Bushels Per Acre

Пікірлер

@farminindiana7590 3 ай бұрын

Those gotta be 1100’s

@trevorcrowe7571 11 ай бұрын

Was your voice missing half way through intentional?

@motormotor3033 11 ай бұрын

kzbin.infoKGlCCzA4aBY?feature=share

@tisFrancesfault Жыл бұрын

How i felt when i was allowed to use the new tractors and not the old ones... It was nice finally having glass in the windows. :')

@queissobrasil3622 Жыл бұрын

😀😀😀😀😀😄😆🤑🤑🤑💐💐🌺🌺🌺🌈🌈🌈📱☎️☎️📱📱📱📱👓👟👟👓👓

@LeeVdH10 Жыл бұрын

John Deere

@samuelponce2820 Жыл бұрын

Tuve la oportunidad de ver las dos maquinas en acción y la verdad CLAAS es más eficiente en todos los sentidos. En mi país antes todo era JD pero con el pasar de los años los agricultores cada vez compran más equipo Claas.

@sergeyragnev957 Жыл бұрын

Почему вы не корректно сравниваете ведь это на самая мощная модель Claas lexion 8700 а если с lexion 8900 ,но даже так он бы уделает его по любым параметрам ..

@icenbryse5190 Жыл бұрын

The capacity is pretty decent on that deere, but the twin rotors rear their ugly head when the sun goes down. Claas sample gets dirtier but capacity doesnt change. At least in our experience

@icenbryse5190 Жыл бұрын

I've seen the fuel consumption first hand. The claas is more fuel efficient. Im not too sure how they got the fuel usage numbers. Cutting a 5 foot width of durum doing about 8 mph (running empty pretty much). The X9 demo i ran was burning 60 liters per hour. So in canola there's no way that john deere was that low. Also, claas did follow up with a comparison in corn where the 8700 mopped the deere. I was really looking forward to the X9, im not machine biased. But I've seen and heard the test from farms in our area. The X9 doesn't hold its own, at least yet.

@PiesGuy35 Жыл бұрын

earned a sub for this 😂❤

@themrpawel9126 Жыл бұрын

Only claas lexion 8900 no 8700

@joephillips486 Жыл бұрын

Comparing the most powerful Deere combine to the 3rd most powerful claas and claas still wins😬

@LeeVdH10 Жыл бұрын

Well actually just because its newer doesn’t mean its better and the S790 did a better job handling tough crop

@jonathanb9429 Жыл бұрын

Now put em in rice... John Deere will have it's guts hanging out in the first 1,000 acres...

@cnebuda7422 Жыл бұрын

Yes same with spring wheat or any kind of wet beans/corn…

@jackdudding9071 Жыл бұрын

Almost every rice farmer in south Louisiana has a John Deere combine and they all keep their value.

@jonathanb9429 Жыл бұрын

@@jackdudding9071we have 3 & the rice eats em alive every year. They take a helluva lot of money in repairs and hole patching to hold their value lol

@joebidenshusband6593 11 ай бұрын

@@jackdudding9071yea I’ve only seen one case harvester in my life in south Louisiana Besides that they are all Deere In terms of cane though they are pretty split Deere and case

@cherylowens5276 Жыл бұрын

Uh?????? what'cha got there?😮

@sergeyragnev957 Жыл бұрын

И эти комбайны сравнить не корректно x9 нужно сравнивать с 8900

@bradyhood3370 Жыл бұрын

Didn't hear much comparing anything. Just seemed to talk about everything John Deere. Next time compare apples to apples, if you are comparing an X9 1100 then compare it to a Claas 8900.

@sergeyragnev957 Жыл бұрын

И Джон Дир всегда больше сжигает топлива при аналогичной выполненной работы,

@sergeyragnev957 Жыл бұрын

Claas lexion всегда был и есть лучше, с чего вы взяли что джона площадь очистки зерна больше снимите решёта с обоих комбайнов и увидите у кого больше Джон Дир всегда делает больше потерь зерна и это факт.

@JackesBAD Жыл бұрын

Jap Claas is good combine.. Deere is also good. I would just like Deere to be less bias and rather better there machine... plus claas always specialized in there combines

@dariomaidana601 Жыл бұрын

Vamos John Deere nomás

@Kubahi Жыл бұрын

claas team

@Brobro449 Жыл бұрын

This is so hilarious how rigged this is between Deere ordering the tests, claas not having representatives at the test, headers be different size, the claas not even having the biggest machine and so on and so forth

@joescheller6680 Жыл бұрын

John deere hasn't a chance against Claas wins hands down in all categories and less money.

@joescheller6680 2 жыл бұрын

We know the cards were stacked against Claas. I know. Look at the world record. Set by 8700 not 8800 put a knowledgeable operator in an 8700 claas not 8800 and Claas will blow doors off the X9 hands. Fuel wise grain quality wise grain lose. We run 45' header on 8600 all the time. On the old 760 it could easily use a 50' head.

@davidmafijanis 2 жыл бұрын

That got me

@joescheller6680 2 жыл бұрын

Great machine. Put out the info that the lexion 8700 had set new world record for most corn combined in 8 10 and 12 hrs held previously by the 760tt

@glynncrook9211 2 жыл бұрын

I just found your channel bc one of your videos was recommended. I hope you push out another video of you’re currently banned. I live in the States and you’re point on with your commentary… outstanding stuff!

@bernaozdemir3506 2 жыл бұрын

John dendere

@AirborneRenegade 2 жыл бұрын

I’ve operated JD equipment, but I think I’d choose Claas for my own operation. Cleaner samples and less loss mean a lot for a farmer. To each their own.

@havanadaurcy1321 2 жыл бұрын

Don't worry, apparently calling out the English activists who said Australia should not have a 24 hour curfew with cats 'is hate speech'. Sorry I am pro wildlife, Facebook

@fansawjan7823 2 жыл бұрын

Claas❤️

@rileyshane78 10 ай бұрын

Until it needs parts or needs to be fixed. If it’s anything like most German engineering they will put a part you need way under another part that don’t need to come out but you have to take it out now. That the only problem with German engineering