Thank youu... its exam time and u helped me alot. Ummwa

thanks for video, When you expose a problem without giving information, it's always guiding towards wrong answers. For example, in the machine problem, it's the person who creates the problem by deliberately not explaining that the machines are working independently from each other, and you expect people to figure out the process of making widgets

Isn't pirahã the exception?

Word for bird (🐦) in Ukrainian is weird. Ptakh (kh is like a Dutch g and like a Spanish j) and I wonder how that came to be.

👉🎥🎞️ lights👉🌞👉🌏🤔

Thank you so much!! I wish you continue making more videos like this. I subscribe and wait for that day.

One of the best videos about the topic, if not the best on KZbin. Definitely sharing this with my psych students. Thanks!

Fantastic presentation!

Swedish has more than 14 vowel phonemes 😊

My brain cells are dying 😢

Khezabe from Tanzania with click sound

Great video, thanks for putting these out there. One simple question I have: if the computer, as you say, doesn't "know" or "understand" anything it computes, then why should it be taken as a foundational concept for understanding the mind? What exactly would allow computers to "know" or "understand", i.e. do actual cognition? And if they don't do actual cognition, then why should we take Computational Theory of Mind seriously?

ah wheres your subscribers bro

Your argument against realism was based on the idea that because our minds have a way to represent the world we don't have direct access to the world but is direct experience the same as thinking in abstractions ?

How does this guy only have 5k subscribers? I thought it was 5million at first glance... Keep up the good work

what are some potential career paths for this? im interested in business, technology, as well as design.

Philosophy and psychology we have Carl Jung psychoanalysis. Carl Jung proves Neuroscience he was right. We need some laws over psychology , perhaps people we don’t problems with the misuse of philosophy, and people start respecting philosophy and all real Genius who really provide positive impact in our society and the history of humanity.

Your Videos are Excellent

Quite informative. At least I know my enemy for what it is: DEHUMANIZATION. Fortunately, you have lots of time to figure out what garbage these physicalist theories are, and what a threat they are to our very humanity. Cheers.

When you say "Qualia", it also makes me think you are just describing phenomenology which is "subjectivity for objectivity". Now I'm not sure about AI or computers having consciousness, but phenomenology is a very real thing. I was also curious if you ever looked into the left-brain right-brain dichotomy or had any videos on that? This video reminds me of that as well. Very well made video for the pseudointellectual that I am!

Brilliant 👏 ❤thanks a million

I think you have to learn more about behaviorism; there is not such an extreme divorce between cognitivism and conductism. Just take a look at the most recent studies done by Albert Bandura and the application of behavioural theory in AI to educate and control the world.

Isn't it actually a logical fallacy to argue that : if we do operation A, it takes a certain amount of time. It took this certain amount of time, therefore operation A was done and not some other operation. This does count as abductive reasoning, but isn't actually a valid inference. We can only conclude that: given it didn't take this certain amount of time, operation A wasn't done. And in this particular case it just tells us that the mathematical transformation wasn't done, however we don't know whether mental rotation via 3d imagery is the only other way of figuring out rotations problems, and so we can't conclude that it is indeed the right model only by ruling out another

But what does computation as operation over representations even mean? How does it tie in with the more formal notion of computation?

Excellent. I was able to remember the 7932 because I used it as a connection to the date of my birth: 7 and 3 (50% accomplished) and then the difference between 9 and 2 = 7 related to my birthday again, so associated with my old long time memory. Interesting to say, I watched 20 minutes of the video, stopped it and played the rest of it the next day. Therefore I was able to remember my strategy 24 hours later. I just had to think of my birthday. Cheers

great video. love this topic. glad i found your channel!

Hey is Active recall or spaced repetition which is better for memories theory book like biology.

It’s pretty amazing your video on cog sci has instead helped me understand discrete maths.

15:40 I think you nailed the AI one right here. Just not sure how you can program empirical data into a “mind” and then it develops subjective experience. I feel humans have become enlightened enough to access this “thing in itself” dimension/substrate which we can’t prove exists, but gives rise to complex abstracts like consciousness.

So clear! Thank you so much for the video!

Loving these videos About to start my cogsci degree in october and these are so interesting

The fact that your reading and pausing massively is putting me off and makes me think you have little subject knowledge. So whilst researching such a subject it make me want to find another channel to watch. This isn't me trolling but me giving constructive critique from one content creator to another.

This is kind of my like argument against purely empirical research method that dismisses that subjectivity needs to be analyzed. How an evolutionary psychologist might try to analyze the human mind largely influenced by its physical components versus a cultural anthropologist who immerses themselves in the subjectivity. This is not an argument against analyzing at the physical level just that the perspective of analyzing subjectivity is not as important and devalued because it doesn't always fully use the scientific method in its qualitative approach yet it is how we can map out our software will others can also map out the hardware. Also if you believe in monism then you will realize subjectivity is the software that rises out of the physical mechanism of the mind.

thankksss for meaking this videos

You started poorly but otherwise a good presentation. Light does not enter the eyes and go to the brain. It is important to reinforce that nothing but blood, neurons, cerebral spinal fluid enter and exit the brain.

The mind is information processing for producing behavior. Other parts of the brain (such as the endocrine system) also produce behavior (of a different type). DNA and other information processing in the body do not produce behavior. They produce metabolic activity.

Termite and other species are not collectively a mind. Collectively they do the work of two birds building a nest, but the birds also act on instinctive instructions so the two birds do not make a mind. It is possible that only humans have a mind---both individually and working collectively.

I have discovered what the mind does and how. It is that part of the computational brain that is not a computer. This does not contradict your lecture. One can place names on various processes as one wishes. For me, my work, the brain contains a computer that allows us to determine things like how much change to give a customer who purchases $7.50 in goods. The mind, again by definition, is the part of the brain doing something else--which I explain. All the best.

20:10 You might show the wrong example mate, the law of small numbers .... it's not about how many people die on a car acc, but how many trips on cars that the car crashes and someone dies how many plane trips happen, and how many of them crashed and someone dies, don't play with numbers or percentage to prove the concept mate the example might be totally wrong

18:26 no the hard problem of consciousness will come in our way . zombie argument which tells that what if humans made same clone of you , which does everything the way you do . So turing machine won't be able to conceive what reality is... From perspective of consciousness, A turing machine won't even be able to know that it even exist ... There is no difference between it and a rock .

22:26 obviously it's true that experience exists ontologically subjective but I don't understand the differentiating line between physicalism and dualism . There are scientist who don't deny it but say because of brain processes the subjective experiences emerges. They just have different mode of existence

4:58 wow it's amazingly put in words ... He must have been a legend it's shows his level of smartness

The whole thing on Weber's law with the bag of pennies (and some falling) was wayyy too long and not really helpful....but you made it up by ending with this very important phrase: "The mind is an information processor that performs computations over representations"!

Very nice talk. I'm a physician interested in Matter to Mind mystery for many years; have read lots of books, watched lots of videos but I think Ryan Rhodes talks/teachings are very good and he explains things in a very intellectual and unique way. But if you don't mind, can you tell me a bit about yourself Ryan; who are you :), what is your background and education in?

Thank you for the explanation. This is much more entertaining than reading Bermúdez's book :D

You are saving my mind and my CogSci grade!!! Thank you!!

Hegel and Lacan!

This was amazing, thank you!

This was amazing! Appreciate your efforts highly.

Cognitive psychology