Spinoza does not equate the God with the Universe. The Universe is just one expression of God. Said differently, the Universe is an infinitely small subset of the God. Spinoza's God has much more attributes than the Universe. So, Spinoza's Nature is not equal to the Universe we inhabit, as it is often interpreted. Also, the immortality of soul is a derivation within Spinoza's philosophy, which for modern science is a tabu. There are many other differences between what modern science claims and Spinoza's philosophy.

@theintellectionsurge ypu will like John vervaeke and claire on spinoza

Weird English 😮

Lucid explanation which allowes me to understand Spinoz's Conatus

You have to understand why atheists lie about Spinoza's God when Spinoza tried to end religion with a truthful and sensible concept of the intelligent creator of the universe. I am cancelled trying to end religion like Spinoza was cancelled by atheists. What does it mean? There would be no religion if atheists had not lied saying Spinoza's God is like no God. Atheists want you to believe the rationalist philosopher Spinoza wrote about God to explain God is the universe therefore death is the end. Do you believe me? I challenge you to read what Spinoza actually said about God. The truth is still atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. To end the war the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news. If you are an atheist reading this loving poem my question for you is "if you don't want the end of religion what do you live for?". God is literally everything because from nothing can not be created something. Logically everything comes from self, reality is created from reality, what has a beginning of existence must be created from what is eternal. Thank you.

All is drawn from ancient Vedantic philosophy

Loved it.

Bur God extends beyond nature also.Indian thinking difficult to understand but has been experienced by a few.

Would be nice if we could read the ethics as a group

Bad news Espinosa when you go to the heavens, you have to see a.k.a Zeus Jesus and he will give a job to protect your loved ones from evil is your choice

God is real an is immortal Zeus aka Jesus enli Osiris is the same person and this is ..I took the picture to the sky Spinoza in your face.Spinoza work for the devil obviously Boludo Espinoza

It's a pity you have pronunciation that is difficult to understand. But better than nothing.

u might've saved my exam w this

Great explanation on Spinoza

Spinoza's God is the God of Shankara (Pure Consciousness-in-Itself), the Tao, the One of Plotinus, the Being-In-Itself of Aristotle, the Ousia of the Stoics, the Rigpa (Essence) of the Buddhists, etc. This is experiential but not in a dualist sense otherwise there would be two or more substances. Access "mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir" and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. Enjoy the Sat-Chit-Ananda, the Self of all.

Great video! One correction. Santos Dumont was the father of aviation.

Great series. Well explained. Music not really necessary.

Eternal "punishment" would be the action of a sadist! Judging the entire human race throughout history for the actions of 2 is insane! The god of spinoza although gauge is much more likely then any of the major religions in the world!

Thanks so much - I'm trying to read 'A little Cloud', Dubliners JJ through a spinozan lens! Please make an audiobook!

The first true naturalist after Aristotle without being a materialist

Well done brother nice understanding from Spinoza.

In small village of Islamic Iraqi Kurdistan, I’m looking for someone to clearly help me to understand the spionza god Luckily I found you. Well done brother.

It's not superstition! They know they're in a lab with humans testing them. They're probably really hungry and desperate to do anything they think they're supposed to do to get food.

Thanks it really helped.

The thing is (and I’m agnostic) is that a God equaling all particles gives us no relief from death. What I love is this expression of nature which is me in this very short period of time. If my atoms make a billiard ball or a cockroach after I am dead is no consolation.

Great job

Est-ce que cette vidéo est disponible en français svp ?

Meaning is the desire for the world to be other than it is, even if that means increasing the predictive certainty that other charges won't occur. There are two primary motivations, avoid and approach, in that order of salience. The purpose of all knowledge, wisdom, and understanding is actionable certainty.

Who is Jesus's God? What/who was he talking about?

“The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free.” - Spinoza

It was really helpful... THANKU ❣️

Great stuff!

Love it!

Excellent video on Spinoza!

Sounds like Taoism.

Spinoza vertaald uit het Engels? Dat lijkt me niet kosher!

Walter Cronkite. I met him on the street once in NYC.

His position is the culmination of centuries of thought that turned against itself, demolishing the neoplatonism and scholasticism before him.

understanding causality is very important to become self determined but free will does exist. Some people are more apt to become self determined than others. You can see this when you watch people being hypnotized or observe how some react to different scenes in a move or a photograph. Strong willed people are more aware of causes than the gullible ones. Strong willed people create causes to influence the gullible.

Thank you for this video about Freewill and Spinoza and easy to comprehend.

excelente trabajo

Great info

I have a question: Your example of the absence of ‘free will’, based upon ‘causality’.. does not address the ‘initial action’ that led to the cause.. If you are in a room, which is on fire, leaving you with only the choice to live, or die.. is indeed a bases for ‘determinism’.. except, what if the fire was started by an arsonist, for no apparent reason, other than the person’s choice, without any life, or death deterministic cause? (This person could have chose to not start the fire, and not face time in prison.. or the person could start the fire, and end up in prison.. to which the person chose to start the fire, and go to prison.) This person certainly possessed ‘freedom of choice’.. in this moment, and chose to start the fire regardless of it being the determining factor that would cause the person suffering, in going to prison..?

This what the fundamental basics of Ancient Egyptian Astronomical Theology teaches in the Medu Netcher, the Netcher and Nature are one and the same thing The Creator is Androgyny and the foundation of Everything and Creation, which are odd, even and imaginary numbers The Word is a metaphor for sound, vibration and Frequencies Desire is a metaphor for fire, heat and light G-d is Consciousness and the Three Veils of Unfathomable Darkness in which Everything resides, moves and is expressed You will never see or experienced G-d because G-d is both the Expressions of the seen and the unseen, the physical Universe and it's laws and the spiritual worlds of the Quantum Universe but G-d is also the Negation of all manifestations, forms, essence and dimensions Negation means, Infinitum and Emptiness and No-Thing-Ness and Non-Being In the Ancient Egyptian Cosmogony, Atum existed in an inactive state of Being, which is Non-Being such as Ex Nihilo, Creation from No-Thing From the ANKH, Amén, Nun, Kek and Heh, Inactivity, Darkness, Infinity, Eternity, Atum awaken and speak himself into being and from him, Atum the double gendered Netcher, created all the Neteru or Netcheru, which includes humanity and the gods are the Cosmos and everything in it In other words, Everything is an expression of Atum, Aleph, Tau and Mem and Aleph Tau is the beginning and the end, the First and the Last

Good vid homie

This french guy is getting everything upside down....is Spinoza a materialist as he says?

I haven’t read the text myself, but does Spinoza really use a chair as an example? I can’t see how a man-made object is an expression of nature. I understand that the wood is nature, and even the carpenter is nature, but surely the chair is something else (ie man made). Otherwise there really is no distinction between what is nature and what isn’t. What do you think?

Thank you.

The sense of free will seems to be a very specific programming by evolution. As such, the purpose of free will must relate to nature's two mandates of survival and reproduction. Since it seems to be a very specific programming, how specifically is it useful as it relates to survival and reproduction?

the next video :( ? ?