Terry Shaneyfelt

Пікірлер

@jaffarallawi 5 күн бұрын

Well explained in an easy to understand way thank you 🙏

@faithE9 13 күн бұрын

how old u now?

@leestevenson3782 19 күн бұрын

You're a gent and a scholar😇

@johnrvt 26 күн бұрын

Great video. Your example uses 20 years. Does the amount of time a factor in RR? The RR likelihood changes as the total exposure changes? I ask as many studies on PubMed are meta-analyses discussing for example, RR of alcohol consumption for a negative outcome, but the meta-analysis aggregates many studies over many different time periods. Is a relative risk of 1.06 a 6% increase in risk compared to a control group for having a single drink, or a single drink per day over a year for example? The meta-analysis mentions the 1.06 but not the time period.

@maribelhansson5111 Ай бұрын

Awsome, thank you so much!!

@billbill6886 Ай бұрын

nice

@Ncb2019 Ай бұрын

Thank you

@addamabdelghani5840 Ай бұрын

Great job prof!

@TheDYNAMITE001 Ай бұрын

Wow.. 11 years later and this is up there with the very best most helpful contents on this topic. Thank you so much!

@laurengray8482 Ай бұрын

Hi Terry, can you explain how a hierarchical composite differs from a composite? Recently there was a trial published in NEJM using a hierarchical composite and the endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. This is different from previously published data, and I wondering how/if the hierarchical component may be influencing the results. Thanks.

@r.h8765 Ай бұрын

Yah please we really need that

@taffareldelimaoliveira 2 ай бұрын

very helpful

@ihasjb3 2 ай бұрын

Super enlightening, thanks!

@Honeybutter-o4u 2 ай бұрын

This video is so helpful, thank you so much! But anyone can explained how to calculate RRR mentioned in 2:46 ?

@jennipherbwalya4120 2 ай бұрын

Amazing thank you so much ❤🎉

@varynhaze 2 ай бұрын

Legend!

@Defsnotruby 2 ай бұрын

This is so old 😢😢😢

@jayzune1752 3 ай бұрын

I can not imagine why I just see the series at 2024!!! They are greatest explanations to clinical trials!! I cry to learn, fabulous!!!

@anurajms 3 ай бұрын

thank you

@neelupetyt6520 3 ай бұрын

You are a legend, your videos have helped me in my assignment so much, not sure where i would be without these videos

@anurajms 3 ай бұрын

thank you

@Tammie-o7o 4 ай бұрын

How deal with cohort studies on every day basic if I'm bipolar also Psychosis and retardation words I do use everyday carry interests in me you talking commonly it get my attention

@apdroidgeek1737 4 ай бұрын

does it have to be asymptomatic? now im confusion cuz chapter didnt mentioned that.

@dr.nishantkania4511 4 ай бұрын

Short, simple & very well explained by simple illustrative diagram

@Jason-o5s 4 ай бұрын

Cheer~~~explain the meaning of (information, words, or actions).😊

@Fatma_a_md 5 ай бұрын

Wow! This should be the top video when you look up this concept. Super concise! Thank you so much!

@philiprobert1332 5 ай бұрын

m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKTIaWOjmMqDaM0&pp=ygUjUmVsYXRpdmUgdnMgQWJzb2x1dGUgUmlzayBSZWR1Y3Rpb24%3D

@vincentmarotta9800 5 ай бұрын

I'm trying to interpret a HR (Hazard Ratio) study done on smoking tobacco. The study looked at non-smokers vs. pipe tobacco smokers over the course of, like, 30 something years. For non-smokers, the HR was 1.0 (control group) For pipe smokers, the HR was 1.2 I'm interpreting this as "A pipe smoker is 20% more likely to get _some_ kind of cancer or complication due to pipe smoking, versus a non-smoker for that same cancer." But my question becomes: Is there a reliable HR study that shows non-smokers, pipe tobacco smokers, cigarette smokers, cigar smokers, and vape users? Thank you. Very easy to follow.