hey Brian. if you are watching. I figured it out. how to unify gravity. just shin a green laser through glass and observe the redshift. then follow the facts

4:43 Even after Galileo and Newton, these boys find it difficult to accept that masses affect at a distance. They seem ignorant of astronomy and the workings of the tides. 🤔

I think the only right answer is, no one knows.

That means consciousness is fundamental and physical reality is just a construct of our consciousness

If he is right then consciousness is fundamental

I have proof

What are being called black holes are not black holes.

Quantum foam is like a cluster of 1D strings

Who else is here after the LV persons letter?

Impossible to jnderstand! He's a brilliant physisist and great teacher! But the average " Joe" aint got a clue😂😂

Could a large part of the energetic radiation from distant quasars have been created in the core by the quantum mechanical effects of time reversal? Are quasars similar to white holes?

Have you actually measured it? If so please comment?

Nothing can escape space. If there is God, it is space. Space is an entity!

if it stretches, then it claims something. does the big bang stretches, or exploded in somewhere? what if going out of this universe, there is a place where there is no time?

i disagree with the idea that quantum means quanta, there are continuous spectrum in quantum field theories, quantum simply means probablistic, where observables are defined by path integral, there's no implication of spectrum being discrete.

Greene is not the guy to be trusted on these matters. He's the Bill Maher of science popularizer hacks. We're so beyond Einstein's titanic error(s).

Einstein assumed that his answer could be the right answer, it could also be a false one. It's still a theory not a fact

But my heart still beats the same as the person on earth so is time making humans age or biology?

Is it possible that no 2 atoms can experience time in the exact same way (ex the atoms in your feet move at a slightly different rate than the atoms in your head) so would 2 atoms right beside each other experience a very small amount of time dilation bc they arent moving through space in the exact same way? So there are no 2 things in the universe that could agree on what now is. Could an observer outside of time and space determine now. What if newton was correct? I know im wrong btw just curious and would like someone to explain it

Not a scientist here, but how can a dimension itself be small? I understand the hose analogy as it applies to an object in space, but aren't dimensions just descriptions of the possible directions an object can move in space?

If this is true and all the matter in the universe was inside the singularity point and it contained no empty space how did it expand. The Big Bang would have to create empty space around itself for the expansion to start to expand. How would matter create empty space from non existence.

Hinduism is mysterious, It has answers, . It says Shiva the light Shakti the energy Combined together is galaxy . Which is . M = E/C2 . Ardha Narishwara is the galaxy in god form

And what did physicists do.23.23.The same as they do now.MAKE UP AN ANSWER..and it still doesn't work now today.but they still keep on doing it..but hey Particle physicists have bills to pay too😢😢

0:33 “instantaneously” - that’s UNDEFINED. you have to stipulate “in who’s reference frame?”. two events can be reversed depending on the observer.

I cannot sleep without listening to your lectures.

*Too much emotion - no description.*

Charismatic

To save my heartbeats, I'm avoiding physical exertion. This way, I'm going to live longer.

🎉

Greene the creep

Interesting

Interesting

More bs analogies wrt multi dimensions. The hose, the ant…and so on… . Or the shape analogies. A balloon, a möbius strip…and so on. More bs piled on other bs.

Can someone point me to a lecture where I can understand how the speed of light is the limit? I am not a physicist so if it is simple it will be great.

10:02

Wilson Sandra Lopez Jennifer Moore Thomas

Lopez Timothy Thompson Paul Thomas Sarah

7:00:00

2^(1/6)*ch=125 Gev[1.602*10^-19/c^2] : by extra 6 dimensional Calabi-Yau manifold of string theory for Higgs boson from vacuum energy ch=8pi*g*(m*c^2/2)^2/c^4 : solution of GR field equation for Higgs field.

The triangle of lights paradox. There are 3 lights in the form of a triangle. A, B, and C are lights and are stationary with respect to each other. S1, S2, S3 are spaceships. S1 is moving from B towards A. S2 is moving from C towards B. S3 is moving from A towards C. A, B, and C flash simultaneously in the frame of reference that is at rest relative to these lights. So in the frame of reference of S1, A flashes first followed by B flashing. In the frame of reference of S2, B flashes first followed by C flashing. In the frame of reference of S3, C flashes first followed by A flashing. So the sequence of flashing is A, B, C, A. But wait! A flashed first. How can it flash last? How can A flash both first and last? It only flashed once in the frame of reference that is at rest relative to these lights. Therefore there is a paradox.

The 2 ships paradox. Ship1 at rest at top: T--------------------N <----- N----------T Ship2 at rest at bottom: T----------N -----> N--------------------T The moment when T1 is lined up with N2 must be the same moment in both frames of reference because there is only 1 moment when this occurs. There was some point in the past when N1 was lined up with T2 according to ship 1 but not according to ship 2. That is impossible thereby proving that special relativity is nonsense.

Taylor Mary Lopez Timothy Smith Scott

Watch a short wave, with a start-, a middle- and an end point. Between the start and end point, is present the amplitude of a wave. When the wave is shorten that short that this zero point in the middle is reached, transformation of the amplitude happens. A so called horizontal wave of time, becomes a vertical line, as a part of timeless infintiteness.

I love that I live in a time where I have access to this information!!

I LOVE THIS!

6:30:00

A paradox: Ship1 at rest at top: T--------------------N <----- N----------T Ship2 at rest at bottom: T----------N -----> N--------------------T The moment when T1 is lined up with N2 must be the same moment in both frames of reference because there is only 1 moment when this occurs. There was some point in the past when N1 was lined up with T2 according to ship 1 but not according to ship 2. That is impossible thereby proving that special relativity is nonsense.

The triangle of lights paradox. There are 3 lights in the form of a triangle. A, B, and C are lights and are stationary with respect to each other. S1, S2, S3 are spaceships. S1 is moving from B towards A. S2 is moving from C towards B. S3 is moving from A towards C. A, B, and C flash simultaneously in the frame of reference that is at rest relative to these lights. So in the frame of reference of S1, A flashes first followed by B flashing. In the frame of reference of S2, B flashes first followed by C flashing. In the frame of reference of S3, C flashes first followed by A flashing. So the sequence of flashing is A, B, C, A. But wait! A flashed first. How can it flash last? How can A flash both first and last? It only flashed once in the frame of reference that is at rest relative to these lights. Therefore there is a paradox.