This is SO interesting! Exactly what i have wondered about as a born and raised Christian. How has my faith, my perception of God and world view shaped my perceptions of beauty and aesthetics? This video has been insightful and definitely sterted some thought processes. Can't wait to learn more about this topic! Would also love to hear more about your thoughts and findings on this topic!
@barbararussell9757Ай бұрын
Modern Poetry was my field of study when I entered graduate work. I was dismayed that so many people identify Eliot only with "The Waste Land" which is his description of twentieth century life but ignore his real masterpiece, "The Four Quartets", which is his prescription for overcoming the disaster of modern emptiness. I have continued to read "The Four Quartets" for 50 years and find depth and richness I had not encountered previously. I am a Catholic which perhaps assists me in my appreciation of Eliot and his poetry.
@1inq3 ай бұрын
After watching a few reviews, no one explained the story better than you. I just finished reading this book, and I had a few problems understanding how are they cloned and for what purpose. Thank you for explaining it very well!
@kathymitchell78963 ай бұрын
It was a ghastly destruction of the beautiful supple book. The tension of the novel is destroyed. Persuasion is all about unexpressed longing. It should never have been made. I hate how they ruined a beautiful love story. Austen would roll over in her grave!
@acratone83004 ай бұрын
More pastiches and plot continuations are published for Jane Austen's novels and her world than for any other author except for Arthur Conan Doyle. There are at least 20 alternate endings for Pride and Predjudice on Amazon. And over a hundred total such homages for all of Austen's books. And a like number for Sherlock Holmes world. That tells me what people love most to read and think about.
@panchitaobrian16605 ай бұрын
you just do not understand what the literature of realism is. Back to school and don´t take our time
@panchitaobrian16605 ай бұрын
so you mean that seeing Black lady Russell and Asian Capt.Wentworth in Jane Austen´s book´s adaptation about regency era gentry and aristocracy in England - is nothing to talk about? So you mean that you do not know European histroey at all? Like, you have no idea? Or are you guys just afraid to even think the truth? Like you know, in 1984? (that was another book written about Britain, by the way)
@maryhamric5 ай бұрын
Austen was incredibly popular among soldiers during WWI, which is a detail I find really heartwarming. Picturing men in the mud and trenches reading about Darcy or Emma or the Dashwoods is heartwarming. They were also recommended to soldiers who were suffering from shell shock because they were soothing. 2005 P&P introduced me to Austen as well. I think it's a beautiful adaptation but yes, the 1995 version is closer to the novel. But the 2005 version will always be close to my heart.
@maryhamric5 ай бұрын
I had this on my Watch Later list and somehow I lost track of this. This was a really enjoyable video!! Thank you.
@kevinrussell-jp6om5 ай бұрын
A comedy is a selected and skillfully-trimmed portion of the bigger whole we call reality, with the bad parts left out or suppressed. I'm guessing that because she (Jane) was the daughter of a clergyman she hoped (but did she believe??) that "all of this" (this mess of reality, with ALL lives ending in tragedy and death) will be straightened out, somehow, somewhere. Still, her observations about people and their behavior and motivation were firmly rooted in realism, not idealism. Your newfound wonder about this topic is hardly to be wondered at. My spouse was pretty much an atheist and a scientist until she gave birth; she is still a believer 34 years later.
@kevinrussell-jp6om6 ай бұрын
From all the fools or weak sisters who are clergymen in her books, I always wondered whether JA's faith was of the shallow or casual kind. All those clergymen orbiting around the Big-House-park in MP were being supported more or less by West Indies slavery, and Jane had no problem pointing out hypocrisy. Thanks for sharing your sense of the other side of the coin.
@kevinrussell-jp6om6 ай бұрын
Jane Austen was a realist in her style and methods of presenting her stories, but many of her novel's storylines (particularly in P&P and especially Persuasion) are romanticized to lesser or greater extent. Congratulations to your family on the advent of your daughter.
@shirley2446 ай бұрын
This year I read Hamerston Hall by Jane Eastbourne and enjoyed it. It fits in well with the Jane Austen July challenge !
@snootybaronet6 ай бұрын
Very interesting presentation! There's a quote, I believe it's Charlotte Bronte, where she expresses a strong aversion to the social world Austen writes about. Bronte sees it as confining, if not prison like. It shows the deep changes over a short period between Austen's world and Bronte's. Bronte's individualism very marked, compared to Austen's more organic social outlook.
@32mybelle6 ай бұрын
I haven't heard of Hannah Moore, so I think that Jane Austen was playing the long game for sure!
@wraithby6 ай бұрын
Thanks for taking up the suggestion and doing this video! As bad as some of the adaptions have been, there has to be a medium that might turn a few to the works of Austen.
@michaelwalsh24986 ай бұрын
This short survey of Austen's reception brings up so much else. And you touched on such an important one -- moral and religious didacticism as an impediment to the integrity of an imaginative work. This recognition by Austen gives her work a resonance with both modernists and post modernists who have to take her seriously in our time. It's a mark of her genius. I came to Austen second year at university when I enrolled in a 19th c. English novel course, restricted to English majors. I wasn’t one, but somehow I wasn't bounced from the course. I had the benefit of a small class doing close readings of Austen, Eliot, C. Bronte, Dickens and Hardy. The professor wasn't too happy with a political science major befouling his group of English majors, serious about going on to graduate work in English. I made it through and gained a decent intro to Austen and the others. At the same time, concentrating in classical political philosophy, I studied under several profs who were acolytes of the acclaimed Leo Strauss at the University of Chicago. I came across some fascinating mentions of Jane Austen in the work of Strauss, such as - “we are in need of a second education in order to accustom our eyes to the noble reserve and the quiet grandeur of the classics,” Strauss notes that “those modern readers who are so fortunate as to have a natural preference for Jane Austen rather than for Dostoievski, in particular, have an easier access to (the classics & especially) Xenophon than others might have; to understand Xenophon, they have only to combine the love of philosophy with their natural preference.” I’ve been fascinated with Austen since then, with no abatement.
@rosezingleman50076 ай бұрын
Cannot hear you.
@Mciftci936 ай бұрын
I have no trouble hearing any of her videos. Are you sure that the volume is turned up at the bottom left corner of the video? Is your computer's audio turned up? You can normally do that by using the speaker icon which is at the bottom right corner of your screen.
@Mciftci936 ай бұрын
I have no trouble hearing any of her videos. Are you sure that the volume is turned up at the bottom left corner of the video? Are is your computer's audio turned up? You can normally do that using the speaker icon at the bottom right of your screen.
@zoobee6 ай бұрын
Beatrice, I know this is a large question, but its something I've been thinking of for a while since I had a discussion a while back. Do you believe Austen is our greatest writer after Shakespeare? I do believe she is. The counterpoint put to me was Dickens. Someone else said Milton. But I think it is Austen, by a mile. Only Shakespeare is her senior from this island.
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
@zoobee oh I agree entirely. I don't think Dickens even comes close (but then again I don't think highly of him in the first place!). From what I've read by George Eliot, I think she might be a better contender. But the quality of Austen's prose is unparalleled.
@zoobee6 ай бұрын
@@beatrixscudeler Its also the greatest literary critic that exists that anoints her too - that critic being time. For hundreds of years now her work has lived, prospered, been re-imagined, and spoken to people across cultures. She touches on the perennial. Her concerns are vast, but they are rooted in a very specific social setting and milieu and time, and concern the restraints of civilised society and the very nature of human longings. I am always delighted to read her
@fernandamurari85776 ай бұрын
Thank you for the recommendations, Beatrice!
@katiejlumsden6 ай бұрын
So many interesting selections here! 😊
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
@@katiejlumsden thank you! Always love your recommendations as well :)
@snootybaronet6 ай бұрын
I'm rewatching the 6 hour 1983 BBC production of Mansfield Park. It's thought there isn't a good adaption of MP, but I've watched this at least three times. I like it better and better each time. It has one great virtue - it's true to the book, there's no other agenda. On the nonfiction front, I'm re-reading Lionel Trilling's essays on Austen, and his reflections on her in Sincerity & Authenticity. I've also got hold of a Q.D. Leavis essay collection & Austen is well represented. Emma for a re-read. Edmund Burke's - On the Sublime and Beautiful. It's on the bookshelf, tried once, try again. Metropolitan, I like that one. A book about Austen's period....have to think about that.
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
Great selection!
@carolinesimmill49627 ай бұрын
Sense and Sensibility 2008 mini series is very good, beautifully photographed and the cottage is set in Cornwall instead of Surrey. Very atmospheric and worth watching. Lost in Austen is good too. Thank you Beatrice for your Austen Challenge and recommendations.
@janeaustenliteracyfoundation7 ай бұрын
I love that you and your husband read aloud to each other! Byron as a vampire sounds right up my alley! I will have to check it out. Happy Jane Austen July. :)
@ArtBookshelfOdyssey7 ай бұрын
I read Jane Austen and the Clergy last month and I enjoyed it. It answered a lot of questions I had about the clergy at the time.
@HeyAllyHey7 ай бұрын
Yes, a Mansfield Park lover! So happy that you’re back, Beatrice ❤
@maryhamric7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your recommendations!! Glad you posted. Blessings!❤
@wraithby7 ай бұрын
Ideas re: Austen content for a future video-perhaps a survey of how Austen was perceived in different periods. I know she had admirers early on, but some just dismissed her as a chronicler of the gentry's romances. I know Sir Walter Scott was a great admirer. But many others in the 19th c. lost track of her. In the 20th c. she had a great revival, some placing her in company with Shakespeare. It would be interesting to trace the patterns of Austen appreciation in different eras.
@beatrixscudeler7 ай бұрын
@@wraithby I love this idea very much - yes, I'll do this!
@wraithby7 ай бұрын
great!
@michaelwalsh24987 ай бұрын
I've not done the Austen challenge- I'd like to take a shot at it this year. In the nonfiction category, I'm currently reading something that might make the grade. I may be stretching it. It's a selection of essays of an American woman of the late 19th and first third of the 20th century. The book is American Austen: The Forgotten Writings of Agnes Repplier, edited by John Lukacs. Agnes Repplier was recognized as a premier American essayist in her time, but forgotten in ours. She was a devout Roman Catholic, a feminist and a very erudite and witty writer. John Lukacs was one of our finest historians, Hungarian born, he made his home in the Philadelphia area, and through interest in the social history of Philadelphia he discovered and championed Agnes Repplier. I'll take any opportunity to re-watch Metropolitan, I adore that film. And through your earlier mention I've watched and loved Austenland. I still haven't got a copy of the Collins' bio, but I've read hers on Austen and the clergy. The Norton Critical editions are a great entryway to authors, lots of gems, annotations and criticism. Persuasion is a good call, I haven't reread it in so long. Happy reading!!!
@wraithby7 ай бұрын
I was happy to see Beatrice mention Norton critical editions. I'm a fan of those as well. There have been some updated editions recently that have taken out valuable critical pieces in favor of more trendy criticism. Sometimes it's worth looking into earlier editions to compare the different content. But I don't think it's across the board, I'm thinking of a recent Melville Norton crit edition that I found wanting, compared to an earlier.
@rosezingleman50077 ай бұрын
Volume too low Beatrice. Please please adjust it UP. I have to turn it to 11 and move up close. Everyone else on YT I can hear without cranking it up. Please!
@beatrixscudeler7 ай бұрын
Urghh so annoying, I recorded it at a higher volume and I can hear it fine, but clearly it's not fine on your end, sorry! I will try to use different equipment next time!
@775Eagle8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the review, very interesting! Just read the book, its very thought provoking.
@sidchillingwitholdies55208 ай бұрын
Oh know u are beatrice portinari
@ly_lu59238 ай бұрын
Emma being bad with a single old woman makes me hate her.
@beatrixscudeler8 ай бұрын
Yeah I totally get that! She is very dislikeable for a good part of the novel...
@philtheo8 ай бұрын
What do you think about other translations of Dante's Divine Comedy like Hollander or Mandelbaum or Longfellow? I wonder about these 3 because they're all free online so it would be a good way to read Dante if we can't afford to buy it. Also my local library has Ciardi and a Penguin edition I think it's Kirkpatrick so I suppose these are two other options. Thanks in advance for any thoughts you might have! 😊
@beatrixscudeler8 ай бұрын
The Hollander is meant to be very good from what I hear!
@Abel-ec6ch8 ай бұрын
I think this is one of those insights that really helps me see Jane Austen in a clearer light, on a much deeper level than I had before. Thank you so much!!
@Abel-ec6ch8 ай бұрын
You've convinced me! I didn't intend to read him, but now I'll give him a try.
@beatrixscudeler8 ай бұрын
Do!
@Abel-ec6ch8 ай бұрын
Fantastic. Thank you for this video!!! My request is to make more videos on aesthetics! I'd like more of an introduction to Greek beauty before you dive more into Christian aesthetics. This has been a topic of interest to me as well. I never imagined that Christianity would present a different kind of beauty, though. This is a really interesting topic. I would like to add also that I've been thinking of beauty as the manifestation of Goodness. Therefore, if there is a new form of goodness, we would have new forms of beauty. I love your channel when you just share whatever you're thinking about, like this. You have a living mind! It's so refreshing! Thank you! Keep making videos about whatever you want!
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
Ok I can totally do this. I will note it down for the future - I might reread Roger Scruton's short introduction to beauty and make a video on that :)
@Abel-ec6ch8 ай бұрын
I love your channel very much.
@beatrixscudeler8 ай бұрын
Thank you!!!
@eduardoan7778 ай бұрын
We did a play on this book when I was in 9th grade. One the most beautiful books ever written, to get life, love, and heaven you first need to go through hell.
@carolinesimmill49629 ай бұрын
Very interesting, thank you. I have the book 'Mere Christianity' looking forward to your next book choice.
@Abel-ec6ch9 ай бұрын
You've inspired me to download the Companion to the Altar and bring it into my own devotional life. I'll miss Jane Austen content!! I love your channel.
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
Do! It's great! Have you read Austen's prayers? I use them in my devotional life and they are quite wonderful.
@Abel-ec6ch9 ай бұрын
You have no idea how grateful I am for your channel. The intro to this video is such a treat. The rest of the video was lovely. You're awesome. Also, behind you on top of the dresser, is that a Roman breviary with the red pagination?
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
Awww thank you for this! And yes, that would be my husband’s roman breviary, well spotted!
@Abel-ec6ch9 ай бұрын
I would love to hear more about your understanding of feminism, what it means exactly, how you understand it, whether you understand yourself as a feminist, different kinds of feminism, etc.
@beatrixscudeler6 ай бұрын
Sure, I can do this! It's such a loaded topic, so it definitely deserves a full video. What I'll say here is that the word has definitely been hijacked to the point that it's difficult to use. Even so, I think early feminists (so early that they wouldn't even have used the term!) and women's rights advocates in the 19th century had a much more coherent understanding of how to help women in their uniqueness. A lot of contemporary feminists (though not all!) don't value or cherish women as a whole, in their femaleness and their reproductive potential. But there are also lots of thinkers who embrace a sex-realist, maternal, care-based feminism, and I think that's beautiful.
@doctorjenny9 ай бұрын
That’s quite a credo Beatrice!Well argued and explained! Good Easter book. Are you going to read Sayer’s religious play too? Looking forward to Brideshead! Happy Mothering!