Mankind need dreamers, found you guys , searching why there is not hot air airships . There is! Wonderful project
@daydreaminginventor-k89579 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤
@robynmasters870 Жыл бұрын
Where's my personal blimp? I want to be able to float instead of drive. I'm sick of traffic.
@forcechief Жыл бұрын
I just want to know the Orchestral Score that's playing.........
@danielnachbar9795 Жыл бұрын
Johann Strauss II - The Blue Danube Waltz
@forcechief Жыл бұрын
@@danielnachbar9795 Thanks.
@C_A1822 Жыл бұрын
Hello from 2023!
@TATONKA-THE-ETERNAL Жыл бұрын
I'm looking to fly from Sydney to Auckland - where do I book in flights?
@rodrigocoockiemonster4460 Жыл бұрын
Can you still buy this?
@D...M...A...2 жыл бұрын
They crashed and died 9 yrs ago...?
@benainscough62292 жыл бұрын
How much is one of these in today's market 🤔 ? Well done Dan
@picklefish743 жыл бұрын
Why aren't the propellers electrically powdered. I don't know what this guy is talking about. I've seen plenty of cool electric airplanes.
@JackSchidt3 жыл бұрын
But where do I buy one
@emanithomas98773 жыл бұрын
Anyone watching in 2021?
@C_A1822 Жыл бұрын
2023 lmao
@randhawaj.s.97923 жыл бұрын
Bravo, keep it up.
@julialeprince78093 жыл бұрын
sad that its not a thing anymore
@mayorgeneralramirez19974 жыл бұрын
12 years already!
@jul88035 жыл бұрын
Looks like it escaped from a Tim Burton flick. I love it.
@RaskalnickoffTube5 жыл бұрын
No news since 2007.
@thespaceman11896 жыл бұрын
So, how do I buy one?
@nerblebun6 жыл бұрын
9 years & never got an answer from these guys. Bought a Power Paraglider & Trike instead.
@dannz26038 жыл бұрын
Nice job guys but do you realize that Cameron Balloons in Bristol England have been building hot air blimps for 30 plus years, and they are nice. I am infact a qualified instructor in LTA flight and have many hours of flight time in these things.
@danielnachbar97958 жыл бұрын
+Dan NZ Always delighted to meet another pilot. Yes, we carefully studied the Cameron, Gefa-Flug, Kubicek, et al designs before we started. Our conclusion was that the best performance that can be obtained from that design direction is still well below the level required for wider application. That's why we are driven to explore different envelope structures. Our view is that hot air ships will remain very much on the margins until someone comes up with a design that can fly at something like 40 knots and can takeoff/land in something like a 20 knot surface wind,. We've done the math to confirm that such performance is indeed plausible. But there remains a great deal of development work between here and there.
@dannz26038 жыл бұрын
+Daniel Nachbar Yes you are absolutely correct, the Cameron hot air blimps are pretty useless at wind speeds of over 12 knots so ideally you need a nice still day to inflate and operate one. I do like your rigid internal support structure rather than the flexible catenary lines as employed in and by Cameron models. Keep up the good work and stay reasonably safe as my old instructor used to say :-)
@Heikki_Finland10 жыл бұрын
It looks great the way it is but if it was completely black it would get the full benefit from the sun heating the surface and thus the air inside. In fact all hot air balloons should be black to save some or even all the fuel.
@GMODISM7 жыл бұрын
Would it not also need to be white inside to not cool down too fast hm?
@homeopathicfossil-fuels47896 жыл бұрын
some sci fi polarizing paint that could change colour from black to white readily would fix that..
@abikelife14813 жыл бұрын
Cool idea! What if you used parabolic concurve reflectors, aimed at the balloon?
@DesmondCreighton11 жыл бұрын
Great job you guys look like people I could have easily partnered with - always dreamed of a personal blimp, last year or so. Haha. Been planning seriously the last two months. I plan on beginning with a single-person hydrogen fueled zeppelin with a unique design. Good luck to you guys, really impressed!
@mikeheinlein374611 жыл бұрын
Paramotor is for recreation, the idea is for a vehicle that can practically transport a person from point A to point B.
@margeylanesandpiper457211 жыл бұрын
I hope they are still working on this. To be able to fly without all the noise would be amazing!
@JohnnyThund3r11 жыл бұрын
I would like to know the same question, maybe they couldn't find funding, whatever the case it sure as heck feels like this project got shelved.
@Shadouchekah12 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it technically be possible to recompress the helium with an air compressor instead of venting it ?
@WranglerSlim6 жыл бұрын
Goodyear blimps have that feature, although it's mainly used for deflating the envelope completely. To increase or decrease lift, they have an air ballonet inside the helium envelope that can be deflated or inflated in order to compress the helium, or allow it to expand (changing it's density varies it's lifting force).
@gairabad12 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know if these guys are still around? Looks like their website hasn't been touched in the past few years...
@Stranger_13 жыл бұрын
Doesn't look like it. I wonder whatever happened.
@CrazyCamo12 жыл бұрын
I'm with you concerning the shape, I find the egg shape, troublesome.
@CrazyCamo12 жыл бұрын
One thought, pedal power, no engine, would make an athlete like me ever so happy. Well, also i think that it would be nice if it were smaller sleek to allow for lift via forward momentum, perhaps also 2/3 helium 1/3 hot air to greatly diminish the size?
@Elround412 жыл бұрын
Couldn't the air also be heated by using a mechanism to suck in and then jet out air into the blimp that uses electrically heated metal wires?
@Jjames76312 жыл бұрын
@drewsisely This is hot air, not hydrogen. Hydrogen is illegal in airships. Hot airships were invented in the '70s and there hasn't been a single serious injury or death in 150+ built since. Furthermore, "turbulence" doesn't cause Hydrogen to ignite. Just ask the Graf Zeppelin. Pure Hydrogen is inert, it has to be mixed with air (leaking out) in order to ignite.
@ArcadeGames13 жыл бұрын
Dear Santa...
@cowboy659113 жыл бұрын
Love the science and experimentation but the costs are a bummer.
@parabounce13 жыл бұрын
Hi Skyyacht, we have a personal flying machine, filled with helium. Check us out please. Patabounce
@crimescene2513 жыл бұрын
@busterpiggle Sounds like you base your life off of the "great race"
@Jjames76313 жыл бұрын
@gguru1 Oh, sure. There are dozens flying. Lindstrand, Cameron, Gefa-flug, and some older companies all produce some. This is the only semi-rigid model in existence, though, and it solves a lot of problems, namely safety, speed, and noise. Well, it's not so speedy now, but Skyacht has hinted at a slimmer, faster ship.
@SuperTrainStationH13 жыл бұрын
YES! A hot air dirigible seemed a no brainer to me, I'm shocked by how few people I've been able to find exploring this idea.
@davidrodgersNJ13 жыл бұрын
Very cool. What's the maximum wind speed you can fly it in?
@1971SuperLead14 жыл бұрын
Why not use helium or hydrogen?
@WranglerSlim6 жыл бұрын
Helium is a lot more expensive, and the FAA doesn't permit the use of pure hydrogen due to the risk of an explosion. Hydrogen could be made relatively safe with the right technology, of course, but that would be quite expensive.
@av8tor17b14 жыл бұрын
Questions: Why the internal support rods? What does that give you that you couldn't do with internal inflatable tubes? What would you do differently with the shape? It seems extremely round to me. Would not a more slender shape help with forward motion? What weight fabric are you using? It is like HTN-90 or Hyperlast? Thanks in advance for your answers.
@darnitalltohell14 жыл бұрын
@busterpiggle My thoughts exactly.
@brent19812215 жыл бұрын
Alright i'm sold...Anything to get in the air!!! Now comes everything's price. Whats the tag on this hovering beauty??
@rhylin2615 жыл бұрын
How does lift compare to a helium blimp of comparable size?
@7019834 жыл бұрын
In air with a density of 1.2 kg/m³, hydrogen gives you around 1.1 kg lift per m³, helium around 1.0 kg and hot air (typical temperatures in hot air balloons) around 0.3 kg/m³.
@SailorBarsoom15 жыл бұрын
Well, there is something to that. Before anybody builds a thousand-foot airship, there will need to be several seven-hundred-fifty-foot airships, and some five-hundreds before that, and probably some two-hundred-fifties before that. But because of the square-cube thing you explain in another reply, I suspect that we should move through the smaller phases as quickly as possible. It may turn out that the biggest flaw with the 1930s airships is that they weren't big enough.
@redsoxfan24515 жыл бұрын
its a very massive ship yes but you said it holds about 1300lbs could you cut back on size and make one smaller that holds one person? and would it be any smaller?
@gjc8207115 жыл бұрын
Excellent invention. I definitely think it will be successful. There will be a niche market for it. It's better then hot air ballooning, you actually have control. And it's much much cheaper then a regular blimp. $100k is on par with small airplanes. & this look safer any then home made plane. And with the high cost of aviation grade fuel, this has got to be cheaper to operate? Would it be cheaper to operate then a Cessna, or small personal jet, over the course of it's usable lifetime?
@Fraggle2415 жыл бұрын
How many pounds can that craft lift before it becomes grounded?
@SailorBarsoom15 жыл бұрын
In fairness, the people in the past who were talking about thousand-foot airships already had experience with eight-hundred-foot airships. It isn't like they were proposing to go directly from a child's balloon to a flying Queen Mary.
@SailorBarsoom15 жыл бұрын
Then again, you could use steam as your lifting gas, and power it with a steam engine. But there's already somebody else working on that. I wish you and them luck. The more successful airships flying around, the better.