which geographies did you survey the 2000+ Agile coaches from?
@jack-dq1qh Жыл бұрын
𝔭𝔯𝔬𝔪𝔬𝔰𝔪
@ABab-jf2jb Жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@materiaprimadecor2 жыл бұрын
Pilares: Transparência, Inspeção e Adaptação
@materiaprimadecor2 жыл бұрын
Product backlog (Artefato I), Sprint backlog (Artefato II), Increment do Produto (Artefato III). É isso pessoal? Minuto 18😃
@materiaprimadecor2 жыл бұрын
PPP - Pessoa, Processo e Produto
@techmech20302 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by “never complete” should we keep user stories that we know for sure will not be implemented in the back log or we remove it?
@omerhatim43262 жыл бұрын
It will be amazing opportunity ...
@andreullmann35192 жыл бұрын
For me it was a really great time and I am already looking forward to the next retreat I perceived it as a motivational boost through new knowledge, deepening of my previous experiences and confirmation of my own thoughts and approaches, which continues to this day.
@axelberle2 жыл бұрын
Love this conference! This year I will be speaking about TDD, BDD and SCARF!
@vitormiranda98592 жыл бұрын
Tks!
@garrettcooper792 жыл бұрын
How do I sign up to attend this meeting? For example, the email links no longer work, and I can't find anything on the SA's website about signing up. Please advise. Thanks.
@scrumalliance Жыл бұрын
Hello Garrett, This was a live webinar that took place in July. This video is the recording from the event. Thank you!
@digitaltransformation12672 жыл бұрын
This is because most people don't understand C2. The Intent is a fully qualified part of Command and Control. C2 still work better than anything else, if you understand it. It even includes Systems Thinking, LEAN, agile methods and others, while the golden thread remains a hard C2 - Without that you may get what is possible and even may get what you need, but not what you want, while having the benefits of successful other and newer ways of leading. So the big question is, do you actually need what you want or are you happy with something that is successful. Think carefully, if you are ready to give up on the exact imagination of what you want, because if you are not ready to let your team lead as the team, then better stick to a solid C2 core. To give an example in real life: Countries cannot give up on a C2 core if they want to prevail, it would lead to a spectrum that is too wide to remain control, borders and all that defines contries would fall apart little by little - It would lead sooner or later to a one nation world with a huge diversity and an extreme spectrum of offer and demand and the appearance of isles of all kind, even non-related to geographical positions. Now companies have basically the same thing going on, just in another scale and in a complete different environment (still) - I have seen leaders that want to change, those who want to accept or try out new ways, but aren't ready within their mindset or aren't ready to give up on the initial idea. Again, if you cannot give up on your idea, stay with C2.
@achimmeyer9889 Жыл бұрын
I am not sure I can or want to follow. To me your comment reads a lot like you did not really listen to the content of this video: maybe try to prioritize understanding what you hear? "C2 still work better than anything else, if you understand it." sounds a lot like a dogma to me -- obviously methods have advantages and disadvantages. Maybe you want to read up on what was mentioned in the talk: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
@AVKBA2 жыл бұрын
It's immense pleasure to listen you all on this platform. Anand Kharade from India - Business analysis practionner.
@amandeeps73452 жыл бұрын
Wonderful layman description ✅
@virmelybruno54742 жыл бұрын
「とても良くて面白いビデオは素晴らしいエンターテインメントの感覚をもたらします!」、
@visualpmpacademy22302 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing
@feliperodrigues67722 жыл бұрын
Obrigado pelo conteúdo e explicação muito clara. Irei fazer nos próximos dias a prova para certificação da Scrum Alliance e foi muito útil
@billc.riemers32452 жыл бұрын
At 31:37 minutes into the video. I would contend ALL unconscious biases are bad, compared to having them as conscious biases. Biases are unavoidable, and sometimes necessary to avoid overload. But to be unconscious of them can and does often lead to disastrous results.
@billc.riemers32452 жыл бұрын
That is the completely wrong definition of conformation bias at 15 minutes in. Confirmation bias has nothing to do with we see the world as we are. Confirmation bias is when we have reached a tentative conclusion for ANY reason, and then unconsciously pick and prune only the facts that support our conclusion. e.g. If we draw a conclusion, we are more likely to select data to confirm it. Hence, the term, "confirmation bias". And this is probably the #1 bias everyone has. Even a well trained scientist will exhibit confirmation bias in presenting their research results. We could probably describe this as "Seeing the world as we already believe it to be." Which sounds similar to "Seeing the world as we are.", but has much much broader implications on where it applies.
@javn0073 жыл бұрын
I love this Scrum Foundations videos, but they are not up to date. Are there any videos up to date with the November 2020 Scrum Guide?
@rajivmisra98553 жыл бұрын
be agile avoid kabul
@hari-km8pu3 жыл бұрын
May I what all the concepts you covered in this session
@Channel-me2dm3 жыл бұрын
Its a great video and we should really come out of our ego or fears to acknowledge appreciate somebody in our home team or even when we are anywhere....I have watched this video as a part of my SEUs. I have experienced this many times but in other way...i was appreciating my juniors any staff for their work anything they do to make them happy and encouraged but but but i was on the other end very few times got acknowledged which was sometimes disturbing me...I worked in India and Sweden..you guess haahaha...
@jl84523 жыл бұрын
Love the glasses.
@BrianPadgett3 жыл бұрын
Unlike blame, accountability is assigned internally - it comes from within. It is a positive force of empowerment that requires courage and compassion. Accountability allows people to take control over themselves and their own actions. It destroys "fault" culture while building trust and communication channels with other team members.
@PSJA223 жыл бұрын
Very Simple, Informative and the best
@bnjha84903 жыл бұрын
This is great!!!! thank you.
@olubisiogunye29283 жыл бұрын
Leading from support angle, what can be done to be better.
@Duc2B3 жыл бұрын
I don't see the difference versus standard Product Management, in which you have a timeline, deliverables, a team, and you must deliver at defined milestones.
@nagabhooshanamvemula4693 жыл бұрын
Scrum, splits the complete project into pieces called Scrums (1-2 weeks duration each), with incremental value, potentially shippable output in each Scrum. So, there is no need to complete one phase before moving to next phase. requirements also keep getting more detailed as scrums rolled. Iterative process. each iteration is tangible.
@susanmayor64494 жыл бұрын
Hey, this video is very cool. I truly believe that Emotional Intelligence can help with anything. #mastercommunication2020
@dgaborus4 жыл бұрын
Agile and scrum is an insult to anybody who finished elementary school. The very idea of incremental development, where in order to create a car, first you need to make a bicycle and later just add two wheels on, is incompatible by professional engineering.
@adrianlees83744 жыл бұрын
Agreed, which is why those of us in Agile circles are trying to get people stop using that image and use a more appropriate view of how to build incrementally. But let's be clear, agile and scrum are not an insult to anyone, the way some people teach it is ;-)
@paulusandreus4 жыл бұрын
Agree, may not be the most up to date example... yet bicycle are from early 19th century, cars from the late part, so maybe 80 years or so difference... doesnt that sound like incremental development? Not clear where the insult is... sounds natural we'd have done bicycles first before cars...
@dgaborus4 жыл бұрын
@@paulusandreus When you want to build a car, you build a car. You do not start this by building a bicycle. The Customer wants to have a complex system and this ideology allows the contractor to use the "MVP" terminology as an excuse for substandard quality of software, managed by people like agile coaches and scrum masters, people with absolutely zero project experience. Competent leaders lead projects, incompetent leaders are people-managers.
@dirkfabricius3 жыл бұрын
Should the customer requirements be as vague as: "We need movement" and the technology requirements be as vague as "round wheels" you better don't start building a car. Scrum doesn't say you have to implement rapid prototyping (building the bike and then incrementally transform it to a car should the need arise from customer side). It does say that you need to have something which the customer can inspect after a short cadence - mainly to adapt the requirements and to early generate business value. Should the technology requirements be clear (will be a car) by any means - don't start with a bike, but think about the largest unknowns and include small experiments to tackle those.
@vasileiostsatsos24573 жыл бұрын
@@dgaborus Your words are hiding some kind of hurtful personal experience which in turn (probably) became empathy. I am no agile coach or whatever, but fact is that companies who operate in this framewrok thrive and of course competent leaders are in fact people managers.
@svendtang54324 жыл бұрын
Did he just say centralised planning.. Need more info.. This is a suspect statement it depends on the level planning.. Strategy and vision for the whole company with annual perspective.. Ok Initiatives close to the execution level to fulfill these strategies yes.. Otherwise you will struggle with teams disconnect and missing buy ins