Thank you so much Angela. this video has been truly valuable. I noticed your interest in studying religion. I highly recommend watching the series of videos. They are definitely worth your time. Once again, thank you. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rIXGdph4ecx4mZo
@jameschristensen1055 Жыл бұрын
Splendid. I happen to be engaged in a programme of reading consisting of three of Professor Charmley's 'horrifying things'. I've finished 'Chamberlain and the Lost Peace', and have moved on to 'Churchill - The End of Glory'. 'Churchill's Grand Alliance' will complete the trilogy. 'Chamberlain' gave substance to my long-standing suspicion: that its subject has been unfairly treated for his attempt to avert, or forestall, another catastrophic world war. Charmley ably demonstrates the 'reasons why' Chamberlain's policy was perfectly sensible at the time. War is the principal generator of myth. In his careful debunking of the dual Chamberlain/Churchill myths Professor Charmley gamely swims against a powerful current. How dare he challenge the almost universal view that Churchill gave us 'the best of all possible worlds'? Churchill said and did some very odd things. His dinner table conversations with Stalin make for some rather grotesque theatre - but that's alright, or so agree 9 out of 10 dentists - erm, historians. It is astonishing that Professor Charmley's plea for 'balance' in our view of Churchill should be so maddening to so many, but such is the power of myth.
@Aprilwang_reading Жыл бұрын
Very very helpful and even touching (that you should remind yourself of what enthused a project that you are working on) !
@pauleguia6244 Жыл бұрын
great
@minatahmasbi91252 жыл бұрын
This video is more helpful than the grad school itself!
@Jacloch2 жыл бұрын
Was this rendered on a potato
@hazratumar2132 жыл бұрын
Hello Angela! How can we connect Zotero with Google drive? Zotero gives only 30MB storage which is very small. Thanks
@lynnechrisp5912 жыл бұрын
Is there a transcript for this video for use with students who do not have access to KZbin, please?
@scwmba71562 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@xolilylino2 жыл бұрын
<3
@benjaminodonnell2582 жыл бұрын
Quick question: why don't you write your notes on sources directly into Zotero's "child notes" feature?
@Ninjaboy572 жыл бұрын
Ty for explaining PEEL so well.
@luyandavictor19572 жыл бұрын
Hy Angele, kindly advise how to add my own voice after very cited writing. Thank you
@ariadnaobregon38612 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this, Angela! I just found your channel, and I have my upgrade viva in a week, your recommendations are helpful
@lindaburnett91893 жыл бұрын
Oh wow. That was so cool. I’ve never heard of Prezi. Ans I love how you combined the three!
@lindaburnett91893 жыл бұрын
This was wonderful! Thank you! You’ve shown me an entirely new way, an easier way, to record my voice overs and make them match the slides!
@ImranKhan-qs6st3 жыл бұрын
V. Good topic,,,, please guide that for international affairs and political development which web, newspaper s good. and also demonstrate a practical upon an international topic. For further clarity plus collect info from different webs.
@mountallen88833 жыл бұрын
appreciate you sharing your use of generating notes. that will be very helpful in the future. thanks.
@donutdudez1303 жыл бұрын
This is to hard. I'm just gonna search up my question.
@kevin-mn9om3 жыл бұрын
I'm looking for a video that talks about controlling scope creep in my research/writing. For example, while working on a literature review I am experiencing that I find two more sources for every paper I take notes on and it's making my research go on forever. As a graduate student, I want to provide full coverage of all relevant research published on the topic, but as a human, I only have so much time to explore. How can I best get this under control and know that I've done "enough".
@jomarflores42633 жыл бұрын
I got sent here by my English teacher nice
@albertonajarro3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! This is very helpful :)
@allwyn98953 жыл бұрын
I want to know how to write a paper. Apart from thee part which is not in the references, its our thoughts and ideas which we have to fill in right?
@omnel53 жыл бұрын
Excellent tutorial! Thank you
@macl4ren4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Angela, this is a great series and there was some wonderful insight in this interview, especially in this new world where will all be having to do more distance learning.
@aaronwoods58614 жыл бұрын
This is great! Have you used Drive to back up Zotero? I'm using a laptop at school and a desktop at home. I've read some about zotero not working well with a cloud based backup like drive, but some people have got it to work. Thanks!
@amadutips4 жыл бұрын
I'm not seeing the attached document
@mcnuggets90674 жыл бұрын
Boring lol
@veenarana54 жыл бұрын
ghost _nugget07 boring lol
@ajb18844 жыл бұрын
This was really insightful and interesting!
@p17y754 жыл бұрын
This was next after a vid so I felt nice so ye !
@techie2udonegal4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing the Animotica tutorial it solved an issue I had with audio in my Animotica videos, you should also investigate a program called Affinity photo, it is an affordable once-off purchase and has very powerful graphic design tools it is infinitely easier and more intuitive to get to grips with than Photoshop and could really add quality content to your digital efforts. Thanks again!
@paulbryant80424 жыл бұрын
What a brilliant video! The most useful source of information I have found about how to start building an academic career. Thank you!
@ResearchTips4 жыл бұрын
So pleased you found it helpful!
@mepropwash4 жыл бұрын
Anny your name is not Anny but I would like to call you something, Can I get InTouch with you about a simple tutorial on using Animotica?
@ResearchTips4 жыл бұрын
Of course - can you reach me initially on twitter? @theacademiclib or instagram? @uniresearchtips
@olliekim17304 жыл бұрын
clicking struggle intensifies
@ralph46054 жыл бұрын
Where is the attachment of Google codes?
@jacksalvatierra79595 жыл бұрын
am sorry, i desagree with you. i research on the chats, and interact with real people...and then i come up with my own conclusion.....
@doubleclick90876 жыл бұрын
you can use this it doesn't take time and faster results and it do all the work instad of you bit.ly/2M30JwT
@muhammadrafiqulislamkhan69946 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Can you make on this video to use internet on pc practically.
@BGP_956 жыл бұрын
The video is really helpful
@stevieandre51726 жыл бұрын
Nerd
@xolilylino2 жыл бұрын
jobless
@nstwo36427 жыл бұрын
Really nice video tutorial very informative.
@jeloroc54187 жыл бұрын
If you know how to properly conduct research then Wikipedia is an excellent tool. Wikipedia provides many ways to confirm the information in any article and has checks and balances in place to limit and correct any misinformation. The idea that a traditional encyclopedia is somehow better than a crowd-sourced one is not a very sound one. The reliability of the information in a traditional encyclopedia is at the whim of the biases of the publisher and the expertise of the editor(s). Wikipedia on the other-hand has more eyes on it to catch more mistakes or misinformation and is less likely to be culturally or politically biased. But of course, as with anything, it should never be your only source for information (thankfully, Wikipedia provides reference links to the information contained in its articles so that the user can check them for themselves!)
@trevormillin5067 жыл бұрын
Well stated. I agree wholeheartedly with every word you just said. As a benefactor of Wikipedia, I have much faith init as a website and informative source. It not only provides good summaries, but extension links confirming what is stated in the articles.
@ResearchTips6 жыл бұрын
Agree- it can be an excellent 'starting' tool for research. In an of itself, Wikipedia should never ever be used for research at any academic level. I even would push this for school-aged children as it is best to inculcate these habits early. The main problem is not that Wikipedia might be wrong - to be fair even published resources can sometimes be wrong (or at least, will provoke disagreement due to various views within disciplines). The fundamental issue with Wikipedia is since it is crowd sourced, you cannot gauge who the author/publisher is and what bias they might bring to the table. There are some wiki-type websites which are certainly useful at a basic academic level - Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is an excellent example - which is edited/reviewed. Another good example (though a little lower on the totem pole) is Victorian web -www.victorianweb.org. Both of these sites offer clarity regarding who has authored various articles.
@wottafella7 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia isn't a bad website, you've believed in a lie that anyone can manipulate the articles tho in reality if anyone was to falsify the information on Wikipedia, the original true info would be restored. Julian Asange is a man of pure truth and knowledge. To top it off Wikipedia always states their sources at the end of their pages, said sources are always legit.
@ResearchTips6 жыл бұрын
The sources are definitely NOT always legitimate. Some articles certainly demonstrate a fairly deep knowledge of the topic which I concede. However, you will find numerous articles whose sources are shallow and dubious at best...
@readjordan22575 жыл бұрын
agree. however, it appears wikipedia being unreliable is only a western world notion. many places in the world, any reputation is potentially fair game, because if you come to the wrong conclusions, its always assumed in these cultures to be the reader's error, the truth is technically within everything, if you are reading behind the text not just the text. as far as academics in less western areas, its more presumed everything is truth and deception, depending on whether or not your reading "direction" is in the right place. which is i guess why the cultural notion that we have of wikipedia being "common sense" has never been heard of in some regions.
@kjell53528 жыл бұрын
thanks lol, I am 21 and this was helpful :)
@onlineresearchbeast65658 жыл бұрын
This video is well done and contains good tips on how to verify sources. It should be noted that .edu sources can be tricky because in many cases students are allowed to post and they are certainly not always correct in what they post. It depends on how liberal (not in the political sense) the professor is in allowing students to post and how much moderation the professor is going to apply to students' posts.