Great content. To make this more interesting you could scrape the original stake off the winnings at a certain level of growth that would allow you to essentially run the bet as a freebie.

This is not compound betting but "challenge gambling". This video explains real compound betting kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIHFl4hqic-GesU There will be no bookie that allows you to place such high bets after so many days. Also, it is absurd to believe that it is possible to win so many times in a row, possible perhaps but unlikely.

You just saved my degree

Very helpful. Thank you :)

Mafee from billions is the reason why im here😌

I liked your lecture. Thank you.

but what if I'm increasing the growth rate higher than the discount rate? how do I calculate for that? for example, let's say I'm getting a perpetuity of 100 a year with a contingency of 2% above the interest/discount rate. how do I calculate that? do I discount the amounts first then account for the future value and then get the npv? there has to be a way to calculate this, right??

do you know that your ppt and book are wholly used by other professor at my uni? even the ppt display are just same kk

Love you

1 lost will wipe all your 💰

The probability of successfully having 93 x 1/10 bets in a row is over 7000/1. Just completing 10 in a row has only a 38.6% success rate. The concept sounds absolutely fantastic but the odds in itself suggest that it will fail 1 in 10 times and that's inflated by the bookies for profit. I started with £1.14 won on some free spins by an online betting site. After 8 bets I'm currently sitting at £6.43 and nearly lost a 1.14 bet until the team scored in the '94min I'm aiming for £1000 but it's incredibly unlikely I'll hit £100.

Good explanation thank you !!!

I need to know how we can calculate Betas of the APT model. for example if we take 3 factors inflation rate, Interest rate, and Industrial Production Index. So my question is how we can calculate the beta of each independent variable through any software like R-language, SPSS, and Eviews. it would be great if anyone could help me out with this.

Professor David, very well explained thank you. I was going in circle with the whole concept of borrowing and lending at the risk free rate turns out its only common sense. When invoking borrowing at the risk free-rate, you effectively invest more on equity making your portfolios having high risk but a rewarding return. Vice versa when lending at the risk free-rate.

hi professor, this is amazing. Are you planning to upload the full lecture of investment and corporate finance courses ?

thank you!

What are the assumptions in EVA ]

Nice scottish accent out there David

Thank you very much

Thank you David , I’m new to finance and this has helped me grasped the concept . Keep at it 💪🏼

I ask you a key question: Ra = Rf + Beta * (Rm - Rf) Ra = 5% with price of stock a $15 Rf = 3% with market value of bond market $100*10^6 Rm = 7% with market value of stock market $100*10^9 and Beta = 0.5 So, CAPM is relative equilibrium, i.e. 5% = 3% + 0.5 * (7% - 3%), and it is wondered how to exchange stock return Ra for stock profits $Ra for real capital asset pricing? In reality, this is a key mistake of CAPM.

I ask you a key question: Ra = Rf + Beta * (Rm - Rf) Ra = 5% with price of stock a $15 Rf = 3% with market value of bond market $100*10^6 Rm = 7% with market value of stock market $100*10^9 and Beta = 0.5 So, CAPM is relative equilibrium, i.e. 5% = 3% + 0.5 * (7% - 3%), and it is wondered how to exchange stock return Ra for stock profits $Ra for real capital asset pricing? In reality, this is a key mistake of CAPM.

informative and helpful video

i am a fan of your book

Professor, cant find your website.

Brilliant explanation, thanks so much!

sir, what if I have to calculate the EAC for the second year, where maintenance is 2,000 and salvage is 1,500. do we find the P.V of opportunity cost as 2500/(1.15*1.15) or 2500/1.15 ??

is there an excel version of this?

Thank you so much for your lecture, it helps understand better

Thanks, was very helpful!

This is a very good explanation - which gave me a fundamental new view of 'why' and original function of theese differete types of corpirate organisation types. Under my national law there is no such thing as 'a partnerskip'; instead we have a vulgarised alternative which gives no knowladge of it's original function and intended use. Thanks.

Dear Friends, I have a questions: 1/ In the Capital Budgeting for 5 years, ABC company spent 500 million USD and borrowed 200 million USD from the bank. I want to calculate the break even point of of the capital budgeting. How do you do?.

Dear Friends, I have a questions: 1/ In the Capital Budgeting for 5 years, ABC company spent 500 million USD and borrowed 200 million USD from the bank. I want to calculate the break even point of of the capital budgeting. How do you do?.

markets are neither irrational nor efficient. they are competitive.

This is a great video. Thank you!

Our "University" professor just gave us the ppt for online course, and nothing else. I am so lucky to have stumbled upon you.

There are two minor errors in the formulas like minute 14:16 it should be in the cost of debt ( 1 - .131 ) and another error found is in the 16.58 it should be ( B / S + B ) * Return_debt, just in case someone could see them and maybe have tough way to understand the results. The results by the way are correct, just the formulas are incorrect. However, excellent videos, very recommended

Hi david, I enjoyed your video's a lot. Just wanted to mention an error on p41 : Principle III puts forward the recommendation...(I think this is still not updated from 2016 version and should be placed in principle 2 of your book: equitable treatment of shareholders).. best regards

M

I

N

E

R

V

A

S

C

H

O

O