Mavis Roads

As early as 1669, Steno determined that every layer of the earth must have been formed horizontally by mixing with water. Shark teeth were found high in the mountains. The conclusion is that at some point seawater must have been higher than the mountains. There are now two possibilities. Either the water is lifted above the highest mountains or the land sinks under the water. Geologists have chosen the latter possibility as the indisputable reason for the formation of layers of the earth. The large number of horizontal layers on top of each other indicate that this event has occurred often. Geologists have estimated that the formation of one layer will take at least 100,000 years. Geologists apparently know nothing about the oldest history of mankind. Several ancient books speak of a cycle of seven world periods that are separated by a natural disaster. Plato tells of regularly recurring disasters involving a celestial body. Other sources tell of a planet that is approaching the earth. There are many images of that event! That planet is invisible until it is close to the sun, says Pliny. Planet 9 must therefore orbit our sun in an eccentric orbit. Then its speed during the crossing is very high. As a result, the gravitational pull on the planets near its orbit is strong. As a result, during some crossings, the water on planet Earth is pulled up very high, even "above the highest mountains" with everything that is scooped up in it. It is an extinction level event. The crossing lasts seven days. At the end the planet is covered in a thick layer of mud including remains of many land and sea animals. The layer hardens after some time and forms the next layer on top of many others. We have been able to construct a timeline in which we can see that five tidal waves are pulled over the Earth and thus five layers of the Earth are formed in a cycle of 25,200 years. Abundant and convincing evidence about this cycle of natural disasters and many images are available in the eBook: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". Search: invisible nibiru 9

Hi, the basemap option is only available in the Pro version?

Very well presented and great slide to end with painting a very realistic picture of AI’s role in the future of geosciences.

Can you share the files

Thanks a lot, very useful tutorials, I learned a lot from them.

Here you can download the notebook used in the webinar: dgbes.com/downloads/notebooks/odbind_webinar_2024.ipynb

This is excellent webinar.

Hello, I'm on 6.2.2 version, when I open the well correlation panel, the well 2D view shows empty (however when I load the well into the 3D survey I can display it).

Thank you sir; important and useful

Very interesting thank you

Hello, I am about to download the new version. I have 2D seismic lines that I need to import. I have seen videos explaining how to load 3D seismic datasets. Could you please provide me with some guidance on how to load 2D seismic datasets? Thanks for your support!

yo stuff sucks dawg on 4nem this aint it

Excellent tutorial on getting started at OpendTect.

Thanks boss for your nice explanation. Can you please tell me how to download the data file?

EXCELLENT !

Thanks

Thank for the lesson! It`s very interesting and useful 😁

Thank you very much ,what is the next step , seismic conditioning or create Dip steering cube

Very interesting! One question. Is it possible to insert python code inside OpndTect to use like a plug-in?

Great!! I needed this information!

Thank you

30:50 Time to depth conversion

really nice!

Thank you very much. I have championed the cwt Mexican hat method and demonstrated its superior vertical resolution capability and happy to see this confirmed independently. I'd love to do the next episode. I. E. CEEMD VS CWT VS FFT and why opendtect is unmatched in the spectral decomposition space. 😂 I have an amazing example...

Excellent. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks Friso. Interesting to see your application of SCI. I have pondered it's value in this regard but not seen it applied. Much appreciated.

Hi, when I display the inline it tells me "NO SAVED COLOR SETTINGS FOUND FOR THE SELECTED CUBE. DEFAULT SETTINGS WILL BE LOADED" and gives me a solid color with no seismic lines. Has anyone had this problem and how did you solve it?

Please how can I find the demo dataset? I did not load it after first installation.

can be this workflow applied to 2D line which is just a bit far from the well, by projecting the well on it?

I found unclear (also in the manuals) which parameters have been used for computation of the steering 2 detailed and 3 background. Can you clarify please? thank you

Thanks for this content!!!

Excellent , thanks for sharing

I only have a 2D seismic file (.sgy) and no velocity file (rms/ int). What can i do? How can i create a velocity model

Thanks Friso for this exellent video and for sharing this very useful Notebook.

This is brilliant. Hybrid philosophy of OpendTect taken to next level. The odpy library opens up the world of python through jupyter notebook for OpendTect data. The ability to incorporate the insights extracted from data back into OpendTect as visualization in a coordinate aware manner is excellent. Is there anyway that the color bar for example for net to gross shown her can be brought back too in the Map view display? Or even better bring the data back as pointset instead of image (which is much appreciated too) so the color range, size and color bar maybe can be controlled better, but this is something for future release maybe. Great work and thanks for uploading the recording as i unfortunately missed the live stream.

Hi SIr, I am always having confusion with difference between checkshot survey, Velocity Survey, VSP Survey. Some geophysicist says that checkshot survey and the velocity survey are same, it it is then why you are having separate tick mark for velocity in well seismic tie dialog. Please provide me some good understanding on this topic.

Please illuminate if we can use this technology to analyze the difficult interpretive anomalies in radargrams.

Hi Sir, This is very interesting video. can you please tell some more detail on it. I want to add this plugin to perform the work on radargram data.

Very excellent

Thank you

Congratulations on the explanations, they are very useful! I'm trying to start the tracking, but I get the message "Insufficient memory to allocate 23.6 GB". How do I free up memory in OpendTect 6.4?

How can I convert 3d horizons to 2d (picked in the seismic lines). Thank you!

Hello, how wells can be placed in 2D views? I have the free version

Excellent Artificial intelligence Applications for Geoscience Cognitive geoscience artificial neural networks machine learning Deep learning statistical learning for Seismic imaging and inversion Seismic attributes Seismic interpretation Reservoir characterization, etc

Very excellent efforts, hope you explain more

Congrats for this presentation and Thank you very much for sharing. Sir, let me ask you about some specific situation: how will you use or apply this kind of analysis if you would have a seismic dataset with 50 meters of VSR and your target would be turbidites channel with 15 meters of thickness? Again, thanks! Best regards!

Deepwater hydrocarbon exploration channel detection thalweg sinuous channel wavelet transform Seismic imaging