Пікірлер
@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari
@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari 18 сағат бұрын
Or so everyone says. But they forget to add that a cheap(ish) camera will, at some point, hinder your photography. I had the Sony a7iii and at first it was ok, then I became increasingly frustrated: the screen, the dials, the button that would "self press"... Now I have the a7rV, the screen is like I wanted it, I have 4 dials I can use, ergonomics have improved... So sure, don't buy a camera thinking it will improve your *abilities*, but do buy the camera that doesn't have the limitations that frustrates you and slow you down
@balu130164
@balu130164 21 сағат бұрын
You are so right.
@MrJapanforce
@MrJapanforce 22 сағат бұрын
Gary you re awesome. Micro Four Thirds Lumix user here since 2008! (Yes, the G1) Never looked back. Ignore and reject all those toxic and idiot haters out there. Enjoy the real photography and let others being happy in their ignorance.
@houghwhite411
@houghwhite411 Күн бұрын
Let me guess, you film yourself with Leica 15mm?
@tommacbride3654
@tommacbride3654 Күн бұрын
Good Job!!
@abchappell01
@abchappell01 Күн бұрын
That was a wonderful video presentation Gary. I agree with you 100%. Keep up the great work that you do. 😊
@RoderickJMacdonald
@RoderickJMacdonald Күн бұрын
This little story communicates the idea well: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qaqlgHiCe8alqtE
@BeingWolfy
@BeingWolfy Күн бұрын
Yeah, and my oven makes really good cakes.
@vermis8344
@vermis8344 Күн бұрын
"That full frame photo is fantastic!" "Thanks! It's actually M43." "Oh, that explains why it's so terrible..." You cannot make this 💩 up. 🤦‍♂️ Tell me you swallow camera conspiracies whole without telling me you swallow camera conspiracies whole. Gary, sorry if these people are your friends and I just insulted them, but _seriously..._
@gray4043
@gray4043 Күн бұрын
I've had several cameras. Now I have a fullframe canon r6mkii but I have fun more with my panasonic g85. Just realized that gear isn't everything. It's just a tool and my g85 gives me great satisfaction.
@szubal
@szubal Күн бұрын
My work camera is S5IIX .... my GM1 is my everyday camera and I love it.
@mirceablanaru
@mirceablanaru Күн бұрын
Hi Gary!! I totally agree with you!! I am a photographer who shot mainly with 4/3 and micro 4/3 gear!!! I shoot also on film. I have the possibility to use FF digital camera but instead of that I prefer to concentrate myself on doing photography with the cameras I already have! I really appreciate photographers who are giving good advices like you!! Take care and bring to us more and more relevant videos and advices like these!!!!
@ВалентинАракчеев-б7д
@ВалентинАракчеев-б7д Күн бұрын
Gary, you are right that in photography the most important thing is not the size of the matrix, but the skill of the photographer, his ability to build a composition and work with light. If you want and have the skill, you can even shoot with a smartphone and get great pictures. Good luck!
@brompterdam
@brompterdam 2 күн бұрын
I sold my Lumix S5 kit and Fujifilm X-T1 kit and settled with used/mint Lumix G9 with Leica DG 8-18, Leica DG 12-60, Lumix 20mm f1.7 and Olympus PEN-F with 17mm, 25mm and 45mm f1.8 set. I will say, I am fully satisfied with my type of photography. I am only missing a telephoto and macro lens but I am not in a hurry since I don't use that much. If money is not a problem, I will buy a Leica Q3 28mm and 43mm version and a set of Leica SL3 with Leica SL Lens, ohh and the latest set of Fujifilm GFX 😁
@HeroVange
@HeroVange 2 күн бұрын
What is your ideal m4/3 vlog set up. Camera + Lens/es. 🤔
@Gary_W
@Gary_W Күн бұрын
I think for vlog, it should be the G100 but it doesn't have IBIS, so any ultra wide lens wouldn't get stabilized since there are none with image stabilizer. I have a G85 that I used to vlog with, but it gets heavy quickly for vlogging. I think the best bet now would be OM Sytem OM5; I personally never tried that camera but if the video quality is solid, then it would be a good vlogging camera due to its IBIS, flip screen, and audio jack.
@snowcat20
@snowcat20 2 күн бұрын
My DRAM camera does not exist also... Unfortunately. What it would be? It will have a body like Lumix G9 (I like classic DSLR like body, quite large but not huge), and will INTERNALLY (!) support both L mount and MFT lenses. It will come with a simple (wires but no electronic inside) optional adapter to be able to attach MFT lenses with it. the camera itself will handle the signals as needed. The sensor would be a 100Mp chip (25Mp for MFT), able to work in different modes: Full res mode - 1 image pixel comes from 1 physical photodetector, quad mode - 1 image pixel comes from 4 physical photodetectors (increased DR, decreased noise), quad mode auto HDR - 1 image pixel comes from 4 physical photodetectors but each pixel gives data using it's own ISO setting. It would be a universal photo camera of my dreams. You want a shallow DOF? Take L mount fast prime. You need to shoot in total darkness? Take L mount and shoot in quad mode. You want a versatile and not huge lens? Take MFT 12-100 and switch to MFT mode. I am not a fan of tiny cameras so it will not be tiny, but I am a fan of versatility so it will be extremely versatile.
@robostripez
@robostripez 2 күн бұрын
How do I buy the fujifilm x1000 VI?? I am going on a cruise in December and would like to buy one and have it before then.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
@@robostripez it's impossible to find here where I live.
@tudongoc3837
@tudongoc3837 2 күн бұрын
I've been following your channel for a long time, I'm also using gx85 but I'm having some problems with updating flimware, I used to use v1.2 but when I updated to v1.3 I had the problem of blurry images. It's not clear, is there any way to go back to the old version of flimware? Thank
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
Sorry I can't help with that, I'm not quite sure you can go back to older firmware version. Have you checked Panasonic's website? Maybe they do have some documentations on how to do that?
@LongNguyen-uj9sl
@LongNguyen-uj9sl 2 күн бұрын
Panasonic gx80 and go 95 which one good? Thank you
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
Depends on what your needs are. If you just want something compact but full-featured then GX80. If you need weather-sealing, better control, and better video features, then G95.
@younessamr6802
@younessamr6802 2 күн бұрын
i own GX85 with 4 primes
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
GX85 is a really nice camera. Cheers!
@mlhm5
@mlhm5 2 күн бұрын
If you stay with micro four thirds you will get an OM-5
@vermis8344
@vermis8344 2 күн бұрын
Gotta admit, it's a good one. When I stopped trying to pretend my GX80 was a wildlife camera, I beefed up with an OM-1. At the same time, I was considering another small camera; mostly waiting for Panasonic to announce a GX9 successor with weather sealing etc. (I still am) Then I realised OM already had something with all my requirements. These days, wildlife is still my main aim, and I still have my GX80 (still a great little camera) but somehow I find myself reaching for the OM-5 most of the time.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
It's an interesting camera for sure, but for now it's very similar to my G85. If I need to replace my G85 I would probably consider the OM-5 as an alternative.
@tmp0922
@tmp0922 2 күн бұрын
Thank for posting Gary, I have a question why the Olympus PEN E-PL7 over the Olympus PEN E-P7? I'm trying to decide between the two and I'm leaning towards the E-P7 but Id love your input on this dilemma.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 2 күн бұрын
I think E-P7 is great, but it's just not available here where I live. There are plenty of older E-PLs in the used market though.
@MingYuanYu
@MingYuanYu 3 күн бұрын
1:10 Instead of developing a new Lumix camera, what's the reason not to go with the Sony A6700? There are good compact E-mount lenses for day-to-day photography.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 3 күн бұрын
Good point, I am contemplating on a ZV-E10 and a couple of sigma f2.8 lenses. It is the closest thing to a GX camera with flip screen and audio jack at GX85 price level. A6700 is a bit too expensive for me.
@MingYuanYu
@MingYuanYu 3 күн бұрын
@@Gary_WYeah I get it. I personally own a GX80, a GM5, and a ZV-E10. I find myself gravitating more to the ZV-E10 especially when shooting my cats indoors 😂. Sony's continuous auto focus is just so much better.
@houghwhite411
@houghwhite411 3 күн бұрын
Somehow I agree with you lol Buy Lumix factory and design team, build a fuji / ricoh killer
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 3 күн бұрын
@@houghwhite411 😁😁😁 if I could ask them to make my dream camera, I'd be really happy 😆😆
@younessamr6802
@younessamr6802 3 күн бұрын
i joined the club recently
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 3 күн бұрын
Welcome to the club, hope you're enjoying the 75mm 😊
@younessamr6802
@younessamr6802 3 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W can't wait to travel and enjoy it
@jcmt8178
@jcmt8178 3 күн бұрын
Thanks Gary - in a simplest way could you explain why cameras like OM5 or EM10 are not for you but GX80 is? Are there fundamental differences that push you towards lumix?
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 3 күн бұрын
@jcmt8178 basically, with Lumix cameras I have more options for video: better frame rate(I don't know the current OM cameras but back then they have no option for 25fps which is the standard here where I live), and the ability to use constant bitrate. Maybe they have implemented those features in the newer cameras, but I have no way to try them, no store has them for display. Hope this explains 😁
@odysseusreturns9133
@odysseusreturns9133 3 күн бұрын
Will the Olympus 35-100 work on a Panasonic GF6 regarding autofocus and image stabilisation?
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 3 күн бұрын
@odysseusreturns9133 not quite sure there is an Olympus 35-100mm unfortunately.
@silverstreettalks343
@silverstreettalks343 4 күн бұрын
I think you have made a good case for MFT for travel, but perhaps you are unnecessarily defensive. You are right that there are some circumstances where full frame or APS-C would be more suitable, but that's the real issue: suitability for the purpose. Perhaps the way people need to learn to think about MFT is that a V8 Chevrolet, a Toyota Camry, a Toyota Corolla and a Nissan Micra will all get you to work, and do a roughly equivalent job. They will also get you to Bandung if you like. But a "full frame" V8 is best if you travel from Jakarta to Bandung several times a week, an "APS-C" Camry will take you to Bandung, but is better if you are only going to Bogor, an "MFT" Corolla is good for the trip to Bogor, but more comfortable if you only run between Sepok and Jakarta. On the other hand, you can still easily drive to Bandung in a Micra, but it's quick and easy to park if you have a flat in South Jakarta and an office in Jakarta.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for the analogy with cars, that was quite an interesting way to explain camera formats. And also thank you for reminding me regarding being defensive, that truly wasn't my intention and I will keep that in mind for my next video to avoid sounding like that. I recognize that each camera format has its best use case scenario, I just happen to observe that more people could benefit from using M43, especially for travel photography. Cheers 😁👍
@silverstreettalks343
@silverstreettalks343 3 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W I know you are a keen supporter of MFT, but we keep getting the message from other photographers that only large sensors count. So we unconsciously tend to defend our choices. I think I mentioned before that I had a couple of Nikon 1s until lenses gave up, and they were lovely for 90% of my photography. I think we all know there are some shots we just won't even bother trying for. Every camera has some limitations, or the collection of add-ons we have with us won't solve some particular shooting problem we have. And we put the camera back in the bag, shrug, and wait until conditions change. I should visit Indonesia one day, I had a Facebook friend who lived in Bogor, and I appreciated her photos and now yours. A beautiful country and not too far from Australia.
@Hexlord
@Hexlord 5 күн бұрын
So where you get your M43 stuff in Indonesia?
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
@Hexlord back then, I bought them from a couple of shops in Jakarta, JPC Kemang and Focus Nusantara. They were the only ones that have good selection of M43 gear. Nowadays, I bought them from any online platforms like Tokopedia.
@jameschetwynd
@jameschetwynd 5 күн бұрын
Think camera that easy in pocket light cheep (so if stolen no biggie) best choice Have old digital Nikon coolpix paid $90 9 years back
@jameschetwynd
@jameschetwynd 5 күн бұрын
Think coolpix I have one of first. So small light and produce good pictures has small flash But outside camera really think 4x zoom
@RDSGolden
@RDSGolden 5 күн бұрын
Great video, Gary. I have the GM5, GX8 and E-P7 and am going on a trip this week to Europe. Many have recommended I take the GX8 with the Panasonic 12-60 kit lens. I have many lenses including the PL 8-18, 14mm 2.5, 20mm 1.7, PL mm 1.4, 12-32 lens, 35-100 that you spoke of in your video, 45mm PL 2.8 (also macro), etc. I don’t want to being too many lenses or cameras or lenses. What would you recommend?
@RDSGolden
@RDSGolden 5 күн бұрын
Just bought your travel photography e-book!
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
I would suggest keeping it light and simple. GM5 or EP7 for the camera body, 12-32 & 35-100 combo plus one of your three prime lenses for low light(choose the most flexible one). GX8 is a great camera and I have it too, but for traveling maybe it's a bit too big and heavy. Hey, thanks for buying the eBook, I really appreciate it 😊🙏
@mk1photography62
@mk1photography62 5 күн бұрын
I find the IQ from my GX80 to be excellent i also use my OMD EM1 MK3 and thats great too
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
Yes, definitely solid IQ from this generation of M43 cameras 👍
@mk1photography62
@mk1photography62 5 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W I used to be in the field of " full frame" is better but to be perfectly honest I really do not miss Canon
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
@mk1photography62 same here, I got some chance to use the early A7R, A7III, some Fujis, and a Canon 5DIII as well. Years later I settled with M43 and couldn't be happier 😁
@mk1photography62
@mk1photography62 5 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W Yep I haven't found myself ever considering a full frame now. I am looking at getting a used OM-1 as higher iso seems very good ?
@sbcwinn
@sbcwinn 6 күн бұрын
Your photos are beautiful.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! 😊
@houghwhite411
@houghwhite411 6 күн бұрын
People should define "best" image quality M43 is different, not bad image. If bad is defined by shallow dof, well it's not the goal of m43 in the first place
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 5 күн бұрын
I agree 👍
@silverstreettalks343
@silverstreettalks343 4 күн бұрын
Very much "Yep!"
@marcodevonphoto
@marcodevonphoto 6 күн бұрын
5:49 where was the shot of the volcano taken? Thanks for sharing your review of the camera.
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 6 күн бұрын
@@marcodevonphoto it was Labuan Bajo, Indonesia 😁
@Alanwking
@Alanwking 6 күн бұрын
Beautiful photos. I'm looking at this lens for my Olympus E-PL3. Thanks for this video.
@vijayakumarva2125
@vijayakumarva2125 7 күн бұрын
Lumix g85 or Canon R100 which is good for travel photos and videos
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 7 күн бұрын
R100 might be more compact, but lens selection is a bit limited. G85 a bit bulkier, has smaller sensor, but it has real sensor stabilizer, weather sealed, and has better lens selection. If you don't need those features, both are good candidates for both photo and video.
@vijayakumarva2125
@vijayakumarva2125 7 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W 🙏 Thank you
@LadyBovine
@LadyBovine 7 күн бұрын
You might have compared these elsewhere, but you've said a lot of good things about the 12-35 f/2.8 from lumix, and in previous videos said it's one of your most used lenses. How does that one fit in between these two in your opinion? Still large aperture, less range, but smaller and lighter than the Olympus. What are your feelings on the lumix 12-35 f/2.8 now?
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 7 күн бұрын
@LadyBovine to be honest I prefer the Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 due to its OIS and smaller lighter build to the Olympus 12-40mm f2.8. However, besides that, they are similar, and can be easily interchanged when you compare either one with 12-32mm. It's just sad that my 12-35 2.8 died 2 years ago 😥
@LadyBovine
@LadyBovine 7 күн бұрын
@@Gary_W Thanks for the the reply and thoughs on the 12-35 f2.8. Sorry to hear yours died. Did it have an accident, or it just gave up?
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 7 күн бұрын
@@LadyBovine it just died. But to be fair, I probably already took tens of thousands of pictures with it, used it hot humid weather as well as freezing cold arctic weather, so the lens actually stood up to the ultimate usage test and created some of my best images. So, no regrets 😁
@dutchvanderlinde15
@dutchvanderlinde15 8 күн бұрын
Im about to buy a lumix g5 in 3 months or so, and Ive already got a 29mm prime from a praktica, amd a 135mm prime. And what ill do is ill buy an adapter and use the lenses uve got for film photos
@larsholst6216
@larsholst6216 8 күн бұрын
I would need a 12mm - 35mm and a 100mm - 250mm to change with on my vacations
@TheDesertsweeper
@TheDesertsweeper 9 күн бұрын
No weather sealing, no good for real travel.
@beesaya_tv
@beesaya_tv 9 күн бұрын
the carabiner hack is cool
@Gary_W
@Gary_W 9 күн бұрын
can't take full credit of it, I found the hack on Google 😄
@enduringtech822
@enduringtech822 9 күн бұрын
I have been travelling with the 12-60mm f/2.8-4.0 which I considered to be very versatile but it's a little heavy. I am tempted to grab a kit 12-60 f/3.5-5.6 from the used market. Realistically it should be quite adequate.
@BigSmokeGTA6
@BigSmokeGTA6 9 күн бұрын
The only thing the Leica does better is gather more light than the lumix 12-60 other than that the 12-60 still gathers more light than the 12-32 and is as sharp as the Leica and for half the price is very impressive for a consumer lens it punches above its weight class for sure only pro zooms like Olympus have a different look and are better for they’re Olympus character and colors other than that the lumix is very good all video and images like life like with it