So the GPTs functionality is missing in Gemini! You’re right about that, but i guess it’s matter of time for google to add them. Currently Gemini model 1.5 you can upload documents to it or anything else Plus u got the deep research feature Which is a game changer if you need to perform any kind of online research!

@ZiadDanasouri Yes you're absolutely correct also I didn't mean to disrespect you earlier. Since I'm studying for cybersecurity, having a model based on specific data is very helpful but again it's just for few percent of people and honestly I use both gemini & ChatGPT and both are great. In fact sometimes when I need an on-screen language translation, I'm not sure what would I do without gemini

U got it budd! Will make that one;)

@@ZiadDanasouri Thank you for considering a video that explains how to use Google AI to create a video by using text or a short story, and explains how different AI voices can be selected to read the text of the material. Thank you from a goofy Professor! By the way, if you look at the two rather simple short videos I posted on my Channel, you will notice the level of knowledge of a non-tech person.!...

Glad to you found it valuable;)

I think it’s gonna be a non ending war! And to your point, competition is great It’s the best thing for consumer by the end of the day

Right, and recently there has been some rumors that OpenAI has Ben been taking verbal commitments from investors not to invest in any other AI company Elon musk talked about that before!

I totally agree!

you're right, and it's very rare to come across these sales leaders who fully understand the technical aspect of the business and its value

Appreciate you!

Glad you enjoyed it Jason! ;)

Welcome to America!!

u got it Mike!

The music of the background is annoying

It works insanely well for web development or systems development. it's doubled my productivity at least. I use gpt everything else has been a flop for me.

So you are smarter than researchers at Apple?

@DrKnowsMore the research is about LLMs in isolation. Nothing new about these findings. Compound systems use multiple LLMs in increasingly complex ways. LLMs are like cortical areas in the brain, and we use them like quick static intuitions with no thinking process involved. Compound systems are like connectome functionality and have no limit to how much extra processing can be done. The AI we have now is infinitely smarter than LLMs by themselves and have liched agi, they are super intelligence. We can make them sentient and autonomous if we want or control them in a completely safe way. My brother in law is a researcher at Apple by the way. So yes, definitely smarter than researchers at Apple lol

Totally agree!!

It is not surprising if AI was so simple that you can just dump some data in LLM and hope you get AGI. I would suspect Human level intelligence would have evolved on earth in several species independently. But this is not what we see.

you're right, I always say no matter how good it looks, always take it with a grain of salt

Reminds me of the numerous studies done on Chess Grandmasters that completely fumble and drop to 1000 ELO whenever they're put in front of boards they haven't seen before. Completely random boards. Now, does that imply that humans also cannot reason? :)

@@leoym1803i think there’s quite a distinction between making mistakes in chess and knowing that small oranges are still oranges 😂

@@br1ghts0ng yeah? which is it? For me, making mistakes with new unseen information (chess) = making mistakes with new unseen information (baby oranges)

@@leoym1803 but the concept of a small object isn’t a new idea to an AI. Chess is a highly complicated game with so many different factors and strategies. Not recognizing that a small object is still the same object is vastly different. Yes, the AI hasn’t stumbled upon that same problem before; that’s why it’s incapable of solving it, because it cannot reason. Copying isn’t reasoning. Let’s get into cognitive sciences: reasoning is defined as the ability to break down problems into logical components and structure it using logical order. Messing up in chess isn’t failing to use reason, it’s just using reason incorrectly, which makes sense considering how unbelievably complicated chess is, logically speaking. If AI used even an ounce of reason, it would easily know that a small orange is still an orange, as the very simplest of logic defines it as such. This isn’t surprising. The way LLMs are designed isn’t to develop reasoning. The engineers can try to force it to, but it ultimately fails as they simply try to copy existing logical structures, it cannot create its own, as the concept of an LLM is not to create logical structures, it’s to copy what it is given. They would not need nearly the amount of data they are given if they could create logical structures.

I also have issues with chemical handling what if they spill chemicals and they corrode the bot causing sparks or over heating thus creating a fire or explosion.

It all depends of who you are... Even your phone or home cameras can be hacked. Phones doesn't have hands tho... But I think the robots will have to be secured in a great way before even distributed to masses. Only one single incident of a robot who was hacked and killed someone (someone famous or very important even worse) - that would destroy the whole product... Like in one single day. Companies with that ambition and vision are very aware of these things.

Every point. It even looks and feels way more luxorious than that outdated design with screen bezels from 2009.