I did this problem over and over and kept getting different answers then i found this video and its was the exact same problem with the exact numbers and i had gotten the right answer with regular method but this was a way better way of doing it.
@DoctrinaMathVideosАй бұрын
Glad you're finding success with determinants!
@inlierinsaan50772 ай бұрын
where is the link of the other part
@DoctrinaMathVideos2 ай бұрын
The link is in the video description. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpSZenptZ8ibqqcsi=GdO1Gac2WZr3Bdsa
@inlierinsaan50772 ай бұрын
where is the application
@DoctrinaMathVideos2 ай бұрын
The purpose of this video is to show how to use the TI calculator to put a matrix into reduced row echelon form. Here is a possible application involving the heat flow of a plate: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fnabg5RrpJWri7csi=02t5PBvLLHVbh8Ef
@joesolomonobusor79163 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this video
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@kartofqizartmasiketcup3 ай бұрын
why -2 not 2 ?
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
Since there is a 2 is in the second row and third column the sign will be negative (-1)^(3+2) = (-1)^5 = -1. Here is the sign chart (same one that is used in the video): tinyurl.com/cofactorsigns
@Football_realmadridd3 ай бұрын
Finally I'm student and i see 😅
@هشامزاهر-ح1ض3 ай бұрын
شكرا
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
مرحباً بك.🙏
@mehrhira97983 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video.
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@ItsmeArya-123 ай бұрын
Thank you so muchh❤
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
You're welcome 😊
@dr.mikestutoringservicellc19853 ай бұрын
What a great video. Perfect in every way. Thank you for sharing. Your handwriting is perfect; it rivals the great Sal Khan's...
@DoctrinaMathVideos3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the delightful comment.
@user-ii6jv1hf5n4 ай бұрын
great content, but wouldn't the solution be undefined? The initial value is (1,4), if you plug in 1 into y, y' would be square root of -8, which doesn't exist. Or maybe (1,4) is not initial value?
@DoctrinaMathVideos4 ай бұрын
Given that the initial value is (1,4) then x = 1 and y = 4.
@MelodiCat7534 ай бұрын
Thanks, this was helpful!
@DoctrinaMathVideos4 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@DYEDart4 ай бұрын
Having been out of Calc 2 for several years now, and having never taken calc 3, I really appreciate how thorough you are in explaining what you are doing. Thanks for uploading this!
@DoctrinaMathVideos4 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@sleyzerzon5 ай бұрын
you mentioned section 4.4 of some book you are using - what is it?
@DoctrinaMathVideos5 ай бұрын
"Linear Algebra and Its Applications" by David Lay, 6th edition.
@aaradhyamohitecrazy59805 ай бұрын
Sir final answer will be -6
@DoctrinaMathVideos5 ай бұрын
The answer is 6, I would suggest reviewing your work and checking your co-factor signs. matrixcalc.org/det.html#%7B%7B4,0,-7,3,-5%7D,%7B0,0,2,0,0%7D,%7B7,3,-6,4,-8%7D,%7B5,0,5,2,-3%7D,%7B0,0,9,-1,2%7D%7Dexpand-along-column1
@mohammedyasir53236 ай бұрын
Thank you man Really helpful
@DoctrinaMathVideos6 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@ArthurD.Greycastle7 ай бұрын
Why is there a subtraction sign just before you start the multiplication?
@DoctrinaMathVideos7 ай бұрын
The sign of the cofactor is (-1)^(i +j), so since 2 is located in the second row (i = 2) and third column (j = 3) then the sign will be (-1)^(2 + 3) = (-1)^5 = -1. Here is the sign chart (same one that is used in the video): tinyurl.com/cofactorsigns
@aryangawand74547 ай бұрын
If we perform coloum transformation and make all zero in row 1 expect one non zero values and again do the same for 2 row and find the determinant for 3x3 matrix and so then can we get the answer ?
@DoctrinaMathVideos7 ай бұрын
Yes, but keep in mind that certain elementary row operations will change the determinant of the original matrix. This is discussed in my notes: blogs.nvcc.edu/mwesterhoff/files/2019/09/Section3.2-Properties-of-Determinants.pdf
@thibaultl19568 ай бұрын
I should look at math lectures from KZbin more often. I'm not sure why but they tend to be a lot more effective than the slideshows, textbooks, and lectures my course offers.
@DoctrinaMathVideos7 ай бұрын
I believe videos can be helpful, but reading and understanding material from a book forces the mind to engage more deeply, resulting in better retention. When I was in college, we didn't have videos, so we had to thoroughly read the material. If we didn't understand something, we would re-read it or look for alternative explanations in other textbooks, often spending a lot of time in the library. Otherwise, we had to visit the professor during office hours, hoping they could provide a hint, as they definitely wouldn't solve it for us. Struggling with a problem or concept is a crucial part of learning math. That's why I always tell my students to try to solve the problem before looking at the detailed solution. It's fine if they don't get it right on the first attempt; they just need to review their work, think about it, and try again.
@thibaultl19567 ай бұрын
@@DoctrinaMathVideos Yep, looking at online lectures is a last resort. I said that I should do it more often because sometimes I am stubborn about that to a fault and don't use anything other than what the course gives to me for far too long.
@guangpaisen8 ай бұрын
That's so interesting ,I hope u can make more videos like this
@DoctrinaMathVideos8 ай бұрын
I am pleased you are intrigued by this. Feel free to share which particular subjects you would like me to cover in my videos.
@letslearntogether74698 ай бұрын
Good to see my favorite professor uploading a new video.
@DoctrinaMathVideos8 ай бұрын
It is great to hear from you! I am glad you are enjoying the new video uploads. Let me know if there are any topics you would like to see covered in future videos.
@randomcreator75559 ай бұрын
This lecture was so helpful
@DoctrinaMathVideos9 ай бұрын
I am glad that you found this lecture to be helpful.
@roy7o910 ай бұрын
thank you!
@DoctrinaMathVideos10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@CharlotteSavigny11 ай бұрын
This was sooo helpful, thank you!!
@DoctrinaMathVideos11 ай бұрын
You're so welcome!
@bbmathematics224 Жыл бұрын
Hi .. I wanna ask from which book you took this problem...kindly share the name of that book...
@DoctrinaMathVideos11 ай бұрын
Hello. "Linear Algebra and Its Applications", 5th edition, David Lay. Problem #33 of Section 1.1 on page 11. Edit: In the 6th edition it is problem #43 on page 12.
@bbmathematics22411 ай бұрын
Thank you very much 😊
@janset3676 Жыл бұрын
Bro thank you
@DoctrinaMathVideos5 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@kevinkore8718 Жыл бұрын
What if the second original row and coloumn was with two vaules different from zero and 3 zeros what should we do in this case ?
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Just apply the co-factor expansion to each of the other columns that do not contain zero.
@haaey1197 Жыл бұрын
This only works for matrices with 1 row or column value and the rest is zero
@haaey1197 Жыл бұрын
I think you will have to add additional terms and include non zero row or column values
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
This example was specifically chosen (by request) to illustrate that it is important to look at the rows and columns carefully to illustrate that the number of steps can be reduced by choosing the row or column with the most zeros. Once you learn the basic technique of the cofactor expansion concept it becomes an iterative process. If an application requires the use of the determinant of a 4 x 4 matrix or higher then I would highly recommend using some type of computational tool such as Matlab or Octave.
@chE3z1 Жыл бұрын
@@DoctrinaMathVideos Tell that to my linear algebra professor who expects us to do the determinant of a 5x5 by hand without a calculator! 😭😭
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Been there done that, but I do find it kind of ridiculous. Better hope that there is a column or row with some zeros in it. :)
@johannloewenstein2249 Жыл бұрын
this trick is EXTREMELY helpful
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
It's not really trick it's more of just taking advantage of the row or column with the most zeros and understanding how the cofactor technique works for finding the determinant of a matrix.
@ashunbound Жыл бұрын
final is in 2 days heh thanks!
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Good luck!
@JatinKumar-w7f Жыл бұрын
thanks for making this video 😃😃
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@lisamhuru5108 Жыл бұрын
Life saver
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Glad you found it useful.
@audiomac Жыл бұрын
So helpful! Knewton told me to approximate the definite integral, but I did not realize I had to use a calculator in this way to solve for the answer.
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Glad this was helpful. This function shown in the video does not have an antiderivative so you must rely on technology (such as the graphing calculator) or numerical techniques such as the Trapezoidal rule, Simpson's rule, and series.The choice of numerical method depends on the nature of the function being integrated, the desired level of accuracy, and the computational resources available. In more advanced math/engineering courses and scientific applications, you will often encounter a combination of these techniques to solve complex integration problems effectively.
@itsd2388 Жыл бұрын
thanks man
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@myeffortsyourpractice6163 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 👍
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@azmatinayat9904 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou for this video
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
My pleasure 😊
@uwadiegwuemmanuel8809 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@uwadiegwuemmanuel8809 Жыл бұрын
thanks
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@uwadiegwuemmanuel8809 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@mimozz5606 Жыл бұрын
Best méthode !
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Merci!
@1anu_ra-dha. Жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@DudeNoEdge Жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation and fascinating subject! :D
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@finnsmither-may2691 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@tootoofor5577 Жыл бұрын
is there a limitation to this method? i find it works sometimes and sometimes it doesn't
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
There is no limitation for the cofactor expansion technique as long as the matrix is square. The last step where you see the diagonal lines can only be applied for 3 x 3 matrices. Instead of the diagonal lines approach you could have continued using the cofactor approach and end up with the same solution.
@chayasandhu Жыл бұрын
This was really helpful, thanks!
@DoctrinaMathVideos Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@michaelgrosso88322 жыл бұрын
thank you
@DoctrinaMathVideos2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@derslibrary2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, now I understand the issue that I did not understand since morning.