14 сағат бұрын
19 сағат бұрын
14 күн бұрын
Пікірлер
@martin4787 Сағат бұрын
You can protect us from the Russians, but it would seem, not from an invasion of the third world, armed with rubber dingy's. I don't blame our armed forces, however, I do blame our weak and totally useless, Uniparty politicians.
@georgeamery 6 сағат бұрын
Do we really need an American accent and the American spelling of "centre" If they want to pretend to be British for money they should get it right. Some elderly Britons notice these things.
@tiwisartikasiregar5774 16 сағат бұрын
Good Information
@layshoppnk3503 18 сағат бұрын
the Royal Navy’s newest submarine ready for action
@RealWorldMilitary 18 сағат бұрын
HMS Agamemnon emerged from the Devonshire Dock Hall at Barrow today, marking the transition from the construction phase to the test and commissioning phase. Following the roll out from the DDH, she will be lowered into the water on the shiplift and moved to the test and commissioning quay where her reactor will go critical for the first time.
@jerrygh11 Күн бұрын
Why are Artful and Ambush not doing anything
@ioanbota9397 2 күн бұрын
Realy I like this powerful warships
@sparkiegaz3613 2 күн бұрын
Wait til king kier cuts number from 8 to 4 ships…
@reluctantheist5224 Күн бұрын
I think military spending is going up to 2.5% in this Parliament.
@dennismoore1924 2 күн бұрын
Your visuals are all over the place. Does anybody editing these things know exactly what a British submarine looks like? A waste of time
@shugieshugied2269 3 күн бұрын
Not before time given what Putin is up to.
@layshoppnk3503 3 күн бұрын
With HMS Anson now at sea, the Royal Navy is fielding one of its most advanced submarines in the world. Meanwhile, HMS Triumph, the last active Trafalgar-class submarine, complements the numbers showing the fleet’s ability to sustain a balanced operational presence even as older vessels near the end of their service
@RealWorldMilitary 3 күн бұрын
After months of maintenance and readiness challenges, the Royal Navy’s attack submarine fleet is back on course with a notable increase in activity, reflecting hard work behind the scenes to get boats to sea
@PeterBrown-r6g 3 күн бұрын
Simply awesome Our Government should consider making one of our lhds capable of launching this great aircraft. Give the Ozzie navy some real power projection. The Italian and Japanese navy did it!
@carltontweedle5724 4 күн бұрын
Money money is not funny when the ruski is banging on the door. Found the money for expenses and big bullet proof cars ( do we pay genghis for them). No angled deck waste of money, been better keeping the Harrier.
@brianmaguire8750 4 күн бұрын
The f35 is not American only sir
@Ken-g2l 5 сағат бұрын
Explain
@toshe.6690 4 күн бұрын
its a cost cutting exercise, something our politicians are fond of , but always get it wrong.
@roymichaeldeanable 4 күн бұрын
Why spend £20 million on a Drone when a $500 Drone can destroy a $5 million Tank or Military asset It's not Logical It's all about Ego
@layshoppnk3503 4 күн бұрын
UK plans to make new supercarrier HMS Prince of Wales as the world's first largest drone carriers
@RealWorldMilitary 4 күн бұрын
Royal Navy launches its largest ever drone from aircraft carrier to unlock ‘highly-potent striking’ force
@bennytsai4065 4 күн бұрын
So a Yank F-35 landed on a Japanese aircraft carrier by a British pilot
@layshoppnk3503 5 күн бұрын
A British F-35 pilot, Lieutenant Commander Baker, recently made history by landing on a Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) platform, marking the first time an F-35 operated by a UK pilot has touched down on a Japanese vessel
@RealWorldMilitary 5 күн бұрын
British pilot lands F-35 jet onboard Japanese ship
@ioanbota9397 5 күн бұрын
Realy I like this powerful warships
@PeterWilliamson-nn9et 5 күн бұрын
Hypersonic missiles can be very accurately directed as we have seen, they are also capable of eluding missile defense systems, so why be dumb enough to build more aircraft carriers?
@PeterWilliamson-nn9et 5 күн бұрын
Over a billion spent on a massive aircraft carrier that can easily be sunk by hypersonic missiles, and presents a huge target, I wonder why Russia stopped building them?The F35 is not competitive because so many branches of the US military had certain demands of the aircraft’s capabilities , ( too many cooks spoil the broth) ergo its pet name the flying dump truck
@AA-xo9uw 4 күн бұрын
pogue
@davidfeatch1436 6 күн бұрын
Taking this long to build a damn frigate is taking the piss.
@kyushu-wb9ev 5 күн бұрын
A frigate which is about the size and weight of our current type 45 destroyers
@davidfeatch1436 5 күн бұрын
@@kyushu-wb9ev So far its been 7 years. Nothing proves the wholesale destruction of our military than this 1 fact.
@SteveJones-om6ks 5 күн бұрын
Not a little frigate and first of class always takes the longest.
@samcam8284 6 күн бұрын
The SA80 and derivatives is a piece of 💩. Always has been always will be. You can’t polish a turd.
@AverageAlien 7 күн бұрын
Trash AI channel
@thecurlew7403 7 күн бұрын
They are actually keeping 23s into the mid 1930s they should have been replaced already. 🇱🇷🇬🇧🇩🇪
@jimbosun2 7 күн бұрын
We should have c’s on our carriers cause they should be catapult carriers then we can have e2 advance Hawkeye and be fully compatible with France and America aircraft. The b’s we can hide if war comes and our airfields are attacked and the raf should have a’s until tempest comes together. That’s just me tho dreaming
@jinmina 7 күн бұрын
South Korea ditched the E-7 because Boeing was asking $6.7 billion for four E-7s. South Korea will either buy Saab's GlobalEye or develop its own AEW.
@gusgone4527 7 күн бұрын
The RN should have sufficient F35B aircraft to fully equip both carriers with reserves to make good losses. In addition to the RAF have several squadrons of F35B to replace the Harriers they lost. Further upgraded F35A airframes also need to be purchased to expend RAF capability.
@bartvanherrewegen8953 7 күн бұрын
also not correct , our government just announced they will order a third frigate last week So Belgium will have not 2 but 3 Frigates , while The Netherlands have changed their order from 2 to 3 possible even 4 Frigates. The existing AA Frigates will get an upgrade and The Netherlands have said they will next go for a new AA frigate which will replace the now being updated ones by 2050. At that time the Belgian navy will look into if that version of Frigate would also be a possibility to enhance the current Frigate fleet even more.
@davidgifford8112 8 күн бұрын
Good to see both F35Bs land safely on the carrier.
@Steve-bn6vz 8 күн бұрын
Great asset for the RN shame you can’t get facts right R09 is PoW, QE hasn’t been in North Sea or had F-35’s on this time while doing work ups off South Coast
@jimbosun2 8 күн бұрын
So hoping the navy gets the go ahead for getting the catapults and wires for our carriers. Good to see the b’s back on deck tho.
@layshoppnk3503 8 күн бұрын
Royal Navy's new F-35 squadron debuts
@RealWorldMilitary 8 күн бұрын
QE-class aircraft carriers
@ianwebb1402 8 күн бұрын
Interesting video and good view of flight deck operations, thanks for posting. Just a shame that most of it was shot on PoW and not QE.
@mac2626 8 күн бұрын
Great to see the Royal Navy gearing up, for CSG 25 next year.🇬🇧
@grahamcook9289 8 күн бұрын
I think the RN should convert one of the QE carriers into an amphibious assault ship by converting the rear into a landing craft dock as they not using it as a large carrier as it has no catapult or arrester. Once ready sell or scrap the other QE carrier. That would make so much more sense.
@ianwebb1402 8 күн бұрын
This makes no sense whatsoever. What are you going to rip out of the ship in order to fit a landing dock? Also in order to operate a landing dock she would have to flood down making her existing deep draught even deeper. This would mean she then has to launch amphibious units much further from the beach which offers no operational advantages whatsoever and would render and landing craft so launched extremely vulnerable to enemy fire. All LHAs/LHDs are designed and built as such from the keel up to do a very specific job with a shallow draught. Converting QE or PoW would be time consuming, incredibly expensive and impractical. We have two perfectly functional LPDs, we just need the political will to use them properly.
@grahamcook9289 8 күн бұрын
Only 8 F35Bs! What a joke. The 22,000 ton Invincible class carriers deployed 12 Harriers. The QE class carriers are 64,000 ton. Why didn't they just keep the 3 Invincible class carriers?
@neilsbs8273 8 күн бұрын
They didnt have 12 all the time only if needed
@mac2626 8 күн бұрын
Jealousy becomes you wee man !!!
@danmitchell8165 8 күн бұрын
Its not a question of the carrier’s capability. It has a normal maximum load of 36 F35s, and could go above that if necessary.
@grahamcook9289 8 күн бұрын
@@mac2626 That doesn't even make sense.
@ianwebb1402 8 күн бұрын
Because they were old, limited in scope and not designed for Sea Harriers in the first place. Just take a look at a schematic of the hangar deck. I should know I served on one. Also the Invincible Class only surged to 12 SHARs during conflict which put a real strain on the ship as this necessitated half the Air Group being kept on the flight deck. In conflict the QEs Air Group could surge considerably up to 36 F35s.
@Backwardlooking 9 күн бұрын
A nice change regarding exports.
@samsar785 9 күн бұрын
Much of the UK's SSN technology is overhyped and euphoric. I remember during the launch of Astute class SSN, they stated the sonar used is so advanced that standing in the waters of Southampton Astute can track movement of ships across the Atlantic. BAE & Rolls Royce think that the people around the globe 🌎 are fools that you can sell just about any possible propaganda. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@toxic_munchkin8307 9 күн бұрын
should be patrolling the channel
@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 9 күн бұрын
Makes no sense. 57mm is the minimum price to entry for short range anti air warfare, the 76mm is the best medium range AAW, and the 127mm is the best at long range AAW gun. However the 57mm is horrendous against anything larger than a patrol boat, the 76mm is poor surface/ ASUW gun, and the 127mm is inferior to the 76mm in AAW in any category other than range. So you need all three together on the same ship to give you same as you need different missile types for ASUW and AAW independently depending on type of opponent aswell as their range and size.
@stephengallichan5165 9 күн бұрын
The Skyranger 35 Anti Aircraft gun system must be an option on the Type 31 class ship as it is much better than the old Phalanx gun that was first doveloped in 1982.
@newton18311 9 күн бұрын
Probably off to pick up More foreign Criminals in the Chanel.
@michaelhughes4562 10 күн бұрын
Never show wat hardware u got. wait an see if anyone fucks with her god bless your soul if anyone's stupid enough
@andrewglendenning5877 10 күн бұрын
Lazy Ai v/o and what about the French carrier? Crappy overbearing music too. Need to get your production shit together here.