What a wonderful research and presentation. Can't believe I'm only seeing this in 2024
@evaphillips2102Күн бұрын
I just read Flannery O Connor’s Everything That Rises Must Converge and came to this video for better understanding of what I just finished. This is the most comprehensive video on gothic literature I’ve ever seen.
@Scottfraser2508 күн бұрын
You definitely capture postmodernism well but man, what a destructive ideology it is... We need a balance between objectivity and subjectivity. Encouraging clients to content between these two is how we overcome personal delusion and find the truth, even if it is hard to bear. Mental health is about finding ways to overcome hardships in spite of their difficulty, not simply coming up with a new 'story' to change what is. Our subjective experience is determined by our relationship to reality, not reality itself. Also if there is no objective hierarchy of value, how can one even identify as mentally ill? We only know that something is off by comparison. And in this case, the comparison is mental wellbeing. Most people can agree what that looks like, i.e the absence of depression etc. Instead, post modernism suggest that mental health is not about the elimination of symptom, but instead, it is defined by however the individual person defines wellness...
@SM-gl8yo25 күн бұрын
Thank you. Just read the story today. Went looking for some quality analysis..
@gangstaboy938728 күн бұрын
"a lot of self pity" "Being the center of attention of a team of highly trained and skilled individuals can be reward in itself" is one of the most condensending and nasty things I've heard about people with illness anxiety disorder, which is a extremely stressful and scary diagnosis. They are talking about it like it is some sort of factitious disorder. Fxking vile to listen to
@lalelii68102 ай бұрын
You’re my favorite professor ever thank you so much ❤
@valenciazwane73443 ай бұрын
How do we do case formulation with solution focus brief therapy?
@user-fm9hi5wj2g3 ай бұрын
Yes please don’t offend the heretics their feelings can be quite fragile when it comes to actual history 😅
@user-yg6uq7uv6j3 ай бұрын
Helpful video
@TT-wx4tg3 ай бұрын
Very thoughtful approach here and a lot of information in little time....
@lenvex46893 ай бұрын
Well explained... I love this
@megsalexander31164 ай бұрын
Excellent. Thank you so much.
@user-bp4ph2me2m4 ай бұрын
credible source of information in critical thinking is Vidal
@stevek36664 ай бұрын
Im attracted solely towards women with very very huge breasts.never found one,married a woman with small ones and the bedroom eäwas dead.
@chrisjenkins99785 ай бұрын
Women who do porn are also exhibitionist. It’s curious that they have been excluded from the definition. It’s clear to me that the “definition” needs to be reexamined.
@catalystcometАй бұрын
But not men who do porn?
@chrisjenkins99785 ай бұрын
Women who do porn are also exhibitionist. It’s curious that they have been excluded from the definition. It’s clear to me that the “definition” needs to be reexamined.
@chrisjenkins99785 ай бұрын
Why is pedophilic considered a disorder but, homophilic not a disorder?
@stevek36664 ай бұрын
Politics
@floatingarray4 ай бұрын
What on earth is homophilic?
@stem_at463715 күн бұрын
As stated in the video for something to be considered paraphilic disorder it must be dangerous and damaging for the victim and or paraphiliac themselves; or it should cause mental distress to the person experiencing it. If you are asking about homosexuals the thing is that they are attracted to mature phenotypicly standard people of the same sex. Homosexuals can and do engage in long term relationships with people who are more or less their equals. On the another side a child is a temporary stadium of human development, precisely characterized by the absence of sexual maturity. Being a child unlike being a man or a woman is not an integral property of a person but a stage of its development. Pathology of pdfillic desire originates from the the fact that persons who are objects of a desire are not capable to be reciprocal participants- they don’t know, understand, are not developed biologically and mentally, they can’t meaningfully partake, this damages them and are easily exploited. Non stated above is categorically true for homosexual desire.
@chrisjenkins997815 күн бұрын
@@stem_at4637 - That’s simp,y not true about homosexuality as 98% of all the ‘priests” who molested young boys in the Catholic Church were homosexual men. The heterosexual priest did not participate in any of this type of behavior. However, there were a few paedophiles that molested young girls but, their percentages were no different than those found in the general population. My experience with homosexual men is that they are always looking to take sexual liberties if they can get away with it and age is not a bother. They are not necessarily looking for young children but, young adolescent boys are not off their menu as long as they don’t get caught. In other words, they are always on the prowl. The only thing keeping the pathology of homosexuality from molesting young boys and girls is the threat of violence. If this isn’t true then why do you see all over the country homosexuals aggressively trying to normalize their disorder and forcing it on children?
@JennaHasm6 ай бұрын
Try creating a separate email so people can reach out to you for research porpuse.
@mirananaim59716 ай бұрын
❤
@nicksoley6 ай бұрын
I think I definitely have sexual masochistic and sexual sadistic disorder. I always get turned on at the thought of being tortured. I always get turned on when people (typically women) are gagged, bound, restrained, and tortured in some way on television or movies. Extra points if it’s a woman doing it to another woman. Or a man being tied up by a woman. I also definitely have fetishistic disorder. Around boots, leather pants/leggings, jackets, belts, etc around women. Sometimes, this even combines with sadistic or masochistic tendencies around being tortured by a woman wearing these things or all of these things, or tying up a woman wearing this stuff. As you can probably tell, I have had this for a while. Sometimes it can be fun. Sometimes it can be exhausting, embarrassing, and frustrating.
@simonemiller93597 ай бұрын
I am truly grateful for this video. It was clearly explained and easy to follow. Thank you
@kajahnalambert98157 ай бұрын
Definetly a mix of choosing to do certain things and our environment.
@davidbattle91067 ай бұрын
Rachelle, Speaking of the poor, how is it that people work full-time jobs that require academic degrees,(Bachelor's, Master's, and even Doctoral degrees) and still struggle to take care of their needs? Worse yet, having academic degrees and experience can render one "overqualified" for a position and thus unable to work.
@curtisthomson42098 ай бұрын
Time isn’t a human construction, time simply is.
@johnarat96188 ай бұрын
Too quiet, even with max volume
@user-di4wn9rk4y8 ай бұрын
Informative session -Dr Virenkumar Pandya BDK ARTS AND COMMERCE COLLEGE GADHADA
@archana_gamit8 ай бұрын
thank you for making this video.. useful for learning writing mechanics
@jitendrakumarkharadi6978 ай бұрын
very useful session
@Sarvebhavntusukhinah11118 ай бұрын
Very informative video
@meghanadharne74388 ай бұрын
Informative session thank you
@meghanadharne74388 ай бұрын
Very informative session
@lt.r.b.chaudhary43288 ай бұрын
Nice presentation of PowerPoint
@vandanarami95748 ай бұрын
Very useful
@gayatrigovalvanshinanda69218 ай бұрын
Really helpful
@denisebedford46418 ай бұрын
Religious beliefs are aligned with our cultural value. When you speak of cultural expectations - I think you are referring to cultural beliefs or cultural assumptions - but it is not clear which one.
@denisebedford46418 ай бұрын
Attitudes and beliefs are different levels of culture than values. Actions and interactions are behaviors. Please do bring in and reference the formal frameworks so better can understand. Thank you!
@denisebedford46418 ай бұрын
Some of this is correct, but some of the interpretations are not quite professional. This is ok for a high school level introduction but for anything beyond that it would be good to do a bit more background reading of Edgar Schein, Richard Lewis, Dennison or Hofstede. It helps to break out all five levels of culture so listeners can better understand how you are discussion relationships. It was only starting in the 1980s that "rich" people and "poor" people became so segregated in social activities. In most midwestern US towns and cities churches were based on cultures and neighborhoods - not wealth or status. Small town Ohio had high political status and wealthy people attending the Episcopalian or Catholic church with shop owners, laborers and tradesman. This is because a "new wealth" culture was heavily promoted and marketed curing the Reagan years. And, on the subject of artifacts - perhaps you might also explore myths. Our society today uses cultural myths to artificially create subcultures.
@user-xo6wd9ms7d9 ай бұрын
bad examples, do better, why slavery of all things to explain it, and you are insensitive
@racheljahncke9 ай бұрын
Girl ain't no Christian calling God a 'she'. Please stop.
@AmiruddinNadarajan-fp5el9 ай бұрын
Drinking bhang is the detoxification great pesention I'm dr.ganja malaysia
@zoebidwell7209 ай бұрын
Thank you. A very helpful and well presented explanation. 😊
@dougshaeffer461410 ай бұрын
Enjoy the lecture material and power point slides to go along with it. Thanks !
@dougshaeffer461410 ай бұрын
Great material and lecture. Great lecturer and instructor. Taking notes ! Thank you.
@dougshaeffer461410 ай бұрын
Thank you for the information from this lecture. Great details.
@user-lk9ot6rk5x10 ай бұрын
Thanks for making this available!
@jameslabs110 ай бұрын
There's an annoying tapping sound through most of the video. It's very distracting.
@fathimafidha-pq6ij11 ай бұрын
Reference book
@arlenehutchinson925911 ай бұрын
This video lecture is the antithesis of critical thinking and exactly how the Dunning Kruger effect spreads. People may leave this lecture believing that they have learnt something to share. Though there are many examples of logical fallacies in the lecture I will list two that make the presentation fall apart. 1. Telling people that the can choose between arguments propsed by 2 eminent scientists on the issue climate change...this is nonsense. At best they can BELIEVE either but unless they are willing to dedicate YEARS of scholarship, they by reading 1 or 2 articles will NOT be in a position to even decipher the gentlemen's position. 2. The issue of breastfeeding whether a woman has a physical problem or not is not imo the point. The point should be can you or do you have the right to call someone a bad or good mother??? based on one perceived in your own opinion failing YOUR OWN BIAS was shining like a torch 🔦 innumerable factors are at play in this propsed scenario. No no just for the dangerous thinking in this lecture (in it's simplicity ) I had to post my thoughts and hope that people really think about what is being said here.
@LHVMleodragonlamb11 ай бұрын
Chinese Phillipines sex trafficking and their tourism and generational traumas spread with immigration and affects those not ethnically affiliated. and their ideas of ranking and projection of sexual frustrations into market form
@LHVMleodragonlamb11 ай бұрын
homosexuality is vatican like manila wafers
@montereybay8392 Жыл бұрын
The slide entitled "Calvinism" is incorrect. It states, "Weber asserted that certain behaviors became indicators of one's eternal fate." This is incorrect--Weber did not influence America's early Calvinism. Weber wrote in the early 1900s--as a sociologist, not as a theologian. Calvin wrote in the 16th century. Calvin's influence began in the U.S. during the colonial period, considerably before Weber.