This video is fair and has some things ok and some things VERY wrong. It is nowhere near what should be expectedThis from MIT. She is trying... . 0:50 Vocabulary: doesn’t mention the vertical and horizontal “stabilizers”. Calls them “parts”. In the graphic, but not mentioned. There is only ONE wing. Going to talk about sea planes ??? 3:11 initially says lift exceeds drag, but corrects it. 4:50 Draws an extreme airfoil shape. 5:22 The way she explains conservation of momentum is a good one, but momentum can be confusing to some people. It is not saying just how these pushes come about, but is better than just saying lift is a Third Law "reaction". 5: 30 Air has mass and conservation of momentum. Doesn’t explain how push occurs. 6:12 GOOD: Explains the Equal transit/longer distance fallacy. Points to flat wing, same length. Math description not needed - correct. Good Aeroastro graphics. 12:01 GOOD: Stated Bernoulli correctly using ‘velocity’. BUT focuses on fast. 12:40 "C" is the WRONG answer! The word "cause" is incorrect. "A" is the only correct statement there, but has nothing to do with Bernoulli.. 12:42 The Graphic assigns INCORRECT cause to lower pressure. 14:00 GOOD: stationary pressures. She only mentions a "force" but not that it is pressures that cause the force! 15_24 Talking about the rest of the aircraft generating lift is a distraction and unnecessary. 15:57 Asks childish questions. Race Car. 16:36 Only says the spoiler “spoils the air flow. Doesn’t explain that it has down lift. 18:00 It is the altered pressures which cause the acceleration of the air (downward) ACCELERATION DOES NOT CAUSE THE FORECE !!! 18:09 Wing ALSO changes the speed of the air. Never states that upper air beats lower air. 18:40 Air past wing, or wing past air question. The critical thing missed here is that the speeds are NOT "IDENTICAL", but different between these two reference frames, BUT the science must be the same. Therefore, talking about fast is misleading. It is ACCELERATION that must be understood. 18:54. Is wing moving faster through the air, or air moving faster past wing? Frame of reference discussion - SAME. Wind tunnel justification. 23:40 Mentions aspect ratio without explaining it. 24:24 Mentions hand out car window and PUSHING, but doesn’t relate to the - IGNORING the momentum explanation earlier. 25:28 Mentions Viscosity. Compares sticky. Sticks to the wing. 27:10 Compressibility affects lift in a different way. NOT FUNDAMENTALLY. 27:20 Calculating lift is not known. 29:45 CALCULATING LIFT. Mentions Kutta Condition and says wrap around is an additional condition. 2D is simpler ) OK, but tip vortex sn not true turbulence. So… Calculate where possible and measure elsewhere. Doesn’t explain chord line. Says: “in between". 32:25 Talks about summing forces around the wing for lift, but doesn’t explain the top-bottom difference. 38:10 Doesn’t actually state what AoA is. Graphic shows it as “A” but is unnamed. 42:20 CONFUSED about the effect of flaps. Airspeed being higher with ground speed lower HUH??? Also doesn’t explain approach being steeper. Misses that is the increased lift that allows slower air speed. 47:38 Only explains that roll is around the longitudinal axis, but not the others. 48:13 Doesn’t explain why adverse yaw occurs. 48:15 Stability OK. 53:30 Question about what happens beyond the critical angle is not answered correctly. Lift does not go to zero. Did not demonstrate a paper airplane stall. It was too stable. 54:45 First mentions separation. 55:56 climb & decent, lift = weight. 57:15 Torque causes a left ROLL. 57:50 P-Factor not so much climbing because AoA not necessarily high, just on ground. They can’t answer the question at 1:02:20 Precession is 90 degrees later. 1:03:14 Question why P-factor not subject to precession. Sort of answered. It is a bigger factor on the ground for a tail dragger the ground where the ground prevents precession and in slow flight when precession only occurs during actual yaw. In zero G flights confuses the upward parabola with top and downward parabola with bottom. Cheers

Thank you so much It's really helpful ❤

This was fascinating to listen to! Thank you for sharing!

Followers of what's fashion...

​ @KilroyGIB Sure, just like protesting corruption etc. Nonetheless, disparaging people that clearly know more and feel compelled to get out up and -try- thus learning the truth about a government that does not care, has been complicit in the horrors and doesn't doesn't care about its own civilians, just the rich ar the top. Super important for people to see and experience for themselves. What a horridly ignorant and arrogant statement. You display an utter inability to understand global politics as well as cause and effect. You're so outrageously blind to the context of this conversation and dismally unaware of the regional players and their effects on international trade that it would be laughable if your inability to grasp politics wasn't widespread. Anyone that knows even a marginal amount of facts regarding this matter can see that you're entirely lacking in factual information. Your words are nothing more than bias.

Annoying bastards 🤦🏼‍♂️

Why march on a synagogue, are you trying to instill fear on innocent people?

Idiots with no concept of the real world. Shameful. Fortunately not that many of these types in Lisbon, it seems.

Unemployed behaviour

They should all be deported to Palestine!!

didnt Spain drive the Muslims out?

Haha this fake country called palestine will never be free😂

So much stupidity in the world. Nobody screaming 'free the hostages".

😂

High-school kids and first-year Uni students, mostly. Same in my country. It's nice weather outside so they took to protesting, lol, because they don't want to have meaningless part-time jobs.

The pollution in Lisbon is huge , palestine trash ,in between others🤮

yes, free Palestine from Arabs

Fuck fuck fuck Palestine 🎶

28:03 advice Read faa books 3x before taking the test. Use test prep book Take practice tests from sports study buddy. 6 month free aopa student membership PhD physicist and pilot I see how it flies by John Denker

Tidying the house, I just found your hat today, Philip. How are ya?

thx for posting these lectures. Unfortunately thats the least prepared lecture so far in this playlist. I guess i could present this slide deck just as informed and boring.

Let me bounce off you

Thank you

sorry but there will not be alot of unmanned airplanes there will always be manned airplanes in the military. also the human does not limit the airplane it makes it better than an unmanned airplane

2:02 perfect

Partly because when they didn’t you crashed in the middle of somewhere you didn’t want to be 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉

Great job guys

great video!

Hope it was water proof !!

Tone is kind of odd. Flight School is about gaining a fundamental knowledge to be a successful and safe aviator and citizen of the air. I only made it to 31 minutes in this video before I turned it off. This level of arrogance and condescension has no place. The "PIC" in both examples, student and commercial pilot, are using the resources and knowledge to get where they want to go. Good on both. All of these are important skills and should not be readily replaced by blindly "following the magenta line". I'm out.

sir is it a mit class?

Tina has a really cute voice. There, I had to say it. 😍

So if equal transit theory is not true, why is airflow accelerated over the wing?

The reason for not running your engine under high loads at low RPM is because of the oil film. A fixed pitch propeller has the RPM directly tied to the load. But if you run it under high load at low RPM, the oil film is not being replaced very quickly and you must use a much thicker oil. This significantly reduces the efficiency because it increases the amount of drag on the engine. Also, thicker oils are a lot harder to lubricate all the components during the startup and in cold weather, and is more susceptible to thermal shock. This is why they recommend not running under high loads at low RPM. Medium loads at low RPM is fine though. Just don't push it to the extreme.

Thank you, when I went through flight training. There was nothing like this.

Even flying a Cessna is more than enough for me. I’m neither physically nor mentally capable of flying a fighter jet

I’m envious! The C8 is amazing.

The female instructor is so much better it’s not even funny, this dude clearly has very little knowledge on everything’s he talks about it and is speed-running this whole lecture

“Every trip is like that movie Sophie’s choice, you have to decide who or what is going or what will be left behind, pretty painful” HAHAHAHAHA😂😂😂😂HAHJAJDGSJAGSUSBE😂😂😂BSJXBWU😂NDGSI😂BEY JACDIFVSH

This video is fair and has some things ok and some things VERY wrong. It is nowhere near what should be expected from MIT. She is trying... For real physics, see this: *rxesywwbdscllwpn.quora.com/* For this video, here are the specifics: . 0:50 Vocabulary: doesn’t mention the vertical and horizontal “stabilizers”. Calls them “parts”. In the graphic, but not mentioned. There is only ONE wing. Going to talk about sea planes ??? 3:11 initially says lift exceeds drag, but corrects it. 4:50 Draws an extreme airfoil shape. 5:22 The way she explains conservation of momentum is a good one, but momentum can be confusing to some people. It is not saying just how these pushes come about, but is better than just saying lift is a Third Law "reaction". 5: 30 Air has mass and conservation of momentum. Doesn’t explain how push occurs. 6:12 GOOD: Explains the Equal transit/longer distance fallacy. Points to flat wing, same length. Math description not needed - correct. Good Aeroastro graphics. 12:01 GOOD: Stated Bernoulli correctly using ‘velocity’. BUT focuses on fast. 12:40 "C" is the WRONG answer! The word "cause" is incorrect. "A" is the only correct statement there, but has nothing to do with Bernoulli.. 12:42 The Graphic assigns INCORRECT cause to lower pressure. 14:00 GOOD: stationary pressures. She only mentions a "force" but not that it is pressures that cause the force! 15_24 Talking about the rest of the aircraft generating lift is a distraction and unnecessary. 15:57 Asks childish questions. Race Car. 16:36 Only says the spoiler “spoils the air flow. Doesn’t explain that it has down lift. 18:00 It is the altered pressures which cause the acceleration of the air (downward) ACCELERATION DOES NOT CAUSE THE FORECE !!! 18:09 Wing ALSO changes the speed of the air. Never states that upper air beats lower air. 18:40 Air past wing, or wing past air question. The critical thing missed here is that the speeds are NOT "IDENTICAL", but different between these two reference frames, BUT the science must be the same. Therefore, talking about fast is misleading. It is ACCELERATION that must be understood. 18:54. Is wing moving faster through the air, or air moving faster past wing? Frame of reference discussion - SAME. Wind tunnel justification. 23:40 Mentions aspect ratio without explaining it. 24:24 Mentions hand out car window and PUSHING, but doesn’t relate to the - IGNORING the momentum explanation earlier. 25:28 Mentions Viscosity. Compares sticky. Sticks to the wing. 27:10 Compressibility affects lift in a different way. NOT FUNDAMENTALLY. 27:20 Calculating lift is not known. 29:45 CALCULATING LIFT. Mentions Kutta Condition and says wrap around is an additional condition. 2D is simpler ) OK, but tip vortex sn not true turbulence. So… Calculate where possible and measure elsewhere. Doesn’t explain chord line. Says: “in between". 32:25 Talks about summing forces around the wing for lift, but doesn’t explain the top-bottom difference. 38:10 Doesn’t actually state what AoA is. Graphic shows it as “A” but is unnamed. 42:20 CONFUSED about the effect of flaps. Airspeed being higher with ground speed lower HUH??? Also doesn’t explain approach being steeper. Misses that is the increased lift that allows slower air speed. 47:38 Only explains that roll is around the longitudinal axis, but not the others. 48:13 Doesn’t explain why adverse yaw occurs. 48:15 Stability OK. 53:30 Question about what happens beyond the critical angle is not answered correctly. Lift does not go to zero. Did not demonstrate a paper airplane stall. It was too stable. 54:45 First mentions separation. 55:56 climb & decent, lift = weight. 57:15 Torque causes a left ROLL. 57:50 P-Factor not so much climbing because AoA not necessarily high, just on ground. They can’t answer the question at 1:02:20 Precession is 90 degrees later. 1:03:14 Question why P-factor not subject to precession. Sort of answered. It is a bigger factor on the ground for a tail dragger the ground where the ground prevents precession and in slow flight when precession only occurs during actual yaw. In zero G flights confuses the upward parabola with top and downward parabola with bottom.

Leave it to a virtue signaling intellectual not to be able to make it through a technical presentation on flight without making a reference to climate change.

Let me save everyone the trouble. There's absolutely no actual information to be learned from Lecture 1, just move straight to Lecture 2.

I feel poor

we use ac to save weight, ac wires are much much smaller lighter gauges

At the beginning when he talks about how no one is called maverick for being the best and most badass it just further confirms my theory that there are only two ways nicknames are created among a tight knit group of men: 1. A distinguishing physical characteristic 2. Some hilarious way you fucked up

This instructor doesnt know how engineers think and really shows his bias. Sad. A scientist must of really hurt him.

Thanks a lot :)

wth that joker is ?????

How cool is this guy?!

First