Hello, at 4:05 I think Prof. Lynch meant the mass matrix value depends on the "configuration" not "acceleration". The force itself, however, is the quantity that depends on acceleration for a particular configuration I guess.
@pasinduvinsuka18 күн бұрын
Thank youuu
@brianngohofficial24 күн бұрын
Great explanation professor! the examples in the end helped tremendously!
@aspectparadox665428 күн бұрын
How is L comp derived?
@ahmedbenyoucef323828 күн бұрын
thank you very much, great explaining
@fairtrade121islamicjihaddotmilАй бұрын
DEFENDING FREEDOMS
@kibeomyounАй бұрын
my comment is blocked?? 0:22 equation is wrong.. plz modify it.. \dot{V_b} should be \dot{v_b} - w \times \dot{q}
@baadwayneinstituteofmodern9375Ай бұрын
You are saving alot of time
@ghadihassan8440Ай бұрын
great work! thanks
@MingjieHan-q3r2 ай бұрын
what's the difference between this polynomial and cubic-spline?
@abhigya62 ай бұрын
why is the topology of the 2R robot arm a torus. isn't it tracing a 2d space?
@frommarkham4243 ай бұрын
ROBOTS ARE AWESOMEEEEEEEEEE🔥🔥🔥🔥🦾🦾🦾🗣🗣🗣🗣💯💯💯💯LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOO😎🤯
@alefpontessilva10933 ай бұрын
Codes, I want codes :(
@insertusername57373 ай бұрын
This video is so much better than the previous one
@mervynlarrier94244 ай бұрын
Pro tip: the cross product is anticommutative, so -omega × q can be rewritten as q × omega. Which is much easier to remember and will make programming much simpler by eliminating an easy to introduce error
@nice1__4 ай бұрын
How do we make sure that the generated trajectory in within reach of the robotic arm?
@Luhpu4 ай бұрын
شرح صعب جدا وغيرمفهوم
@SphereofTime4 ай бұрын
1:00
@Nishi33265 ай бұрын
sir while finding fk for body frame we start from theta1 but for space frame we start form theta3 why is that??
@user-cw4xm2bm1i5 ай бұрын
He does not know how to teach sadly
@Nishi33265 ай бұрын
i couldn't understand how Js3 is unaffected by joint 3's rotation
@kaishang6406Ай бұрын
check 5:12, notice that S3 is to the right of the adjoint matrix. I think that is how it works.
@kaishang6406Ай бұрын
I rewatched this a bit more and i think you need to reconsider what jacobian, twist, and screws represent. they aren't like vectors in 3d space but rather an extended version of axis of rotation. With that, you should see how the js3 (axis of rotation like thing that describes joint 3) is not affected by the rotation of joint 3.
@اكرمالحاج-خ6و6 ай бұрын
Hi I want to ask you why we don't write the linear velocity for revolute joint in sin and cos?
@ky89207 ай бұрын
thanks for these amazing videos & book
@AbrahamLee-sj6zp7 ай бұрын
Mind-bogglingly helpful. Thank you for making this public.
@sudhanshuvaishampayan89718 ай бұрын
In the torque equation at 5:05 it should be c(theta)*theta dot instead of c(theta, theta dot) right?
@muhammadkhieraleter64608 ай бұрын
Hello sir ...can you help me?
@SLOTCHAMPIONS8 ай бұрын
I wish he explained things in a simpler way. Not all of us are experts on linear algebra.
@bastiane2158 ай бұрын
There are another videos for that. It´s hard to understand so I totally agreed with that ... this type of knowledge is hard to find so I think is a truly opportunity ... Work hard bro :)
@ky89207 ай бұрын
if you watch the previous 24 videos from the playlist, it is not hard to understand it. you only need to learn the basic of screw motion/theory that unified the translational and rotational motion
@RohanKumar-oz8tc8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. I didn't understand how when specifying C, we have moved B away from the circumference of the point A. Isn't B supposed to be at the circumference of A?
@neeladke95579 ай бұрын
Where is the joint 3 and 4?? I only see one prismatic joint at the end
@TheEiman10 ай бұрын
Can i position the wheel with one of the wheel not same distance?
@Vp.s1238 ай бұрын
Have u tried this yet? I have a similar project and don't have any idea that does it work.
@ArtVernen10 ай бұрын
how to calculate the rotation speed of mecanum-wheel wheels on a four-wheeled vehicle in rad/s please give the formula
@ericcheng549611 ай бұрын
Great video for finals review
@burakergocmen566111 ай бұрын
You explain it perfectly. These explanations are very lucid. Thank you..
@iamyouu11 ай бұрын
how to do this for a floating base system ?
@Alice_Dawn23 Жыл бұрын
SE(3) 0:42
@readdaily5680 Жыл бұрын
Woooohoooo! Thanks for this
@madebytony7804 Жыл бұрын
very nice, thank you.
@stark1e25 Жыл бұрын
For Decouple Task-Space Control, is w_e the matrix log of R^T*Rd or element-wise log?
@TatharNuar Жыл бұрын
4:18 How do you identify dependent constraints though?
@kalaivanank-nc3vd Жыл бұрын
prof. at 2:56 you said "Unlike a holonomic constraint, this velocity constraint cannot be integrated to give an back equalent constraint config. " can you prove it by mathematically.
@speedbird7587 Жыл бұрын
Thanks professor, very clear and nice lecture
@vigneshbalaji21 Жыл бұрын
What is convex hull of the control points/via points ?
@tshebeletsotjabane4979 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@whg1504 Жыл бұрын
This is so cute I randomly ended up watching his videos he seems like a really good professor that most students would love. and he explains the concepts really well. I also majored in mechanical engineering but even the basic things he explains hit me hard.. amazing man
@SpaceStickwithSpaceTick Жыл бұрын
These videos have given me a lot more respect for mechanical engineers as an electrical engineering student. This math is pretty tough!
@seekwhen1848 Жыл бұрын
1:51 How could I have not thought of subscript cancellation in changing reference frame!! This was super intuitive.
@abdulqadiryusuf6274 Жыл бұрын
The best video that explained more about the introductions to control engineering. Weldon Sir❤
@intheshell35ify Жыл бұрын
OMG, you are literally giftwrapping humanity for the robots!!!!