Actually the world record was not Unionville. It was Barot, Gouadeloupe on November, 1970 whit 38,1mm in 1 Minute

Omg the audio is awful, we're in 2024 like get better audio.

Look at 26:06

Fantastic presentation, thank you very much Dr. Shu-Peng for your contributions to the field.

C ... H..... E ..... M ...... T ..... R ..... A......I...... L..... S .... &...... H...... A.......A......R....... P Stop it, satanists, the brainwashing

No climate sht. Just heavy metals flushed from planes.

And all this time, I thought it was trickle and retreat 🤦‍♂

- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us one thousand years to the past of the universe. Today April 11, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 85 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA.

😠 'PromoSM'

42:00 onwards for crux

❤❤ good job ❤

Hello dear sir, I have watched your youtube channel very carefully every video you have is very good but your videos have low views because there are not enough keywords so it is not reaching people and views are not increasing

We can not measure the CO2 in the air, what are the smug checks and CO2 sensors that made many Californians lose their cars to? Corrupt scientists made us believe that bad engines put out more CO2 and that it was kept as a secret from its owner until the next smog check to be revealed to DMV only with no warning to the owners on the dashboard. The truth is that a good engine with proper mixture and compression will break down every molecule of the fuel into CO2 and H2O, if it doesn't, it will put out dangerous gasses like CO. VW and korean automakers directly participated and benefited the most, they dumped their cars forcefully on Americans by leasing [and not selling] them with high interest, many became careless/jobless/homeless. Corrupt and criminal scientists, judges, lawyers and officials received billions of dollars [a portion of the looted money] via "Volkswagen emissions scandal" and they managed to legitimize and legalize their crimes against Americans. CO2 is not an toxic, there is higher concentration of CO2 in our lungs than the air, we pay extra to drink CO2 in soda, clouds are CO2/Dry Ice and we see as cloud is the Carbon atoms and not H2O.

It’s very clear that CO2’s modeled warming effect is not causing the ocean warming that is causing the current atmospheric warming. New research clearly demonstrates that the current warming is being caused by sub-oceanic and surface volcanic influences. CO2 warming theory is dead.

Temperature is not linear in log of pressure. This invalidates your entire process. Look at the magnitude of your temperature scale in the areas of difference. This is why you don’t get equal forcing with gas concentration doubling. Secondarily the assumptions are based on modeling rather than actual data.

Odd little mistake at 8:04 speech and screen "1 Tg = 1 metric ton" S.B. "1 Tg = 1 million tonnes".

Great video

I visit your KZbin channel and found lots of workspaces that means need update perfectly. If you update these all areas then you can see good result day to day.

this is super interesting

this will be the technology that alerts us to the potential outcomes in the future of weather prediction

what's with the extreme precision -0.44 W/m2 and bizarre political prods?

ewwwwww!!!,..."Lightning Rings !" TsunamiBergs Gigantic Flaming Cyclonadoes 60C somewhere in a city, ...boiling i can't make this up fast enough i think Climate Change is "unbelievable"

Hello from Thunder Bay, Canada, ...just fascinating, thank you for making the effort to share this Knowledge. There is so much use of this event to confuse the Climate Issue's we all face. looking forward to Your views on impact to Our World.

Amazong!

The atmosphere has nothing to do with climate.

OMG. RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!! No. Trace level variations of inert gases do not drive temperature equilibrium on our giant planet.

Hello from Thunder bay

Fascinating

Someone name RAM RAMAswamy is speaking about RAdiative forcing? Do y’all plan things this way? Lol

Professor please help me how can I download data from COSMIC satellite in a specific latitude and whole longitude? thank you

This is the worst talk I ever have heared by a professor. He has no insight, no understanding. He does not care about units. A lenght has units of meter, but in his case it is dimensionless. He confuses names for established quatities at will and without explanation. What he calls absorption coefficient must be the (decadic) molar extinction coefficient. Otherwise the units will not work out. We dont know whether it is the decadic or not because he does not care. As I said, a highschool student would do a better job than this garbage here.

In October of 2022 on their website NOAA published their predictions for the upcoming winter. They claimed that southern CA and the SW in general would continue to be influenced by La Niña and as such locales woild experience warmer and drier conditions than normal. Whoa! As we all now know, were they ever wrong! CA was much cooler than as n normal and broke the all time record for snowfall in the Sierra. The mountains east of LA were paralyzed by 7-8 ft of snow in early Feb. LA received far more rain in Feb and Narch than it does in a year. AZ was much cooler and wetter than usual with floods in Sedona and Phoenix. Laughlin NV had a major flood. All models have the biases of the modeler naked in. They’re worthless.

is it really worth the effort for the climate? I was looking at the IPCC AR5 published 9 years ago, and not one of their models was remotely close to forecast the last 8 years (global land & ocean temperatures have been flat since 2015)

Turkey Lurkey said to run off to see the king & tell him the sky is falling

A catchier title might be: Does the gradual decrease in aerosols predict a worsening of climate effects?

Thank you for this presentation

This talk is complete nonsense. What is tau? He calls it optical thickness. But optical thickness tau is already defined in optics as something completely different. There Tau is the logarithm of the ratio of incident to transmitted intensity. He says if dtau is one, all is absorbed. Thus another confusion which does not fit to standard optics, neither to his previous definition. He reinvents new definitions for well defined quantities and creates a complete.chaos.

"Radiative forcing" is the current version of caloric and phlogiston, made-up terms to explain what does not exist. Once upon a not so long ago time published, peer reviewed, main stream, scientific consensus included: phlogiston, caloric, luminiferous ether, corpuscles of light spontaneous generation, water filled Martian canals, planet Vulcan, medical humors, four elements of matter, cold fusion........ And they all turned up wrong. Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory is going to join them.

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. (kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZnvMm6ptYr56Y7c) The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming. Version 1.0 042922

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. (kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZnvMm6ptYr56Y7c) The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.

surprise me 2022...

For the last 3 month's, skies here in Australia have had an unusual deep purple colour high up in the atmosphere, mainly visible in evenings. I've only ever seen this colour overseas in large cities with heavily pollution. For the last month flooding has been excessive and non-stop in Australia. Starting from South Aus, and over last 4 weeks it's moved up east coast, flooding from NSW up to QLD on a scale I've never seen in my 45yrs living here. Is this coincidence, or a result of china's "blue skying" or silver iodide cloud seeding?

Thank you very much, please your email.

Thank you

The national hurricane centre completely disagrees with your information! and even the ipcc agrees there is no trend in hurricanes! in fact for usa there was an unprecedented quiet 10 years !

Underrated lecture!

Em em em em

By reflecting away 30% of the incoming solar energy the albedo makes the Earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere much like that reflective panel behind a car’s windshield. The non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules render “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a LWIR black body impossible. For example, the 396 W/m^2 upwelling from the surface is a “What if?” theoretical calculation without physical reality. (refer to: TFK_bams09) Without the 396 W/m^2 upwelling there is no 333 W/m^2 GHG energy up/down/”back” LWIR greenhouse gas loop to not “warm” the terrestrial surface. The greenhouse theory and man caused climate change are negated by any one of these three points. Hysterical speculations over sea levels, ice caps, glaciers, extreme weather, etc. are irrelevant noise. Zero greenhouse effect, Zero CO2 global warming and Zero man caused climate change. Version 1.0 091621

Thanks

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 050721