By: Rachel Taylor

Пікірлер

@Amuseraa Күн бұрын

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@SaintJudeKhudjoe 3 күн бұрын

this is how we learn. cool

@harrybinn4455 3 күн бұрын

Well, the Fossil record doesn't exist for evolution and claims on such things as the Piltdown man, Nebraska Man, Lucy and others have been shown to be either frauds or wild conjectures based on very few bones. The Comparative Embryology by Haeckel was a known fraud right from the beginning; from taking embryos from different developmental stages to changing the drawings to try and emphasize similarities that weren't there to claims on body parts that had nothing in common with different species while in development. Homology is not an indication of evolution. It's just a design that is efficient. As for DNA, the claim of apes and humans being 99.5% the same has now dropped to something like 80% because the methodology used was a pick and match system from different areas of the DNA. Even Chinese scientists are rejecting this tree of Life scenario from Darwinian Evolution and describing life as a forest. While Evolutionist want to claim that this theory is real, there is less and less evidence supporting it. From the problems inherent in Origin of Life chemical issues to the fact that no one has actually found any fossils supporting it. It's time to go back to the drawing board as this theory requires more blind faith than anything else.

@PhilipK-xk4by 2 күн бұрын

*such things as Piltdown man, Nebraska man* It’s always these two examples that are brought up. But anyone who brings them up never realized that they were discovered to be frauds by people who actively studied evolution. *Lucy and others* Lucy isn’t the only example of Australopithecus Afarensis. *Homology is not an indication of evolution* Yes, it is. *It’s just design that is efficient* Doesn’t sound like this designer is all-powerful if there’s only one efficient way to make living things. And it doesn’t explain why we share more in common with other apes than we do with other mammals. *the claim of apes and humans being 99.5% of the same has now dropped to something like 80%* “Ape” isn’t a species. We share more in common with chimpanzees than we do with gorillas. *Even Chinese scientists* Apparently, being Chinese makes them bad at science? *While Evolutionists want to claim that the theory is real* Whoops, you called it a ‘theory’. *From the problems inherent in Origin of Life* Despite that evolution can be studied separately from the beginning (becoming?) of life. *no one has actually found any fossils supporting it* Aside from the fossils of feathered raptors. Or the fact that you can’t find a modern dog fossil in the same geological layer as a tyrannosaurus.

@harrybinn4455 2 күн бұрын

@@PhilipK-xk4by There are no examples of a full skeleton found together for any of the so called ape to man progression. They are just parts that have more missing bones than actual finds. The rest is fantasy. Drawing hair, eyes, skin tone from bones is nonsense. Even using the chimp argument, the DNA is vastly different. Science keeps changing its claims as often as the Kardashians change men. The vast amount of DNA used to be called Junk DNA and now apparently it is incredibly important. You want mock the Chinese for actually having the intelligence to question evolution where in North America it's so much of a cult that even questioning it gets people fired, then fine, go ahead. At least they are looking at the problem. And a good Designer understands how to use designs over and over in much different situations instead of redesigning the wheel all the time. So that claim is again nonsense. And saying Homology IS evidence of evolution is nonsense claim. Oranges and apples are round, rocks are round. They are homologous in shape. They sure the heck aren't indications of evolutionary progress from rock to apple. People see stuff all the time and most of it is in their mind, not in the actual item. And Evolution is a theory. Micro Evolution can studied, but that's just variation within a species and it in no way represents the Macro Evolution that people try to claim is the same. They are not. And no one has seen Macro Evolution occur. As for the raptors, it's a supposition about the feathers, just like everything else in this Evolutionary nonsense.

@PhilipK-xk4by Күн бұрын

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@@harrybinn4455 *There are no examples of a full skeleton* That would be rather rare. But there’s a lot of information you can garner from fragments. *for any of the so called ape to man progression* Except that humans are still apes. We have the genetic and physiological traits that classify us as a species of apes. *Even using the chimp argument, the DNA is vastly different* No examples are given here. *Science keeps changing its claims* Yes, scientists have a tendency to change their minds in the light of new information. That’s the point of science. *as often as the Kardashians change men* I don’t understand this reference.

@PhilipK-xk4by Күн бұрын

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@@harrybinn4455 *The vast anount of DNA used to be called Junk DNA and now apparently it is incredibly important* What percentage of “vast” is supposed to be equal to. *You want mock the Chinese* I doubt that the entire population of China denies the occurrence of evolution. *even questioning it gets people fired* It doesn’t. Typically, biology teachers get fired for not teaching biology. Because if you get paid to do a job that you’re not going to do, then you’ll lose it. *a good Designer knows how to use designs over and over* But, apparently, not an all-powerful one. They can make a universe, but they need to give every animal the same design? That just shows a lack of creativity.

@PhilipK-xk4by Күн бұрын

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@@harrybinn4455 *They sure heck aren’t indications of evolutionary progress from rock to apple* The main reason why this is, is because rocks don’t have sex. You also might not know what common descent is. *People see stuff all the time* Like how you can trick yourself into thinking that things are somehow designed. *Evolution is a theory* Yes, like gravity and atomics. *Micro evolution can be studied, but that’s just variations within species* As well as taxonomical classes, orders and genus’s. It’s mainly why you’re a mammal. Take lions and tigers for example. They’re closely related enough that they can produce an offspring (which shows common descent) but not so close that they produce a fertile male (this shows speciation). Which means that, at some point, there had been big cats (and big cat sex) before lions or tigers.

@bbb20198 6 күн бұрын

it is great for home schooling

@bdicap2588 7 күн бұрын

what is this music? ts fire. lmk rachel taylor

@FunnaTickleU 7 күн бұрын

Literally doing this bs for studying and preparing for the Nyc state regents exam. And yes my yappertron Living teacher forced us to watch this😭🙏

@TonyTigerTonyTiger 10 күн бұрын

5:08 Not all dinosaurs had feathers. And the closest living relatives to dinosaurs are crocodilians, not birds. Birds ARE dinosaurs.

@TonyTigerTonyTiger 10 күн бұрын

Good, but a couple nitpicks. 1) At 3.14 on screen (and read I think a few seconds earlier) it says that all life on Earth has genetic sequences we share. That is ambiguous, and could be taken to refer to the entire genetic sequences of genomes. Better would have been adding "some" to qualify it ("All life on Earth has some genetic sequences we share") 2) And around the same point, there is a grammatical error. It asks, "What could us humans have ...". That should be "we". "What could we humans have ..."

@XTHE_GOATX 11 күн бұрын

Miss zainab the goat

@AbisDen 12 күн бұрын

this glossary of terms is perfect - all teachers should be using this in class!!

@AbisDen 12 күн бұрын

amazing, thank you

@caitlinburgess1945 14 күн бұрын

you just saved my life

@jevan_07 14 күн бұрын

I love this video man this is the only topic i was iffy about before the test but now I am undeniably locked in 😊😎😎

@Sleepp10 14 күн бұрын

Let’s lock in ap bio students!

@ByRachelTaylor 14 күн бұрын

🔒 🔒 🔒

@shanialopez4679 14 күн бұрын

Dios te bendiga

@leanneshihed3264 16 күн бұрын

amazing vid!

@SCRIABINIST 16 күн бұрын

good luck soldiers, 'tis will be a tough battle.

@stevedoetsch 17 күн бұрын

No matter how much they want to wish it away, evolutionists still cannot eliminate the brute fact that intelligent design is precisely one of the two possible causes for structures in the universe. Given any physical structure, including DNA, it is either designed, or formed via natural causes. Evolutionists are so desperate to cling to thier failed theory they intentionally lie to the public that design is not a scientific fact. Why trick people into rejecting design 'a priori' when evolution can simply be proven? Because of course Evolution cannot be proven scientifically but must be accepted as a Mythos through which state it is interpreted. Yet, evolutionists are so bad at philosophy and logic that they do not even comprehend they have undermined their own scientific claim! Anyone who claims that the fact of design is not possible has already undermined the scientific underpinnings of evolution because they have made evolution into a claim that cannot be disproved. One of the many reasons the failed science of evolutionary theory has perpetuated so long is exactly because of ideologues who dismiss criticism with the ad hominem fallacy that critics "don't understand evolution". What a simple minded way to never have to deal with the science! 😂 Evolutionary theory is unobservable, untestable, unrepeatable, is the only major theory to be proposed with no mathematical proofs, and it reveals no scientific knowledge that can be applied in the present; it's a story about the past that far better meets the description of a historic myth than it meets the criteria of a scientific theory. Evolution is wrong not merely because it contradicts theology and philosophy; it's wrong because it's bad science Yet evolutionary theory is not merely wrong, it actually causes harm to science, in this case, by holding back the study of epigenetics for decades. What can you do if you believe in the theory of evolution? Nothing at all because it's just a story about the past and does not convey any real scientific information useful in the present. On the opposite side, what can you do if you believe in intelligent design? You can do epigenetics! Evolutionists have held back science for decades by calling the metadata in DNA "junk DNA" and completely ignoring the information that was right in front of us the entire time. That's how severely dangerous the evolutionary theory is to real scientific progress. But by understanding DNA from an intelligent design framework science has come to understand that the "junk DNA" is actually metadata that controls the expressions of genes. There is no incorrect theory that is merely neutral; it inherently harms the advancement of science when a theory is wrong but people adhere to it out of social fear and group-think, like they do with evolution. Darwin himself is the one who first suggested irreducible complexity as a method to disprove his theory. Why are evolution ideologues always so ignorant of science? 😂 "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." -Charles Darwin, 'On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life' I provided the full title for Darwin's book so you can see what a racist you are for believing in it. 😂

@PhilipK-xk4by 15 күн бұрын

*intelligent design is precisely one of two possible causes for structures in the universe* Or perhaps life began accidentally in a series of events caused by interdimensional wizards attempting to heat their studies during the winter. (Let’s see who gets that reference) There’s as much evidence for that as there is for intelligent design. *Evolution cannot be proven* Of course it can. It’s proven through the genetic and physiological similarities shared among all species. (Which is why you’re a mammal) And we can deduce from fossil records which species did not exist at the same time. (Which is why you never found a dog fossil in the same geological layer as a tyrannosaurus) Or take lions and tigers for example. Both are closely related enough to produce an offspring together (this shows common descent), but not a fertile male (this shows speciation). Which means that there had been big cats (and big cat sex) before there had been lions or tigers. This is basically why evolution is a theory. Because it’s supported with observable evidence. *no scientific knowledge that can be applied in the present* Aside from agriculture and vaccines. *You can do epigenetics* Epigenetics evolve as well. *Darwin himself is the one who first suggested irreducible complexity as a method to disprove his theory* Good thing that we learned that “irreducible complexity” was nonsense in the last 150 plus years. *I provided the full title for Darwin’s book so you can see what a racist you are* Despite that “race” here involves the entire human race. Darwin was actually quite progressive in his time. He was a staunch pro-abolitionist and a critic of imperialism. He even understood that all people flow so smoothly with one another that the concept of “race” among humans was superficial. He even challenged other natural philosophers to cite the exact number of human races and noted that each of them came up with different, contradictory numbers.

@reneesantiago6496 17 күн бұрын

Or God just created each species exactly as they are.

@PhilipK-xk4by 15 күн бұрын

This wouldn’t explain why we share more similarities with other apes than we do with other mammals. And more with other mammals than we do with other animals.

@reneesantiago6496 15 күн бұрын

@@PhilipK-xk4by Yes it does. Because that was Gods design.

@TonyTigerTonyTiger 10 күн бұрын

@@reneesantiago6496 Prove it.

@PhilipK-xk4by 22 сағат бұрын

⁠@@reneesantiago6496 Why did this god design people to be apes?

@user-re4iv6ny1p 21 күн бұрын

In the population growth why did u add 59 + 173 We already found B-D And 173 experienced it sooo I didn't really understand that part

@namikazeminato3079 22 күн бұрын

crazy video

@SolidMeat 24 күн бұрын

what does the water by product from the electron transport chain do

@ByRachelTaylor 24 күн бұрын

It’s just a byproduct/ becomes part of the cell fluids.

@Ada-xg5zy 24 күн бұрын

ily

@humblex_bby 25 күн бұрын

well explained

@marchpotato5614 26 күн бұрын

THIS WAS SOOOO HELPFULLL

@miawagner8069 28 күн бұрын

This saved me for my exam tmrw, ty! :)

@summerli3872 Ай бұрын

for the exponential growth example, how did you get from dN/dt = 28 to 108 fish? I'm a little confused about that.

@ByRachelTaylor Ай бұрын

dn/dt is the change in population in that time. The population changed by 28 fish. The problem says that the original population was 80, so it grew by 28 fish to 108 fish.

@simrit6615 Ай бұрын

very helpful thank you!!

@roberttombs3108 Ай бұрын

How can a mutation be beneficial or give value to the species where the 2 Law of thermodynamics / entropy specifies a decrease as a law? Also, how was the metaphysical entity of DNA (information and code to create proteins) created?

@jdiwkim Ай бұрын

kral hakkını kimse ödeyemez

@rocketsurgeon1746 Ай бұрын

Is this a joke? These pictures make the wing and hand look so basic, but they have far too many differences to evolve from each other. It is your "theory" so you must know the answers to some simple questions. 1. How many major and minor changes are needed to evolve a human hand from a chimp(or closest relative)? 2. How many changes are needed to change from a wing to a hand? Thanks

@PhilipK-xk4by Ай бұрын

They didn’t evolve from each other. Humans and birds just share a common ancestry. Which is why these similarities exist. *how many major and minor changes are needed to evolve a human hand from a chimp* About 6 million years worth of changes. *how many changes are needed to change from a wing to a hand* Not sure. Are there examples of handed birds?

@rocketsurgeon1746 Ай бұрын

@@PhilipK-xk4by you didn't answer any questions, my friend. I am well aware humans are not direct(or even distant) relatives of birds. You still have to prove your theory by giving the number of beneficial mutations needed to evolve from one stage to the next. Then we know how much time would be needed. If you don't know the answer to these questions, you are just like a person sitting in a pew believing whatever the priest says

@PhilipK-xk4by Ай бұрын

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@@rocketsurgeon1746 *you didn’t answer any questions* Sure, I did. You just don’t think that the answers are satisfying. *the number of beneficial mutations needed to evolve from one stage to the next* Living things aren’t divided by “stages”. That’s not a classification. If you wanted the number of mutations that divided Grey Tree Frogs from Cope’s Grey Tree Frogs, then the number of mutations required are 1. *Then we know how much time would be needed* But we already know the answer to that. It’s 3.7 billion years. Because that’s how old life is on Earth.

@rocketsurgeon1746 Ай бұрын

@@PhilipK-xk4by we will try again. How many beneficial mutations are needed from chimps to man? Or paki to whale? Clear concise answers please. Simple question

@PhilipK-xk4by Ай бұрын

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@@rocketsurgeon1746 *we will try again* You don’t have to. I already gave an answer the first time. *how many beneficial mutations are needed from chimps to man* We don’t evolve from chimpanzees. We just share a common ancestor. Which we separated from 5-6 million years ago. So, 5-6 million years-worth of mutations. Because evolution occurs by reproduction. *paki to whale* Pakicetus is already considered the “first whale”. But the time between Pakicetus and modern species of whales is 50 million years. So, 50 million years-worth of mutations. *Clear concise answers please* That’s as consice as it gets. *Simple questions* Not the right questions, however.

@nsp74 Ай бұрын

the best you tube video to debunk this lie is long story short

@PhilipK-xk4by 29 күн бұрын

That’s unfortunate. Cause those videos are pretty awful.

@bilalezzedine5074 Ай бұрын

Why you added 1 to the rmax in the example of exponential growth?

@ByRachelTaylor Ай бұрын

It's just a simple math trick. You could multiply the original population by rmax, and then add it to the original population size to get the final population size. Or, you could just multiply by rmax + 1 to get the same answer.

@michaelrowland-us3he Ай бұрын

Instead of coloured dots could you show the molecules involved

@ByRachelTaylor Ай бұрын

The enzymes are proteins, and each dot represents an amino acid. Proteins are built from amino acids, and there are 20 different types of amino acids.

@adventurefighter7501 Ай бұрын

Ppl often use this against (abrahamic) religions. But who’s to say that evolution and religion can’t co-exist? I mean when you’re a theist and going out your way to believe in the supernatural, you might as well believe that Adam & Eve came from the sky. Not believing in a God in the first place is a whole another story, you don’t have to use THIS as counter-evidence. The verse that says Adam & Eve came from the sky isn’t meant to be a scientific verse anyway, but just some info for the already believing. And God made us very similar to apes cuz life is a test; if we were completely alien then there’s no freewill, is there? Everyone will have to believe in a God at that point. But the fact that there are theists and atheists shows the freewill & diversity God has put on us.. and it’s arguably more merciful that way if you ask me.

@PhilipK-xk4by 29 күн бұрын

Evolution isn’t evidence against a god. The evidence against god is the construction of lightning rods on the roofs of churches.

@TonyTigerTonyTiger 10 күн бұрын

This is a science video. Leave the nonsense about invisible sky wizards where it belongs ... ancient fairy tales.

@venigos Ай бұрын

subbed. I love this channel ❤

@vganterogaderamnesie3535 Ай бұрын

very well explained

@rouleit5131 Ай бұрын

Better than Ap daily

@ProximusCentauria Ай бұрын

Everyone using this for school while im trying to show this to people who deny it everytime i try to prove this (losing my sanity in the process)

@234Spotman Ай бұрын

Thank you so much!

@huddinina Ай бұрын

W vid chat

@brennhhh Ай бұрын

this makes so much more sense tysm!!!

@brennhhh Ай бұрын

wow, this was so incredibly helpful!! thank you so much!

@faizanpro355 Ай бұрын

Thank you

@deadlocker1420 Ай бұрын

One of the best explanations out there, saved my in class sleeper ass

@thanosasscheeks Ай бұрын

You have no idea how helpful this is

@saadiaislamnoor235 2 ай бұрын

Thank you soo much literally watched 2 3 other videos I couldn't get this simple top until I watched your video , so thank you

@myperfectworld3414 2 ай бұрын

This was very well produced video.

@bmxbandito9 2 ай бұрын

Can this happen with humans?

@DocReasonable 2 ай бұрын

*HUMAN GROUP EVOLVING TO BE AQUATIC HUNTERS* The Bajau people, or Sea Nomads, have engaged in breath-hold diving for thousands of years. Evolution has increased Bajau spleen size, providing an oxygen reservoir for diving, just like in other sea-going mammals like otters, seals and whales. They can stay underwater for 15 minutes, which is even longer than a dolphin can do it for! Most of us humans can only handle less than two. Oh yeah, and the Bajau people are also capable of seeing clearly underwater. They are able to make their pupils smaller and change their lens shape. Seals and dolphins have a similar adaptation. This has been proven in underwater visual testing, the Bajau see twice as well as other humans.

@Animeedits-sb6wi 2 ай бұрын

Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер