Take a video about this , The world is now ruled by one community of people, the world Satanic elite, you can also call them the committee to meet the Antichrist and prevent the 2nd coming of Jesus, Trump called them the deep state, at the moment it consists of about 10,000 people, the main ones there are Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Windsors, Baruchs, they, their ancestors, descendants and other people who enter there have the mark of Lucifer, which, if they bring the antichrist and do not allow the 2nd coming, they will receive eternal life after the x hour, and the rest of humanity, for all the time that they have lived, they won't get anything, so all people should know about the existence of a world government (Jesus who was a The Prophet of God, not God.God will send Jesus as a reward to humanity, if humanity deserves it, for this it is necessary to fight Lucifer and his elite)

Hi, i just wanted to ask u if i can use mx d362 instead of mx d363 because i cant find the transistor u used in the video anywhere. Pls reply

Hey ho... I did not run through all the comments but I wanted to drop this idea: as can be seen from your measurements things are saturating from stage to stage. I was wondering if you could build a power staged setup where each new stage has a higher voltage applied same like for multi staged turbo chargers in cars or for turbines in jet engines. You could further more improve the efficiency now as you may measure the optimal power supply for each stage now thus may increase the overall efficiency in both, thrust and power consumption. (Hope you could understand my explanation, if not, reach out to me 😅)

Btw. Better help steals people’s data and messages with therapists and sends them to 3rd parties (someone that sells sensitive medical data on vulnerable people is probably not who you want to be associated with.

Or you can just go buy a taser.

Well done bro!!! Just wonder if there's some simulation software you could use to speed things up? Instead of prototyping each stage? I know it's not as fun but it could speed up your results exponentially.

In respect to the spacing and minimal change to speed. Maybe it’s true that volume of air increases not just speed. Try using thrust as a base measurement instead of speed

Run some radioactive decay through it and see if you get more thrust?

Curious

If you're doing a boat, point them forward against a sail for me, please?

*IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OUTPUT MORE ENERGY THAN YOU PUT ON IN A FUSION PROCESS, PERIOD, AT LEAST YOU ADD FUEL HELIUM 3 TO KEEP THE REACTION WITHOUT SPENDING MORE ENERGY, ALL THAT IS MONEY LAUNDERING, THAT IS THE BIGGEST PLASMA LAMP EVER*

funnel

What about a gradual decrease in each size of thruster sort of pyrimid style?

Great video, can you make a video on this for a bladless fan for those hot summer days?

Likin the tesla stache

Ok so I'm very interested in this, could you entertain me a bit and try with a housing around it so it directs where the thruster tries to pull the air from?

Can you tell if the earth is flat!!! Do you ever have to nose down!! Look up NASA measurements. Lol. I think we been lied to!!! You should also see the sun and moon. Only 13,0000 feet up. Maybe 20,000. I know y'all see it in the clouds!! Come on over to the truthers!!!

Did somebody say [Thunderfury, Blessed Blade of the Windseeker]?

Futuristico

This is a great demonstration on how the moons of Jupiter affect the storms and plasma in the atmosphere of Jupiter.

Do these things still produce ozone?

Add some mechanics plenum chamber, ventura, turbo use the physics of the airs flow use posative and negative pressure by restricting then expanding add some turbines or create swirl like every thing in life its all about positive and negative

Haven't seen a comment about it, but I'm thinking about this design a bit. You're trying to take in air that is ionized to go from a negative to a positive (Am I right?) through the air (electrical field and magnetic field). Repelling negative air ion from negative and attracting them to the positive, right ? So instead of making stuff linear, why not try to make them more like a zig-zag (or cavity-like (like the leaf)) to get a better surface to react to the attraction ? Like if 2 leaf where actually made of copper. This would make the "acceleration" more linear I believe and spreading them apart should enable you to make a better distance... I don't know how you could do that design to get bigger "wire" to propagate current and tension to smaller "wire" as to divide the load in a way to avoid melting smaller branches, but I firmly believe it would help. Like the little dent you did based on Integza design (which I see you also did on your last 2 models). Trying to make an imperfect shape may actually give you better result then a linear rail that I keep seeing in your designs.

Ok blonde haired Nikola Tesla 😂😂

Would making each stage slightly smaller than the previous one help improve increase air velocity using convergence as well

"you're a wizard Harry"

I sent this to the Exploratorium. Hopefully they'll do a version of this, and hopefully-hopefully actually give you credit!

AVP 👽 You 🙉 heard why / and they both lost "human trafficking / ... cool cause"Darrell stabs/ I'm tracking .../ Well they are tracking down "groups / in particular "Oakland kids group / ..../ They had been ✌🏾"sleeping / adults ✌🏾"clothed as middle schoolers / AVP 👽 We'll see / ... here let's see 🙈 ..we can curve it / ...../ How bout ... alternating....like on on top n,... space ,.. one on bottom /... space ...on top agin /. Bottom? / And maybe 🤔 vortex it

hello, I already got all electronics for this but, where can I find the 3D files? are they avalible?

You should have put the thrusters on the bottom, better in flight stability, clears the top off for a solar panel and then you can put some high density proppelant or batteries in the wing

We have very different definitions of a half inch lmao

I suggest you should go with ring shaped design together with ring shaped electrodes or In simple words change ur triangle to circle.

so the first iteration sucked because of diminishing returns and created a v2 with the same flaw? what you are doing is taking a ball and kicking it with your 10kmh moving foot over and over again, it won’t stack. densen the airflow while keeping the same speed for more output or go back to your v 2.1 where you had multiple fans actually converge.

What about instead of a straight air flow you put in a way to create a vortex through the center?

Just a thought, what if you arranged it with slightly turned to create an angled output creating a vortex with increased center like a hurricane spiral based on the golden angle and Fibonacci series of numbers? It’s in nature everywhere

Feel sorry for those who have seen an evidence of an afterlife and saw their asses in safety for a moment.

I won't drop my sub on you but you should reallly part ways with better help. The problem with them is that they basically sell your data.... yes even the most private like the one you share only with psychotherapists (or rather the "i hope he really is a" psychotherapists

Great video. But please change your background music. It’s terrible and not fitting the mode of your presentation.

looks like the EMF is very not good for that big coil. My small kacher Brovina works much better and lights up bulbs much brighter just from 12V 10W power supply

POTENTIAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT. What we are attempting with this, is the movement of maximum air mass, from the input of the device, to the output of the device, while minimising losses and or negtive force vectors. Major problems include: 1. Radial thrust losses instead of axial thrust gains. 2. Cross sectional area against the direction of movement (drag). 3. Reduction in low pressure at the input/head. 4. Reduction in high pressure at the output/tail. 5. Flowrate limitations of the cylinder that contains the axial airflow. Historically, my main idea has always been a solid state propulsion device, that is no more than a tube or trumpet (velocity stack), with an active surface. Using a series of electrically/mechanically/magnetically isolated rings along the length, which can change the localised pressure/vaccum/ion state along the axis, enables a pump which resembles a sign wave moving along the axis, which drags the air through the container. This to be done by charged ions dragging the uncharged air through the device with it. Someone below suggested using stages with different pressure stages (like modern steam turbine energy recovery) to make the system more efficient, but there is also another way. The way nature gets around increasing the flowrate limitation problem of a fixed diameter orifice, is to create a vortex. Fundamentally, by spinning the airflow like a cenrtufuge, you create low pressure at the center of the axis, which drags in more air than normally possible, while also creating greater pressure at the wallls, where the active component of the thrust mechanism, actually does its work. In theory then, you should be able to improve all 5 of the elements listed above, by using a phase shifted/pulsed vortex...or literally create an archimedes screw in an electrical/ion drive sense, by using an active surface. Where the effective rotation of the field, drags the ions in both an axial and rotational motion.

Interesting fact is that such a generators gives you usually about a hundred(s) thousand volts and the current in that sparks rises up to several dozens of amps that considered absolutely lethal. BUT the time it acts so short (nanoseconds) that any damage just doesn't have time to happen.

Bernoulli principal nossle would work great here. This thruster being the smaller input of the larger nossle

Where did you get the aerodynamic tubing?

What about the Venturi effect / Bernoulli principal? Could this help move more air to produce better thrust. Each stage should be a larger area then the previous.

You can try a helicoidal form better than a linear way to move the Air, something like a tornado 🌀

Could you get ring shaped "razers" that reduce in circumference?

I suspect the reason why you get diminishing returns on velocity with the old sequential design has less to do with your explanation and more with the simple fact that you add the same kinetic energy at each stage and the kinetic energy being proportional to the square of the velocity. You would expect a the results your getting since velocity is proportional to the square root of the kinetic energy

What about making a cone in the Center that creates possible added vortex effect?

what would happen if you created more of them and aligned them all in a circle?

It's possible that the triangle shape is creating too much interference, causing the air to fight itself to get out, ie drag. I don't know how you'd test that though; confetti in a fire resistant room? Maybe try a box, with thrusters on just two opposing side. Or, if you wanna keep the three sides of thrusters, you could try the bestagon approach, and connect them with three equal blank sides. Likewise, you may wanna try containing the entire unit in a sleeve. You can get cardboard tubes of varying diameters at the local hardware store. For shits and giggles, you could try funneling the exhaust.