Jackson Joseph Johnson Steven Brown Donna

Thomas Michael Jones Sharon Taylor Richard

Anyone know where to find the refutation of the science board?

Jones Laura Davis Kimberly Jones Steven

I think the joy is not in “figuring “ it out but in the search. The observation. Thank you both!

Have you ever heard about "Mushi"? I found them in a Japanese manga, Mushi-shi, a very beautiful one, indeed. They are neither plants nor animals. They differ from other forms of life such as the micro-organisms and the fungi. Instead, they resemble the primaeval body of life and are generally known as "Mushi". Their existence and appearance are unknown to many and only a limited number of humans are aware of them. Ginko is a "Mushi-shi" who travels around to investigate and find out more about the "Mushi". In the process, he also lends a helping hand to people who face problems with supernatural occurrences which may be related to the "Mushi".

This is excellent, especially tapping into Martin Buber. I'm also using Buber from different perspective in a book I'm writing. Btw Edward Carpenter warned us of this back when unnecessary suffering was imposed in the past.

Fabulous discussion. What a wonderful thoughtful person. Need to interview/find people who are taking this kind of humane approach to mental health institutions and facilities for the elderly.

Fascinating topic for exploration and contemplation. Superlative dialogue. Gracias. 🙏

❤

The world needs to thank Mauro for being honest about everything! Yes I love "Jesus" but we need to understand the past to make a difference. I believe Jesus was called the word because he understood the meaning of Elohim and stood up against the lies of the "Jews"... For now that's all we can take as truth. The truth will set you free from slavery.

Super interesting guest and discussion.

Edward Witten, one of the brightest mathematicians said consciousness will ever remain a mystery. I myself heard a great saint saying : „A dual mind is half blind.“ So I think science we will only solve the easy problems….. Thxs and best regards from Vienna.

Great conversation!

Fabulous interview, I'm confused about proton field because proton is not fundamental as it consists of three quarks

This was so great to listen to! Thank you both so much and God bless 🕊

is it possible for you guys to do research on 'time-telling'ability of a bangladeshi man without watching a watch?

I believe more in Mr. Hancock than anyone. Archaeologists are so stuck in the dark ages. Obviously we have a much richer history than what they believe and I love to hear of Mr. Hancock’s research! He’s opening a whole new past for mankind. Thank you so much Mr. Hancock!😅

I'd argue that it's "what" you are that doesn't change, & "who" you are is entirely irrelevant. In other words Its NOT a matter of "my" sentience, its that sentience itself is thE ontic primitive/what nature is.

Always inspiring to listen to Patrick Harpur. His book are daimonic masterpieces!

What a wonderful woman ❤. Love this way of thinking.. how privileged to be able to listen to quality discussion on these important issues.

If the biological father was an Elohim, then Jesus was a true revolutionary. In my opinion, his true relevance is then far greater than that in the religious story that Christians believe.

Fabulous! Two of my favs together 🥰 44-45:30 is 90 secs of illuminated brilliance 🤩! And I agree with the rest too. I imagine it’s very hard for him to communicate the download from his transcendent experience to the rest of us. Hard to put the ineffable into words, but he’s doing well! Please have on Doug Matzke (Deep Reality, bit physics) who has a theory that is uncannily close to this one. I heard him giving a talk with Bernard Carr (also one of my favs) and it was amazing! I would love to hear these two authors (Faggin and Matzke) discuss the similarities and differences between their theories as each came to such similar notions through different means. They probably would be very happy to find each other if they don’t already know each other!

I respectfully diasagree with alex: & taxpayer paid scientists... This kind of scientist, which is everywhere - is brutal in its quest to dismiss all opposition. Multitude, as the good dr Shiva says, is the melting pot of the forward movement of the whole complexity of moving, living life... And what is more evolution itself is complex and not stictly linear. .

This is Rupert Sheldrake’s work on consciousness as being present in a fields. .

Federico is getting better explaining what he knows to the rest of us. I am glad he modified free will as not being total and qualified it as a modicum of free will, these points are crucial as there are many sceptics. It must be the case Federico's theory will fall short in some ways nonetheless I truly believe he is near the mark. What would be a good idea is to have a questioner constructively challenge Federico so we can put the pieces together and Federico can see where his theory might need tweaking. My personal take on understanding Federico theory is that you have to work really hard initially to try to get the fundamental points and for that I use the podcast transcript which I edit out um, uh etc. Federico's theory (not forgetting Dariano) is a basic blueprint of how an underlying spiritual dimension runs kinda parallel to our experiences, though that phraseology would benefit from much qualification outside of a brief comment. All in all this podcast is the best to-date probably as Federico's ability to define has improved. Thanks guys.

Thank you both very much for sharing your time and work Federico, and Alex, really enjoyed this conversation, peace

Patrick Harpur is an unrecognised genius.

Get into dzogchen Look for Keith Dowman

Faggin rocks 💪

The privacy of the inner experience in quantum terms seems to be between the observer and the observed... the particle/wave and the consciousness that winesses it at a given moment. Bit frustrating that 11 minutes in and Fredrico has not been asked to describe the experience or experiences that led to his awakening.

Thank you for sharing. Cheers

Clearest way to explain what a quantum particle is that I have seen until now (for those who are not familar with quantum physics): electron is correlated to its quantum field the same a wave is correlated to the sea. That's why we sometimes see the electron as a particle (a wave itself, the physical mass of water reaching a peak and going down) and as a wave (the transmission of movement between those masses of water).

37:00 Brilliant. And the robot (the body with its brain) thinks that he is the most sophisticated form of existence. You see that this phenomenon by which we tend to think (totally wrongly) that we are the climax of creation is the same fear we project against AI, believing that, in the future, robots will have that same tendency and destroy us. It's the same that we have been trying to do (in vain because it's impossible) with global consciousness (God or whatever u want to call it): destroy it.

Fantastic! Conversation! I wonder though is Dr Fagin's use of the word ONE something of a barrier to understanding. Perhaps the word NOW is closer in English to the concept he is communicating because ONE implies quanta/particularity whereas NOW is more an expression of qualia/field. The questioner Raymond at 1:08:34 who aligned free will with creativity, I think, has the same intuition that I'm alluding to here. Effectively ONE implies a rational number (a then) where NOW is more like an irrational number (being). How many NOWs are there? Thank you!

Неужели эти ребята всерьёз говорят о том, что отсутствие у них счастья заставило их поверить в идеализм и первичности сознания?

Thank you so much !

This is an excellent interview with Van Lommel because you ask the important questions. Your questions are the one's that are hardly ever asked. I can answer some of them myself (are babies conscious of where they came from = yes) but not on here. All the best !

I love how Rupert in his Brittish-est of accents calls the cornered materialist mob "bigots" and more than once! Such a vicious psychological warfare is rooted in fear and censorship. The thing is that the general public no longer follows the mainstream science hail, rain or shine. People see right through the tactics of intimidation and are turned off by them. We ought to continue supporting scientists and journalists like Rupert and Graham for their research, reporting and courage. Alex's wrap-up comment on not "erecting another monoculture." is a well-timed reminder to not fall on extremes. Thanks to the Pari Center for giving these trailblazers the room to speak candidly and reach a wider audience. I'd love to see more interviews with Rupert and Graham here.

I wish to point out to Patrick Harpur the Norwegian author and researcher Maria Kvilhaug ! - she has written to books “ The Seed of Yggdrasill” and “ The Maiden with the Mead” . This is a multiple stories about what Harpur call Diamon - please check her up. She has a bunch of knowledge about this from the norse mythology- and she told that The Great goddess Freya/ Frøya appeared when she was working on her master thesis.

Many western intellectuals, quantum physicists take to appreciating eastern mysticism, more out of ignorance than anything else. Bohm is no different, observer and observed are often mistaken as a quantum puzzle. But when there were no on to observe, before human evolution, quantum measurements continued. We just have to misrepresent reality. Many great scientists fell for the wrong interpretation.

This matter of a living forming universe - replete with living beings is treated of by PROCLUS in his theologia mystica. A commentary in the Parmenides of Plato. Which essentially treats of the inner structure of enkosmuc formation and divine imagination. See my series on divine imagination of the latter Platonists and Pythagoras this link... kzbin.info/www/bejne/hJrdnnqunLeMhtksi=mbzYVg0QzgA_WTO6

Imagination-potentia is nested within an archetypal wholeness.

I do not agree with a literal approach to religion, or to the Bible. Religion is in metaphor as deep truth cannot be conveyed in the language of literalism. What does it matter what literal word they used, if the definition of God is: Consciousness, Existence, Bliss. That is what is important. ‘Let Us create man in our image;’. Man wasn’t the first creation as there were angels, so the plural was used. We can hope that what is expressed in this video is not more nonsense to further confuse religion and the religious. The important thing is that God is One as Consciousness and all that exists shares in that Consciousness. Enough with interpretations. Do you strive to Know, Love, and Serve God? If not, your nitpicking nonsense is just that, nothing more. Again, strive to Know, Love, and Serve God. Enough with what was, was not, or what may have been. This is the absence of the religious impulse, it is in essence, casting doubt on religion, especially for those who approach it from a literal perspective, rather from devotion and the desire to serve humanity. I would agree that Religion is One and is expressed in different ways in different cultures. Literalism in place of Devotion, Service , Love for God and all creation is what is IMPORTANT. This would give me a headache.

🙏thank you both for sharing this in such a lovely way 🧡💚..I am listening again sharing zoom screens with some friends the togetherness experiens is so valuable 🐦

Imagination is assimilating, receiving, INTER- FORMING... Bringing forth what is not yet.

Priscian of Lydia 600Ad says precisely this- the imagination is at once receptive of both external object and the living form of the object. Patric gives a great summary of this. There is no perception without imagination.

There have always been partial dissolutions.. Mother Nature cleans house.

I am a second law of thermodynamics denier. Thank you for outlining in passing that false creativity can be ego metastasis. However I really think that a deep paridgm of steam engine thermodynamics started in Victorian England which has trapped academia in spite of it solidly knowing that monoatomic gasses are in perpetuaI moton. There are also large corporations fearcely seeking Frankenstein creature economic power and immortality. The last factor for mention here is social pessimism where many people say that if a proposisition sounds too good to be true it is indeed false. The new paridgm of unfettered lossless perpetuall energy conversion has not yet bloomed. Thank youersation for appreciating long form conversaetion. Here are my paste posted essays on the suɓject in top first reading order:

《 Civilization may soon realize full conservation of energy ànd quit the 2nd law of thermodynamics 》 Sir Isaac Newton wrote a professional scientific paper deriving the second law of thermodynamics, without rigorously formulating it, on his observations that the heat of a fire in a fireplace flows through a fire prod only one way - towards the colder room beyond. Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, though not cheapest, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy at a meeting around a taɓle using evidence from steam engine development. These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death. This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal. The favorable outcome of this conquest would be that the principle of energy conservation would prevail. Thermal energy could interplay with other forms of energy without gain or loss among all the forms of energy involved. Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI clarity. The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference. Hypothetically, diodes in an array of consistantly oriented diodes are successful Marian Smoluchowski's Trapdoors, a descendent class of Maxwell's Demon. Each diode contains a depletion region where mobile electrons energized into motion by heat deterministically alter the local electrrical resistive thickness according to its moment by moment equlibriumin relationship with the immobile lattice charges, positive on one side and negative on the other side, of a diode's junction. 《Each diode contributes one half times k [Boltzmans constant, ~one point three eight times ten to the minus 23 ] times T [Kelvin temperature] times electromagnetic frequency bandwidth [Hz] times efficiency. The result of these multipications is the power in watts fed to a load of impeadence matched to the group 》 The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. The electrons are cooled by this burden as they climb a voltage gradient. Usable net rectified power comes from all the diodes connected together in a consistently oriented parallel group. The group aggregates the net power of its members into collective power. Any delivered diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat to electrical energy. More efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is short circuited or open circuited has no performance as energy conversion, cooling, or electrical output. The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter. Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers. Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage. If counter examples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric lights so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant. Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap. Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independently powered cars. EMP resistance would be improved. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people. Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns. This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious, mature, and unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but mature social force should oppose this. I filed for patent us 3,890,161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992. It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved. the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusivity. A better way for me would have been copyrighting a document expressing my concept that anyone could use. Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom. Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified cooperative conglomerate. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy if many people can afford to be generous. Aloha😊