what is residual camber in composite steel girder kindly clarify
@gieco32 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great video!
@richardv9648 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation. Are you saying ductility factor only applies when the time period is more than 0.6 sec?
@hurairsaleem1423 Жыл бұрын
Amazing ! You made it so much simpler. Thank you
@kuidjodenzel2927 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@yosephnegussie4391 Жыл бұрын
If you can, please explain the design and construction of the post tension structure?
@pranaybadgujar3278 Жыл бұрын
👍
@pranaybadgujar3278 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing knowledge sir
@Nasirbinbashir Жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@RheeJaeHyuk Жыл бұрын
Years of training summed up with 10minutes lecture
@kamilhassenseman97532 жыл бұрын
IT is best and detailed explanation about Fatigue load limit state. i am really say to you thanks
@praveenkrsahu63552 жыл бұрын
Dear sir... How much actual deflection are observed for different bridges like rcc crossing bridge, etc
@normaguamani91042 жыл бұрын
Thank you. How do we obtain fps? Please
@navalfa72912 жыл бұрын
I am a mechanical engineer doing some seismic work on a vessel base frame. You, civil engineers, need a lot of imagination to understand these concepts of ductility and seismic rules I would say.
@Royden582 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@shahidali-zy2bw2 жыл бұрын
Dear sir could pleas make videos on CSI Bridge ?
@saital2 жыл бұрын
Perfect!
@kevinbatista58912 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation
@civilideas19252 жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@civilideas19252 жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@imdadimmu87412 жыл бұрын
Sir please if any videos has been recorded on fatigue analysis of steel concrete composite beams please send
@imdadimmu87412 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir for support
@karthikpathikonda34932 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@allinengineering81682 жыл бұрын
best explanation
@usmanzafar72933 жыл бұрын
Beautiful explained....Lecture
@usmanzafar72933 жыл бұрын
Hats off
@nafiaykut73253 жыл бұрын
how can you define "exposure" and "vulnerability" in earthquake engineering.What do you think.
@majdiflah3 жыл бұрын
Interesting work! Thanks for sharing
@babulchandra87603 жыл бұрын
excellent
@spannovationbridgeandseism94213 жыл бұрын
Currently, the series is available on Thinkific through the following link: spannovationschool.thinkific.com/courses/fundamentals-of-seismic-engineering-lecture-series
@structurelearninghub33403 жыл бұрын
Please uploas all 4 webinar on internet sir
@haroonahmed21783 жыл бұрын
Can you explain for a fixed ended structure
@ziaulhasan67203 жыл бұрын
thanks
@hansenm69103 жыл бұрын
Hi sir, Can the matched response spectrum(of a certain time history ground motion record) be used as an alternative seismic input instead of the design response spectrum(target) from the code?
@spannovationbridgeandseism94213 жыл бұрын
One could do a site-specific response analysis (it's usually carried out by geotechnical engineers). For this, an outcrop ground motion is input at an appropriate level below the ground surface and wave propagation analysis is done to obtain the time history signature at or close to the surface. A design spectrum can then be generated corresponding to the mean or mean plus minus some standard deviation of the response spectra of a number of time histories.
@hansenm69103 жыл бұрын
@@spannovationbridgeandseism9421 thank you sir, i'm just wondering, what if i have this ground motion record, then i did a spectral matching of its corresponding RS to the design RS of code (target). Since I already obtained the matched RS, instead of doing a time history analysis using the RS-compatible time history, I will used the corresponding RS of this time history, assigned it at each support, and then perform the conventional response spectrum analysis (but in this case i have different response spectrum at each support of the bridge). do you think it is an acceptable/appropriate procedure?
@noorhanalkhatib43413 жыл бұрын
Please doctor what about the point in the spectrum when T=0 sec? We can't use the equation A=u*w2 in this case right?
@spannovationbridgeandseism94213 жыл бұрын
The Sa value at T = 0 sec corresponds to the peak ground acceleration (PGA).
@noorhanalkhatib43413 жыл бұрын
@@spannovationbridgeandseism9421 thank you very much
@structurelearninghub33403 жыл бұрын
Please make private video public sir
@francisanthonyvalderrama30083 жыл бұрын
Well explained. I do have two basic questions. Firstly, during the design stage what are the detail categories mentioned in AASHTO do I need to consider when designing steel box girders and I-girders? My second query is, for railway bridge design, can I use the provisions of AASHTO on fatigue loadings which is 15% increase in wheel load including IM or is there a provision in AREMA to determine the fatigue load from trains? Thank you.
@AT-wx2bw3 жыл бұрын
Great Video- Loved your explanation to make it more rational, Hats off to AASHTO for reducing confusions, unlike others in a similar role on Building Side, You did a great job explaining. This is what I would say a Unified Approach- Meaning regardless of user - The answer would be the same. Instead of being judgemental and/or having answers to the same question to the different users all over the place. in that sense, I would say AASHTO is more deterministic than the rest of the organization in a similar position. I would also say that this outcome also requires better and confident Engineers on Committees.
@GAMEOVER-gf7yl3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful mr maen abdulhaq you are intelligent, please send me the pdf lectures please
@jmdjh13 жыл бұрын
Very Well Explained. Worth admiring !!
@deyaeldinfadol25703 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video, is it possible to include part of live load deflections in to camber, so that you can reduce the total deflections in the structure, e.g. Camber = Dead Def. + 20% Live def.
@spannovationbridgeandseism94213 жыл бұрын
Yes, one could do that. However, the general practice is to not include any live load in camber calculations. Live load deflection and vibration control is related to rider and pedestrian comfort. Camber does not help with this issue.
@jmdjh13 жыл бұрын
The closing note from Pakistani friend is really True. You guys took time for us. Thanks for the webinar. Looking forward for next live webinar
@jmdjh13 жыл бұрын
The Basoli bridge is close to my hometown in J&K
@jmdjh13 жыл бұрын
Being a doctor is a good thing but bridging the gaps is better "My perception: Engineers vision"
@jmdjh13 жыл бұрын
Working with creativity definitely takes lesser time. It's still sad that we r judged by working hours