This is so eurocentric

Imagine being drawn to linguistics at the age of 12...and knowing your path and purpose at such a young age. Michael was truly extraordinary.

This is an excellent speech, but why is it interrupted with ads? This is educational and should be nonprofit.

What a wonderful lecture! I really loved it. David knows his stuff and explains it really well

I need an elephant painting 😍

You haven't answered why a urinal kept in an exhibition is considered as art. So the artist decides what is art.no academic can put artists in their conceptual vision. Ever since artists rebelled against the French academy artists are rebels who don't just break rules but create the new rules.ary is whatever the true artist does next.

We can see intentionality in abstract paintings, the fact that the artist may have included a repetition of shapes or a particular rhythm to show movement or emotion or anything else is what obviously distinguishes the work from that of a child or an elephant who won't think to include techniques like repetition or rhythm. As a figurative artist, I personally find it insulting to my dedication to learning and exploring skills, techniques, anesthetics, history and so many other things that are involved in being an artist and making art, only for someone to come along and graze the canvas with a bunch of very basic level brushstrokes or to pour or splash paint on a canvas and that to be considered as a great work becausethey were keen enough to add a balance of color or rhythm or something else. It is a disservice to the artist whose work also includes all of those aspects and even more.

All this sykology is measuring iz whut we already know: any given culture has pre-loaded its members with normative values of authenticity versus not and ethical-emotive responses accordingly. And her 'essence" proposition is purecumbaya nonsense, as well because it's our own emotive state that creates said essentialities to begin with.

Guess I’m part of the highest niche of niches. Thank you for uploading these for those not able to attend.

in fact, in this whole lecture, the fake is the lecture itself... a fake for psychology, which it is not..

I don't understand how people find kids and animals work are the same as abstract art made by the artist?! The canvas the paints, the quality of movement and shapes are so much more supreme, it is obvious. No need to underate artists because of your own ignorance.

Instead of pulling out color blind people, may we should do studies comparing color blind people to those not color blind regarding art critiques.

Thank you America 🎉🎉🎉🎉

Very relevent in this new emerging AI art curfuffle

❤

16:30 The one on the right clearly has more goudire!

Very interesting

this is another example of why we are where we are today,why do we as humanity feel that we need to examine the shit out everything?even our perceptions of simplicity in all it,s beauty!

Hot take: The intrinsic value of art is received by the creator and not the viewer. All value given by the viewer is subjective and there are no wrong views. The amount of intrinsic value of art is closely tied to what level of transformation the artist has received from doing the work. It can be a soup can or a Rembrandt or even a AI image, but I would argue that the transformation recieved by the artist for making an AI image can be far less than other forms, for example. And yet there IS transformation using AI tools, however little or great, and therefore art.

Thanks for sharing...🌹🌹❤️❤️

❤❤❤❤❤❤

Not offended by saying Chinese culture is primitive, because I don’t know if this is true, but I can say original art and forgeries in Chinese culture are valued vastly different. I wonder where you got the idea that’s the opposite? 😂 Interesting lecture and seriously good questions asked by the audience.

I'd never heard the Jefferson interest in natives. And the criminal justice application. so cool. I love hearing the narratives.

Art can not be engineered by scientific understanding. If it was than we wouldnt need artist we would follow a series of rules and we would create a work of art. But that is not to say there shouldnt be scientific studies on art. Such studies keep academics busy at psychology/philosoohy departments but are meaningless when you try to create real art.

16:10 clowning the choice of art from the study lmfaoooo 💀

all art starts with shapes...so in a sence all art starts that way that is ...abstract

AI i is fraud because they steal from thousands of images they didn't create themselves.

Modern abstract “Art” requires the conjunction of opposing imaginative terminology and the assistance of media’s hype to create value in a worthless object. Abstract art requires what the lazy artist who created it lack, the fortitude to completely create something identifiable that a random stranger could create a link between image, experience and observation. The abstract is so abstract it’s unrecognizable on any level

Excellent lecture ❤

You can't approach philosophy with a pseudo bullshit science like psychology as it had already plagiarised everything from the philosophers in the first place. Philosophy and theology hold the intellectual high ground whereas psychology is the retarded offspring that has hoodwinked modern society that it is a valid profession. Disgusting that these people are paid anything for ussiinng such a crude subject. Even Jung saw the importance of philosophy over that of his findings.

How can we reach out to Ellen Winner regarding questions?

I would think outsider art could lend itself quite well to AI generated art comparisons.

Thanks from the future for the great speech Teresa.

Christ is a forgery . Adored and bought by top Nazi. Hmmmm... sounds right.

For morons who can't hack stem

Advertisers have been on to this for years, they call it “brand”. James Frazer is on to this as well.

Surely 'Outsider Art' is the most intriguing psychologically

Well work reading Robertson Davies 'The Cornish Trilogy

"... the sahara land of the blacks" Jesus, this woman is stuck in a colonial time castle.

20:27 the art teacher really tricked those innocent kids and made it his whole argument

so the "less abstract" an abstract art is, the more likely people think it's made by an adult human? doesnt that invalidate the whole argument of abstract art to begin with?

I understand and appreciate what is being said from a Western psychological discipline, (some of it sounds familiar to symbolic interactionism). Also embroiled in this psychological approach is the philosophy of the mind, i.e. belief (Gendler). But to say "art" and not "painting" in the case discussed in the video is reductionist. Also some things in art cannot be made solely by children, animals or machines as indistinguishable from an artist such as certain kinds of sculpture, photography, ceramics etc.

Great video, questions and answers. Enjoyed this one

Well done, seems to be the tip of the iceberg of this technology. Somewhere the knowledge is hidden from us and all of this will lead to freeing of the truth. Unless it’s purposely destroyed.

ART is BETWEEN US

25:51 so when we see art, we become entranced by it and we can also see the mind behind the art.... I wonder if it also applies to nature when people go hiking or just observe and experience the outdoors?

Thank you for sharing.

nice

nice

anti-intentionalism = formalism benjamin was a communist