@@wayneyee1334 guy had a sound module in the plane..

Ya im sure it can. People have flown it on 6s with foam cutting

But i wouldnt think on stock setup.. upgrade the esc to at least an 80amp

And upgrade motor to lower kv

That is answered below ..

I got it from Motionrc and they have them without the tiger decals applied. I ended up applying them to the rudder though and man was that a pita😅. The first go at getting that big one on, i about went psycho, about ripped it up, then randomly figured out to spray it with water to make it way easier to slide it about. When starting to apply it , you wet the decal for five seconds and set it on some wax paper. Paint on micro set on the painted surface and then slide your decal as close as you can to where it needs to be. Then spray the decal with water and let the slipperiness of the micro set allow you to message the decal into place easily like kneading bread almost. Apply more water to let it loosen up, but not so much that it washes away the adehsive. Brush micro sol on the top of the decal and the thing looks like it was painted on.

@@jared6072 Copy that, I forgot they have the ARF version without the livery. Thank you for the reply and nice flying!

I thought about the rudders.. perhaps i can use one servo and attach one to the other with a rod. Is that what u did? And i think it rolled particularly fast that day because the winds were pretty strong 😬

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 No I used 2 3.6g micro servos embedding them in the fins running the control wires up the booms. After removing the lump of iron in the elevator (which causes it not to fly as scale also) you have plenty of weight free. Can take a photo/vid tomorrow if you like

All stock 6s setup. Using a spektrum 8020t rx. Running elevons, canards, rudder, steering servo all on their own channels. Just using the white mixing board for gear sequncer and lights.

Its 6s. I had to do a few mods to get cg at 40mm behind the recommended marks with 700-740 gram 5000 6s lipos without having to add alot of extra dead weight in the back. Pulled the magnets out of the nose and glued the nose on, removed pilot, removed the airbrake mechanism (i have a mix to pivot canards down as shown by two brothers rx), and stuck the control box all the way back under the airbrake mechanism. I hogged out the foam under the rudder as far back in the base of it as i could and dropped the included cylinder weight plus another 20 grams of lead. If i have the missile pylons on, i can get cg where this plane lands and flies beautifully. Im on the fence about 8s. I think 8s would be a rocket for sure. Hell, the 6s has plenty of pull and speed already. The airframe could deffinetly handle the extra weight you put into it with the negatives being that it will land faster and will not as nimble in the air. At least thats what i felt when i switched to the freewing 8s setup on the F22. The f22 still handles like a beast with all that extra weight and was worth it for that bump in power where i feel the typhoons already weak pitch authority will become worse with the added weight. Maybe not. Stay tuned cause another guy at the field bought an 8s typhoon and we will see if it worth the extra weight for that speed and power bump.

Thanks man.

Dont do what i did before the crash and not use an adequate esc to handle the higher amps of the 12 bld... in my case 14.😁

I was using spektrum 5000 6s 100c g1 in this flight. I am also using smc 5000 6s. In reality, just use anything under 750 grams. This jet flies best with cg 35-40mm behind the recommended cg and thats hard to do with any heavier battery

@@jared6072 Hey thanks Jared!

The typhoon is a very cool jet. I have never seen a full scale one flying in real life though😥

Nope, but deffinetly convienent.😄

I hit the upload button around 3am and passed out 😄

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 LOL. I'd been awake since about ten last night and am still awake now. Starting to get a little sleepy though.

10 volts in theory would not get to the RX. They are regulated down to 5 whether by the stronger of the load taking over or both sharing the load. It also depends if they were switching or linear becs, with the linear ones ok to use both red wires. Dont exactly know why and there is a big debate about this in the forums. Also don't remember what the Brw 262 was as I havent had this plane for years now, but in any case, I would still use an external Bec in any edf setup. Why? More amps and heat go through the escs to drive these fans. If your esc overheats, so does your internal bec..and there goes your servos for any chance of a power off glide. 3S probably wouldnt have been a problem to run two wires since the becs are more rated for the thermal limits at that kind of voltage.

Don't remember the mm, but I had to cut a hole above the basket and move battery back half way from the original 3s position

In its original state, it can also fly - just wonkier controls. With differential thrust, it's harder to trim out to fly straight. Also the lipo that it comes with are more subject to failure if not cared for properly. They can develop high internal resistance and not produce the power needed to even get off the ground, let alone hand launch.

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 I had this plane when the game launched and just got around to trying to fly it! I am going to keep trying until I get it in the air I am also at some point going to get a better plane and rc control. Flying is fun when you get the thing in the air. It would be nice with the new Splinter Cell coming if they could add a new and better plane with the game.

@@bechet12 cost was a factor obviously. They wanted to make it easy enough for newbies, but instead the shortcuts they made (no rudder or ailerons) made it more difficult.

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 There is a new Splinter Cell coming next year and I wish they would revisit this idea so we can get something better than what was initially offered!

How's it going Victor! 'Sirlordwhitman' from the rcgroups..

Are you the guy with the Dynam Gloster Meteor?

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 I do own a Dynam Gloster Meteor upgraded myself to 6S and painted into a Belgian scheme yes. I think I was the first pilot worldwide to post a vid, it's some years ago already though ...

Why did it dive on landing? Was it slow and stalled or ? Maybe wind sheer lol

@@evassier that wasnt intentional. 😅 The wind was a little gusty switching from north to northeast and from maybe calm winds to maybe 12 mph. It was calm as i was approaching and them i felt gust pop up and i think the wind was swirling down the runway. It didnt feel like a traditional stall like other planes cause i feel like the b2 would tip stall like the the second one that landed. It felt like someone literally grabbed the left wing and shoved it up and forward cause the gyro and i wer able to save it with tons of elevator, aileron, and a quick burst of thrust. Im sure it wasnt a gyro or radio glitch cause i couldnt see the control surfaces moving erratically in the video right up until the incident that lead to my brown pants.🤣

@@jared6072 Whatever happened that was an AWESOME save and great pilot skills!

Thanks, Mr. Seelbach!

Yes, i had this model in my inventory a while before trading it in. The new owner painted it red and silver and can be seen on this channel. Don't know if I agreed with his color choice, but it flew great for him until a crosswind landing attempt clobbered it. It's repaired now...just not as pretty. Thanks for the comment!

Thank you for the comment and your diligent service, sir!

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 Thank you, I enjoyed the majority of my time in the Navy. Went around the world four times and saw that we, specifically the poor, in this country has few things to complain about when compared to other countries poor. Most of the poor in other countries would trade places with out poor without a 2nd thought. I know I used to be one when I grew up in southern Idaho in the mid 70's. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya

Same kv motor and also new esc. Nothing should have changed dramatically to make it that tail heavy except when I rebound to the plane and the elevators were off.

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 Was it the same model of motor from the same manufacturer? Was it the same model of ESC from the same manufacturer? The only thing that will make the model tail heavy is adding weight behind the aerodynamic center of lift or removing weight in front of it. The elevators can't make the plane tail heavy, they can only make it out of trim in pitch about the horizontal axis. The same kv motor from a different manufacturer may not be the same weight as the original. The same amp ESC from another manufacturer may not be the same weight as the original. Even a small weight change can make a big difference in the CG. It's not just the weight, it's the combination of the weight and the arm (distance from center of lift). Weight times arm gives a moment (essentially torque). This is the effect that is actually felt. Same as a torque wrench. Ten pounds applied to a torque wrench one foot away from the pivot point yields ten foot pounds of torque, apply ten pounds two feet out and you get twenty foot pounds of torque. Apply ten pounds directly to the pivot point and you get no torque or movement at all. This is why you can add weight at the CG and it effects nothing, it has no arm to act through, and will only increase the wing loading. The father away a small weight is added, the more effect it has. The best rule is to never change any component without verifying the CG is still correct. Even the same model of motor from the same manufacturer may have been updated and be heavier or lighter than the older one you were using. Weighing old and new components for comparison is also a good practice, you'll get surprised sometimes. I'm sure I'm not telling you anything new, but a verbal reminder from someone is ALWAYS better than the way the plane will remind you. LOL.

@@shelbyseelbach9568 I believe every word you say, little buddy. Here's the zany thing- This motor was used in the exact same 2 models that have long since retired which have been featured on way earlier videos on this channel. There, the plane is flying on rails with no issues. It is also the motor that comes with the kit. The reason why I changed the last one is because it burnt itself up and fried the stock ESC. So I bascially made a one for one swap with components that already come with this kit. Also, there is no moving the battery forward or aft for CG. It gets installed in this goofy little picnic basket embedded in the fuselage and can't accomodate anything bigger than a 2200 4s. So it was pretty much designed as a no-brainer setup. Only other thing I can do is add ballast weight to the nose, but that adds to the wingloading; Or maybe move the EDF unit forward a peg... but that will cut down on the thrust.

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 Ok, was just asking. You could add weight to the nose, if it is tail heavy. It's not necessary to move the battery or fan unit. CG is never a no brainier, and should never be assumed. Sorry for the in depth comment before. Thanks for the reply, little buddy.

He turned my old A6 into a nightmare! 😰. Lol... Oh well he got it flying good! 😁

@@modeljetjuggernaut4864 Yes, he did and yes, it is. 🤪😜