Probably koi commentary mein hoga, as many Shlokas from Puranas are used in them which are not there today due to alterations, only Srimad Bhagavatam aur Bhagvat Gita hin hai jiska 18000 aur 700 shlok hain baaki sare scripture main kuch upar niche hai

@omsaimohapatra8171 i'm telling iskon peoples degrade all devi and devas to show radha is great but if you see linga puran that shows shiv is great and in vishnu puran vishnu is great same like that bramavivartha puran says radha is great But iskon people so de grade all gods and here telling because of radha rukmani got krishna What the fu*** Many mahapuranas tell rukmani is mahalakshmi

@@gowthammabhuddha No one in scripture is said as Parameswar except Krsna and his expansions, except Shiv ji and Durga Maiya all devi devtas are jivas with special celestial posts. Shivji is Kaal shakti(Time) of Krsna and Durga Maiya is External Potency of Krsna. I think it's pretty simple. Talking of Rukmini comes from Radha or not, everyshakti form is expansion of Radha Rani and Every shaktimaan is expansion of Krsna, as Prabhuji told it's love parallel, our complex mind keeps things complex, I find it simple, don't think I am a devotee thats why I am supporting iskcon, I agree with iskcon with their philosophy and all those processes but disagree with cosmology part(which I am presently studying)

@@omsaimohapatra8171 what about this then Rukmani tu dwarake cha radha thu vrindawane. Means both are same but why they are telling rukmani was a normal women krishna take her hand because of Radha If radha was the reason then why any puran doesn't mention it Trinurthis has same power but shiv and vishnu got more power than bramha Three came from one single energy that energy divides three that's it Same like durga maa she was the main source of two saraswathi and lakshmi but bhramhavivartha puran like modern books totally changes every thing As shri krishna bhakth so sad to see this bhakti of iskon where they showing krishna himself serving Radha😢🫡🫡😞 if she was that important then why krishna doesn't tell about radha in bhagwatgeeta where krishna himself telling i'm the source of all but doesn't tell a single word about her iskons hinduism is very different from all where they didn't vocalize Correct matras They are doing bussiness like jaya kishore In the name of radha rani

@@gowthammabhuddha Where did Prabhuji say that Rukmini is normal jiva?? she is shakti of Vasudev Krsna. Come on man, hear the lecture properly. Have you ever read Srimad Bhagvatam!!!, No where it is written that from one energy trimurti have orginated. And talking of Radha Rani, Radha Rani is very much confidential and how do we know that??? because not Iskcon but Rupa Goswami and Jiva Goswami say that. And Iskcon comes under Gaudiya Vaishnav Sampradaya which is completely authentic sampradaya, I disagree with iskcon with their view with modern science but with these cases iskcon is completely authentic and has authentic Guru Parampara starting from Krsna. And I don't understand why Indians have a negative understanding about the word business, Iskcon does business?? YES it does but also spends the money in Food for life and many other programs.