data now gathered from over 100 years of mutation research in general and 90 years of mutation breeding in particular enable scientists to draw conclusions regarding the ability of mutations to produce new species. After examining the evidence, Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, a scientist from the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Germany, concluded: “Mutations cannot transform an original species into an entirely new one. This conclusion agrees with all the experiences and results of mutation research of the 20th century taken together as well as with the laws of probability. Thus, the law of recurrent variation implies that genetically properly defined species have real boundaries that cannot be abolished or transgressed by accidental mutations.” Science, the official magazine for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, noted: “Species do indeed have a capacity to undergo minor modifications in the physical and other characteristics, but this is limited and with a longer perspective it is reflected in an oscillation about a mean.” Scientist Francis Hitching says: “Living cells duplicate themselves with near-total fidelity. The degree of error is so tiny that no man-made machine can approach it. There are also built-in constraints. Plants reach a certain size and refuse to grow any larger. Fruit flies refuse to become anything but fruit flies under any circumstances yet devised.” If beneficial mutations are a basis of evolution, what proportion of them are beneficial? There is overwhelming agreement on this point among evolutionists. For example, in his book The Wellsprings of Life, science writer Isaac Asimov admitted: “Most mutations are for the worse.” Professor Irving Kristol put it this way: “Most genetic mutations work against the survival of the individual.” Cytogeneticist Peo Koller states: “The greatest proportion of mutations are deleterious to the individual who carries the mutated gene. It was found in experiments that, for every successful or useful mutation, there are many thousands which are harmful.” “Such results are to be expected of accidental changes occurring in any complicated organization,” states the Encyclopædia Britannica. That is why mutations are said to be responsible for hundreds of diseases that are genetically determined. The Encyclopedia Americana acknowledges: “The fact that most mutations are damaging to the organism seems hard to reconcile with the view that mutation is the source of raw materials for evolution. Indeed, mutants illustrated in biology textbooks are a collection of freaks and monstrosities and mutation seems to be a destructive rather than a constructive process.”-Vol. 10, p. 742. Evolutionists have never observed mutations-even beneficial ones-that produce new life-forms; yet they are sure that this is how new species arrived. They have not witnessed the spontaneous generation of life; yet they insist that this is how life began. Astronomer Robert Jastrow refers to “the religious faith of the scientist” and his irritation when the evidence doesn’t match his beliefs. Science writer John Sullivan calls belief in spontaneous generation “an article of faith,” and T. H. Huxley said it was “an act of philosophical faith.” Physicist H. S. Lipson says that after Darwin “evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to ‘bend’ their observations to fit in with it.” As Dunn and Dobzhansky in Heredity, Race and Society pointed out: “Scientists, like all other men, often succumb to the temptation to prove some particular view or to reinforce some preconceived ideas.” The truth is as Professor John Moore declared: “Upon rigorous examination and analysis, any dogmatic assertion that gene mutations are the raw material for any evolutionary process involving natural selection is an utterance of a myth.”--On Chromosomes, Mutations, and Phylogeny
@claudiaflores61622 ай бұрын
I loved this !! Thank you 🙏🏻🌎🐝🌳
@razer00720732 ай бұрын
What about homoplasy?
@TruckyIsACar2 ай бұрын
I learned this in lexia core 5
@AshelleGreene2 ай бұрын
Me
@tenztsephel372 ай бұрын
Thank you - so straightforward and easy to understand 😊🙏🏼
@accountholder3652 ай бұрын
Can someone please "flag" the damn background music on this video virus. Thank you.