Moose test Peugeot 307

Classic KZbin video from 2006. Amazing 😊

Mir juckt mein Saxo

That is vts 16 120, or 90? Seems 120 bhp version. 8.9 secs 0-100, seems quite slow, claimed 7.7... I think there are people that do it quicker, more similar to claimed figure, even measured with Draggy in not engine tuned cars

El saxo y su suspensión genial lo amo

My dad just gave me his 2002 saxo vts

😊😉

Getting a Saxo VTS Special Swiss Edition with a Compressor ! 6.3 sec 0-100 In 2016 ! My first car guys! I'm so in love! :D

Será el 90 cv

0-100 8.9 ????

just a great chassis, a car with 100hp less than the S3 being only a few tenths of a second slower

@LIP15, tu ne sais pas de quoi tu parle...

Guys from motorvision ought to learn how to start correctly... /watch?v=6y1zebGeGXU

dich means 'you'

fuck french cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Great test, great car and great driver. :)

@Testostrone250 Yeah, i thought it was 7.6 secs aswell :s

@antonyr123, Yeah i never said there were going to be quicker! VTS's are alot quicker as they have a 16v engine with 20bhp more and a different box. Well its a n/a 1.6 its not gonna be stupidly quick unless forced induction was used! Its not as fast as alot of cars in a straight line but the 106 gti (which is the same chassis as the VTR/VTS) was voted second best handling in some top gear episode and it was against ferraris and shit. handling > power (where i live anyways)

@rumble291 vtr are still slower then vts no matter how u look at it lol since when was 8.9 seconds worth talking about

@LIP15, Stop chatting shit. 170bhp in a 920kg car is overkill for most road users not only does it increase insurance prices and fuel prices by having forced induction but it also will increase the amount of fatalities caused by having too much power in a car that weighs practically nothing. There cheap, nippy and great handling cars full stop.

my mk2 vtr does 0-60 in 8.8 seconds with 3 people in the car....

@WillJPalmer haha hardly, as apposed to a ford puma or vauxhall tigra, or do oyu have one of them ^_^

@Y0RKSHRE ah i see, i have driven them before and they do seem quicker, never timed it though, 0-60 is so good because of the longer ratio 2nd gear

@deviljamez 0-60 in my VTS, and i would say all VTS's is much lower than that, easily less than 7 seconds..

8.9 secs 0-60, my vtr mk2 will do it in 9.4 secs , not fast i know but not much difference between 8v and 16v :S

If its fast, cheap and handles how can you complain.

these 90's cars looked realy good, what the fuck did they do with the C2 it looks likes a fuckin post mans van

faster than a trashmerican Corvette, enough said!

that is pretty good. I love hot hatchbacks, economical, good handling, brakes and performance, affordable prices.

this is a vtr not a vts. Look at the alloys

Dimonmmc true!!!:D

Then, does that mean that the UK is NOT part of Europe?

I have saxo 1.6 VTS stock it runs 7.6-100 sec, my friend have the same car, and it runs also 7.6 +-0.1 sec. Measured by G-tech SS.

mate you havent even got the slightest clue what your on about

hahaha Its not that I dont like Saxo's I rem test driving a VTS when they first came out, and it was very nippy but all the chavs were lining up too so I walked I have just come hate their image, people chat on threads like this about 0-60 times and their handling etc... when its the type of car your mum buys! Everytime I see a VTR its always being driven erratically by some twat with a baseball cap on who thinks hes Schumacher because hes got 87bhp! the C2 has gone the same way to twatville

You clearly didnt grasp the sarcastic nature of my post

I agree with you. Saxo VTS has better acceleration than poor 8,9s

heheh well enough for this vid

your german isn't too well eh????

I am to please :) Truth is I have nothing against any car when it comes out of the factory (even cheapo french stuff), but people seem to try and convince themselves that these cars are fast and are for racing etc.... Its the type of car your mum buys.....

Its OK in German I will translate for you: 0:29 This velour interior is typical of the French, its plasticy and crap! 0:37 This car was designed for 17's yr olds, dwarves and your mother. Real men cant fit behind the wheel even with the seat adjusted 1:06 When you thrash the nuts off it and change gear as if your Schumacher you'll still get beaten by a Mondeo 2:12 Buying this chav car means your required to permanently drive up someones arse as Demonstrated here 3:04 Dont bother, buy Audi

nah you should just read the info.

+1 my stock 1.6 VTS `00 7.6/100 tested by G-Tec

yep, I agree with druide106. these cars don't need more than 8 sec from 0-100 for sure...

0-100 in 8,9sec???? what a bullshit, I never saw a Saxo/106 wich need over 8sec!! all cars were faster than 7,5-7,9sec stock!

vts mate. Phase 1 VTS had the same wheels as Phase 1 VTR. The Phase 2 VTS has different wheels but the Phase 2 VTR has the same wheels as the Phase 1.

and fucking shite

You sum up the vast majority of corsa drivers.. dumb, dumb and err... dumb.

corsa is car for tiny girls,

it's VTS 16V, just look at the engine.